General News of Friday, 7 September 2012
Source: Anas Aremeyaw Anas
‘Dr.’ Joshua Drah, the now infamous medical assistant who had been illegally operating an illegal abortion clinic – Universal Mission Clinic – conducting 1000s of abortions whiles having sex with some clients gave reasons for which he had to have sex with his clients.
That has brought into perspective the question of whether or not, his actions amounted to consensual sex with the consent of the clients or otherwise.
According to the raw footage that our hidden cameras captured from his abortion room, the man was seen almost always seated whiles several girls and young women came in one after the other to be operated upon.
He would however not start having sex with any lady that he wished to have sex with, he usually started by inserting his gloved hands into the female birth path repeatedly, then he began to give several excuses why he had to have sex with the patient in question.
Amongst many reasons that Drah used to have his sexual demands acceded to were, it would serve as an anesthesia for the pain that was likely to be experienced during the abortion and also to push off membranes that were obstructing ‘safe abortions,’ that could in the long run affect the womb.
Meanwhile, a legal practitioner has been speaking to the New crusading GUIDE on the issue of consent, according to him; the type of consent that Drah attained could at best be described as induced and laced with false pretence.
He dilates further on the issue by stating that consent in law was supposed to be voluntary and without duress from a free thinking adult; “but in a condition where a person is under treatment and the person supposed to be a doctor uses sex as a locus for treatment, that certainly cannot be legal consent.”
“For all intends and purposes, the person walked in for a medical treatment without sex in mind, in the middle of the treatment sex is used as a treatment? Such ‘consent’ is clearly under the mistaken belief of medical treatment,” he added.
According to him, legal authorities have spoken on this issue extensively and called on fellow lawyers to help delve deeper into the issue and to educate the citizenry on it.
The New Crusading GUIDE would follow the trial of Drah and would keep readers updated. Stay tuned.
Following is a transcription of two separate encounters during which he managed to convince two young ladies to allow him to have sex with them in the middle of an operation.
Doctor: It’s been a long time since you did the ‘thing’
Patient: What did you say?
Doctor: You did the ‘thing’ a long time ago.
Patient: You said I did what?
Doctor: You haven’t had sex in a long while.
Doctor: Eii! Your ‘thing’ is cute. If you won’t mind let’s have sex to open you up.
Patient: You said?
Doctor: I said if you won’t mind let’s have sex so that it will open you up.
Doctor: Or you don’t like that. Let me check and see. I’m doing this but the thing is rather closing up, why? Mm!
Patient: I don’t know.
Doctor: I’m inserting my fingers in there but it is still closing up why?
Patient: I don’t know.
Doctor: I have to do the ‘thing’ to open it up and you are saying no. I’ll just have to put it in there one, two, three that’s it, and then it will open up.
Doctor: should I put it inside? Are you sure? Then come forward so I will put it inside. When I put it in there ‘one, two, three’ then that is it, it will be ok.
Doctor: Did you take the medicine?
Patient: That very morning I told you I was feeling dizzy
Doctor: I am inserting my hand but it is not working
Doctor: There is a membrane covering your this thing …
Patient: Hm …
Doctor: I can only remove it by having sex with you to push it aside, should I; if I don’t, I can’t do the operation for you
So, were the several sexual bouts that he engaged clients in, consensual?