SC verdict: Okudzeto’s “voodoo mathematics disappointing” – Amaliba

Read Article

Comments (75)

This article is closed for comments.

Read Comments Comments (75)

LATRINE MAN JUDGE 10 years ago

KILL THE CAT WHAT ARE WE WAITING FOR

KILL THE CAT WHAT ARE WE WAITING FOR
Kwadwo 10 years ago

Its really sad how people could destroy all they built for themselves due to politics.

Its really sad how people could destroy all they built for themselves due to politics.
HASSAN RASTA GERMANY 10 years ago

HE IS A MAD MAN HE NEEDS A PSYCHIATRIC

HE IS A MAD MAN HE NEEDS A PSYCHIATRIC
GTV-TV3 on WWW.OFMTV.COM 10 years ago

Watch every show or NEWS LIVE FROM GHANA ON TV3,FIFA SPORTS, FIFA WORLD CUP,
TV AFRICA, GTV, ADOM TV AND OVER 7500 TV - RADIO
CHANNELS FREE ONLINE AT WWW.OFMTV.COM

Watch every show or NEWS LIVE FROM GHANA ON TV3,FIFA SPORTS, FIFA WORLD CUP,
TV AFRICA, GTV, ADOM TV AND OVER 7500 TV - RADIO
CHANNELS FREE ONLINE AT WWW.OFMTV.COM
CARDINAL 10 years ago

Amaliba is a damn idiot. He did not advance any evidence to counter what Sam Okudzeto said. Where is Amaliba's theory that makes Okudzeto's assertion a voodoo mathematics? Amaliba just want to say something and took a quote ...
read full comment

Amaliba is a damn idiot. He did not advance any evidence to counter what Sam Okudzeto said. Where is Amaliba's theory that makes Okudzeto's assertion a voodoo mathematics? Amaliba just want to say something and took a quote from Reagan's voodoo economics quote.
betty 10 years ago

Okudzeto is an ass hole where from this now I thought this issue is death and gone.

Okudzeto is an ass hole where from this now I thought this issue is death and gone.
DKB 10 years ago

Semi illiterate Betty, you can't even string a proper sentence together without errors no wonder you come with insults. Little minds turn to insults rather than make objective counter arguments. Cheap woman.

Semi illiterate Betty, you can't even string a proper sentence together without errors no wonder you come with insults. Little minds turn to insults rather than make objective counter arguments. Cheap woman.
XZ 10 years ago

I wholly agree with you. What is his argument? Not an iota of basis for his counter claim. He should put forward his own analysis.

I wholly agree with you. What is his argument? Not an iota of basis for his counter claim. He should put forward his own analysis.
IBF - Canada 10 years ago

Kwadwo, Okudaeto gave reasons for his analysis so what is your reasons for disagreeing with him?

Kwadwo, Okudaeto gave reasons for his analysis so what is your reasons for disagreeing with him?
PLUMBER 10 years ago

It is true the Supreme Court gave out two categories of issues to were to be determined. But from reading these issues it was very clear they were not clear cut pigeon hole issues. It was therefore going to take breaking down ...
read full comment

It is true the Supreme Court gave out two categories of issues to were to be determined. But from reading these issues it was very clear they were not clear cut pigeon hole issues. It was therefore going to take breaking down these issues into categories that could be verified and weights attached to each looking at the evidence. Thanks to Gabby Otchere Darko's earlier expose. Luckily the SC took the views of the petitioners who put out 6 categories as issues to be determined in order to arrive at a verifiable decision. These categories were fashioned out by the Petitioners, not the SC nor the respondants. So what weight was to be given to each of these six categories? The weight for each category was determined by how many of the justices voted for the petitioners and who voted against them on that category. Very very simple. On three of the categories it was unanimous, meaning all 9 judges dismissed the claims. That is 9-0 against the petitioners. On the remaining three categories the scores or weights were 5-4,5-4,5-4 against the petitioners. There was no single category in which the petioners had more votes or weights. So in ordinary arithmetic when we find the average it would be (9+9+9+5+5+5)/6 = 42/6 =7 for the respondants. For the petitioners the average score is (0+0+0+4+4+4)/6 =12/6 = 2. So the final score over the six categories proposed by the petitioners and adopted by the SC works out to be 7 - 2 against Jake and Dr Pink Sheet. So where did Sam Okudzato get his figures from? It is high time people took arithmetic and logic lessons serious at school.
Mama Tula 10 years ago

I have said here on few occasions that this man, Okudzeto, has become senile and now fractured in his reasoning prowess. Nobody should take him seriously any more. Very disgusting in his so called analysis.

I have said here on few occasions that this man, Okudzeto, has become senile and now fractured in his reasoning prowess. Nobody should take him seriously any more. Very disgusting in his so called analysis.
EFO KOKU 10 years ago

Is Mr. Beautiful now a lawyer for NDC? No wonder. Jokers in charge.

Is Mr. Beautiful now a lawyer for NDC? No wonder. Jokers in charge.
WEAKLION 10 years ago

VOOOOODOOOOOOO NOW IS OUR NEXT OPTION TO SOLVE OUR PROBLEMS

VOOOOODOOOOOOO NOW IS OUR NEXT OPTION TO SOLVE OUR PROBLEMS
ASEMPA NEYE 10 years ago

Atuguba wanted his nephew to keep his job as an Executive Assistant toPresident Mahamah. Plain and simple. Atuguba was not trueful to Ghanaians when he opined that the SC panels various judgement was ready and lodged with the ...
read full comment

Atuguba wanted his nephew to keep his job as an Executive Assistant toPresident Mahamah. Plain and simple. Atuguba was not trueful to Ghanaians when he opined that the SC panels various judgement was ready and lodged with the Secretary to the Courts. In fact he Atuguba was so anxious he read a wrong judgement which was corrected after 24 hours in the books. Atuguba is treacherous, dishonest, and did not exhibit objectivity throghout the deliberations In fact if dotse a Kuffuor had not allowed his tribal affliations with Tsikata to cloud his objectivity Mahamah could have lost 4 to 5. THE PETITIONERS in their own right should have taken him off the panel. Isnt it ironic that Rawlings appointees: ATUGUBA, GBADEGBE, AKOTO BAMFO, voted deciding that NO VOTER INFRACTIONS TOOK PLACE in the December 2012 election and that the PETITION was without merit?. GOD SAVE GHANA Nana will win hands down next time. IT is now open sected that ATUGUBA twisted Dotses arms to vote with him.
Woman's Wisdom 10 years ago

Lawyer Okudzeto has explained why he said what he said with supporting evidence. So why is Amoeba Amaliba not coming out with supporting evidence of why he thinks Okudzeto is wrong. This is NDC for you. They never speak the ...
read full comment

Lawyer Okudzeto has explained why he said what he said with supporting evidence. So why is Amoeba Amaliba not coming out with supporting evidence of why he thinks Okudzeto is wrong. This is NDC for you. They never speak the truth. NDC is made up of liars and criminals and I wish them all dead. And when you talk of Atuguba, the case is more so stupefied. How could a whole SC judge lie to the whole world, making 6/3 outwit 4/5. A devil is a devil is a devil is a devil and so is Afari Gyan.
Nicholas J Bedzo 10 years ago

So your wise wisdom tells you to start
abussive words on NDC? You have limited wisdom.

So your wise wisdom tells you to start
abussive words on NDC? You have limited wisdom.
HASSAN RASTA GERMANY 10 years ago

YOU FOOLS DONT KNOW ANYTHING RATHER THAN TRIBALISM. YOUR NANA DWARF WILL NEVER WIN TILL HE JOIN HIS DWARF ANCESTORS.

YOU FOOLS DONT KNOW ANYTHING RATHER THAN TRIBALISM. YOUR NANA DWARF WILL NEVER WIN TILL HE JOIN HIS DWARF ANCESTORS.
jiga 10 years ago

56yrs of indep; abysmal public utility delivery- poor public education, poor public health, inadequate energy supply, portable water problems, poor sanitation, massive youth unemployment, unproductive parliament, yet plenty o ...
read full comment

56yrs of indep; abysmal public utility delivery- poor public education, poor public health, inadequate energy supply, portable water problems, poor sanitation, massive youth unemployment, unproductive parliament, yet plenty of time to engage unproductively= Banana State
Nemesis 10 years ago

NPP HYPOCRITES-THEY CREATE THE PROBLEM AND BLAME IT ON THE NEXT!!! AND FOOLS LIKE YOU SUCK IT ALL UP!!!!

NPP HYPOCRITES-THEY CREATE THE PROBLEM AND BLAME IT ON THE NEXT!!! AND FOOLS LIKE YOU SUCK IT ALL UP!!!!
Nicholas J Bedzo 10 years ago

This man is getting out of sense by
his caculations.

This man is getting out of sense by
his caculations.
Nicholas J Bedzo 10 years ago

lf some somebody is getting mad you
dictate from his behavious like Okudzeto,needs mental cure before it is too late.

lf some somebody is getting mad you
dictate from his behavious like Okudzeto,needs mental cure before it is too late.
STONER KOBYLYNTON 10 years ago

What do you mean by "If some somebody is getting mad you dictate from his behavious"?

What do you mean by "If some somebody is getting mad you dictate from his behavious"?
Ali 10 years ago

The simple mathematics is that judge Atugiba is far more intelligent than all the NPP lawyer and all Akan put together. Do you now understand voodoo mathematics

The simple mathematics is that judge Atugiba is far more intelligent than all the NPP lawyer and all Akan put together. Do you now understand voodoo mathematics
Eye Yen Dargarteyfor 10 years ago

He is only more intelligent than your stupid father who drinks from the same stream of water with goats and cows. It's very sad that so many Ghanaians can't see beyond their noses. Can't you see that what the useless Atuguba ...
read full comment

He is only more intelligent than your stupid father who drinks from the same stream of water with goats and cows. It's very sad that so many Ghanaians can't see beyond their noses. Can't you see that what the useless Atuguba did was a recipe for a great disaster in the country? Where are your brains that makes you a human being?
Maame 10 years ago

Ali the terrorist leader from the al shaabab group

Ali the terrorist leader from the al shaabab group
Kwame Safo 10 years ago

So why don't you also give your legal interpretation to jutify your dissent for Okudzeto's view. Is it a fact that NDC scribes cannot engage in healthy debate at any level? He provided some analysis. Much as his position is d ...
read full comment

So why don't you also give your legal interpretation to jutify your dissent for Okudzeto's view. Is it a fact that NDC scribes cannot engage in healthy debate at any level? He provided some analysis. Much as his position is debatable the only way to challeneg him is to counter his claim with your own rationale analysis and leave Ghanaians to be the judge. Stop the mudslinging and focus on facts Oh NDC!
mawriz 10 years ago

My legal interpretation is that they did not go for a review signaling everything is in order. I don't know which victorious warrior will withdraw and concede defeat after his opponent is declared the victor. He will make sur ...
read full comment

My legal interpretation is that they did not go for a review signaling everything is in order. I don't know which victorious warrior will withdraw and concede defeat after his opponent is declared the victor. He will make sure they are completely vanquished. Please let's put a stop to all this for it becoming boring. NPP can still go for a review.
j gian 10 years ago

it is rather you amaliba and atuguba's judgement which is dissapointing, stop the nonsense and learn to speak the truth.

it is rather you amaliba and atuguba's judgement which is dissapointing, stop the nonsense and learn to speak the truth.
MINOR CASE 10 years ago

Foolsh man ,why do you think every thing an Ewe does or says stems from his voodoo background.?

Foolsh man ,why do you think every thing an Ewe does or says stems from his voodoo background.?
MINOR CASE 10 years ago

Foolish man . Why do you think everything an Ewe man does or says stems from his voodoo background ?

Foolish man . Why do you think everything an Ewe man does or says stems from his voodoo background ?
Joejoe 10 years ago

For NDC nothing is wrong with the judgments because they got what they want. To NPP nothing is right in the judgment because they do not get what they want. The truth now is that the Judges do nothing good for Ghana other th ...
read full comment

For NDC nothing is wrong with the judgments because they got what they want. To NPP nothing is right in the judgment because they do not get what they want. The truth now is that the Judges do nothing good for Ghana other than building trouble into our 2016 General Election as no one is going to allow such stealing to take place again in 2016 election. No one will seat down to say we will be going to the so called Supreme Court for those thieves called Judges giving us belly full judgments
Rockson Adofo 10 years ago

NPP are so damn stupid that they did not do their homework on the petition case before going to court and after their back door deal was thrown out they started the blame game. Why are they now blaming the judges whom they th ...
read full comment

NPP are so damn stupid that they did not do their homework on the petition case before going to court and after their back door deal was thrown out they started the blame game. Why are they now blaming the judges whom they thought would grant them the judgment. Akufo-Addo/Bawumia knew so well they were losers even before the case started. Now their idiot supporters are crying like babies without milk to feed. Grow up chickens and wait for better days which may be million years away. Meanwhile shut the shit up.
kOFI 10 years ago

dont waste your time and energy on okudzeto he is sick

dont waste your time and energy on okudzeto he is sick
yussif 10 years ago

whats your mathematics amaliba?right from the beging of this case u ve no mind of your own,you even said you dont mind dieing after listening to tsatsu,you ve played second class fiddle till now so give us a break boy.You ve ...
read full comment

whats your mathematics amaliba?right from the beging of this case u ve no mind of your own,you even said you dont mind dieing after listening to tsatsu,you ve played second class fiddle till now so give us a break boy.You ve decided not to think ,allow people with brains to correct atuguba as the bigger judgement await him,we all live grow older and we die.
Clarence Hedzolleh 10 years ago

Let's forget Mr Okudzeto; he has outlived his usefulness!!!!! Nothing he would do would endear him to the NPP because he is an Ewe!!!!!!!!!!

Let's forget Mr Okudzeto; he has outlived his usefulness!!!!! Nothing he would do would endear him to the NPP because he is an Ewe!!!!!!!!!!
DKB 10 years ago

You make such a foolish comment about him being Ewe and you people turn round to accuse NPP of being tribalistic. It is people like you who hate Akans out of ignorance that are the problem. Lawyer Okudzeto is comfortable amon ...
read full comment

You make such a foolish comment about him being Ewe and you people turn round to accuse NPP of being tribalistic. It is people like you who hate Akans out of ignorance that are the problem. Lawyer Okudzeto is comfortable amongst Akans because he is level headed and has self confidence. It is losers likes Clarence who lack self confidence and belief who go about making stupid tribal comments even against their own. You are the true tribalist.
AMPONSA KAKABO LONDON 10 years ago

SO YOU DON'T FEEL ASHAMED FOR SUCH A CORRUPT JUDGEMENT WHICH HAS AFFECTED OUR JURISPRUDENCE AND BEEN RIDICULE IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS.
TAKE YOUR POLITICAL LENSES OFF AND TAKE TIME TO STUDY THE JUDGEMENTS FROM THE NINE JUSTICE ...
read full comment

SO YOU DON'T FEEL ASHAMED FOR SUCH A CORRUPT JUDGEMENT WHICH HAS AFFECTED OUR JURISPRUDENCE AND BEEN RIDICULE IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS.
TAKE YOUR POLITICAL LENSES OFF AND TAKE TIME TO STUDY THE JUDGEMENTS FROM THE NINE JUSTICES AS A RATIONAL LAWYER, FROM THERE THAT YOU WILL REALISE THE CORRUPTNESS AND FLAW OF THE SAID JUDGEMENT.
YOU BETTER SAY A BIG THANK YOU TO NANA ADDO FOR ACCEPTING ALL THE TRASH FROM ATUGUBA, AKOTO BAMFO, ADEJINAH, AND GBADEGBE.
GHANA MUST SALUTE THIS MAN AS HE SAID, "BECAUSE OF HIS UPBRINGING". ELECTIONS ARE NOT GOING TO BE THE SAME AGAIN IN GHANA FOR A JUDGE WHO HAS BEEN SUFFERING FROM JUDGES DISEASE TO ADDRESS POLITICIANS AS HIS KIDS. NOW, HE IS CHILLING OUT IN NEW YORK WITH HIS THANK YOU FREEBIES.
ATUGUBA IS NOT EVEN ASHAMED OF HIMSELF FOR BRINGING OUR JUDICIARY INTO SUCH CONTEMPT.
4 Year Old 10 years ago

This guy is another Kookooase lawyer.

This guy is another Kookooase lawyer.
TOTOKOKOBABAFO 10 years ago

NPP FULL OF SHIT......... THIS FOOLISH LAWYER OSUO DESCENDANTS FROM ASHANTI VILLAGE BUSH MAN WANTS ATTENTION FROM THE MIDIA ;CASSAVA RAISE KID WITH NO FUCKING BRAINS TALKING. FROM. HIS STOMACH NOW HE WEARS SUN SHIELDS ;BUSHMA ...
read full comment

NPP FULL OF SHIT......... THIS FOOLISH LAWYER OSUO DESCENDANTS FROM ASHANTI VILLAGE BUSH MAN WANTS ATTENTION FROM THE MIDIA ;CASSAVA RAISE KID WITH NO FUCKING BRAINS TALKING. FROM. HIS STOMACH NOW HE WEARS SUN SHIELDS ;BUSHMAN GO DO FARMING.
WEAKLION 10 years ago

VOOOOOOOOOOOOOODOOOOOOO WILL FIX OUR BAD ECONOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMY

VOOOOOOOOOOOOOODOOOOOOO WILL FIX OUR BAD ECONOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMY
Truth USA 10 years ago

How can any black man that says he is educate use the word, "voodoo", as a form of insult? White folks say such things in the US government. I expect such ignorance from them but a negro born in Africa?!!! Has this negro no r ...
read full comment

How can any black man that says he is educate use the word, "voodoo", as a form of insult? White folks say such things in the US government. I expect such ignorance from them but a negro born in Africa?!!! Has this negro no respect or honor for the lives his Ancestors lived and were mostly civilized at a time when white folks were still living in caves in Europe and taking baths twice a year.
If such a slave-minded negro had said christian or islamic instead of voodoo or traditional beliefs...you colonized negroes on this site would have been in an uproar!
Mental slaves still in this 21st century.
Whatever 10 years ago

No wonder the Ghana Bar Association is a subjective association. People like Okudzeto has destroyed it with their dishonesty and inconsistency because of blind partisanship

No wonder the Ghana Bar Association is a subjective association. People like Okudzeto has destroyed it with their dishonesty and inconsistency because of blind partisanship
KBL 10 years ago

it is true that the law is an ASS and idiots try to take undue advantage of it.BUT COMMON SENSE SHOULD ASK SAM OKUDJETO TO SHOW OR TELL THE WORLD WHERE THE SO-CALLED OVER VOTING TOOK PLACE.SENSIBLE PEOPLE WILL NOT ALLOW TECHN ...
read full comment

it is true that the law is an ASS and idiots try to take undue advantage of it.BUT COMMON SENSE SHOULD ASK SAM OKUDJETO TO SHOW OR TELL THE WORLD WHERE THE SO-CALLED OVER VOTING TOOK PLACE.SENSIBLE PEOPLE WILL NOT ALLOW TECHNICALITIES TO SELECT A FALSE PRESIDENT. WHAT TYPE OF A RE-RUN OF ELECTIONS WERE THE TWO JUDGES TALKING ABOUT. WHY DID THEY NOT CALL FOR A RECOUNT OF VOTES
Papa Yaw 10 years ago

How

How
onetouch 10 years ago

this lawyer is a stone age lawyer and not abreast with the new trends,allow him to hallucinate,BIG TIME DAY DREAMER

this lawyer is a stone age lawyer and not abreast with the new trends,allow him to hallucinate,BIG TIME DAY DREAMER
sisis ba 10 years ago

FINALLY THE TRUTH HAS COME OUT. MAHAMA THEREFORE CONTINUES TO AN ILLEGITIMATE PRESIDENT BECAUSE HE WAS MADE PRESIDENT BY DUBIOUS JUDGE ATUGUBA AND NOT BY THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE. SHAME ON ATUGUBA AND MAHAMA.

FINALLY THE TRUTH HAS COME OUT. MAHAMA THEREFORE CONTINUES TO AN ILLEGITIMATE PRESIDENT BECAUSE HE WAS MADE PRESIDENT BY DUBIOUS JUDGE ATUGUBA AND NOT BY THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE. SHAME ON ATUGUBA AND MAHAMA.
cool 10 years ago

oooooo atuguba and co as sell Ghana to war spirit for 2016
and I know that God love Ghana so much
because of that atuguube and co will neve will have peace on the are life
because of they have done

oooooo atuguba and co as sell Ghana to war spirit for 2016
and I know that God love Ghana so much
because of that atuguube and co will neve will have peace on the are life
because of they have done
be productive 10 years ago

thief

thief
Owu 10 years ago

In order for us to move forward we have to refrain from tribalism. It will never ever bring peace.

In order for us to move forward we have to refrain from tribalism. It will never ever bring peace.
Yaw 10 years ago

So why can't Dotse and Baffoe-Bonnie be clear and tell us their positions on the issues and what they voted for?Their conscience will judge them.

So why can't Dotse and Baffoe-Bonnie be clear and tell us their positions on the issues and what they voted for?Their conscience will judge them.
ANTHONY 10 years ago

MR OKUDZETO HAS DISGRACED HIMSELF AND ALL WHO EVER SAW HIM IN ANY GOOD LIGHT , WITH HIS DISHONEST OR IRRATIONAL UNDERSTANDING OF THE JUDGMENT BY THE 9 JUSTICES DISMISSING THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION PETITION , BY NANA AKUFO ADD ...
read full comment

MR OKUDZETO HAS DISGRACED HIMSELF AND ALL WHO EVER SAW HIM IN ANY GOOD LIGHT , WITH HIS DISHONEST OR IRRATIONAL UNDERSTANDING OF THE JUDGMENT BY THE 9 JUSTICES DISMISSING THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION PETITION , BY NANA AKUFO ADDO AND CO , AGAINST VALIDITY OF DECEMBER 2012 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION RESULTS. MR OKUDZETO CLAIMS HIS READING OF THE JUDGMENT SHOWS THAT THE VERDICT SHOULD BE 5 FOR THE PETITION AND 4 AGAINST IT. HE FAILED TO CONSIDER THE EFFECT OF ALL THE 9 JUSTICES VOTING AGAINST 3 OF THE 6 ALLEGED ELECTION IRREGULARIES. ALL 27 VOTES WERE AGAINST THE PETITION. IN EACH OF REMAINING 3 ALLEGED IRREGULARITIES , THE JUSTICES VOTED 5 AGAINST AND 4 FOR THE PETITION CLAIMS. THAT IS 15 AGAINST AND 12 FOR IT. SUM TOTAL OF VOTES AGAINST MERIT OF THE PETITION IS 27 +15=42 AND 12 FOR IT. DIVIDING BY FACTOR 6 , REDUCES MAJORITY DISMISSAL RATIO OF 42 TO 12 , TO 7 VOTES AGAINST AND 2 VOTES FOR THE PETITION.
Kyei Bediako East Orange NJ 10 years ago

This rebuttal is hollow. Someone is telling you that after reading the report has given his fact and figures. If you are disputing these facts and figures, you don't do that with one sentence. Lawyer Annabila should know bet ...
read full comment

This rebuttal is hollow. Someone is telling you that after reading the report has given his fact and figures. If you are disputing these facts and figures, you don't do that with one sentence. Lawyer Annabila should know better if he wants to be regarded credible by any civilized society.Give us the facts and stop saying Sam Okudzeto has allowed politics to cloud his legal aanalysis and interpretation. hon Annabila if you want to sound credible, a lawyer of your supposed caliber should deal with facts that mere statements. Legal scholars and the comman man is reading into your sense of judgement,. Akom ko ama everybody is calling himself a lawyer.Annabila, my late father will throw away your summation if you had appeared b4 him. Gone are the days
Akwadaa_Nyame 10 years ago

Your super-judge father nor Sam Okudzeto ever made it to the apex court of this this nation! And we have to be thankful to the Man upstairs for that.
A month has passed since the verdict came down,and just as we saw in that ...
read full comment

Your super-judge father nor Sam Okudzeto ever made it to the apex court of this this nation! And we have to be thankful to the Man upstairs for that.
A month has passed since the verdict came down,and just as we saw in that 'bogus'petition, not even one of the nine panel members has voiced any objection to the summary verdict read in open court by the Presiding Judge.
And you are asking Amaliba to do what?
Charles De Sensible 10 years ago

De supreme court judges have really disappointed ghanaians by given such an unfair judgement , they will pay dearly 4 what theyhave done for their generation to come

De supreme court judges have really disappointed ghanaians by given such an unfair judgement , they will pay dearly 4 what theyhave done for their generation to come
NKWASEAFUO DOOSO NDC DODON 10 years ago

Amabila stop fooling with your Optuo(Eagle)face.No condition is permanent.Toto wopa ko na wobehyia difuo,Akuromfuo.

Amabila stop fooling with your Optuo(Eagle)face.No condition is permanent.Toto wopa ko na wobehyia difuo,Akuromfuo.
wheel 10 years ago

'stupidness'? Damn illitrate!!

'stupidness'? Damn illitrate!!
Joshua 10 years ago

No doubt this old man behaves like a shrine or juju attendant in my village. All his experience in education has been wasted. If you have an old man like this been the head of family then I am afraid nothing good will come ou ...
read full comment

No doubt this old man behaves like a shrine or juju attendant in my village. All his experience in education has been wasted. If you have an old man like this been the head of family then I am afraid nothing good will come out of that family. Such an old man will use divide and rule tactics which is the trade mark of the elephant party which he belongs to,to disorganize his family. At his prime age, instead of setting some good examples for the youth to emulate, he is rather warmongering. What a big shame for this baaaaaaaaaaaad old man.
DKB 10 years ago

On the contrary he is the head of a very good family, well cultured children including other children he adopted and educated as his own. We sit behind computers and say things about people we don't know. If you knew him in h ...
read full comment

On the contrary he is the head of a very good family, well cultured children including other children he adopted and educated as his own. We sit behind computers and say things about people we don't know. If you knew him in his private life you would take back your comments in shame. He has made his analysis on how he saw it, if you think otherwise, make your analysis to counter his. That is what any sensible educated person would do both of which you do not qualify.
Kwadwo 10 years ago

Atuguba was incoherent in delivering a summary of his understanding of the other Justices ruling. I am of Okudzeto's illumination.

Atuguba was incoherent in delivering a summary of his understanding of the other Justices ruling. I am of Okudzeto's illumination.
GHANA FIRST 10 years ago

If Justice Dotse was not in favour of the petitioners why would he give a very bad comment about the EC chairman
Look at the allegations being levelled against Otumfour?
In Ghana there is always some truth (half or quatre o ...
read full comment

If Justice Dotse was not in favour of the petitioners why would he give a very bad comment about the EC chairman
Look at the allegations being levelled against Otumfour?
In Ghana there is always some truth (half or quatre or one third truth) in every rumour
The bribery allegations cannot just be
dissmissed like that
Afari Gyan too has lost trust among many people (electorates)
Why should such a person be allowed to referee 2016 elections?
OUR LEADERS ARE PREPARING GROUNDS FOR CONFUSION IN 2016
Their hands are tainted.Many Ghanaians dont trust the EC and many of our leaders
Thank God we have peace now but if something is not done now we will not enjoy the same peace tomorrow
Kalahariman 10 years ago

hey mr want to be a writer whats your point....the decision is finally we have moved forward....if mr addo of npp want to contest he should do so the next election....meanwhile he needs to be charged with ...causing financial ...
read full comment

hey mr want to be a writer whats your point....the decision is finally we have moved forward....if mr addo of npp want to contest he should do so the next election....meanwhile he needs to be charged with ...causing financial loss to the country with a false and misleading accusation.. attempted coup....
ogyampa 10 years ago

If the conditions or perimeters which were set by the SC had stated that the SC judges must not declare the election valid even if a particular Justice of the panel found one of the six determining factors to be at fault then ...
read full comment

If the conditions or perimeters which were set by the SC had stated that the SC judges must not declare the election valid even if a particular Justice of the panel found one of the six determining factors to be at fault then all six factors be considered invalid, then I will say Mr.Okudzeto might be right on his accounts. However, his analysis based on the 588-pages Judgement's transcripts is inconclusive in the article.
Kwame Koramoah 10 years ago

Read my article of 15 September 2013. It is exactly what I said. The decision was plainly in error and needs to be reviewed.

Read my article of 15 September 2013. It is exactly what I said. The decision was plainly in error and needs to be reviewed.
PLUMBER 10 years ago

The SC adopted the proposal put forward by the petitioners to aid them in their analysis. This is because the two issues set forth had to be categorised to be meaningful. That was exactly what the SC agreed to do following th ...
read full comment

The SC adopted the proposal put forward by the petitioners to aid them in their analysis. This is because the two issues set forth had to be categorised to be meaningful. That was exactly what the SC agreed to do following the prompting by the petitioners and they have the right to adopt any such procedure under their rules. So what were the scores on these categories as demanded by the petitioners? 9-0,9-0,9-0,5-4,5-4,5-4 all against the petitioners whether some of the justices switched sides or not. So on which of these categories of claims could a decision in favour of the petioners be based?
K. Young 10 years ago

What is wrong with this learned lawyer? How can u say Justices Ansah, Owusu and Anin-Yeboah ruled in favor of Akufo Addo, when you are very much aware that on three counts they voted in favor of Mahama. Is he saying he is the ...
read full comment

What is wrong with this learned lawyer? How can u say Justices Ansah, Owusu and Anin-Yeboah ruled in favor of Akufo Addo, when you are very much aware that on three counts they voted in favor of Mahama. Is he saying he is the only one who can read the judgement and deduct meaningful logic out of it? Am afraid for Ghana if we have people like this who are to no better. After all, all the nine justices ruled on three counts in favor of Mahama, the other three was 5 to 4 in favor of Mahama. How can you then come to the conclusion that because it was not explicitly stated by the three above mentioned justices in their summary judgement dismissing the petition, it amount ruling in favor of Akufo Addo. Was it stated like that in the judgement? He should ask him self and come again. To me the judgement is 44 to 12 in favor of Prez. John Mahama.
Goza Gotoro 10 years ago

Okudzeto is only displaying elderly rascality that borders on madness so ignore him.He is an elderly man, but I suspect the good part of his brain is not being activated!!!!!!

Okudzeto is only displaying elderly rascality that borders on madness so ignore him.He is an elderly man, but I suspect the good part of his brain is not being activated!!!!!!
GENERAL DeGAULE 10 years ago

The petitioners did not ask for a re-run of the elections in affected areas. They asked for the annulment of 4 million votes and for a declaration that Akuffo Addo was duly elected President (minus the 2,002 pink sheets inclu ...
read full comment

The petitioners did not ask for a re-run of the elections in affected areas. They asked for the annulment of 4 million votes and for a declaration that Akuffo Addo was duly elected President (minus the 2,002 pink sheets including Asokwa pink sheet).

2 Judges asking for a re-run in affected areas, where the presiding officers would then sign the pink sheets is not a WIN by any stretch of the imagination. The outcome would have been the same. The Presiding Officers signature and the other matters would not have affected the outcome. The petitioners definition of over voting included blanks read as zero. In any case only 2 of the Judges offered this solution which the petitioner's had not asked for.
okofo 10 years ago

Amaliba, anybody at all can say what you said: why don't you dispute the analysis made by the distinguished lawyer, Mr Okudjeto, by way of reasoning on legal grounds if you can?

Amaliba, anybody at all can say what you said: why don't you dispute the analysis made by the distinguished lawyer, Mr Okudjeto, by way of reasoning on legal grounds if you can?
PLUMBER 10 years ago

Read my analysis below @ ALL MUST READ THIS CALCULATION. sam Okudzato has actually engaged in Vodoo arithmetic. Figures don't lie, but liars like Okudazato can figure.

Read my analysis below @ ALL MUST READ THIS CALCULATION. sam Okudzato has actually engaged in Vodoo arithmetic. Figures don't lie, but liars like Okudazato can figure.
Moses 10 years ago

The kind of language you use shows what kind of person you are. Your real self is not your tribe, your height, your colour but what comes out of your mouth or writing. Being a frafra or latrine man who has risen to become a j ...
read full comment

The kind of language you use shows what kind of person you are. Your real self is not your tribe, your height, your colour but what comes out of your mouth or writing. Being a frafra or latrine man who has risen to become a judge is what motivates, not some one who claims to be from a superior tribe but is empty and hides behind his tribe. I respect people who deal with others on issues and not hide behind tribe. Such people are cowards and cannot stand on their own without hiding behind their tribe. Let your tribe hide behind you and proof to others how superior you are. Only empty cowards with no substance talk and write the way you do. You do not exhibit any enlightenment. Americans are enlightened and have elected a man whose father comes from Africa as President and they give him all the respect he deserves. How can my fellow black man tell me he is superior. Superior in what? The world is moving forward and some of you are still hanging on to stupid and un-enlightened ideas. Please, grow up. Your tribe does not make you. In this day and age, progress in life has moved beyond that kind of thinking.
Louis Nana Essuman 10 years ago

The disagreement after the 2012 election verdict from opinion polls does not give maximum respect to the highest court of the land. I therfore share in addition that, no one is perfect on this earth so however the judgement, ...
read full comment

The disagreement after the 2012 election verdict from opinion polls does not give maximum respect to the highest court of the land. I therfore share in addition that, no one is perfect on this earth so however the judgement, should be approved and accepted by every single individual person. My fellow Ghanians, let unity bring peace in our country and no doubt, Ghana will reach her maximum target.
Ruling 10 years ago

DO WE HAVE RENTED CONTRIBUTORS ON THIS FORUM? THE TREND IS SAME PPLE COMENT FOR NDC ON ALL ISSUES. NEVER MISS, IS IT THEIR JOB?

DO WE HAVE RENTED CONTRIBUTORS ON THIS FORUM? THE TREND IS SAME PPLE COMENT FOR NDC ON ALL ISSUES. NEVER MISS, IS IT THEIR JOB?
PLUMBER 10 years ago

Author:
PLUMBER

Date:
2013-09-27 05:33:49

Comment to:
Re: OKUDJTO HAS GREATLY DISSAPOINTED ME

It is true the Supreme Court gave out two categories of issues to were to be determined. But from reading these ...
read full comment

Author:
PLUMBER

Date:
2013-09-27 05:33:49

Comment to:
Re: OKUDJTO HAS GREATLY DISSAPOINTED ME

It is true the Supreme Court gave out two categories of issues to were to be determined. But from reading these issues it was very clear they were not clear cut pigeon hole issues. It was therefore going to take breaking down these issues into categories that could be verified and weights attached to each looking at the evidence. Thanks to Gabby Otchere Darko's earlier expose. Luckily the SC took the views of the petitioners who put out 6 categories as issues to be determined in order to arrive at a verifiable decision. These categories were fashioned out by the Petitioners, not the SC nor the respondants. So what weight was to be given to each of these six categories? The weight for each category was determined by how many of the justices voted for the petitioners and who voted against them on that category. Very very simple. On three of the categories it was unanimous, meaning all 9 judges dismissed the claims. That is 9-0 against the petitioners. On the remaining three categories the scores or weights were 5-4,5-4,5-4 against the petitioners. There was no single category in which the petioners had more votes or weights. So in ordinary arithmetic when we find the average it would be (9+9+9+5+5+5)/6 = 42/6 =7 for the respondants. For the petitioners the average score is (0+0+0+4+4+4)/6 =12/6 = 2. So the final score over the six categories proposed by the petitioners and adopted by the SC works out to be 7 - 2 against Jake and Dr Pink Sheet. So where did Sam Okudzato get his figures from? It is high time people took arithmetic and logic lessons serious at school
Forest Commander 10 years ago

Weak mind, weak analysis. Oh Okudzeto why are allowing yourself to be used in this manner. A once respected and objective elderly statesman now descending into the abyss of partisanship. I am greatly disappointed. What is you ...
read full comment

Weak mind, weak analysis. Oh Okudzeto why are allowing yourself to be used in this manner. A once respected and objective elderly statesman now descending into the abyss of partisanship. I am greatly disappointed. What is your motive? To cause confusion in the country? Dear old man you have enjoyed your prime days on earth, let the young ones coming up also have their turn peacefully
NATIONAL PROPAGANDA PARTY 10 years ago

Foolish npp supporters, infact am ashamed of your high illiteracy rate. You motherfuckers are not using your brains at all. You gonna fuck the shit out of mind, you idiots. You've claimed "let my vote count" yet you fucking i ...
read full comment

Foolish npp supporters, infact am ashamed of your high illiteracy rate. You motherfuckers are not using your brains at all. You gonna fuck the shit out of mind, you idiots. You've claimed "let my vote count" yet you fucking idiots want about 4 million votes to be annulled. This is illogical and even an insane person never gonna think this bogus way. Ghanafuo abre mu npp fuo, na aden? Npp, muye nponkye paa. Change your fucking attitude to suit modern world knowledge.

SC verdict: Okudzeto’s “voodoo mathematics disappointing” – Amaliba

Read Comments .st0{display:none;fill:#14BDD3;} .st1{display:none;} .st2{display:inline;fill:#FC0F0F;} .st3{display:inline;fill:#FFFFFF;} .st4{display:inline;fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:6;stroke-miterlimit:10;} Comments (75)

Read Comments Comments (75)