Re-evaluating the Boko Haram conflict

Read Comments Comments (3)

• Captain Jean-Luc Picard 8 years ago

  "The truth is that terrorism is rarely easily defeated in any country."
  
  That sums up the greatest truth about terrorism. This means that even if the nation-building process succeeds and the present groups of de-Nigerianize ...
  read full comment

  "The truth is that terrorism is rarely easily defeated in any country."
  
  That sums up the greatest truth about terrorism. This means that even if the nation-building process succeeds and the present groups of de-Nigerianized Nigerians feel the properly belong to the hood, there will still be some odd ones who will feel they want to go their own ways. As it is, Boko Haram can NEVER be completely defeated but they can be pushed to the extreme where they remain only a minor nuisance. That should be the aim rather than a complete victory. I think that has also been part of your argument - not talking about a complete victory.
  
  Then there is the intelligence work which is like half the battle. It is this, and the experiences of the real live battles, that have to be shared with neighbouring countries including Ghana. This is not just Nigeria's problem. It affects the sub-region as terrorism is adept at working across national boundaries.
  
  Anyway, Jideofor, that was a good analysis.

  reply
• Kwame 8 years ago

  The west and Gulf countries train, arm and provide logistics to these Islamic terrorist and not until these activities of NATO and the Gulf countries who want to expand Sunni Islamism into Africa stops Islamic terrorism will ...
  read full comment

  The west and Gulf countries train, arm and provide logistics to these Islamic terrorist and not until these activities of NATO and the Gulf countries who want to expand Sunni Islamism into Africa stops Islamic terrorism will be with us.
  The U.S. and her NATO partners who created terror in Afghanistan, first by arming terrorists there and attacking her to clean it of the snakes it hatched have not been able to wipe out the terrorists because as we stated already they sponsor the terrorist and that some rich and some legislator gain from the existence of terror and terrorism.
  Apart from Yugoslavia where the U.S. and her NATO allies intervened to overthrow the legally constituted government there which is at peace after the intervention Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Tunisia, Ukraine, Egypt and Somalia have all not seen peace and the forces of the west have not been able to confront the terrorists.
  It looks like African nations should appeal to other countries apart from the west that promote the terrorist to train their armed forces.

  reply
• MARCUS AMPADU 8 years ago

  Brother Adibe, it is a big mistake to tackle the Boko Haram conflict as a strictly Nigerian problem. It is subregional, and fighting it should be done cooperatively by West African military forces; similar to ECOMOG that ende ...
  read full comment

  Brother Adibe, it is a big mistake to tackle the Boko Haram conflict as a strictly Nigerian problem. It is subregional, and fighting it should be done cooperatively by West African military forces; similar to ECOMOG that ended Charles Taylor's reign of terror in Sierra Leone & Liberia.
  
  And this regional military force, with shared armaments & intelligence, will remain in the subregion until the back of the Boko Haram terrorist group is broken.
  
  Meanwhile ECOWAS needs to be taken seriously. We need to take the integration of the subregion with a new dynamism.

  reply