Na lie. Has this dermatologist hear of randomised controlled trials. Evidence based medicine does not rely on such impressions
Na lie. Has this dermatologist hear of randomised controlled trials. Evidence based medicine does not rely on such impressions
Barrister 7 years ago
hmmm smartphones, so what should we do now? ladies are fond of taking selfies paa oo
hmmm smartphones, so what should we do now? ladies are fond of taking selfies paa oo
Lapiiwa 7 years ago
@Barrister, who said ladies are the worst victims? A boy I know even prefers to video himself often
@Barrister, who said ladies are the worst victims? A boy I know even prefers to video himself often
Concerned Citizen 7 years ago
This heading is misleading. The camera part of your phone has nothing to do with this electromagnetic radiation that the article is talking about. It is the phone itself. Whether it has a camera or not is irrelevant. We've kn ... read full comment
This heading is misleading. The camera part of your phone has nothing to do with this electromagnetic radiation that the article is talking about. It is the phone itself. Whether it has a camera or not is irrelevant. We've known this from long ago.
then is serious
Na lie. Has this dermatologist hear of randomised controlled trials. Evidence based medicine does not rely on such impressions
hmmm smartphones, so what should we do now? ladies are fond of taking selfies paa oo
@Barrister, who said ladies are the worst victims? A boy I know even prefers to video himself often
This heading is misleading. The camera part of your phone has nothing to do with this electromagnetic radiation that the article is talking about. It is the phone itself. Whether it has a camera or not is irrelevant. We've kn ...
read full comment