Open governance hinges on freedom of information law - GII

Read Comments Comments (1)

• WORRIED OF EVIL OVERTAKEN THE COUNTRY 8 years ago

  The torturing, labeling or accusing of the victim (the electoral commissioner) in any form of sacrifice is violence. Charlote has become a surrogate victim which the oppositions even including moderators and the so called b ...
  read full comment

  The torturing, labeling or accusing of the victim (the electoral commissioner) in any form of sacrifice is violence. Charlote has become a surrogate victim which the oppositions even including moderators and the so called bishops and men of God or ‘gods’ want to use as a surrogate to appease their gods of violence. Lately Charlote Osei has become their surrogate victim whom they seek and finds because she is vulnerable and closest at hand. In other words, such a surrogate victim, Challote is the “scapegoat for those who need someone to vilify because of their own failures.
  In scapegoating of this nature, Charlote Osei the ritual victim of her detractors is innocent but pays for the guilty parties, her adversaries. In fact, what is the moral distinction which her opponents could draw?
  To explain more, the relationship between the potential victim and the actual victim cannot be defined in terms of innocence or guilt. Because those opposed to Charlote are seeking to deflect from the crime, a relatively indifferent victim i.e. a “sacrificiable” victim needs to be found. Otherwise, the violence would be vented on the community, which people desire to protect. The opposition to Charlote cannot pounce on her as a sacrificial victim to atone for the accumulated sins incurred by her opponents since the inception of this country.
  Those who are intellectuals and all those well informed in knowledge and wisdom should judge if it is justifiable for the innocent Charlote to suffer for the blood thirsty and corrupt guilty opponents with their hidden agendas in this country.

  reply