You are here: HomeNewsCrime & Punishment2015 03 27Article 352154

Unemployed jailed for having sex with female idiot

This article is closed for comments.

Read Comments Comments (9)

  • kwabena boateng 9 years ago

    A woman of 26 years learning to be a seamstress cannot be described as an idiot surely. She didn't complain at being raped so how can he be charged and convicted as such? I can presume that the woman can consent to sex as she ...
    read full comment

  • Kelo 9 years ago

    Boat u must know that though she is an apprentice and 26 yrs yet she can't analyse complex issues. Medically an 'idiot' lacks reasoning. So your argument that she is 26 and an apprentice is neither here nor there!

  • He Goat 9 years ago

    Please, what is the meaning of idiot?

  • Concerned 9 years ago

    Technically correct but politically incorrect. A more sensitive choice of words would have been appropriate. Stupid journalist doing the reporting

  • Koforidua Bob 9 years ago

    Being Challenged mentally does not make one an idiot, the police officer involved should be ashamed for using such language.

  • tenta 121 9 years ago

    How can the police be allowed to describe the young lady as an idiot.There should have been some telling off by the Judge.In this day and age that is unacceptable and disgraceful.Anyway she's 26 and there was no mention of ra ...
    read full comment

  • Man 9 years ago

    10 years for having consensual sex with a woman and we are talking about "justice for all", a program to ease the number of prisoners in our prisons which is ongoing. What about if he raped the woman? These are not the crimin ...
    read full comment

  • niigbese 9 years ago

    The mother and the judge must be charged for mishandling the future of two Idiots. There is no rape nor the report of pregnancy but a consented relationship of two ,irrespective of the state of mind of the 26 years old lady ...
    read full comment

  • Kelo 9 years ago

    U guys don't get it , the judge knew dat had it not been d lady's medical challenge she wouldn't have consented to d act.please employ empathy else u might not get d judgement right