Review after SC verdict not automatic - Sam Okudzeto

Read Comments Comments (10)

• vigour 10 years ago

  Sam Okudjator is a wrong lawyer

  Sam Okudjator is a wrong lawyer

  reply
• frankloy 10 years ago

  Where is he wrong? Would you care to educate us since you appear more knowledgeable than him. From his statement, there are 11 supreme court judges, nine are sitting on this case. So his argument is that if the decision is sp ...
  read full comment

  Where is he wrong? Would you care to educate us since you appear more knowledgeable than him. From his statement, there are 11 supreme court judges, nine are sitting on this case. So his argument is that if the decision is split with a difference of three or more, then a review will be pointless. Secondly it is they who will decide if a review is necessary. This seems to be simple logic.

  reply
• Zoobie-Zoobie 10 years ago

  Thanks for the explanation.

  Thanks for the explanation.

  reply
• OLD SOLDIER 10 years ago

  Author: OBAA YAA
  
  ...So, the people around the president including his wife and those Team “B” staffers were aware of the president failing health. Therefore, who were they kidding when they ruin insults on whoever ques ...
  read full comment

  Author: OBAA YAA
  
  ...So, the people around the president including his wife and those Team “B” staffers were aware of the president failing health. Therefore, who were they kidding when they ruin insults on whoever questions the former president health?
  As much as I hate to admit Rawlings was right with his statement. If they have had listen to those who were concern with the president health, he might be alive today...

  reply
• ECOMINI 10 years ago

  I want to know from someone if there is a review can a judge who ruled in a particular way not change his/her mind during the review process??????

  I want to know from someone if there is a review can a judge who ruled in a particular way not change his/her mind during the review process??????

  reply
• frankloy 10 years ago

  It is possible but highly unlikely. Remember these are the top judges in the country and to be seen to change ones mind on matters of law sends the wrong message. In fact nothing would endanger the legitimacy of the instituti ...
  read full comment

  It is possible but highly unlikely. Remember these are the top judges in the country and to be seen to change ones mind on matters of law sends the wrong message. In fact nothing would endanger the legitimacy of the institution more if that happens. They could be accused of all manner of things.

  reply
• Truth 10 years ago

  It is ok to bring on the review.

  It is ok to bring on the review.

  reply
• Apia 10 years ago

  who knows, if the tally does not end up with more than 50% votes for neither candidate, a runoff may be indicated by the court... fingers crossed.

  who knows, if the tally does not end up with more than 50% votes for neither candidate, a runoff may be indicated by the court... fingers crossed.

  reply
• John 10 years ago

  Why is this man always talking no review, review not necessary, no automatic review? Does he knows the verdict already? Perhaps the judges have told him something. This man is purely an NPP sympathizer and may be he have been ...
  read full comment

  Why is this man always talking no review, review not necessary, no automatic review? Does he knows the verdict already? Perhaps the judges have told him something. This man is purely an NPP sympathizer and may be he have been able to bribed 5 judges perhaps talking about 5-4 verdict. We live to see anyway.

  reply
• Menua Kwadwo 10 years ago

  Unfortunately for Ghana, there are a lot of people like you; your level of comprehension is very low. You have to interject every discourse with a partisan slant. PITY, PITY, PITY!!!!!!!!

  Unfortunately for Ghana, there are a lot of people like you; your level of comprehension is very low. You have to interject every discourse with a partisan slant. PITY, PITY, PITY!!!!!!!!

  reply