Why Kwame Nkrumah's cure for ethnic bigotry was counter-productive

Read Article

Comments (11)

This article is closed for comments.

Read Comments Comments (11)

Repugnant. 7 years ago

Did you cut and paste this nonsense under duress? You made no sense at all.

Your venality toward Nkrumah has not worked and has been rather 'counterproductive' at best. Get lost with your lunatic logic.

Did you cut and paste this nonsense under duress? You made no sense at all.

Your venality toward Nkrumah has not worked and has been rather 'counterproductive' at best. Get lost with your lunatic logic.
Kroket 7 years ago

So why do Labadi Ga folks feel "superior" to Bukom Ga folks, or why do Saltpond Fantes roll their eyes when they hear about Sweduru Fantes?

Even in your esteemed London, there are all those cockney, Irish, Welsh and Scotti ...
read full comment

So why do Labadi Ga folks feel "superior" to Bukom Ga folks, or why do Saltpond Fantes roll their eyes when they hear about Sweduru Fantes?

Even in your esteemed London, there are all those cockney, Irish, Welsh and Scottish "scales" of upward branding!
G. K. Berko 7 years ago

I am disappointed by the waste of such eloquence of the author's on so weak a logical premise.

To be concise, bigotry comes in various forms and the seeming umbrella definition that the author gave does not capture it al ...
read full comment

I am disappointed by the waste of such eloquence of the author's on so weak a logical premise.

To be concise, bigotry comes in various forms and the seeming umbrella definition that the author gave does not capture it all.

Besides, in curing any disease, its symptomatic manifestations first might need to be controlled even as the root cause is being vigorously pursued for uprooting.

The notion projected by the author that there is no need for constricting the avenues of disseminating the effect of bigotry, and that the measures taken by Nkrumah in that regard, as enumerated by the author were needless, exposes the shallowness of the author himself in his knowledge of what bigotry really is and what its possible causes are.

If the author does not think the solutions Nkrumah and others applied to curb bigotry in their respective Nations were not appropriate, why did he not tell us what he thinks could be better solutions? The author seems to be content with just leaving things as they were, and not doing anything about any perceived bigotry or the ethnocentrism that he pegs against the former behavior.

Furthermore, the solutions for mitigating racism or ethnocentrism may well be applicable in some environments to bigotry, at least, in some of its forms. Some medicines, for example, could cure more than one ailment. Some might have been originally discovered a particular sickness and later found to be effective in curing other sicknesses, as well.

The mere fact that bigotry does not manifest itself in other situations of some various interacting groups does not form any rational basis for disputing the existence, or the potential eruption, of bigotry in other places between other different groups. And one thing the author ought to learn is that different Countries adopt whatever different combinations of measures to mitigate bigotry among their folks, given their special or unique circumstances and characteristics of the relationships existing within individual Countries.
Different factors might fuel bigotry in different Countries or between different sets of interacting groups.

The author could have zoned in on particular solutions that Ghana's Nkrumah applied to curb bigotry but failed. In that case, we could all contribute more effectively in discussing whether those measures really failed or not. Moreover, the author should have considered the fact that measures that would work on certain problems at some particular period may be less or no longer effective on the same problems in another period. Then, also, one has to check if the chosen measures were continued or discontinued at some point. If the measures were discontinued, or tweaked in some way that failed to take into account certain factors fueling the problem, those measures would not work well.

So, if, by the article, the author were only searching for something to discredit Nkrumah and his peers with, he has woefully shot off target.

Long Live Ghana!!!
G. K. Berko 7 years ago

I meant to say:
1). "..in their respective Nations were appropriate,.."
2). "... Some might have been originally discovered FOR a particular sickness and later..."

I meant to say:
1). "..in their respective Nations were appropriate,.."
2). "... Some might have been originally discovered FOR a particular sickness and later..."
GORGORDUTOR 7 years ago

Thank you Mr Berko! Respeek

Thank you Mr Berko! Respeek
Sober 7 years ago

Loool ..... aaa gyeih! Looooool .....

Loool ..... aaa gyeih! Looooool .....
Prempeh 7 years ago

Mr. Simons should have known better. Nkrumah is perfect and nothing he did was wrong. Everything would have worked but for the sabotage of my people.

Why waste your time Mr. Simons.? I fully understand where you are co ...
read full comment

Mr. Simons should have known better. Nkrumah is perfect and nothing he did was wrong. Everything would have worked but for the sabotage of my people.

Why waste your time Mr. Simons.? I fully understand where you are coming from and I can tell you when Ghanaians from different tribes meet abroad they often live together happily and very supportive of one another. Your premise of territorial defence, and all other forms of defence holds perfectly. I think when we travel we carry one identity and the same concept of converging for self defence applies there. A private bank in Ghana was alarmed at the presence of people from one particular tribe and decided to do something about it. I think others would have understood you better had you not brought in Nkrumah. In case you didnt know, he was a perfect man and you hurt the feeling of many if you try to find fault with anything he did.
Brukus 7 years ago

Cynical nonsense!

See how what Nkrumah left behind, has degenerated into, despite HIPC benefits and all the other CL&S NDC schemes!

Cynical nonsense!

See how what Nkrumah left behind, has degenerated into, despite HIPC benefits and all the other CL&S NDC schemes!
Nyame Dua 7 years ago

So sad I've wasted five minutes of my life on this fool. Ghanaweb must respect the great Kwame Nkrumah and stop putting his image on anything at all

So sad I've wasted five minutes of my life on this fool. Ghanaweb must respect the great Kwame Nkrumah and stop putting his image on anything at all
Sarkodie Obidi GTP Rapper 7 years ago

Am hear to learn.
Bro)fo nie

Am hear to learn.
Bro)fo nie
Kwadwo Poku 7 years ago

A very convoluted write up. A bonkum
couch in sophistry.

A very convoluted write up. A bonkum
couch in sophistry.

Why Kwame Nkrumah's cure for ethnic bigotry was counter-productive

Read Comments .st0{display:none;fill:#14BDD3;} .st1{display:none;} .st2{display:inline;fill:#FC0F0F;} .st3{display:inline;fill:#FFFFFF;} .st4{display:inline;fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:6;stroke-miterlimit:10;} Comments (11)

Read Comments Comments (11)