Minority attended Appointment Committee meeting- Deputy Chair

Read Comments Comments (16)

• OMari Dominic 11 years ago

  Elephant Patriots] Dr. Michael Buadoo
  Dr. Michael Buadoo Michael@buadoo.com
  I thought it was respectful to let you know where I was going and what I was going to do. I am glad to have served my country in a very small wa ...
  read full comment

  Elephant Patriots] Dr. Michael Buadoo
  Dr. Michael Buadoo Michael@buadoo.com
  I thought it was respectful to let you know where I was going and what I was going to do. I am glad to have served my country in a very small way by supporting my friend, Dr. Papa Kwesi Nduom, and party, Progressive People’s Party, (PPP), with my very little efforts. I however commend the people on the ground who did all the work.
  I look forward to numerous healthy discussions with you, that are geared toward keeping Ghana on a highway to ‘wellness’ and finding ways to make things better for our dear Ghana. I wish to clearly state that I am not here to make statements on behalf of PPP in any way, shape, or form. As many of you know, I was here (in this forum) before PPP was born. It was clear to all then that Dr. Nduom was my friend and I would sport him, if he asked me to, yet that did not impair our ability to participate in healthy discussions here. I am a free man but a loyal team player. I joined Nduom’s group because I believed in their mission, and I stand by all decisions that I make. In the process, I learn from those decisions rely on them to help me be a better man. Brothers and Sister’s I AM BACK!!!
  I went back and read a couple of postings and thought I’d offer my view on some hot topics such as the Electoral Commission (EC) / Supreme Court (SC) issue, MPs Boycott of the vetting process, and the banning of Haruna Mahama from this forum, to see if I can learn more from you: 1. First, I wish to commend the NPP Party for taking on the EC in COURT for an election that could clearly have used a more careful supervision. You have my support on your approach. Ghana has a constitutional process to address such issues and your path demonstrates discipline. Keep it all the way up!
  
  I think It is best if NPP enjoys the backing of all its members and even all who believe in a peaceful democracy. There is a dispute, and you have gone to court to resolve it! Period! Nothing wrong with that at all! It is indeed the only way to go. Let me be clear. I am not saying that NPP will win or lose. I am saying that the process you have chosen to handle this dispute is admirable. The judges, after hearing all the evidence, will decide and we will all be honored.
  
  Also, the NPP flag bearer, Honorable Nana, was nominated by NPP via a credible process, right? If so then one does not have to like him… BUT you must ALL support the NPP legal process throughout and TILL THE END. A party is not owned by any flag bearer. The party is in court. I think all who seek to serve the interest of our nation via the party’s platform must support the party in this proceeding. Not wise to be divided!
  
  A question for those who do not support the party in the EC case SOLELY because they do not like Nana. >>> Do you expect to enjoy the support of those from Nana’s camp when a future flag bearer/candidate is one you favor? Guess what? You may NOT! What will that do to your party? Mess it all up, right? – How then does a part stand tall when it is divided during an external fight? Isn’t keeping your fights internal and presenting a unified front externally the way to go? Think about it!
  
  2. I still need to learn more as to why the NPP MPs in parliament should boycott the vetting process. I have read all the arguments available to me and still do not understand why that is necessary. These are questions that keep coming to mind: a. Will boycotting that constitutional process influence or an attempt to influence the outcome of the court hearing in favor of NPP? I hope this is not NPP’s position because if it is, then NPP may inadvertently be suggesting that it is OK to use any tactic that would influence the outcome of the court’s decision, even if it means violating a constitutional process – if so then what stops the opponent from using their own evasive tactics?
  
  I therefore suggest that the MPs stay to fulfill their oath of office and let the process move forward. It is a very important process and I do not see any legal ground to violet it. That is certainly not the process, stated in our constitution, for addressing such issues. Unless there is God himself amongst the group who knows the outcome, then what if NDC/EC wins the court case? Wouldn’t NPP MPs then have wrongly failed Ghanaians?
  b. If the court rules in favor of NPP, will the current government step down? (they will !!! and there is a process to ensure that – so why boycott a constitutional process that we are all fighting to defend via the same constitutional provision. Does NPP choose and pick what parts of the constitution to adhere and which park to violet?
  
  I have read the arguments and the various convincing scenario’s that have been offered but I will be grateful is someone can answer my question above on legal grounds ONLY. Is it not that basic principle that NPP is in court to defend to which many none NPP individuals such as myself encourage? - Until I learn otherwise many of us will be very disappointed if the NPP MP’s boycott the vetting process. 3. The call for any party to start preparing for 2016, regardless of who is making that call, or whether or not there are other ongoing activities, is not a bad idea at all, or is it? What is wrong with it? Will there not be an election in 2016 whether or not NPP wins the EC legal case? Can’t a party, full of resources and talents, not handle multiple activities of this nature at the same time? How does it benefit or hurt the legal process if there are other party members who are available to start strategizing for the 2016 elections? Why should any party wait when others are strategizing? Should all of NPP be consumed by this one legal process?
  
  Granted, some like Nana, others like Allan and Kuffour etc etc….. of what relevance does that have to do with proceeding with strategies that will surely benefit a time ahead that will surely come, ill respective of the preferences of those who are calling for 2016 planning? Do you say no to such a wise advice just because the origin does not support Nana? Can’t both processes parallel in the interest of a party? Where is the central committee? Take away emotions and one may see what I see.
  
  4. Banning Haruna Mahama from this forum: I think you have made this guy a star by the amount of energy spent on his case in this forum. I humbly wish to say however, that I still do not know what specific rule of this forum he has violated. I will share why in my next posting.
  
  Cheers, Michael

  reply
• TerriblY Spe cifiC 11 years ago

  WHY DOES THIS MAN CONTINUE TO CRY FOUL ANYTIME HE LOSES AND ELECTION? WHY DID HE NOT CRY FOUL IN THE 2000 AND 2004 ELECTIONS EVEN THOUGH THERE WERE PETTY PROBLEMS DURING THOSE ELECTIONS. WE ARE FED UP WITH A PREZ. CANDIDATE A ...
  read full comment

  WHY DOES THIS MAN CONTINUE TO CRY FOUL ANYTIME HE LOSES AND ELECTION? WHY DID HE NOT CRY FOUL IN THE 2000 AND 2004 ELECTIONS EVEN THOUGH THERE WERE PETTY PROBLEMS DURING THOSE ELECTIONS. WE ARE FED UP WITH A PREZ. CANDIDATE AND PARTY WHO ONLY CRY WHEN DEFEAT DROPS IN THEIR MIST.

  reply
• OMari Dominic 11 years ago

  The Supreme Court has power to remove Mahama from office and make Akufo Addo President.
  We know that when big masquerades appear, little ones take to their heels. Nobody has and will ever dispute the fact that those who sta ...
  read full comment

  The Supreme Court has power to remove Mahama from office and make Akufo Addo President.
  We know that when big masquerades appear, little ones take to their heels. Nobody has and will ever dispute the fact that those who start running usually start walking and in most times, crawl? Is it not equally true that neither the Amalgamation of Nefarious Alliance against Democratic Dividends nor a conglomerate of deficient and criminally-minded persons have ever succeeded in any part of the world? The Nefarious Destructive Cancer seems to have forgotten one important thing and it is better they are reminded to enable them come to the realization that a day of reckoning awaits them and that the day the lion is fatally crippled will be the day the sheep will go to demand what rightly belongs to it. Surely, there can be no peace without justice.
  But it is a sad phenomenon today to realize that this cardinal principle has been thrown overboard by Ghanaians. Our philosophy of being one another’s keeper is no longer tenable. Negative Politics has taken the better part of us for everything one does or think is hinged on that.
  The December 7, 2012 Elections have come but the reverberations are still with us. The New Patriotic Party which happens to be the largest opposition party in the country has smelt a rat in the conduct of the elections and is in court to challenge its outcome. All eyes will from now on be feasted on the Supreme Court which is the final adjudicator of the case.
  The likely scenario at the Supreme Court: There are four likely scenarios to emerge from the petition at the Supreme Court. These are –
  The petition can be thrown out due to lack of evidence. Under that scenario, the status quo remains.
  The results from polling stations where irregularities took place can be annulled and fresh elections ordered.
  It can order a Re-Run Elections between the top contenders in the last elections.
  The Supreme Court can order that Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo Addo won the elections and should be sworn in as President.
  Nigeria as a Test Case: I have been an expert on Nigerian politics and have chosen to use the country as a test case because we share a common history and ancestry with that country. We cannot discount the fact that when Nigeria sneezes, Ghana catches cold. Recently, when there was gas shortage in the country, President John Mahama quickly rushed to Nigeria to have discussion with the country’s political leadership on how to remedy the situation here in Ghana.
  Nigeria was the first to stage a coup d’état in 1965. Ghana followed suit in 1966. The two countries have had a history of expelling nationalities of other African countries from its territory. Ghana first did it in 1969. Nigeria retaliated twice in quick succession. Ghana was the first of the two countries to hand over power from the Military to a civilian administration when in 1969 the NLC’s Three Member Presidential Commission led by Lt. Gen. Okatakyie Akwasi Amankwaa Afrifah handed over power to Prime Minister Kofi Abrefa Busia in 1969. Twenty years later, Nigeria’s Matthew Aremu Okikiade Olusegun Obasanjo of the Supreme Military Council Handed over power to the newly elected President, Alhaji Shehu Shagari of the National Party of Nigeria (NPN).
  Nigeria introduced the National Service Scheme and Ghana quickly followed suit. Nigeria began the concept of the JSS& SSS concept and Ghana had no choice but to tag along. Here, it must be stated that one or two English speaking West African Countries had earlier taken the lead before Nigeria. Again, it was Nigeria that mooted the ECOMOG idea and Ghana joined. What about the National Road Safety Corps? It was Nigeria First, Ghana Second. The same with the Nigerian National Petroleum Corporation! Ghana now has the Ghana National Petroleum Corporation whose one time Chairman, Tsatsu Tsikata was sacked by Jerry Rawlings at the twilight of the First NDC’s administration.
  Nigeria is yet to execute any of its past leaders for alleged acts of embezzlement, corruption and dissipation of public funds. Ghana had in 1979 executed eight high ranking military men including three former heads of states. We must however not overlook the fact that in the Eighties Nigeria had executed more than sixty soldiers and civilians for their complicity in a coup attempt to remove the evil genius of a President, General Ibrahim Badamosi Babaginda and his Vice, Admiral Augustus Aikhomu from power. But enough of the comparison!
  The country called Nigeria: It is a Federal State, made up of 36 States with Abuja as its capital. The status of Abuja is like that of Washington DC. The country has an Executive President assisted by a Vice President and an Executive Council made up of Ministers. In appointing Ministers, the issue of Federal Character is strictly adhered to, for each State of the Federation has to be represented. The Government is modeled on that of the United States. It has a bi-cameral legislature, made up of the Senate and the House of Representatives. Each State is represented by Two Senators. Representation in the House of Representatives is based on population - for the larger the population the larger its representation at the House of Representatives.
  State Governors: Each State is administered by a Governor, assisted by a Deputy who is elected on the ticket of a political party by the citizens of the State. Its le legislative functions are performed by the State Legislature headed by the Speaker.
  Many of the State Governors have been removed from office due to proven acts of voting irregularities, including blatant rigging. The following are examples of how different State Election Petition Tribunals and the Courts of Appeal handled cases in respective states of the Federation. We should not forget that in a Federal States, Governors wield executive powers similar to those held by Presidents of countries like Ghana.
  Anambra State: Dr Chris Ngige of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) was sworn in as Governor in May, 2003. He fell out with his God-father, Chris Ubah. In the heat of the confusion, Chris Ubah had stated publicly that he would tell the true story of how the PDP won the election and how it did not win the elections. Peter Obi of the All People’s Grand Alliance (APGA) filed a writ challenging the declaration of Dr Ngige as winner of the 2003 Gubernatorial Elections. In March 2006, the Court of Appeal sitting in Enugu declared that Ngige’s electoral victory in 2003 was fraudulent. Peter Obi was then sworn in as Governor when his submission that he had scored majority of votes cast in the Anambra Gubernatorial Election was upheld by the court.
  He had only served for nearly one year out of his Four Year mandate when the Electoral Commission ordered a General Election thereby bringing his tenure to a premature end. Andy Ubah of the PDP was elected Governor and sworn in May, 2007. Peter Obi brought an action at the Federal High Court challenging INEC decision to hold gubernatorial election in Anambra State, arguing that his tenure would end in March 2010, rather than 2007, having taken the Oath of Office on 17th March, 2006. His petition was thrown out at both the Federal High Court and the Court of Appeal. On further appeal before the Supreme Court in June 2007, the Court ordered his re-instatement on grounds that his tenure would start on the day when he took the Oath of Office.
  Osun State: Prince Olagunsoye Oyinlola of the PDP became Governor in May, 2003 and was re-elected in 2007. Rauf Aregbesola initiated a petition against the election and declaration, but the State Election Petion Tribunal threw the case out. He appealed again and fresh hearing started in 2009. Governor Oyinlola was caught on tape telling local PDP politicians on how he would supply army uniforms, arms and ammunition to party foot soldiers so that they could rig the re-run elections in nearby Ekiti State.
  On November 26, 2010, the Court of Appeal sitting in Ibadan and presided over by Justice Clara Ogunbiyi ruled that Oyinlola had not won the 2007 Gubernatorial Election and that Rauf Aregbesola of the Action Congress of Nigeria (ACN) be sworn in as Governor.
  Ondo State: Olusegun Agagu of the PDP was declared winner of the April 2007 Gubernatorial Election by INEC. The candidate of the Labour Party, Dr Olusegun Rahman Mimiko challenged the results of the declared election.
  On July 25, 2007, the Ondo Stat Election Petition Tribunal, chaired by Justice Garba Nabaninwa sacked Agagu from office after discounting invalid votes in 3 Local Government Areas. The Tribunal found out that Olusegun Agagu had 128, 669 votes against Rahman Mimiko’s 198, 269 votes. It ordered that Mimiko be sworn in as Governor.
  Ekiti State: On 26th September, 2006, the State House of Assembly impeached Governor Ayo Fayose of the PDP and his Deputy, Mrs. Abiodun Christine Olujumi on charges of gross misconduct.
  On 19th October, 2006, President Obasanjo declared a State of Emergency and appointed Lieutenant Colonel Tunji Olorun as Sole Administrator. He was replaced by Tope Ademuluye in 2007.
  Olusegun Oni was elected Governor in April, 2007. The Action Congress Party’s candidate, Dr. Fayemi Kayomi challenged the results. The Tribunal ordered a cancellation of the results in 63 wards and ordered a Re-Run in the affected wards. The State Electoral Commissioner refused to announce the results alleging fraud and went into temporary hiding. The incumbent Governor, Olusegun Oni won in May, 2010 by a split decision of 3 to 2 at the election Tribunal.
  Not satisfied with the judgement, Dr Kayomi appealed at the Appeal Curt, which is the final adjudicator of gubernatorial elections. On September 14, 2010, the Court declared Dr Fayemi Kayomi as Governor after nearly three and half years of legal battle.
  Edo State: In the April 2007 Gubernatorial Elections, Dr Oserheimen Osunbor of the PDP was declared winner over Comrade Adams Aliyu Oshiomole of the Action Congress of Nigeria by the Independent National Election Commission (INEC). Comrade Oshiomole contested the outcome in court. On March 20, 2008, Edo State Election Petition Tribunal nullified the election of Osunbor and declared Oshiomole the winner.
  On November 11, 2008, a Federal Appeal Court, sitting in Benin City upheld the ruling of the State Elections Petition Tribunal declaring Comrade Adams Aliyu Oshiomole to be Governor of Edo State. The decision was based on several voting irregularities.
  The Ghanaian situation: I have given these copious examples to illustrate how the court system works in various African countries of which Ghana is one. The write up is to serve as a precursor and prepare the minds of the citizenry on the likely consequences of the Supreme Court’s decision.
  Alhaji Bature’s assertion: I vehemently disagree with the assertion by Alhaji Bature that the Supreme Court cannot declare Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo Addo winner of the December 7, 2012 Presidential Elections, if evidence points to the fact that he obtained the highest number of valid votes cast. Evidence abounds in the examples I have given. In the case of Ondo State, the court even gave the exact number of votes gained by the contending parties.
  Alhaji Bature by his assertion is attempting to throw dust into the eyes of Ghanaians. It is mischievous and if not challenged and rebuffed, is bound to cause chaos and confusion in the likely event of the Supreme declaring Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo Addo as President–Elect. Alhaji Bature’s assertion has been echoed by other devious characters like THE TRAITOR Kwasi Pratt and the turn coat Kakra Essamuah.
  Unnecessary delay at the court’s proceedings will be meaningless: Any of the contending parties, especially the NDC can adopt all the delay tactics in its arsenals, but it will amount to nothing. No amount of ‘filibusting’ can prevent the Crossing of the Rubicon. The pragmatic forward march of the progressive forces cannot and will never be halted by any amalgamation of Nefarious Alliance Against Democratic Dividends.
  People are under the erroneous impression that if the court process is not concluded within four years, that will be the end of the matter. But that is not correct. The mandate of the President is Four Years. Therefore, if even the case is concluded in December 2013 and Nana is sworn in as President in January, 2014, his mandate will expire in January 2017, not in January 2016 as is the belief amongst members of the Nefarious Destructive Cancer. To such people I advise them to face reality and not be taken in by the propaganda of agents from the kingdom of darkness who are out to win converts for their rapidly shrinking kingdom.
  Need to enact a law to punish EC officials who aid or abet in rigging elections: I am very optimistic that the Supreme Court’s verdict will make it necessary for an amendment to the electoral laws to be effected. The verdict, if it goes against President Mahama and the EC will open a can of worms whose cancerous spread can only be checked by meting out stiffer punishment to staff of the EC and anybody who aids or abets in rigging elections to make it possible for an unpopular candidate to emerge. This of course, includes the Commissioner himself.
  Parliament should start thinking of enacting a Law to establish a Special judicial body to ensure enforcement of the Court’s verdict, should it go against the incumbent government.
  No need to panic: There appears to be a glimmer of hope at the end of the tunnel. It is hoped that the two contending parties will willingly accept the court’s verdict whichever way it goes. Both parties were signatories to the Memorandum of Understanding signed in Kumasi. Thus, the call on both parties, especially the President to give an undertaking to abide by the verdict is neither here nor there. Both have already committed themselves.
  Conclusion: Ghanaians expect nothing but the truth from the Nine Eminent Judges of the Supreme Court who will adjudicate over the petition. The future survival of this great country of ours depends on their arriving at a fair decision which will be acceptable to all including the international community. We therefore pray that in arriving at such a decision, the Judges will be guided by the principle of fairness, transparency and the Fear of God.
  Daniel Danquah Damptey. (0243715297)
  (damptey_daniel@yahoo.com) (danieldanquah_damptey@yahoo.com)

  reply
• Sam 11 years ago

  They went there not to make any meaningful contributions towards the issues under discussion but for them to sign-in as present at the meeting, and by extension, be able to collect the sitting allowance.
  THIEVES!!!!!!!

  They went there not to make any meaningful contributions towards the issues under discussion but for them to sign-in as present at the meeting, and by extension, be able to collect the sitting allowance.
  THIEVES!!!!!!!

  reply
• John KOFFISON 11 years ago

  IS NPP FINALLY BECOMING NONSENSE PEOPLE PARTY?
  The word nonsense means exposing a behavior, or language that is foolish or absurd; or using insolent language, or engaging in a conduct that is absurd or contrary to good sense ...
  read full comment

  IS NPP FINALLY BECOMING NONSENSE PEOPLE PARTY?
  The word nonsense means exposing a behavior, or language that is foolish or absurd; or using insolent language, or engaging in a conduct that is absurd or contrary to good sense. It also means acting like a clown.
  
  From NPP’s bogus agenda which include the following irrational key elements “all die be die”, hostel to Kayaye and Free SHS to its tuggish behavior after the proclamation of the election results in Ghana, I stated questioning myself whether this losing party which still tries to keep its head above the water is finally becoming a Nonsense People Party?
  
  Unfortunately, in human society, we have to cohabitate with losers and nonsense people even though their behavior does not only prevent the development of their potential, it eventually destroys them. No one is born a loser. Losers are made, not born; and you have to work at it and it appears that NPP is working hard to remain a losing and nonsense people party. By doing so, they become a source of much pain and frustration to those who love them.
  
  A nonsense loser has characteristics that will show he will prove it over and over, because that is what he is, and that is the way he thinks, he will just continue losing and saying he is proud and nonsense loser. Nonsense losers disagree with everyone, the people who elected democratically their president, the Electoral Commission, the President, the Court, etc.. OMG (Oh My God) the nonsense losers are really a pain in the neck, but we have to accept them!
  
  There are definitive patterns and indicators. If the person you are wondering about possesses even one of the following warning signs, then he or she is a loser and I will illustrate these indicators with some facts from Michael J.K. Bokor taken from his article: “Compelling reasons why Akufo-Addo must be rejected”
  ? A loser displays any sort of hostility or aggression especially when unwarranted and unreasonable.
  ? Displays bizarre behavior. (Take it from me. Akufo-Addo hasn’t given us any convincing justification to warrant his being elected President. All he has done is to bandy about extravagant and fulsome promises, hoping that they will be snapped up by the electorate. He is more invested in dangling promises than demonstrating that he is a more capable candidate for the job. Extravagant and politically motivated promises don’t build countries)
  ? Displays blatant selfishness. (Every sane person should be very much shocked if the electorate buy into these vain promises to elect him. The explanation is simple.)
  ? Is a judgmental and critical immoralist. (Since leaving Kufuor’s government—driven by the morbid ambition he is now pursuing after an unimpressive performance—he has not added any value to himself nor purged himself of all the obnoxious impressions that have dented his public image thus far.)
  ? Commits illegal acts (such as involvement with drugs or other criminal behavior.
  ? Has a restricted range of conversation in general and cannot make decisions without consulting a family member (e.g. The party’s Council of Elders will meet Tuesday to decide whether to go to court or concede defeat in the December polls.).
  ? Has a cruel sense of humor such as “all die be die”.
  ? Is voted out by his or her peers.
  ? Has no interest in hearing the point of view of others.
  ? Engages in juvenile attempts to win the attention and affection of others, and this at all cost.
  ? Is disrespectful to others, even to the Duly Elected President of the country they live in.
  
  The losers really lose it. They get mad easily, blow up, and do dangerous things like threaten others. Though the losers promptly assures you that they are not angry with you, but at others or the situation, you can be sure that their hostility and violence will eventually be directed at you. We have seen it all with NPP and unless the real leaders of this party assume their leadership, their party will be known as Nonsense People Party with no serious voice.

  reply
• ADAMA 11 years ago

  BTW, THIS IS DRUG INDUCED PSYCHOSIS!!!

  BTW, THIS IS DRUG INDUCED PSYCHOSIS!!!

  reply
• JAMES Y 11 years ago

  Perhaps, NPP have thought twice about their incredible decision not to take part in the vetting of the ministerial appointees.

  Perhaps, NPP have thought twice about their incredible decision not to take part in the vetting of the ministerial appointees.

  reply
• ADAMA 11 years ago

  YES THEY THOUGHT TWICE ABOUT GETTING THEIR SALARIES!!! CONFUSED PARTY OF GREEDY AND SELFISH BASTARDS!!!!

  YES THEY THOUGHT TWICE ABOUT GETTING THEIR SALARIES!!! CONFUSED PARTY OF GREEDY AND SELFISH BASTARDS!!!!

  reply
• PRINCE 11 years ago

  NPP DOES NOT EAT GOAT MEAT, IT ONLY TAKES GOAT SOUP. FINALLY, THEY ATTENDED THE VETTING COMMITTEE'S SITTING. WHY CAN'T YOU PEOPLE TELL YOUR FOOLISH SUPPORTERS THE TRUTH. IDIOTS.

  NPP DOES NOT EAT GOAT MEAT, IT ONLY TAKES GOAT SOUP. FINALLY, THEY ATTENDED THE VETTING COMMITTEE'S SITTING. WHY CAN'T YOU PEOPLE TELL YOUR FOOLISH SUPPORTERS THE TRUTH. IDIOTS.

  reply
• OMANNI ASARE 11 years ago

  Alfred seems have no idea what Dominic had put to the public for the past days,BOYCOTT,GBA do not to tell NPP motive of their case and should seal their mouth,bastards group with face shield.

  Alfred seems have no idea what Dominic had put to the public for the past days,BOYCOTT,GBA do not to tell NPP motive of their case and should seal their mouth,bastards group with face shield.

  reply
• FORTUNE TELLER 11 years ago

  DO NOT BE DECEIVED BY THE PRESENCE OF THE NPP AT THE MEETING. THEY WERE JUST THERE TO SEE IF THEY COULD ALSO LAY THEIR HANDS ON ANY INCRIMINATING MATERIALS FROM THE PUBLIC SENT AGAINST ANY OF THE MEMBERS TO BE VETTED. THIS TH ...
  read full comment

  DO NOT BE DECEIVED BY THE PRESENCE OF THE NPP AT THE MEETING. THEY WERE JUST THERE TO SEE IF THEY COULD ALSO LAY THEIR HANDS ON ANY INCRIMINATING MATERIALS FROM THE PUBLIC SENT AGAINST ANY OF THE MEMBERS TO BE VETTED. THIS THEY WILL USE TO START THEIR SMEARING CAMPAIGN SOON WITH. OH NPP. ALWAYS FULL OF VENGEANCE AND EVIL. JUST LISTEN TO HOW ANY NPP PERSON ARGUES.

  reply
• Abudu i Adam 11 years ago

  Astrong opposition keep the balance of power by bringing checks & balance s, excessive government spending
  
  It's very important to scrutize these ministers , therefore as u fight the court battle make those electorates pro ...
  read full comment

  Astrong opposition keep the balance of power by bringing checks & balance s, excessive government spending
  
  It's very important to scrutize these ministers , therefore as u fight the court battle make those electorates proud by participating in goverance of the country

  reply
• Oboye the Great 11 years ago

  If the minority MP's are boycotting vetting proses,then what is the need to take part in its meetings and for what?

  If the minority MP's are boycotting vetting proses,then what is the need to take part in its meetings and for what?

  reply
• WILLY 11 years ago

  That is what Dr.Wereko said.they are a bunch of gimmicks who know no shame.If I were them I wouls stand by my words not to participate in the vetting.Come 2016,they will all lose their seats.We put them there for our developm ...
  read full comment

  That is what Dr.Wereko said.they are a bunch of gimmicks who know no shame.If I were them I wouls stand by my words not to participate in the vetting.Come 2016,they will all lose their seats.We put them there for our developments,but hey thougt it otherwise.Seeking their selfish interest and so forth.Yes, NPP is doomed forever for as long as the party hierarchies are afraid of these Akyem Mafias, led by Akufo Addo.

  reply
• WILLIAM 11 years ago

  The Ministers-designate have a lot of work waiting for them. Please confirm them early for better Ghana agenda to be advanced.

  The Ministers-designate have a lot of work waiting for them. Please confirm them early for better Ghana agenda to be advanced.

  reply
• HAWA YAKUBU 11 years ago

  You guys better listen to Mr. Tarzan and stop all this bullshit and go home and prepare for 2016

  You guys better listen to Mr. Tarzan and stop all this bullshit and go home and prepare for 2016

  reply