Implications of SC Ruling: All signatures don’t matter

Read Article

Comments (96)

This article is closed for comments.

Read Comments Comments (96)

PRINCE KWASI ADADE 10 years ago

WHO CAN PROVE KWASI ADADE WRONG? I AM SAYING, THAT, GHANAIANS VOTED FOOLISHLY!! GHANA'S PROBLEM, TODAY, IS NOTHING BUT THE RESULT OF CRIMINAL NDC'S ALLIANCE TO CREATE, LOOT AND SHARE POLICY***---------------*** "IT IS ONLY A ...
read full comment

WHO CAN PROVE KWASI ADADE WRONG? I AM SAYING, THAT, GHANAIANS VOTED FOOLISHLY!! GHANA'S PROBLEM, TODAY, IS NOTHING BUT THE RESULT OF CRIMINAL NDC'S ALLIANCE TO CREATE, LOOT AND SHARE POLICY***---------------*** "IT IS ONLY A FOOL, WHO ALLOWS HIS TESTICLES TO BE STEPPED ON, TWICE"-------GO OUT THERE AND RECEIVE YOUR REWARD, ALL GHANAIANS. GO AND PAY THE PRICE FOR YOUR FOOLISHNESS. YOU DON'T GIVE A SECOND MANDATE TO AN INCOMPETENT AND CORRUPT GOVERNMENT, NO!! NOT AT ALL, THAT IS ABOMINATION IN DEMOCRACY, VERY SUICIDAL. HAD NDC MANAGED THE ECONOMY WELL, THESE ECONOMIC PROBLEMS WOULDN'T HAVE BEEN THE SITUATION. NDC HAS PRESIDED OVER THE BIGGEST RESOURCES GHANA HAS EVER HAD. THEY HAVE ALSO CONTRACTED MORE LOANS THAN ANY OTHER GOVERNMENT IN OUR HISTORY, BUT THEY HAVE NOTHING TO SHOW FOR THIS. GHANAIANS SHOULD HAVE ENJOYED SOME ECONOMIC PROGRESS AT THIS TIME IN OUR HISTORY. THE ECONOMY IS COLLAPSING BECAUSE THE GOVERNMENT IS SO CORRUPT. TO RESCUE THE SITUATION, THE POOR IS NOW BEING FORCED TO PAY. THIS IS INJUSTICE. THIS IS NOT THE GHANA KUFFOUR HANDED OVER TO NDC, HE EVEN ADDED FRESH CRUDE OIL WELLS. NPP TRANFORMED GHANA TO A MIDDLE INCOME ECONOMY WITH LIMITED RESOURCES BUT GOOD POLICIES. NDC IS WOEFULLY REVERSING THESE NPP ACHIEVEMENTS. GHANA'S CURRENT SITUATION IS VERY DISTURBING. WHEN THE HISTORY IS TOLD, IT WILL BE SAID THAT GHANAIANS WERE OFFERED FREE SECONDARY EDUCATION, IMPROVED UNIVERSAL HEALTH CARE, SOCIAL HOUSING FOR THE POOR AND AN EGALITARIAN SOCIETY BUT 50% SAID NO THANK YOU. THEY PREFERRED ECONOMIC "WOYOMISATION" , PHANTOM DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS, PHILANDERERS FOR LEADERS, MACHIAVELLIAN DISRESPECTFUL CORRUPT LOUTS AND A VISIONLESS EVIL GOVERNMENT. I AM SO PROUD I VOTED FOR NANA AKUFFO ADDO.
dennis awah 10 years ago

prince you are simply an idiot with no appreciation for what you say. you talk in absolute terms making you a liar and an idiot. what middle income economy did NPP leave behind?????? who says crude oil alone can lift Ghana fr ...
read full comment

prince you are simply an idiot with no appreciation for what you say. you talk in absolute terms making you a liar and an idiot. what middle income economy did NPP leave behind?????? who says crude oil alone can lift Ghana from the mess that has been created over centuries? you are one of those illiterate persons who listens to people talk and then rushes to vomit what you heard without thinking. No capacity to reason or gather information to improve your understanding.

I will take on your challenge and show you how stupidly vulnerable you are to bullshit and how much this bullshit stinks coming out of your mouth. You claim that "IT WILL BE SAID THAT GHANAIANS WERE OFFERED..........BUT 50% SAID NO THANK YOU" also you say "YOU DON'T GIVE A SECOND MANDATE TO........ " and again you say " GHANAIANS VOTED FOOLISHLY.....GO OUT THERE AND RECEIVE YOUR REWARD, ALL GHANAIANS. GO AND PAY THE PRICE FOR YOUR FOOLISHNESS". These statements are a clear indication that Prince Adade- someone who is so proud he voted for Nana Addo and who is vehemently spitting stinking bullshit on this site know s that Nana Addo did not win the election at the polls!! you are clearly stating in these comments that you know that Ghanians didn't vote for Nana Addo. So explain to me why your idol refused to accept the verdict of the people which you clearly believe and know was genuinely declared, and went out there for 8 months with his party monkeys shouting thief and all sorts of insults to whoever stood in the way of him overturning the true verdict of the people that you claim was correct??? Please explain this and show us your ability to reason this one out????After all this article is about some lawyer not agreeing with the verdict of the court!!!! idiot, you don't even have the ability to stick to the topic of the article???
SGT ANANI FIADZOE 10 years ago

If infact you are a sensible, educated, learned person with credible
character and just a political naivety, surely in the first instance
you will not support NDC criminals who
have because of corruption, incompetency, dis ...
read full comment

If infact you are a sensible, educated, learned person with credible
character and just a political naivety, surely in the first instance
you will not support NDC criminals who
have because of corruption, incompetency, dishonesty, deceitful, lies and the highest level of economical confusion has brought our
nation to state of anarchy and hopelessness.

How come can some body can claim
that signatures are not important on
documents? If NDC so-called politicians are not crooks, thieves
and total incompetency how could they
claim that signatures are not significant? Kwasea like that.
Kwame 10 years ago

I just don't get it. How can a group of people be so peeved that they lost an election, thereby trying to hold every one hostage?
A presiding officer, who realizes that his party has lost at his station can refuse to sign th ...
read full comment

I just don't get it. How can a group of people be so peeved that they lost an election, thereby trying to hold every one hostage?
A presiding officer, who realizes that his party has lost at his station can refuse to sign the pink sheets in order to invalidate the results is that it? Sheer nonsense i will say.
Instead we should be calling for a law that makes it compulsory for these officers to sign the sheets once the results have been declared.
BRIAN WILLIAMS 10 years ago

BE RATIONAL AND LOOK AT THE OTHER SIDE OF THE COIN:THE EC CAN HAVE A MILLION PINK SHEETS WITHOUT SIGNATURES IN ORDER TO PICK THE PARTY OF THEIR CHOICE AS VICTORS. SC JUDGES ARE A DISGRACE SINCE THEY CAN'T EVEN INTERPRETE THE ...
read full comment

BE RATIONAL AND LOOK AT THE OTHER SIDE OF THE COIN:THE EC CAN HAVE A MILLION PINK SHEETS WITHOUT SIGNATURES IN ORDER TO PICK THE PARTY OF THEIR CHOICE AS VICTORS. SC JUDGES ARE A DISGRACE SINCE THEY CAN'T EVEN INTERPRETE THE LAW. THE WHOLE COUNTRY IS CORRUPT. THE PRESIDENT IS DOWNRIGHT STUPID AND VERY CORRUPT. AND YES I HAVE SAID IT, STUPID AND CORRUPT.
Ben K 10 years ago

Brian Williams, you are rather making a case for the SC without realising it. If the SC has decided that an election is valid if and only if the Presiding officers sign the pink sheets, then the EC or the Presiding officers ...
read full comment

Brian Williams, you are rather making a case for the SC without realising it. If the SC has decided that an election is valid if and only if the Presiding officers sign the pink sheets, then the EC or the Presiding officers will hold us hostage. If they don't sign then there is no election. Is that what you want?
OWUOMPOSURO 10 years ago

What this judge is saying is that, if he preside on a case and after judgement he do not sign the judgement sheet his judgement is still valid and enforceable.

What this judge is saying is that, if he preside on a case and after judgement he do not sign the judgement sheet his judgement is still valid and enforceable.
BRIAN WILLIAMS 10 years ago

BEN K., STEAL A CHECK FROM ME, WITHDRAW GHS1000.01 FROM MY BANK ACCOUNT WITHOUT MY SIGNATURE AND SEE WHAT I WILL DO TO THE BANK. OBVIOUSLY COMMONSENSE IS COMMON, BUT NOT COMMON TO COMMON PEOPLE. SIGNATURES ARE IMPORTANT TO MA ...
read full comment

BEN K., STEAL A CHECK FROM ME, WITHDRAW GHS1000.01 FROM MY BANK ACCOUNT WITHOUT MY SIGNATURE AND SEE WHAT I WILL DO TO THE BANK. OBVIOUSLY COMMONSENSE IS COMMON, BUT NOT COMMON TO COMMON PEOPLE. SIGNATURES ARE IMPORTANT TO MAKE DOCUMENTS AUTHENTIC.
NAKED TRUTH 10 years ago

A pink sheet is identical to a school terminal report card. If the headmaster does not sign, does that invalidate the exams and the score? You can go back to the school, have the exams and score checked, and get the headmast ...
read full comment

A pink sheet is identical to a school terminal report card. If the headmaster does not sign, does that invalidate the exams and the score? You can go back to the school, have the exams and score checked, and get the headmaster or his assistant to sign. The electoral rules make provisions to call back such defaulting presiding offices to sign if need be. If the NPP meant business, the party would have asked for a simple recount to justify their claims. It is sad to see a party ask firmly for 4 million votes to be annulled for Nana to be president. Professor Kumado should give us a break from the "carpentry shop" law he wants to imply
NPP Disillusioned Desperadoes 10 years ago

Marriage certs aren't a Gud example to use. The law adequately provides for pple living together -life partners, intestate law.therefore, u don't need a pastor's signature to validate a marriage.
As a prof in law, that ough ...
read full comment

Marriage certs aren't a Gud example to use. The law adequately provides for pple living together -life partners, intestate law.therefore, u don't need a pastor's signature to validate a marriage.
As a prof in law, that ought to have been obvious to him. Furthermore, cases were cited by justice Atuguba to back his opinion abt absence of signatures by certain pple not being a sufficient enough grounds to invalidate a document ie render it illegal or not binding.
ODIKRO BA KOFI JIMMY 10 years ago

IF A PERSON DIES AND HIS DOCTOR ( OR HOSPITAL OFFICIALS DO NOT SIGN HIS DEATH CERTIFICATE, IS HE ALIVE OR DEAD?
IF HE IS NOT COUNTED AS DEAD WHEN HE IS LYING THERE BLOWING FUMES, THOSE WHO WANT TO COUNT HIM AS ALIVE CAN DO S ...
read full comment

IF A PERSON DIES AND HIS DOCTOR ( OR HOSPITAL OFFICIALS DO NOT SIGN HIS DEATH CERTIFICATE, IS HE ALIVE OR DEAD?
IF HE IS NOT COUNTED AS DEAD WHEN HE IS LYING THERE BLOWING FUMES, THOSE WHO WANT TO COUNT HIM AS ALIVE CAN DO SO. IF YOUR PHARMACIST GIVES YOU MEDICINE AND DOES NOT SIGN THE PRESCRIPTION, WILL YOU TAKE THE MEDICATION OR NOT?
kwapea 10 years ago

These questions are certainly from someone who wants to hear himself speaking.
If a Doctor does not sign a death certificate, the person will be dead alright but, the fact of his/her death cannot be used to legally claim/ap ...
read full comment

These questions are certainly from someone who wants to hear himself speaking.
If a Doctor does not sign a death certificate, the person will be dead alright but, the fact of his/her death cannot be used to legally claim/appropriate any of his/her properties without an authentication of the death by a signed death certificate.
More so, if you went to the pharmacy to buy certain category of medicines without a duly signed prescription form from a Doctor, you can have all the money in the world but, you cannot procure the said medication. It is only Ghana that prescription drugs are sold over the counter like any other drug. So please look for better analogies the next time you want to do a riposte.
Fo Kodzo 10 years ago

One of the problems facing our developmental agenda is that there are too many useless academics in the country who are paid fat salaries which they use to chase teenage girls, talk balderdash, eat plenty and shit big. I thin ...
read full comment

One of the problems facing our developmental agenda is that there are too many useless academics in the country who are paid fat salaries which they use to chase teenage girls, talk balderdash, eat plenty and shit big. I think the Kumado man is one of them.
WILLIAM 10 years ago

Did I HEAR WELL? pROF kUMADO COMPARING REGISTRAR OF MARRIAGES TO PRESIDING OFFICER? PINK SHEET TO MARRIAGE CERT?AND WHAT DOES HE MEAN BY FEELINGS OF A JUDGE? is THE LETTER OF THE CONSTITUTION MORE COMPELLING THAN THE SPIRIT O ...
read full comment

Did I HEAR WELL? pROF kUMADO COMPARING REGISTRAR OF MARRIAGES TO PRESIDING OFFICER? PINK SHEET TO MARRIAGE CERT?AND WHAT DOES HE MEAN BY FEELINGS OF A JUDGE? is THE LETTER OF THE CONSTITUTION MORE COMPELLING THAN THE SPIRIT OF THE CONSTITUTION?
MARKUS 10 years ago

Are people just stupid or they just refuse to see the dangers in the s.c interpretations of the laws is nothing but making mockery of the people who wrote the laws and saying that they know better. when the law say the presid ...
read full comment

Are people just stupid or they just refuse to see the dangers in the s.c interpretations of the laws is nothing but making mockery of the people who wrote the laws and saying that they know better. when the law say the presiding officers shall sign, the judges failed to acknowledge the importance of that and why it is necessary that they sign and so they think that the fundamental right to vote ends everything forgetting that there are humans and for that matter Ghanians that have to ensure that that right is protected in that without the signature, that right can not be said to have received the proper care and protection. what is achieved when some few people can change what that right is suppose to achieve. when that right is exercise it must show the will of the people and the signatures is part of the process that will have ensure that no individual or group of people could change that.
Ben K 10 years ago

Markus, I doubt if you understand what you yourself are saying. The constitution does not guarantee a Presiding officer a right. The Presiding officer, who could be anybody, has a duty to perform. The voter is guaranteed a ...
read full comment

Markus, I doubt if you understand what you yourself are saying. The constitution does not guarantee a Presiding officer a right. The Presiding officer, who could be anybody, has a duty to perform. The voter is guaranteed a right and when that right classes with the non-performance of a duty by a Presiding officer, it is always the right that triumphs. This is the case not only in Ghana but in other jurisdictions.
Nii Ashitey 10 years ago

You indeed did not understand what you are saying yourself neither do I.As explained to you there are competing claims,the right to vote and a duty under the constitution.The right to vote is fundamental right but a breach of ...
read full comment

You indeed did not understand what you are saying yourself neither do I.As explained to you there are competing claims,the right to vote and a duty under the constitution.The right to vote is fundamental right but a breach of duty can only impact on the culprit and not on an innocent voter because the voter has done no wrong so they two different things.Your long ranting does not make sense so wise up. Failure to perform a constitutional duty must attract sanction against that felon and nobody else.
kaketonti 10 years ago

YOU WRONG.The ruling is final and GHANA our beloved country is FREE;

YOU WRONG.The ruling is final and GHANA our beloved country is FREE;
kaketonti 10 years ago

GOOD ONE THERE.

GOOD ONE THERE.
Ama 10 years ago

A bunch of thieves guarding Bank of Ghana vaults,that is what the National Deceit Party(NDC) is. Can you call what Afari Djan defended in court as a credible election. When he did not even know that when the number of ballot ...
read full comment

A bunch of thieves guarding Bank of Ghana vaults,that is what the National Deceit Party(NDC) is. Can you call what Afari Djan defended in court as a credible election. When he did not even know that when the number of ballot papers issued is less than the votes counted, it's over voting. Only blind fools like you believe that these bunch of thieves should guard BoG vaults. a thief is a thief, he will steal everything including elections, because he is simply a thief.
PADDY 10 years ago

VERY SAD, THEY'VE COVERED THE NATION WITH HARDSHIP,SUFFERINGS,PAINS AND SORROW.SOMEDAY THESE JUDGES WILL BE RECALLED TO ANSWER A LOT OF QUESTIONS.IN GOD WE TRUST.

VERY SAD, THEY'VE COVERED THE NATION WITH HARDSHIP,SUFFERINGS,PAINS AND SORROW.SOMEDAY THESE JUDGES WILL BE RECALLED TO ANSWER A LOT OF QUESTIONS.IN GOD WE TRUST.
woyome 10 years ago

Non signing of the pink sheet by the P.O will it affect the result of the election?no!!! Marriage Certificate is more important than pink sheet.

Non signing of the pink sheet by the P.O will it affect the result of the election?no!!! Marriage Certificate is more important than pink sheet.
Yag 10 years ago

Indepedent and Profs. How can you compare marriage certi. with pink sheet ? In election there was competition and party sympathisers who been a presiding officers will delibrately not sign to make a favourable case for their ...
read full comment

Indepedent and Profs. How can you compare marriage certi. with pink sheet ? In election there was competition and party sympathisers who been a presiding officers will delibrately not sign to make a favourable case for their party.Independent investigate those who did not sign. Congratulation noble JUSTICES !!!
Sandra 10 years ago

NPP STILL DON'T GET IT.

NPP STILL DON'T GET IT.
pink sheet president 10 years ago

Sandra,
Including their lawyers,accountants,lecturers,students and even, their so called, men of "God".

Sandra,
Including their lawyers,accountants,lecturers,students and even, their so called, men of "God".
Yag 10 years ago

Sandy, You what ? It is interlectual dishonesty to the highest degrees that exist.

Sandy, You what ? It is interlectual dishonesty to the highest degrees that exist.
THE WORLD HAS SEEN 10 years ago

Those judges have showed how stupid they are. If a judge says signature is not important while even children know that signature really important on any document,it shows how ignorant and shallow-minded they are. they are n ...
read full comment

Those judges have showed how stupid they are. If a judge says signature is not important while even children know that signature really important on any document,it shows how ignorant and shallow-minded they are. they are nothing but a waste of money to the Country. Let them be.
Apio 10 years ago

You I guess do not have any sense at all. You must be the most STUPID person in earth if you cannot see the logic of the ruling.

You are a waste of time and space. Crawl into your nasty shell and stop showing your crass ...
read full comment

You I guess do not have any sense at all. You must be the most STUPID person in earth if you cannot see the logic of the ruling.

You are a waste of time and space. Crawl into your nasty shell and stop showing your crass stupidity!!!!
NUNYA 10 years ago

Honestly, many Ghanaians especially followers of that NPP which sees nothing good inn our motherland Ghana, think that signature on pink sheet is more important than citizens votes? What a hell is this? If signature is more i ...
read full comment

Honestly, many Ghanaians especially followers of that NPP which sees nothing good inn our motherland Ghana, think that signature on pink sheet is more important than citizens votes? What a hell is this? If signature is more important then anyone can win a presidential election just by telling his or her sympathiser POs or pay them to refuse to sign Pink sheet and after the declaration put in petition and get a ruling in his favour and become president. Why are you looking country men? NPP had Ghana is better now.
pink sheet president 10 years ago

The world has seen !
You are very very wrong. By the way, have you ever considered, what may happen in the future,if it should be established, that,absence of presiding officers' signatures can nullify election results ?Ple ...
read full comment

The world has seen !
You are very very wrong. By the way, have you ever considered, what may happen in the future,if it should be established, that,absence of presiding officers' signatures can nullify election results ?Please, try to think through this problem,and the answer is there for you to find,bearing in mind, that,you and i,cannot know the mind of presiding officers,even,if they are permanet staff of the commission.No insults please.
Oppong Kyekyeku 10 years ago

What they mean is that a ruling or judgement not signed by the presiding judge is still valid and enforcable!!

What they mean is that a ruling or judgement not signed by the presiding judge is still valid and enforcable!!
Mander 10 years ago

Can any one explain to me what is common-law marriage? This writer doesn`t get. The act of counting the vote in public, signatures of polling agents is evidence enough to overide the absence of the presiding officer`s signatu ...
read full comment

Can any one explain to me what is common-law marriage? This writer doesn`t get. The act of counting the vote in public, signatures of polling agents is evidence enough to overide the absence of the presiding officer`s signature. This is common sense ruling and the judges got it right.
GENERAL DeGAULE 10 years ago

Having failed to prove any evidence of electoral fraud they are scraping the bottom of the barrel hoping that techicalities can be used to prove electoral malpractice. The curious thing though is why did they leave out the As ...
read full comment

Having failed to prove any evidence of electoral fraud they are scraping the bottom of the barrel hoping that techicalities can be used to prove electoral malpractice. The curious thing though is why did they leave out the Asokwa pink sheet? Because if all those were included and the votes anulled, Akuffo Addo's supposed votes would not tally up to the 52% they claimed.
Jato.P 10 years ago

What about tradtional marriages which are contracted between families and do not go to court are they not considered as validly contracted marriages?

What about tradtional marriages which are contracted between families and do not go to court are they not considered as validly contracted marriages?
Ruling 10 years ago

JB, they accepted in their own right as not formal. for any formal action must have the doc signed. your school certificate is it signed

JB, they accepted in their own right as not formal. for any formal action must have the doc signed. your school certificate is it signed
Joe Biney 10 years ago

This is deep thinking, which is distinct from academic polemics.

This is deep thinking, which is distinct from academic polemics.
pink sheet president 10 years ago

JB,
I like that !You are very very right .

JB,
I like that !You are very very right .
Teye Kwesi 10 years ago

Do not put political spectacle to analyse supreme court judgement. To me two things doubt the judges to be convinced whether no signatures was intentional: 1. NPP reps signed the form like wise other parties. 2. No complain s ...
read full comment

Do not put political spectacle to analyse supreme court judgement. To me two things doubt the judges to be convinced whether no signatures was intentional: 1. NPP reps signed the form like wise other parties. 2. No complain sheet was fill for no signatories. So it is clerical error.
Yag 10 years ago

CONGRATULATION TO NOBLE SUPREME JUSTICES of KING SOLOMON sense Judgement

CONGRATULATION TO NOBLE SUPREME JUSTICES of KING SOLOMON sense Judgement
Abba 10 years ago

THE SC JUDGEMENT IS DANGEROUS FOR GHANA BECAUSE MAYBE RWANDA TYPE OF WAR IS GOING TO TEACH US SENSE IN 2016 ELECTIONS IF.....

THE SC JUDGEMENT IS DANGEROUS FOR GHANA BECAUSE MAYBE RWANDA TYPE OF WAR IS GOING TO TEACH US SENSE IN 2016 ELECTIONS IF.....
kk 10 years ago

Can WAEC cancel exams result of candidates who registered, study and wrote the exams because an examiner failed to sign that s/he supervised the exams? NPP graduates

Can WAEC cancel exams result of candidates who registered, study and wrote the exams because an examiner failed to sign that s/he supervised the exams? NPP graduates
Nelson Mandela 10 years ago

Why are some of you so intellectually bankrupt? What kind of analogy is this? Is there a constitutional or WAEC provision for that matter requiring an invigilator to sign a sheet that he supervised the exam failure of which n ...
read full comment

Why are some of you so intellectually bankrupt? What kind of analogy is this? Is there a constitutional or WAEC provision for that matter requiring an invigilator to sign a sheet that he supervised the exam failure of which nullifies the exam? If there is then yes by the true interpretation of the law. By the way does the law also provide that the students sign to acknowledge that they were supervised and was conducted properly? Just don't rebutt peoples comments for the mere sake of it. Think through your intended comments or rebuttals before you come displaying your folly to the general populace. Thanks.
e akuteye 10 years ago

Its a pity that blind eye were turn against the reality.

Its a pity that blind eye were turn against the reality.
Baffour Agyemang 10 years ago

Prof Kumadu how would you judge a situation where a marriage breaks down after years of toil and making properties and children together, one side pulls out a marriage certificate that had not been sgned by the registrar and ...
read full comment

Prof Kumadu how would you judge a situation where a marriage breaks down after years of toil and making properties and children together, one side pulls out a marriage certificate that had not been sgned by the registrar and therefore claiming the successes of the marriage for him or herself as the petitioners sought for.
Baffour Agyemang 10 years ago

GOOB should be GOOD

GOOB should be GOOD
Ruling 10 years ago

Mr Baffour, After all these gains in that marriage, if the cert is not signed, the marriage is regarded as not properly done (FACT of LAW)

Mr Baffour, After all these gains in that marriage, if the cert is not signed, the marriage is regarded as not properly done (FACT of LAW)
Nii Ashitey 10 years ago

The position of the law is that after several years together whether properly married or not,you are entitled to all rights of a married person.No need for signed certificate.Lord Denning master of the rolls ruled on that in ...
read full comment

The position of the law is that after several years together whether properly married or not,you are entitled to all rights of a married person.No need for signed certificate.Lord Denning master of the rolls ruled on that in his epic case the the deserted wife's equity which has become part of common law.So you don't need a certificate to establish marriage.The relation between the two determines if is marriage or not and not necessarily a signed certificate.
Papa Yaw 10 years ago

How

How
Papa Yaw 10 years ago

True

True
CAPE COAST BOY 10 years ago

GOD BLESS OUR HOMELAND GHANA AND MAKE OUR NATION GREAT AND STRONG

GOD BLESS OUR HOMELAND GHANA AND MAKE OUR NATION GREAT AND STRONG
the gtruth 10 years ago

but we have differnt issues here marriage certificate and election form are totally two different things they have no relations whatsoever by te way does marriage couples stand in queue to register their marriage what at all ...
read full comment

but we have differnt issues here marriage certificate and election form are totally two different things they have no relations whatsoever by te way does marriage couples stand in queue to register their marriage what at all is going on
Woman's Wisdom 10 years ago

Any judge who thinks signatures don't matter are all fools. In case a mad man pops into a voting area and force himself to write whatever he wants on the pink sheets, and for this reason, a presiding officer refuse to sign th ...
read full comment

Any judge who thinks signatures don't matter are all fools. In case a mad man pops into a voting area and force himself to write whatever he wants on the pink sheets, and for this reason, a presiding officer refuse to sign the pink sheet, are the judges saying that whatever is on the sheets don't matter? Or how wrong is the information on the sheet and how does the judges explain to that? Does it make sense even to accept any document without a signature? Some of the judges are simply unwise.
Kwabena Twum 10 years ago

No judge saying that signatures on the pink sheets don't matter. But what they meant was how do you punish innocence voters and let those who actually committed the crime or broke the law go free? Does it makes sense to you t ...
read full comment

No judge saying that signatures on the pink sheets don't matter. But what they meant was how do you punish innocence voters and let those who actually committed the crime or broke the law go free? Does it makes sense to you that those presiding officers who refused to sign the pink sheets for whatever reasons, is being acquainted but innocence people being punished for law they did not break? The judges looked at it in this way, if the information on the original pink sheets were different from the copies which every party obtained then it affected the results but since every information on the original pink sheets match the copies how do you say it benefited one candidate?
Abeeku Mensah 10 years ago

My goodness, do we have another professor without sense of reality or critical thinking? Professor Kumado’s assertions are not only infantile but goes to show why the legal system is dead in Ghana and the GBA is not worth a ...
read full comment

My goodness, do we have another professor without sense of reality or critical thinking? Professor Kumado’s assertions are not only infantile but goes to show why the legal system is dead in Ghana and the GBA is not worth a hill of beans. Would the professor explain why if there are three or more signatories to a document, two-thirds of the signature would be accepted as sufficient? Would the professor explain why laws passed by parliament do not require every lawmaker to be present to make the enacted law valid? It is not only childish but a sign of political party partisanship that permeates Ghana's so-called intellectual class when they make these idiotic pronouncements. Nowhere in the statutes governing Ghana's electoral process does it mandate that without the signature of one person the votes cast there should be invalidated. As a matter of law and principles of common sense that can and should be adduced from the law, the presiding officer in his or her refusal to sign must affirm his/her actions with a protest statement. Professor Kumado ought to get his nose out of the legal literature he reads and let common sense prevail lest he become a mere Ghanaian with classroom earned credential that is worth no more than toilet paper.
AHMED JACOB 10 years ago

The signatures of the Presiding Officers was mandatory by the constitution. It was not put in the constitution just for being there sake, There is a reason why it is there, to curtail confusion and to authenticate the results ...
read full comment

The signatures of the Presiding Officers was mandatory by the constitution. It was not put in the constitution just for being there sake, There is a reason why it is there, to curtail confusion and to authenticate the results. Now we do not know why the POs did not sign the sheets. Maybe they had a reason! This is the confusion that will arise the next time. We must all remember that if you give a judgement that you yourself know is bad, it will come back to bite you.
NPP Disillusioned Desperadoes 10 years ago

That is why the onus is on all citizens particularly the legal savvy to include provisos that will curtail any such negligence or deliberate pulling of a fast one by any unscrupulous election official or party person colludin ...
read full comment

That is why the onus is on all citizens particularly the legal savvy to include provisos that will curtail any such negligence or deliberate pulling of a fast one by any unscrupulous election official or party person colluding with election official to subvert the true will of the people after having properly cast their vote without hindrance...
Sadat 10 years ago

Charlie,

We did not when the election. Simple and short. Let us not swallow hook line and sinker the inward-looking propaganda of our leaders. Whilst the NDC uses propaganda to capture power during national elections, in t ...
read full comment

Charlie,

We did not when the election. Simple and short. Let us not swallow hook line and sinker the inward-looking propaganda of our leaders. Whilst the NDC uses propaganda to capture power during national elections, in the NPP our champagne-popping cigar-smoking leaders have mastered the art of lting their own party faithful and rigging to sail though primaries but when it comes to national elections they are found wanted. Ask your self, did our candidate extend his campaign in 2012 to the Volta, Upper East and Upper West Regions or just concentrated on a few towns in the remaining regions, relying on media hype to do the rest. In a country of 70% rural dwellers media hype has a diminishing role in elections, their is no substitute for organisational effectiveness and grassroots feedback.

Our party chairman is about to introduce the most dictatorial amendment to the NPP constitution, just for the 2016 elections, as if he already knows who will be or must be the candidate. The warped winner-takes-all logic underlying the proposed amendment is that if the Presidential candidate is elelcted first, those who dont support his candidature can all go to hell. The Presidential candidate takes over the party structures from national, regional, constituency to polling station, and ward level (including party affiliated organs) so that he can prosecute the election as he pleases with any hindrance. Is that a democracy. What then happens when he wins with such a divided party?. Of course the logic is that he will continue to work with "only those he can work with". In effect the party is no longer a collective association of persons with a common philosophy and goal. Why should provisions be made for those who out of their own character flaws cannot reconcile and unit their political parties to capture power. Such infantile arguments should not be entertained after so much struggle to bring about democratic governance. Is this what we fought against the Rawlings Dictatorship for, i.e. just to finally introduce our own farcical iron-clad rule over political parties, make and mockery of time-honoured principles and label our selves "democrats, patriots and intellectuals". A sad day it will be when Chairman Jake reads out the proposal at the National Council meeting of all places.
Mr No Name 10 years ago

I personally think the reason for not signing the pink sheet is to protest the validity of the Document in kind. The scenario is the Agents were scared to protest, thinking of repurccassion that might occure.

I personally think the reason for not signing the pink sheet is to protest the validity of the Document in kind. The scenario is the Agents were scared to protest, thinking of repurccassion that might occure.
Mr No Name 10 years ago

We're there provisions stated in the Constitution to guide or protect Polling Agents in the case of Protest?

We're there provisions stated in the Constitution to guide or protect Polling Agents in the case of Protest?
GREAT NANA ANTWI 10 years ago

ARE YOU IN NEED OF A FAST POWERFULL SPIRITUALIST look www.greatnanapowerfullspiritualist.blogspot.com

ARE YOU IN NEED OF A FAST POWERFULL SPIRITUALIST look www.greatnanapowerfullspiritualist.blogspot.com
Bomfaboy 10 years ago

I thought the constitution was supreme in ghana's jurisprudence, and therefore any breach of it becomes unconstitutional and therefore invalid. The constitution provides that parliament debates and enact an act, and the presi ...
read full comment

I thought the constitution was supreme in ghana's jurisprudence, and therefore any breach of it becomes unconstitutional and therefore invalid. The constitution provides that parliament debates and enact an act, and the president of the land is to sign before it becomes a law. So if the president does not sign the parliamentary proceedings does it become a lwa, Justice Gbadebe? Certainly the presiding officers has far more weight and responsibility than party agents. Parties MAY appoint pooling agents, but the EC SHALL appoint the presiding officers. I believe in the law dictionary, may is discretionary, wholes shall is mandatory. We know that not all political parties had pooling agents in all pooling stations, but the EC had Presiding Officers in all pooling stations. Why is that so? This is because without a presiding officer an election cannot be held, even if there are party pooling agents. Gbadebe is therefore totally wrong and should be ashamed of himself, so also all the others who think like he did.
K.Twum 10 years ago

Why is he wrong? the law that enforced the presiding officers to sign the pink sheets, if they refuse what punishment does it give them? If none, what will be happened in the future elections if the judges happened to annul i ...
read full comment

Why is he wrong? the law that enforced the presiding officers to sign the pink sheets, if they refuse what punishment does it give them? If none, what will be happened in the future elections if the judges happened to annul innocence voters votes? These officers are not permanent workers for EC but recruits. So, if officer is a party sympathizer, and knowing well his or her party is losing, wouldn't he/she refuses to sign just to get the results annul and get away with it? So if there is no punishment for an officer who refuses to sign, then how do you want the judges to impose punishment on innocence people who did nothing wrong? If NPP happened to prove that the entries on the original pink sheets were different from their copies then yes, the results needto be cancelled and call for re-run but not a situation whereby all the entries are the same. God bless us all
O B Obiba 10 years ago

The Supreme Court Judges who sat on this case have done a disservice to Ghana. They voted on political and tribal affiliations and should be ashamed of themselves. On the face of incriminating evidence they voted to ignore ...
read full comment

The Supreme Court Judges who sat on this case have done a disservice to Ghana. They voted on political and tribal affiliations and should be ashamed of themselves. On the face of incriminating evidence they voted to ignore the infractions. Everyone was shocked,including NDC die-hards who thought the game was up! Ghana needs to wake up to see that truth and accountability is non existent in our country.
simple truth 10 years ago

The Judges were called upon to INTEPRETE the CONSTITUTION NOT to give their PERSONAL views.The ludgement is a LAZY work on their part.THEY had other KNOWN CONSIDERATIONS and they MUST tell GHANA.IT was a JUDGEMENT of LAST MIN ...
read full comment

The Judges were called upon to INTEPRETE the CONSTITUTION NOT to give their PERSONAL views.The ludgement is a LAZY work on their part.THEY had other KNOWN CONSIDERATIONS and they MUST tell GHANA.IT was a JUDGEMENT of LAST MINUTE and their collective reflection was not MADE.IT is FULL of FLAWS?NOBODY?is proud of their VERDICT.ELECTION, one major PILLER of DEMOCRACY has received a serious BLOW.Tomorrow our elections will see confusion,and intense EXCHANGES and perhaps generalised confusion and tensions.
ROGUE LAWYER 10 years ago

The question of the marriage certificate and the signature ,goes directly against the persons who made the mistake and can directly rectify without purnishing anybody.onlike the pettioners claimes to purnish the voter on so ...
read full comment

The question of the marriage certificate and the signature ,goes directly against the persons who made the mistake and can directly rectify without purnishing anybody.onlike the pettioners claimes to purnish the voter on somebodys mistake on the pinksheets-
if the pettioners Claims were not evil to reverse the choice of the People through the backdoors, the best for all the interested parties were to ask the court to rectify the mistake on the pinksheet but not to anull those votes, and it was clear through the preceedings that those Errors had no effect on the votes cast for the various candidates hence by the declaration of the suprem court.
Godwin Osei 10 years ago

why are we taking parts of the statements and making cases out of them?
What was said is when both parties(representative) have signed the votes cannot be annulled because the presiding office did not sign

why are we taking parts of the statements and making cases out of them?
What was said is when both parties(representative) have signed the votes cannot be annulled because the presiding office did not sign
concern ghanian 10 years ago

A RIGHT TO VOTE AND A RIGHT TO SIGN. THE LAW GAVE THE RIGHT TO VOTE AND THE SAME LAW GAVE THE OFFICER, AFTER VOTING YOU MUST SIGN. SO WE`RE NOT GOING TO CANCEL MULTIPLE VOTING BECAUSE OF THEIR RIGHT TO VOTE? WE NEED TO THINK ...
read full comment

A RIGHT TO VOTE AND A RIGHT TO SIGN. THE LAW GAVE THE RIGHT TO VOTE AND THE SAME LAW GAVE THE OFFICER, AFTER VOTING YOU MUST SIGN. SO WE`RE NOT GOING TO CANCEL MULTIPLE VOTING BECAUSE OF THEIR RIGHT TO VOTE? WE NEED TO THINK ABOUT THE FUTURE NOT NOW THAT IF NDC IS NOT IN POWER ANOTHER PARTY MAY NOT USE IT. THIS IS AFRICA
GHANAIAN OBSERVER 10 years ago

THE IMAGE OF GHANA'S SUPREME COURT IS ALREADY DENTED. WITH JUSTICES ATUGUBA AND BAMFO (LATE ATTA MILLS CONCUBINE/GIRLFRIEND) SIDED AND SHARED SECRET NOTES WITH RESPONDENT (NDC, MAHAMA AND ELECTORAL COMMISIONER) LAWYERS AFTER ...
read full comment

THE IMAGE OF GHANA'S SUPREME COURT IS ALREADY DENTED. WITH JUSTICES ATUGUBA AND BAMFO (LATE ATTA MILLS CONCUBINE/GIRLFRIEND) SIDED AND SHARED SECRET NOTES WITH RESPONDENT (NDC, MAHAMA AND ELECTORAL COMMISIONER) LAWYERS AFTER EVERY PROCEEDINGS; AND ATUGUBA OPEN COURT SHOUT AND YELLING AT PETITIONERS LAWYERS; AND ATUGUBA’S MACHO AND AUTHORITARIAN ATTITUDE AND BEHAVIOR AS PRESIDENT OF THE COURT, HAS MADE GHANA'S SUPREME COURT USELESS, LAUGHING STOCK AND UNIMPORTANT JUDICIAL HEAD OF THE COUNTRY. IN THE EYES OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY AND GHANAIAN POPULACE AT HOME AND ABROAD, THE TOP COURT IS BIAS AND CORRUPT. GHANAIANS CAN NO LONGER DEPEND ON IT TO SAFEGUARD AND PROTECT THE CONSTITUTION. INDEED, IT IS VERY PATHETIC FOR CHIEF JUSTICE TO APPOINT PARTISAN AND BIAS JUDGE LIKE ATUGUBA TO HEAD SUCH SENSITIVE AND IMPORTANT CASE. ATUGUBA’S BEHAVIOR AND ATITUDE HAS BROUGHT ONE OF THE REPUTABLE AND HIGHLY RESPECTED COURT IN THE WORLD, GHANA SUPREME COURT INTO THE MUD. IT WILL TAKE YEARS FOR THE COURT TO REDEEM ITS IMAGE.
pepeni 10 years ago

The law is what the courts say it is.

The law is what the courts say it is.
Ernest 10 years ago

The equation is totally wrong. Can you asked yourself why man cannot be given blood of animal bcos all blood should be blood?
if 2 things are not the same level, we cant equate it like pink sheet and marriage.
Can you sign ...
read full comment

The equation is totally wrong. Can you asked yourself why man cannot be given blood of animal bcos all blood should be blood?
if 2 things are not the same level, we cant equate it like pink sheet and marriage.
Can you sign your check on any paper? BCOS ALL PAPERS ARE PAPERS
A concerned citizen.................. 10 years ago

This 9 judges have goofed big time...so it means a check without a signature is valid..huh..

This 9 judges have goofed big time...so it means a check without a signature is valid..huh..
SAY IT AS IT IS! 10 years ago

What has marrage got to do with this case. Really we have got some thnking heads in our dear country.
That is why our children coming out of our school are still fools like thier parents who never went to school in the first ...
read full comment

What has marrage got to do with this case. Really we have got some thnking heads in our dear country.
That is why our children coming out of our school are still fools like thier parents who never went to school in the first place.
If one have this blok as your teach you are bound to be a fool if you can't think as a child.
BOB CAT 10 years ago

ALWAYS IDIOTS ARE FAR AWAY FROM UNDERSTANDING.YOUR CHILDREN ARE FOOLS LIKE YOU.WE HAD A GOOD GHANA BEFORE YOU WERE BORN.SINCE WE HAD PEOPLE LIKE YOU GHANA IS REVERSING TO STONE AGE.YOU PEOPLE THINK ONLY ABOUT A PARTY AND YOUR ...
read full comment

ALWAYS IDIOTS ARE FAR AWAY FROM UNDERSTANDING.YOUR CHILDREN ARE FOOLS LIKE YOU.WE HAD A GOOD GHANA BEFORE YOU WERE BORN.SINCE WE HAD PEOPLE LIKE YOU GHANA IS REVERSING TO STONE AGE.YOU PEOPLE THINK ONLY ABOUT A PARTY AND YOURSELF BUT NOT THE COUNTRY.GOD MUST REWARD YOU ALL WITH DEATH.BE POLITE.
BROWN 10 years ago

Mahama is destined to be Ghana's longest serving president (July 2012- January 2021). Hahahahahah

Mahama is destined to be Ghana's longest serving president (July 2012- January 2021). Hahahahahah
STOP THESE PREACHINGS AND DISCOVE 10 years ago

OPAYIN PROFESSOR,

WHATEVER ARGUMENT YOU MAY THROW,THE ELECTION AND SC JUDGEMENT ARE OVER, AND IT IS TIME FOR THE SO CALLED PROFESSORS, DEANS, HEADS OF DEPARTMENT, LECTURERS, ECONOMISTS, ENGINEERS and PhD'S TO ASK THEMSELVE ...
read full comment

OPAYIN PROFESSOR,

WHATEVER ARGUMENT YOU MAY THROW,THE ELECTION AND SC JUDGEMENT ARE OVER, AND IT IS TIME FOR THE SO CALLED PROFESSORS, DEANS, HEADS OF DEPARTMENT, LECTURERS, ECONOMISTS, ENGINEERS and PhD'S TO ASK THEMSELVES WHy WE ARE STILL BACKWARD UNDERDEVELOPED AND POOR.

IT SOUNDS EVEN A SHAME TO HAVE THESE TITLES IN THE MIDST OF POVERTY.

OUR MOST DETERMINED AIM SHOULD BE HOW TO PROPELL ECONOMIC GROWTH, MANUFACTURING, PRODUCTION, DEVELOPMENT,JOB CREATION, INCOME AND QUALITY OF LIFE.

LET US DISCOVER TOMORROW AND STOP THESE IRRATIONAL ARGUMENTS,PREACHINGS AND SERMONS.
hard one 10 years ago

professor, do you go to register your marrige or you go and vote at AMA or the registral? your arguement dose not make sence to me,elections pettition is over pls lets move on.what at all those NPP want?

professor, do you go to register your marrige or you go and vote at AMA or the registral? your arguement dose not make sence to me,elections pettition is over pls lets move on.what at all those NPP want?
AFI-TEYE 10 years ago

DENNIS AWAH IS JUST AN IDIOT AND FOOL.
THE NDC LATRINE CARRIER STUPID FOOL,SUCKER.

DENNIS AWAH IS JUST AN IDIOT AND FOOL.
THE NDC LATRINE CARRIER STUPID FOOL,SUCKER.
TerriblY Spe cifi. 10 years ago

Go back to law school and learn again.

Go back to law school and learn again.
zongo president 10 years ago

Where did this judge get his education ,,,is he a judge?

Where did this judge get his education ,,,is he a judge?
Osei Yao 10 years ago

THE MALICIOUS INTERPRETATION BEING PLACED ON JUSTICE GBADEGBE'S RULING BEGGARS COMMON SENSE. REFUSING TO ACCEPT AN UNSIGNED MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE DOES NOT INFRINGE ON ANY FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT OF ANY ONE BUT DISQUALIFYING THE WHOL ...
read full comment

THE MALICIOUS INTERPRETATION BEING PLACED ON JUSTICE GBADEGBE'S RULING BEGGARS COMMON SENSE. REFUSING TO ACCEPT AN UNSIGNED MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE DOES NOT INFRINGE ON ANY FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT OF ANY ONE BUT DISQUALIFYING THE WHOLE ELECTORAL PROCESS (REPEST PROCESS) ON UNSIGNED PINK SHEET DOES INFRINGE ON FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT OF THE VOTERS.
Kwabena Twum 10 years ago

If your marriage is not sign, you go back and get it sign is already in the system. What's so hard about that.

If your marriage is not sign, you go back and get it sign is already in the system. What's so hard about that.
Kwaku 10 years ago

Our wise and learned Justices have given their ruling, who are we, as laymen to challenge it? As layman I know that signature demonstrates true witnessing and authority. However,our Justices say it doesn't matter.Well, they ...
read full comment

Our wise and learned Justices have given their ruling, who are we, as laymen to challenge it? As layman I know that signature demonstrates true witnessing and authority. However,our Justices say it doesn't matter.Well, they know the law, but I wonder how a jail sentence can be enforced without without the authority of the court embodied in its seal of approval.
Unus Yahaya u/w/r 10 years ago

The stupid and foolish SC Judges think that if Ghana is burning they would be spared . Let Atubuga and his ilk know that in any eventuality, when flying out,as he did, he and his ilk should not forget about there villages and ...
read full comment

The stupid and foolish SC Judges think that if Ghana is burning they would be spared . Let Atubuga and his ilk know that in any eventuality, when flying out,as he did, he and his ilk should not forget about there villages and other relations. They should take them along and remain there for ever or else they will burn with all of us.
STRAIGHT TALK 10 years ago

BIASED AND FAKE INTERPRETATION!

BIASED AND FAKE INTERPRETATION!
Whatever 10 years ago

Who put up this ignorant headline there? The electoral process guides us to sign or to protest and give reasons. If your reason ae back by compelling evidence then your protest matters. Same way your signature matters if ther ...
read full comment

Who put up this ignorant headline there? The electoral process guides us to sign or to protest and give reasons. If your reason ae back by compelling evidence then your protest matters. Same way your signature matters if there's evidence of votes. This is common sense.
BOB MARLEY J 10 years ago

IT IS AMAZING HOW THESE JUDGES FOUND A WAY AROUND THE LAW AND THE CONSTITUTION JUST FOR A COUPLE OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN THEIR OFF-SHORE BANK ACCOUNTS. THEIR LOGIC WERE ALL BALONEY. IT IS JUST UNBELIEABLE HOW THESE JUDGES C ...
read full comment

IT IS AMAZING HOW THESE JUDGES FOUND A WAY AROUND THE LAW AND THE CONSTITUTION JUST FOR A COUPLE OF MILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN THEIR OFF-SHORE BANK ACCOUNTS. THEIR LOGIC WERE ALL BALONEY. IT IS JUST UNBELIEABLE HOW THESE JUDGES COULD NOT THINK OF THE TERM IMPLICATIONS OF THEIR JUDGEMENT CHOSE TO TAKE 'MAHAMA-BREAD' INSTEAD. SHAME ON YOU JUDGES!!!!!!!!!!!!!
11111111111
abi 10 years ago

people closer to justice Gbadegbe should ask him 'did he sign his judgement if yes why. the last question to him is how does he redraw his salary from the bank

people closer to justice Gbadegbe should ask him 'did he sign his judgement if yes why. the last question to him is how does he redraw his salary from the bank
Analyst 10 years ago

Reasonability is always required in interpreting any law. Polling station results are counted and displayed publicly before they are recorded on the pink sheets so the absence of presiding officers' signatures does nothing to ...
read full comment

Reasonability is always required in interpreting any law. Polling station results are counted and displayed publicly before they are recorded on the pink sheets so the absence of presiding officers' signatures does nothing to devalue the results. If the petitioners' argument was that the results on the unsigned pink sheets were wrong figures, they would have a good case.
The majority Justices did not rule that signatures are not required in official documents. To suggest that this was what majority Justices meant in their ruling shows a naive interpretation.
Michael Adzima 10 years ago

Unsigned marriage cert does not invalidate the marriage processed and witnessed appropriately. So unsigned Pink sheet should invalidate vote properly done and counted.

Unsigned marriage cert does not invalidate the marriage processed and witnessed appropriately. So unsigned Pink sheet should invalidate vote properly done and counted.
Kofi 10 years ago

Maybe, unsigned school certificates shouldn't invalidate the certificate since there are school records that one attended the school and even wrote the required exams!

Maybe, unsigned school certificates shouldn't invalidate the certificate since there are school records that one attended the school and even wrote the required exams!
K.Twum 10 years ago

If your school cert. is not signed, you can go to the school and get it sign. What's so hard about it? It's already in the system.

If your school cert. is not signed, you can go to the school and get it sign. What's so hard about it? It's already in the system.
ABREWA 10 years ago

Why jail a goat or food thief or even anybody for stealing because he or she is hungry and need to eat. Asem sebe!!!

Why jail a goat or food thief or even anybody for stealing because he or she is hungry and need to eat. Asem sebe!!!
ABREWA 10 years ago

Since they are also true citizens who
queued to vote.

Since they are also true citizens who
queued to vote.
IBF - Canada 10 years ago

This is indeed shocking especially coming from a judge who is rather being naive and sensational. What is the value of a signature and why did the constitution stipulated that the returning officer must sign? Without the retu ...
read full comment

This is indeed shocking especially coming from a judge who is rather being naive and sensational. What is the value of a signature and why did the constitution stipulated that the returning officer must sign? Without the returning officer's signature, the document is but ordinarily paper without weight. How did the honourable justice know that the votes on those pink sheets were genuine but not somebody somewhere who had accumulated the figures? The only sure word in this is that the returning officer has confirmed by signing the document. Is really a dangerous precedent these justices have cowardly set and we shall surely reap the fruits soon; and I do hope that these justices will live to see the consequences of their actions.
Michael Adzima 10 years ago

Yes Kofi your unsigned Certificate does not invalid your education and graduation. Only the cert must be redone. It happens

Yes Kofi your unsigned Certificate does not invalid your education and graduation. Only the cert must be redone. It happens
Paa Osei 10 years ago

I have a simple question and that is how do you determine valid votes?

I have a simple question and that is how do you determine valid votes?

Implications of SC Ruling: All signatures don’t matter

Read Comments .st0{display:none;fill:#14BDD3;} .st1{display:none;} .st2{display:inline;fill:#FC0F0F;} .st3{display:inline;fill:#FFFFFF;} .st4{display:inline;fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:6;stroke-miterlimit:10;} Comments (96)

Read Comments Comments (96)