Comment: Tsikata’s supreme political verdict

Read Article

Comments (46)

This article is closed for comments.

Read Comments Comments (46)

Koo 10 years ago

it is obvious you and your NPP lawyers are envious of Tsikata. Trust me if Tsikata were in the petitioners legal team NPP would have won the case.

it is obvious you and your NPP lawyers are envious of Tsikata. Trust me if Tsikata were in the petitioners legal team NPP would have won the case.
DKB 10 years ago

Foolish comment. Are you saying that the petitoners had a case but because they did not have someone like Tsatsu they lost? Are you saying the elections was truly rigged. Don't make such stupid comments to justify your point.

Foolish comment. Are you saying that the petitoners had a case but because they did not have someone like Tsatsu they lost? Are you saying the elections was truly rigged. Don't make such stupid comments to justify your point.
A GERSIS 10 years ago

GVYB TV
A Gersis reportig

Fellow Ghanaians

Henderson's side in this case lost and he is mad. He is indeed a goat. He should go away with all the made up stories about Tsatsu. When did Tsatsu say he was better than any ...
read full comment

GVYB TV
A Gersis reportig

Fellow Ghanaians

Henderson's side in this case lost and he is mad. He is indeed a goat. He should go away with all the made up stories about Tsatsu. When did Tsatsu say he was better than anybody else?
You are a fool. You lost! Maybe he's better than all of you combined.

Antonio Gersis
Plaza One
Dallas
PK 10 years ago

DKB, I decided not to respond directly to "Koo". You can always tell a man's head is filled with air when he takes aim at his own foot and actually goes ahead to shoot it.

Gersis, by your own comment you agree it's quite ...
read full comment

DKB, I decided not to respond directly to "Koo". You can always tell a man's head is filled with air when he takes aim at his own foot and actually goes ahead to shoot it.

Gersis, by your own comment you agree it's quite distasteful to say what I've attributed to Tsatsu in the article. Well, guess what, the man said that and even worse things. In fact, not only did he say that he has better grasp of the law than the petitioners' counsel, but he also claimed that they can never ever dream of attaining his level of knowledge of the law in their lifetime. After the interview, I had a call from two friends, both of whom were shocked by Tsatsu's comment. That's when I decided to write this article. So, Gersis, I'm as shocked as you're that someone like Tsatsu would say such things.
OYOKOBA 10 years ago

This article is very educative and actually hones in on my misgivings about Tsatsu Tsikita's outbursts on judge Anim-Yeboah, but for lack of knowledge in legal lingo couldn't forcefully express. Thanks so much. More grease to ...
read full comment

This article is very educative and actually hones in on my misgivings about Tsatsu Tsikita's outbursts on judge Anim-Yeboah, but for lack of knowledge in legal lingo couldn't forcefully express. Thanks so much. More grease to your elbows Mr. Henderson. Bravo!
Akua AU 10 years ago

ONE OF THE QUITE FRANKLY NDC IDIOTS.

ONE OF THE QUITE FRANKLY NDC IDIOTS.
YHO 10 years ago

this jail bird who envy him. Is only atugbugas court that judgement has been pronounced first by SC AND SECONDLY by radio what a judgement. Let me tell you that the security services can not kill the whole 5 million and over ...
read full comment

this jail bird who envy him. Is only atugbugas court that judgement has been pronounced first by SC AND SECONDLY by radio what a judgement. Let me tell you that the security services can not kill the whole 5 million and over people who voted for Nana so the jail bird should keep his stinking mouth shut.
Eric 10 years ago

Mr henderson is so wrong on all the legal points. The political points may be right but your effort to show to us you know some law failed. The World Bank agreement is completely different fromt he IMF Articles of Agreement. ...
read full comment

Mr henderson is so wrong on all the legal points. The political points may be right but your effort to show to us you know some law failed. The World Bank agreement is completely different fromt he IMF Articles of Agreement. The effect in immunity would therefore not be the same. Lawyers are always called students of the law. So Tsikata is himself student of the law. Please let's now focus our attention on our sinking economy.
PK 10 years ago

I don't know which part of what you read was difficult to understand.

1. Note that I agreed with Tsatsu that it was improper for Justice Anim-Yeboah to refer to IMF Articles of Agreement because the IFC is a member of the ...
read full comment

I don't know which part of what you read was difficult to understand.

1. Note that I agreed with Tsatsu that it was improper for Justice Anim-Yeboah to refer to IMF Articles of Agreement because the IFC is a member of the World Bank Group (WBG), not of the IMF. More appropriately, he should have quoted from IFC/World Bank articles of agreement.

2. Nevertheless, also note that I also pointed out that the effect wouldn't have been different because both the WBG and the IMF, as members of the UN system, derive their immunity clauses, which are written into articles of agreement, from the same source, the contentious 1946 UN Convention on Privileges and Immunities.

Yes, anyone who is a practioner of profession forever remains a student of it. But it's ridiculous to base the supposed superiority of your knowledge, or legal arguments, relative to another's, on you having once taught the latter. It's even worse to hold an opponent lawyer in utter contempt for the same reason, as if being your former students made them permanently inferior to you. No serious academic worth his salt behaves like that.

So, yes, let's now focus on our attention on "our sinking economy". But you must address your advice more appropriately to the likes of Tsikata because their comments have the potential of poisoning the atmosphere.
Nana 10 years ago

It is different from retroactive legislation, but it is very correct. Tsikata is right. Please check the law in America.

It is different from retroactive legislation, but it is very correct. Tsikata is right. Please check the law in America.
PK 10 years ago

"It is different from retroactive legislation, but it is very correct. Tsikata is right...."

Sorry, Sir, you're very wrong on two grounds.

1. Retroactive punishment occurs when a law or an ordinance is passed to apporti ...
read full comment

"It is different from retroactive legislation, but it is very correct. Tsikata is right...."

Sorry, Sir, you're very wrong on two grounds.

1. Retroactive punishment occurs when a law or an ordinance is passed to apportion sanction on an action that has already taken place. Retroactive punishment is therefore the consequence of retroactive or post facto legislation.

2. In the particular context of the Election Petition trial, the relevant law on which the petitioners were basing their claims already existed at the time of the 2012 elections. However, Tsatsu's argument is that you cannot punish voters for the failure of electoral officers to do their public duty. That's vicarious penalisation. Pure and simple! As to whether the claim is sound is completely another matter.
Kwame 10 years ago

Mr. P.K. the votes were announced in public in full glare of voters, party agents, local and foreign observes. All the party agents and even radio stations announced the votes, which any person could add together and come to ...
read full comment

Mr. P.K. the votes were announced in public in full glare of voters, party agents, local and foreign observes. All the party agents and even radio stations announced the votes, which any person could add together and come to the same conclusion reached by the EC.
When a presiding officer made mistakes why should it then affect the voter whose vote was before the administrative mistakes on the pink sheet?
The other side of the matter is that every adult in the world have the right to adult universal suffrage, which can not be taken away from his by any court. We stated that a court can not turn a person into a goat and that is a fact that no one can deny.
PK 10 years ago

1. "When a presiding officer made mistakes why should it then affect the voter whose vote was before the administrative mistakes on the pink sheet?"

Kwame, your question actually reinforces my position. If that's Tsatsu's ...
read full comment

1. "When a presiding officer made mistakes why should it then affect the voter whose vote was before the administrative mistakes on the pink sheet?"

Kwame, your question actually reinforces my position. If that's Tsatsu's concern then the term "retroactive penalisation" is a mischaracterisation. Now, as to whether voters cannot be punished for the mistakes of presiding officers is a matter for the judges to decide applying the law. Unfortunately, we're yet to see the reasons behind the way the judges voted. I'd rather wait than speculate, except to say that votes were cancelled in some polling stations where there was an over-vote by one ballot. Certainly, all the voters in those polling stations were punished for the crime or mistake of one voter, don't you think?

Secondly, it's factually untrue that "every adult in the world have the right to adult universal suffrage" (sic).
NANA IS USING BAWUMIA 10 years ago

Tsatsu got his first class degree in law at Legon at the age of 17. At what age did all the ones get their first degrees? 40? 60? 70? So your so-called NPP lawyers are no match for Tsatsu.

Tsatsu got his first class degree in law at Legon at the age of 17. At what age did all the ones get their first degrees? 40? 60? 70? So your so-called NPP lawyers are no match for Tsatsu.
YHO 10 years ago

what about you

what about you
SMOOTH 10 years ago

HE MAY HAVE GOT FIRST CLASS IN LAW, WHAT ABOUT WISDOM?.....HE LACKS WISDOM....

HE MAY HAVE GOT FIRST CLASS IN LAW, WHAT ABOUT WISDOM?.....HE LACKS WISDOM....
Weaklion 10 years ago

Tsatsu got his first class degree in law at legon at the age of 17. That's absolutely lair . After all he is getting paid for himself. What Tsatsu is doing to boost Ghana economy if compare him to Bill Gate and Steve Job ? ...
read full comment

Tsatsu got his first class degree in law at legon at the age of 17. That's absolutely lair . After all he is getting paid for himself. What Tsatsu is doing to boost Ghana economy if compare him to Bill Gate and Steve Job ? Ghana doesn't need corrupt lawyers . Ghana do needs Scientist , Technology and Engineers to move Ghana forward so park Tsatsu Tsikata somewhere.
NANA IS USING BAWUMIA 10 years ago

Tsatsu got his first class degree in law at age 18. That doesn't make any much difference, because at age 18 P. K. Henderson was still in JSS or Middle School.

Tsatsu got his first class degree in law at age 18. That doesn't make any much difference, because at age 18 P. K. Henderson was still in JSS or Middle School.
NANA IS USING BAWUMIA 10 years ago

At the age of 18, P. K. Henderson was still at JSS or Middle School chasing grasscutters. So do not envy Tsatsu.
Inasmuch as I do not agree with Tsatsu naming and trying to shame Justice Anin Yeboah I also do not think you s ...
read full comment

At the age of 18, P. K. Henderson was still at JSS or Middle School chasing grasscutters. So do not envy Tsatsu.
Inasmuch as I do not agree with Tsatsu naming and trying to shame Justice Anin Yeboah I also do not think you should envy Tsatsu that gravely, because he is a genius and the best lawyer Ghana has ever had.
NANAO!! MOTHER 10 years ago

You see when you are lying you always make mistakes like Atuguba reading the final verdit.

You see when you are lying you always make mistakes like Atuguba reading the final verdit.
oppong london 10 years ago

it is too much of seeing this stupid and chimpanzee tsikatas face on ghanaweb,please stop bringing this ewe animal,s news ,we are fed up with this tribal man,s news,an armed robber who was spared jail sentence.

it is too much of seeing this stupid and chimpanzee tsikatas face on ghanaweb,please stop bringing this ewe animal,s news ,we are fed up with this tribal man,s news,an armed robber who was spared jail sentence.
Ben 10 years ago

Mr Oppong London, what would it cost to use decent language? How would we describe you if we could see your face?
No amount of insults will affect the brains of a very intelligent person.

Mr Oppong London, what would it cost to use decent language? How would we describe you if we could see your face?
No amount of insults will affect the brains of a very intelligent person.
PETER 10 years ago

Tsikata an armed robber? Did you forget to take your medication or you over took them?
Tsikata had no class among the lawyers npp assembled. He knows the law more and better than them all.

Tsikata an armed robber? Did you forget to take your medication or you over took them?
Tsikata had no class among the lawyers npp assembled. He knows the law more and better than them all.
painkiller 10 years ago

This is an excellent comment. It is extremely dissapointing to see someone of Tsikata's stature display such catostrophic irresponsibility in selfish pursuit of "self-rehabilitation." All he's achieved by those attacks is op ...
read full comment

This is an excellent comment. It is extremely dissapointing to see someone of Tsikata's stature display such catostrophic irresponsibility in selfish pursuit of "self-rehabilitation." All he's achieved by those attacks is open a can of worms, while further damaging his reputation! Talk about shooting oneself in the foot, and then putting the bloody foot in ones mouth dammit!
PALMWINE SELLER 10 years ago

AM STILL WAITING TO SEE IF ATUBUGABUGA WILL INVITE TSATSU FOR CONTEMPT. MONKEYS PLAY IN SIZES.

AM STILL WAITING TO SEE IF ATUBUGABUGA WILL INVITE TSATSU FOR CONTEMPT. MONKEYS PLAY IN SIZES.
ASANTE 10 years ago

OPPONG LONDON YOU ARE A PIG FOOLISH MAN LIKE YOU YOUR FATHER AND MOTHER BORN YOU PIG IDIOT

OPPONG LONDON YOU ARE A PIG FOOLISH MAN LIKE YOU YOUR FATHER AND MOTHER BORN YOU PIG IDIOT
badawe 10 years ago

hahahahahhahahahahah

hahahahahhahahahahah
Maame Serwaah, Guildford. 10 years ago

Who wants to see this trokosi tribalist whose lips, like all his tribal brothers, corroded with akpeteshie on our screens. Just a look at Tatsu's lips tells you all. They get hooked on ogogro to caary out their evil intention ...
read full comment

Who wants to see this trokosi tribalist whose lips, like all his tribal brothers, corroded with akpeteshie on our screens. Just a look at Tatsu's lips tells you all. They get hooked on ogogro to caary out their evil intentions. We know them. You and i know what these ewes have done to mother Ghana's develpment- one of Nkruma's legacies.
KKO 10 years ago

Tsatsu is just a common criminal. Ironically it was Akufo-Addo's bungling of the charges against him that gave him the leeway to toil with the court system! At least he admitted stealing $2000 of the money to buy shares for h ...
read full comment

Tsatsu is just a common criminal. Ironically it was Akufo-Addo's bungling of the charges against him that gave him the leeway to toil with the court system! At least he admitted stealing $2000 of the money to buy shares for himself. That was enough to show his personal interest in guaranteeing the loan!
BENONY TONY AMEKUDZI, ESQ. 10 years ago

DEAR READING PUBLIC OF GHANAWEB.COM,
THERE IS A WISDOM SAYING THAT "IF YOU LIVED IN A GLASS HOUSE YOU DO NOT THROW STONES" AND THAT AS I AM PERSONALLY AWARE IF IT COMES TO THE PROTECTION OF THE CONSTITUTION IT IS THE RESPONS ...
read full comment

DEAR READING PUBLIC OF GHANAWEB.COM,
THERE IS A WISDOM SAYING THAT "IF YOU LIVED IN A GLASS HOUSE YOU DO NOT THROW STONES" AND THAT AS I AM PERSONALLY AWARE IF IT COMES TO THE PROTECTION OF THE CONSTITUTION IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF EVERY GHANAIAN AND NOT ONLY SOME WHO THINKS THEY ONLY DESERVED THAT ONEROUS PROTECTION.
IT IS AT THESE RELATED BACKDROP THAT I AM RESPECTFULLY RECALLING THAT "NO ONE PERSON IS PARAGON OF LEGAL BRAINS" AND TO PURPORT SUCH NOTION IS ONLY PAROCHIAL THINKING".
THAT SO FAR AS I AM CONCERNED THAT THE LEGAL REASONING BEHIND BOTH COUNSELS OF PETITIONERS AND RESPONDENTS AS WELL AS OUR DEAR LORD JUSTICES TO BE ASCERTAINED BEFORE WE CAN REASONABLY AND HONESTLY PURPORT TO BE CASTING "INSUNNATION" SINCE THE SAME ACCUSATION CAN AND COULD BE LEVELLED AGAINST THE SAME PERSON CASTING THE INSUNNATION.
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
THAT I AM NOT YET APPRISED OF THE FULL JUDGEMENTS OF THE SUPREME COURT" TO FIND OUT WHETHER THAT LEGAL DEFECTS HAVE BEEN CURED OR THE PRESIDENT OF GHANA WAS MADE A LITIGANT IN THE CASE WHICH THE FRAMERS OF GHANA 1992 CONSTITUTION AND PEOPLE OF GHANA NEVER CONTEMPLATED AND THEREFORE CLEARLY PROVIDED FOR THOSE PROVISIONS.
THAT I HAVE ALSO NEVER SEEN IN THE C.I.16 A PROVISION MADE FOR "STATEMENT".
HOWEVER, SINCE LITIGATION SHOULD HAVE FINALITY THAT I AM RESPECTFULLY URGING ALL GOOD PEOPLE OF GHANA AND GHANA'S FRIENDS ALL OVER THE WORLD RATHER TO MAKE SCIENTIFIC, CONSTRUCTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE CASE WHICH WOULD HELP TO CONTRIBUTE TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF GHANA JURISPRUDENCE AND TO PURPORT TO RESORT ON THE CONTRARY WOULD ONLY BE A FRUITLESS AND TIME WASTING EXERCISE.
GOD BLESS GHANA AND LONG LIVE GHANA.
VERY TRULY YOURS,
BENONY TONY AMEKUDZI
INTERNATIONAL LAWYER/LEGAL CONSULTANT
BENCO 10 years ago

TSATSU IS RIGHT YEBOAH WAS THE ONLY ONE WHO CONSISTENTLY VOTED AGAINST RESPONDENTS MOTIONS AND OBJECTIONS BUT TO HIS CREDIT HE JOINED THE 9-0 VERDICTS

TSATSU IS RIGHT YEBOAH WAS THE ONLY ONE WHO CONSISTENTLY VOTED AGAINST RESPONDENTS MOTIONS AND OBJECTIONS BUT TO HIS CREDIT HE JOINED THE 9-0 VERDICTS
NANAO!! MOTHER 10 years ago

It means Anim Yeboah is the only Judge who did not took bribe from your corrupt Mahama.

It means Anim Yeboah is the only Judge who did not took bribe from your corrupt Mahama.
PETER 10 years ago

We understand where you are coming from. On the law, sorry you don't come nowhere near the wizard. You can't contest him.You may try but the world knows the ocean of difference between you and Tsatsu Tsikata. You crooks are s ...
read full comment

We understand where you are coming from. On the law, sorry you don't come nowhere near the wizard. You can't contest him.You may try but the world knows the ocean of difference between you and Tsatsu Tsikata. You crooks are still bitter, huh !
edmondprime, USA 10 years ago

If wise men like Tsatsu speaks, I expect people like you, the author and your NPP scribes to take notes. Its so appalling that you criticize a legal brain. You must pray you olget a single wise man like him in your party. Idi ...
read full comment

If wise men like Tsatsu speaks, I expect people like you, the author and your NPP scribes to take notes. Its so appalling that you criticize a legal brain. You must pray you olget a single wise man like him in your party. Idiotic fool ????
PK 10 years ago

Thankfully, Tastu's rather silly notion, which he made evident in the interview with Mr. Pratt, that he has a "better grasp on legal matters" than his former students can ever dream of attaining doesn't cover me.

1. I wasn ...
read full comment

Thankfully, Tastu's rather silly notion, which he made evident in the interview with Mr. Pratt, that he has a "better grasp on legal matters" than his former students can ever dream of attaining doesn't cover me.

1. I wasn't his student, will never be, so his primitive pedagogical ideas don't affect me, unless he also thinks that no one else can ever study law and become as good as he thinks he is, in which case the man's hubris would be reaching divinely tragic proportions.

2. I studied in the same universities from Tsatsu received his education and also earned a first class. You must see why, while I respect him as an older person, I'm not intimidated by his so-called superior, or rather gnostic, knowledge.

3. Rather than calling me names, like your hero Tsatsu is doing to Justice Anim-Yeboah, you should put forward your own opinion of the matter in contention. Most people would respect a man who disagrees with, even vehemently attacks, the soundness of their argument. Just hope you can do more than joining the Tsatsu Praise Choir!
Yamuah 10 years ago

You people should give us a break over this rubbish. The court matter is over let's think of our daily bread. NPP stay in opposition and come 2016 and lose big time.

You people should give us a break over this rubbish. The court matter is over let's think of our daily bread. NPP stay in opposition and come 2016 and lose big time.
Sam Doku 10 years ago

I applaud Mr. Henderson for an article well researched and brilliantly written except that he flatly muddled and adumbrated his "retroactive penalisation and vicarious penalisation" explanation. If I may ask, is vicarious lia ...
read full comment

I applaud Mr. Henderson for an article well researched and brilliantly written except that he flatly muddled and adumbrated his "retroactive penalisation and vicarious penalisation" explanation. If I may ask, is vicarious liability not a law requiring action to be brought against employers for wrongful acts perpetrated by employees? In this instance, the electoral officers were not employed by the Ghanaian voting public, so I contend that Mr. Tsikata was correct in using the adjective "retroactive" instead of "vicarious." I stand to be corrected.
Bright 10 years ago

I thought there couldn't be any reader to correct this but thank God you are there. Vicarious has no place in this context unless a punishment is being prescribed for the EC due to the failure of its employees committing a to ...
read full comment

I thought there couldn't be any reader to correct this but thank God you are there. Vicarious has no place in this context unless a punishment is being prescribed for the EC due to the failure of its employees committing a tort.
Sam Doku to you, i say Bravo!
New Sherrif in Town 10 years ago

Vicarious because the EC is a Constitutional body set up by "we the people" in whom the 1992 Constitution vested the power to create that animal called EC. The is acts on the behalf of "we the people" and therefore any one th ...
read full comment

Vicarious because the EC is a Constitutional body set up by "we the people" in whom the 1992 Constitution vested the power to create that animal called EC. The is acts on the behalf of "we the people" and therefore any one the EC "delegates" such power to act on it's behalf also works on behalf of "we the people". In context of the EPT both of you must please tell Ghanaians wherein lies Tsikata's "retroactive penalization" when the Constitution of 1992 requires Electoral Officers to sign specific Election Records which they failed to do? Simply those records are not admissible for any legal declaration.
nana addo 10 years ago

you are all ignorant and envy of him

you are all ignorant and envy of him
sani 10 years ago

please Mr. "Hinderson" (or whatever you are called)don't hinder our understanding of law.

"vicarious penalization" is a situation where a person suffers the punishment of another's wrongdoing. For instance, father jailed f ...
read full comment

please Mr. "Hinderson" (or whatever you are called)don't hinder our understanding of law.

"vicarious penalization" is a situation where a person suffers the punishment of another's wrongdoing. For instance, father jailed for son's stealing of a goat. “Retroactive penalization” on the other hand comes about when one made to suffer punishment prescribed by a newly enacted law for committing a crime in the past.

Now to the supreme court chamber. Mr. Henderson, when Mr. Tsikata was arguing his case he made reference to both terms. Although he did not expressly mention "vicarious penalization" it was at the center of his argument.

He pontificated that although the 1992 Constitution mandates a presiding officer to sign the results at the end of the polls it has not indicated what punishment should be visited upon him who fails to do so; neither has it shown a remedy. in that case, per his argument, not even the presiding officer can be punished, talk less of the innocent voters whose inalienable right the petitioners sought to revoke.

Annulling the votes is tantamount to "vicarious penalization" - punishing the voter for the wrongdoing of the presiding officer.

Meanwhile, he stressed that even if the court was to prescribe a punishment for culprit presiding officers, that should be applied prospectively (i.e. to subsequent elections, not retrospectively (i.e. to past elections). That was when he mentioned "retroactive penalization".

He made this point to rule out any possible cancellation of votes.

In any case the petitioners failed miserably to bite at the cherry; why waste your ink and efforts and time writing provocative articles to dent the image of Ghana's legal dinosaur.
New Sherrif in Town 10 years ago

Find some space among the "toilet grabbing fool soldiers" and stop being a dumb linguist of this criminal called Tsatsu

Find some space among the "toilet grabbing fool soldiers" and stop being a dumb linguist of this criminal called Tsatsu
YAW 10 years ago

Be fair to all. Condemn the NPP man too. Why pick on only the NDC man and leave out your NPP man?

Be fair to all. Condemn the NPP man too. Why pick on only the NDC man and leave out your NPP man?
oyinasky 10 years ago

What a brilliant piece. These are the sort of analytical articles' we would like to read on Ghanaweb.

What a brilliant piece. These are the sort of analytical articles' we would like to read on Ghanaweb.
crorkservice 9 years ago

5Ib6E3 wow, awesome article post. Cool.

5Ib6E3 wow, awesome article post. Cool.
crorkz matz 9 years ago

zwzSoV Appreciate you sharing, great blog.Really thank you! Really Great.

zwzSoV Appreciate you sharing, great blog.Really thank you! Really Great.

Comment: Tsikata’s supreme political verdict

Read Comments .st0{display:none;fill:#14BDD3;} .st1{display:none;} .st2{display:inline;fill:#FC0F0F;} .st3{display:inline;fill:#FFFFFF;} .st4{display:inline;fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:6;stroke-miterlimit:10;} Comments (46)

Read Comments Comments (46)