Chief should play partisan politics - Majority Leader

Read Article

Comments (26)

This article is closed for comments.

Read Comments Comments (26)

Kwadwo Manu 8 years ago

Which trail?

Which trail?
KWAAMENA 8 years ago

Do you want our chiefs to join the political looting brigade who have no conscience whatsoever........ Let them try and see the insults, confusion and anarchy that will result..... ......... CONSCIENCELESS NDC THIEVES have be ...
read full comment

Do you want our chiefs to join the political looting brigade who have no conscience whatsoever........ Let them try and see the insults, confusion and anarchy that will result..... ......... CONSCIENCELESS NDC THIEVES have betrayed the poor North and South who voted for them....... SADA GYEEDA SUBAH FAKE JUDGEMENT DEBTS etc are what NDC THIEVES have indeed used to empty our coffers to the point where we can't even buy fuel to power our national electricity generation...
Concerned 8 years ago

Bagbin just focused on the advantages without giving any consideration to the disadvantages. We all know in certain communities, no one can go against the wishes of the chief. How will that advance our democracy? At the momen ...
read full comment

Bagbin just focused on the advantages without giving any consideration to the disadvantages. We all know in certain communities, no one can go against the wishes of the chief. How will that advance our democracy? At the moment we have a situation where the andanis and the abduls are engaged in a conflict which has been fueled by politicians to their advantage at the cost to the people.
Bagbin's solution will only help individual chiefs who are interested in politics but would hurt the community as a whole. I must however say it would be a brilliant idea if we do away with party politics and replace it with a union government. The chiefs will be able to promote government policy without any division or problems.
DONBOLI 8 years ago

Useless Bagbin, no wonder upper west region has chiefs fighting. How can a leader take one part of his people. Chiefs, religious leaders and even govt worker has no right to have a political party.
Bagbin is getting stupid a ...
read full comment

Useless Bagbin, no wonder upper west region has chiefs fighting. How can a leader take one part of his people. Chiefs, religious leaders and even govt worker has no right to have a political party.
Bagbin is getting stupid and foolish in thinking that way.
Divide and control. A chief will be stupid to join a political party. Who will respect and chief with political party. Chieftaincy is not politics, we don't elect them, it's a custom we follow.
Bagbin is a shame to people of upper west region and should be voted out come next elections. Shame unto Bagbin
Dr Diasempa 8 years ago

The dirty Ghanaian politics is not the terrain for Honorable Chiefs. Once they land into politics they should be prepared to be smeared with insults and dishonorable mudslinging that go with it.

The dirty Ghanaian politics is not the terrain for Honorable Chiefs. Once they land into politics they should be prepared to be smeared with insults and dishonorable mudslinging that go with it.
KWAAMENA 8 years ago

Jesus Christ, Bagbin you disappoint me....... U should know far better than this........ Politicians are simply EVIL AND DEMONIC POSSESSED...... look at Betty mould, Barton odro, and those criminals NDC lawyers,,,,,,, they ...
read full comment

Jesus Christ, Bagbin you disappoint me....... U should know far better than this........ Politicians are simply EVIL AND DEMONIC POSSESSED...... look at Betty mould, Barton odro, and those criminals NDC lawyers,,,,,,, they are all thieves and extremely dangerous....... We know this, they know this, we insult them daily but they don't care because they lack conscience and don't fear God.......... Do you want our chiefs to tow this line............ .Tofiakwah, Bagbin....... Never never never never never never never...... So use your head...
Nana Odi Oman Sika 8 years ago

More than 90% of our chiefs are corrupt and politicized already. None of them is a saint when it comes to money and sale of lands for personal enrichment. Do away with chieftaincy and let everyone compete on equal terms and o ...
read full comment

More than 90% of our chiefs are corrupt and politicized already. None of them is a saint when it comes to money and sale of lands for personal enrichment. Do away with chieftaincy and let everyone compete on equal terms and on merit. Bagbin is right, let them compete but without claiming any special status.
Uncle Al. 8 years ago

Hypocrites add the NPP'S thieves, nation wreckers and acid death squads among your your nonsense write up. . Horrible idiots who think politics is all about mudslinging, insults and pull-him-down attitude.

Hypocrites add the NPP'S thieves, nation wreckers and acid death squads among your your nonsense write up. . Horrible idiots who think politics is all about mudslinging, insults and pull-him-down attitude.
KOJO 8 years ago

SURE, CHIEFS HAVE IMPORTANT ROLES IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THEIR AREAS BUT NOT THROUGH POLITICS.
THERE ARE MANY AREAS CHIEFS CAN INTERVENE TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE.

1.THEY CAN WORK TO CHANGE A LOT OF THE BAD AND AT TIMES DEADLY ...
read full comment

SURE, CHIEFS HAVE IMPORTANT ROLES IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF THEIR AREAS BUT NOT THROUGH POLITICS.
THERE ARE MANY AREAS CHIEFS CAN INTERVENE TO MAKE A DIFFERENCE.

1.THEY CAN WORK TO CHANGE A LOT OF THE BAD AND AT TIMES DEADLY CULTURAL PRACTICES IN THE AREA.

EXAMPLES ARE
-FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION
- BANNING PEOPLE PERCEIVED AS WITCHES FROM THEIR COMMUNITIES
-TEACHING THEM THE IMPORTANCE OF BIRTH CONTROL
-TAKING GOOD CARE OF YOUR CHILDREN

2.INCULCATING THE SPIRIT OF SELF RELIANCE AND NOT DEPENDING ON GOVERNMENT ALL THE TIME .FOR EXAMPLE THE CONSTRUCTION OF BORE HOLES TO PROVIDE CLEAN WATER WHERE NEEDED.

THERE ARE LOTS OF THINGS CHIEFS CAN DO TO LIFT THEIR PEOPLE.
Deep Thought!!! 8 years ago

Chiefs were the political heads of the people before this stupid European thiefs political constitutions which has made all politicians corrupt.We better rethink about what Bagbin is saying.

Chiefs were the political heads of the people before this stupid European thiefs political constitutions which has made all politicians corrupt.We better rethink about what Bagbin is saying.
C.Y. ANDY-K 8 years ago

I penned this in 2011, suggesting some reforms which must be championed in the future. In the concluding par. I wrote what Bagbin has just repeated. In Nigeria, being a chief is even an added plus to become a politician. I ca ...
read full comment

I penned this in 2011, suggesting some reforms which must be championed in the future. In the concluding par. I wrote what Bagbin has just repeated. In Nigeria, being a chief is even an added plus to become a politician. I can argue conclusively and show why the fears of some people are unjustified. The Const'nal clause barring chiefs from participating in politics must be removed. It is redundant anyway.

Andy-K

PART 2

TAMING THE GHANAIAN STATE: REFORMING CHIEFTAINCY

Part 2 deals with some few suggestions on reforming the institution of chieftaincy in order to do away with the debilitating conflicts and issues surrounding it, if we are not going to abolish the “archaic” institution outright, as some rather prefer. Doing that will also involve a radical reform of the present state structures of governance. I shall leave the arguments for this position for a latter day. My position is therefore a compromise between the ”royalists” and the “abolitionists”. After all, the State, a modern imposition much in need of legitimacy, is equally at fault, even more so, in the spate of chieftaincy disputes and land conflicts due to the dysfunctional institutional structures and laws to govern and develop the country.

I was not impressed when I learned that the NPP regime was about to pass a new Chieftaincy Act. Having seen their actions, (acting reactionarily in some cases by returning lands already under government control to the Asantehene in particular, while dragging their feet on Ga lands - which evidence emerged when out of office - they were busily sequestering for themselves, and on the verge of leaving office shoddily ordering the release of some state lands to the Gas as a token), I knew that they’d just create an unwholesome can of worms for the next administration. I therefore doubted very much if the Act as proposed by the NPP hold any progressive developments in shaping the institutions of chieftaincy and national governance and development. The whole debate must therefore be revisited alongside President Mills’ Constitutional Review agenda.

It is clear the nefarious, miseducated national elite who in the past had frown on the chieftaincy institution as a bastion of illiterates and reactionaries, a hindrance to development, for reasons I would not delve into here, have gradually transformed into one which now covert the institution and see it as a crowning glory to be made chiefs; or just another key avenue to seek rent from the land resources that such a position brings. We are gradually getting a convergence of the national and traditional elite, as many key chiefs are part of the national elite; can boast of the same level of educational attainment and even better than key bureaucrats and politicians. The attempts to buy into chieftaincies and/usurp will therefore increase if steps are not taken to curb this development. A register of rightful candidates is therefore required, as recently mentioned again by the Ministry of Chieftaincy Affairs though this request dates back to the late 1970s.

We ought to rationalise the system too, with special titles created for conferment on individuals who have distinguished themselves and done something substantially good for the community. Already, precedents exist aplenty but just a few will suffice. British royalty are [in]famous for selling their titles to rich people, from America in particular; apart from the Queen regularly bestowing titles on some deserving individuals. In Ghana, non-royals had actually been rewarded with chieftaincy stools, for their valour or contributions in wars in particular in the past. In fact, many chieftaincy stools originated in that way. In the past in Anlo society, in addition to the foregoing, wealthy individuals had created for themselves what is known as “hozikpui” - wealth stool - which is not inheritable. Today, Akan chiefs often award titles such as Nkonsuhene, development chief, to even foreigners who contributed a few $100s to village projects. We therefore need to be more creative in democratising entitlement to the chieftaincy accolade.

ABOLISH REGIONAL HOUSE OF CHIEFS

The non-performance of the Regional House of Chiefs, especially the moribund VR House of Chiefs, to resolve conflicts, partly because the State has not equipped them with the requisite human and financial resources, (plaintiffs and defendants even have to pay the sitting allowances on cases), clearly show these modern creations have failed in their assigned duties and must be scrapped in some regions and replaced with District Judicial Chambers of Chiefs (DJCC). A VR Judicial Council of Chiefs in which no Anlo chief is sitting at the moment to resolve issues on Anlo is an anomaly, as it flaunts the very premise for handing over to them such powers, that is, they have the requisite knowledge about customary norms and practices to better adjudicate over customary issues. No wonder they have displayed their incompetence and lack of interest in resolving a dispute which does not concern nor affect their areas of jurisdiction such as the Anlo Awoamefia dispute. They must be scrapped in the constitutional review in progress or in the future. They have proved themselves to be totally useless and a colossal waste of time.

ESTABLISH DISTRICT JUDICIAL CHAMBERS OF CHIEFS

In place of the disbanded Regional Houses of Chiefs should be created District Judicial Chambers (DJCC), whose membership shall include respective kingmakers of the area and some specialised individuals to be determined in each area of jurisdiction.

Chieftaincy disputes should only go to the new DJCC for arbitration when the two parties agreed. No one can be installed as chief unless the DJCC approved, if a dispute is brought before it. Otherwise, the ordinary courts should have the right of being the courts of first instance a party can go to, thereby by-passing the DJCC in case of a dispute. We are in a republic and we must modernise along those lines. By this, I am not suggesting that the so-called ordinary courts of the State are flawless dispensers of justice in Ghana. The intolerable high level of corruption in them and the awfully long years they take to adjudicate over simple matters are well known to the long suffering victims of their gross incompetence in the administration of justice in Ghana. I had already referred to the case of the disgraced Mr Woanya of the Denu High Court in Part 1. The judiciary, along with the Police or security service, are therefore parts and parcel of the rogue State in Ghana and they must be reformed radically too in order to serve the people speedily and without the graft and partisanship we now know are associated with them. The Judiciary and law education in Ghana must therefore also be reformed in order to take upon the added role of settling chieftaincy disputes. Coding and teaching customary law practices must become an essential part of the curriculum of law education and jurisprudence in Ghana.

LAND REFORMS: It deserves special attention. It was high time to place all lands chiefs are supposedly custodians of on behalf of their people – a big farce largely created by the Aborigines Rights Protection Society in the C19th - under the control of District Assemblies, not the central government. I shall briefly summarise the reasons for this position as grounded in the general corruption, incompetence and gross misappropriation into private hands of lands the central government and the Lands Department have displayed in handling land taken over by government since the colonial state was instituted. The Lands Department must be scrapped as it has become one of the most dysfunctional and inept of the institutions foisted on us by the colonialists, and whatever good roles they still perform transferred to district land administrative units. Likewise, taking control of land from the chiefs is simply an act of restoration of the people’s rights to them, as their subjects have grown up, are of age and DO NOT NEED any chiefs to protect their lands for them anymore. There is no need to catalogue the general egregious abuse of lands in the hands of chiefs in Ghana in this piece but it must be done elsewhere to support our case. The evidence abounds that the chiefs did not originally have control over the lands. A few examples will serve to buttress my point and serve as a point of further research to support the advocated position.

Starting from my own Anloland to much of Eweland, no chief has control of any land in custody for his so-called subjects. Clan heads (clan head may become a chief though) and family heads have that control, that is, what is not as yet fragmented and shared to family heads or members already. The Keta lagoon, which is the remaining major resource exploited in common cannot be alienated by the Awoamefia alone without the approval of the chiefs. It should therefore not be difficult to place that under the control of the reformed and empowered District Assembly.

In Northern Ghana, it was only in the late 1970s that the SMC passed a decree transferring allodial rights to land to the chiefs of the four major skins, in return for pledging their support for the infamous UNIGOV idea. This was in pure breach of the traditional norms which had existed for centuries. As recorded in various books, it was the Tendaana, or spiritual heads of each locality who have control of land. That this breach and attempts to enforce the new bounty handed over to the skins was the direct cause of the protracted, devastating and bloody conflict between the Konkombas and allied minority groups on the one hand and the Dagbons, Nanumbas and their allies on the other cannot be disputed. Clearly, this anomaly must be reversed by putting the District Assemblies in charge of land in order for peace to prevail and development to take place in those parts.

Coming down south to Asante, we read from Reindorf (1893:72) about how the Asantehene Opoku Ware was taught to seize the lands of even his deceased chiefs and captains and others conquered in wars, by the defeated then more powerful king of Techiman, Amo Yaw, who succumbed to the treachery of Bafo. It was through the guidance of Amo Yaw that the Techimans also taught the Asantes the art of making the now famous “Asante” gold and silver weights, apart from reforms in the governmental and social organisation of the emerging Asante confederacy. Some old war wounds never healed fully, and today, overlords of Techiman and Kumasi are still locking horns on who control which land area, which led to the rumpus surrounding the Asantehene’s ultimatum referred to in Part 1. Time to take that control of land from both of them. We are in a republic!

I believe these suggestions shall go a long way to stop the blatant cases of abuse associated with land use in Ghana and curb the desire of would-be chieftaincy post buyers. An interesting contribution to the debate was made by Otchere Darko on Ghanaweb. For work to begin on the reforms, we have to return to the CPP legislations of 1958 under which the Songhor Lagoon, for instance, was vested under state control as a starting point.

LIMITING THE TERMS OF CHIEFS

An innovation will be limiting the terms of chiefs to seven years, even in areas where chiefs are not destooled such as Eweland and Ga-Adangme, in conformity with suggestions for modernisation by C.O.C. Amate in his book, The Making of Ada, Woeli Publishing Services (1999), with the option for re-election as long as the king-makers and the subjects deem the person fit to continue as chief. This will make chiefs to serve their people selflessly and with dedication.

The power of the State to “recognise chiefs” or destool chiefs by gazetting or de-gazetting must fall away. Once a chief is properly installed, he must be automatically recognised as chief; any need for gazetting must be a mere formality. The reformed ordinary courts shall have a final say in any dispute over a chieftaincy – a stool or skin.

RESTRUCTURING THE DISTRICT ASSEMBLIES

District assemblies shall be restructured to include representatives of the various paramountcies in each district. At present, central government appoints some members, supposedly with the consultation of the chiefs. We have already heard enough complaints from the chiefs that they were hardly consulted. I propose that a proportion of those appointed members should be directly appointed by the paramount chiefs in consultation with their own traditional councils and chiefs.

Chiefs should be formally and legally allowed to engage in politics, just as they do in Nigeria to no detrimental effects. In fact, they already openly do de facto in many cases. Let them do so de jure, as it’d be a positive development in the body politic. It will help to disperse the current tribal loyalties and politics, as citizens identify with political parties on issues rather than on the basis of which ethnic group one comes from.

Andy C. Y. Kwawukume
cyandyk@ymail.com

London
April 2011
Uncle Pee 8 years ago

How would you like the chief of your town being exposed to public insults and ridicule like you politicians? I wouldn't like my chief/king to go through that public spectacle and humiliation.

How would you like the chief of your town being exposed to public insults and ridicule like you politicians? I wouldn't like my chief/king to go through that public spectacle and humiliation.
Kwesi Baidoo 8 years ago

Learn the deep senses.you have disappointed me Majority leader.

Learn the deep senses.you have disappointed me Majority leader.
Grow up 8 years ago

Oh Bagbin you dissapoint me!!How can a community leader take sides by declaring his political stand? A chief is like a public officer as he stands for all the people. If so then public officers must also be allowed to play ac ...
read full comment

Oh Bagbin you dissapoint me!!How can a community leader take sides by declaring his political stand? A chief is like a public officer as he stands for all the people. If so then public officers must also be allowed to play active partisan politics. In UK the queen is held in high esteem because of her non involvement in politics. We need constructive suggestions from our legislators we are tired of their sycophancy!!
Grow up 8 years ago

NPP did a great mistake by bycoting the 1991 elecctions which allowed some unqualified people to enter parliament. This is the result of what we see today.Long service does not mean perfection!!

NPP did a great mistake by bycoting the 1991 elecctions which allowed some unqualified people to enter parliament. This is the result of what we see today.Long service does not mean perfection!!
kofi adu 8 years ago

If chiefs were to be DCE nobody like "who say twiaa" can be appointed to a district to mess up monies for "kvip", roof for schools etc. They better do the right thing.

If chiefs were to be DCE nobody like "who say twiaa" can be appointed to a district to mess up monies for "kvip", roof for schools etc. They better do the right thing.
Prof. Alhaji Awuni Dauda 8 years ago

Bagbin, do you understand what you just said? A "Father for All" should have no party affiliation or colours hence the need for the new enskinned chief to resign his npp parliamentary seat. This is simple and straight.

Bagbin, do you understand what you just said? A "Father for All" should have no party affiliation or colours hence the need for the new enskinned chief to resign his npp parliamentary seat. This is simple and straight.
BOY KOFI 8 years ago

Sesemilla is running around my brain.Thank you.

Sesemilla is running around my brain.Thank you.
Ataa Kanfla 8 years ago

If so then civil and public servants should be allowed to display their political colours openly. What about that?

If so then civil and public servants should be allowed to display their political colours openly. What about that?
Analyst 8 years ago

There is no ambiguity in the constitutional provision that chiefs should not take part in active partisan politics. In other words, no chief should play any active role in projecting the interests of any political party. It i ...
read full comment

There is no ambiguity in the constitutional provision that chiefs should not take part in active partisan politics. In other words, no chief should play any active role in projecting the interests of any political party. It is not possible to actively engage in partisan politics without publicly identifying with one political party or the other.
Assuming a chief holds an appointment in a political party how will his subjects who don't belong to his party relate to him? The moment the political leanings of a chief are publicly known, he becomes delineated from his subjects who are not from his party and he will be rendered ineffective. The constitutional provision therefore protects the interest of chiefs and so should be defended by chiefs. I would be surprised for this report to be true that the majority leader (of all persons) is not happy with this good provision in the constitution. I hope he is being misreported.
BOY KOFI 8 years ago

Ganga is running around his brain,majority leader my foot.Blakk Rasta is 100% right.Thank you.

Ganga is running around his brain,majority leader my foot.Blakk Rasta is 100% right.Thank you.
Mawuetornam Dugbazah 8 years ago

Mr. Bagbin:

A better suggestion is to make chiefs an official part of the legislation process.

In other words let them remain insulated from partisan politics. But empower them to be part of the legislation process. AL ...
read full comment

Mr. Bagbin:

A better suggestion is to make chiefs an official part of the legislation process.

In other words let them remain insulated from partisan politics. But empower them to be part of the legislation process. ALL parliamentary bills should go through the National House of Chiefs
before being signed into law.

As well, chiefs, of their own accord should be more conspicuous in public policy debates.
Mawuetornam Dugbazah 8 years ago

Mr. Bagbin:

And please do consider this one...concurrently, as you formally involve chiefs in the parliamentary legislation process, SCRAP THE REDUNDANT COUNCIL OF STATE!

Mr. Bagbin:

And please do consider this one...concurrently, as you formally involve chiefs in the parliamentary legislation process, SCRAP THE REDUNDANT COUNCIL OF STATE!
Ghanaman THE REAL 8 years ago

Mr Bagbin, the answer to your sad suggestion is a BIG NO, NO, NO! The primary role of our traditional rulers is one of unifying their subjects and not to be involved in divisive or adversarial party politics, however popular ...
read full comment

Mr Bagbin, the answer to your sad suggestion is a BIG NO, NO, NO! The primary role of our traditional rulers is one of unifying their subjects and not to be involved in divisive or adversarial party politics, however popular or magnanimous the Chief MP will be. The traditional ruler is usually quite a time consuming role so hoe can he act in both capacities? The Constitution framers obviously better forward thinking than you so-called Honourable!!
BOY KOFI 8 years ago

Natty Bagbin,catches a fire,go there.

Natty Bagbin,catches a fire,go there.
Mumuni 8 years ago

Babgin's time is up, so he says stupid things to grab the headlines. What is the meaning of what he is saying? You have been in Parliament all these years. Is it now you know this? What an idiot! No matter what, you wouldn't ...
read full comment

Babgin's time is up, so he says stupid things to grab the headlines. What is the meaning of what he is saying? You have been in Parliament all these years. Is it now you know this? What an idiot! No matter what, you wouldn't be in Parliament come 2017.Fool stop.

Chief should play partisan politics - Majority Leader

Read Comments .st0{display:none;fill:#14BDD3;} .st1{display:none;} .st2{display:inline;fill:#FC0F0F;} .st3{display:inline;fill:#FFFFFF;} .st4{display:inline;fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:6;stroke-miterlimit:10;} Comments (26)

Read Comments Comments (26)