You are here: HomeNewsPolitics2013 05 09Article 273452

NPP legal team vows to block new documents from respondents

This article is closed for comments.

Read Comments Comments (35)

  • Nii Ansah 10 years ago

    this issue has to be dealt with once and for all, NPP should not use this to create crisis, for the problem to be resolved, all the pink sheets has to be seen by all and not some and then we will know who is telling the truth ...
    read full comment

  • SHAMO 10 years ago

    JUST CANCELL THAT FAKE ELECTIONS AND LETS HAVE A CLEAN ONE! KICK MAHAMA ASS AND BRING NE ELECTIONS

  • Dr Pinksheet Bawumia 10 years ago

    Your father will provide funds for your so-called 'clean' elections.

  • SHAMO 10 years ago

    EVEN GHANA HAVE MONEY TO PAY YOUR STUPID MINISTERS! LET YOUR AKONFEM PREZ BRING OUR LOOTED MONEY! YOUR GREEDY BASTARDS HAVE GIVEN WOYOMI BILLIONS! STUPID ALLIENS LIKE YOU WILL FOREVER BE SLAVES

  • SGT ANANI FIADZOE 10 years ago

    NPP is such a political party which hates, deceit, dishonesty, corruption, thievery, feticious and
    forged documents because such will help NDC to deceive the court.

    We the majority people of this nation knows that NDC is ...
    read full comment

  • Dumega Prosper Jnr. 10 years ago

    How can the NPP be allowed to go scot free?? A few hot questions can furnish people's way of thinking here!!!
    1. The NPP sold the Ghana telecom. For what??
    2. The NPP vanquished the Ghana Airways which Nkrumah single handed ...
    read full comment

  • Terry 10 years ago

    The Ndc Layerrs ATO DADZIE and co are all intellectual liars.
    Tai kata just does not know the art of Ross examination. He predicates statements as questions and that is wrong. Cross examination must be short concise questio ...
    read full comment

  • Nii 10 years ago

    These bushmen can never impose their bush logic on Ghanaians. How can you select your so called criminating evidence from other peoples' strongholes and think that your strongholes should be left unaddressed? They lie bad!

  • Kwabena Ansa 10 years ago

    Nii, I am appalled by your comment. One thing you have to know is that it is uncalled for to call other people names, especially, when they are derogatory. It is simply bad and disrespectful to call other people names like "b ...
    read full comment

  • Gaby Bruk 10 years ago

    The whole world is watching the supreme court trial so over to you, Justice Atuguba and panel

  • Man of the True God 10 years ago

    NPP YOU ARE GRADUALLY DESTROYING GHANA...ONE CRISIS AFTER ANOTHER...WHAT DO THESE PEOPLE WANT? GOD HELP US!!!!

  • tiger shark 10 years ago

    These NPP thugs think ghanaians are fools.The NPP accepted the same so called violations in ASHanti and Eastern regions because it was in the favour,But call the same in other regions fraud.It will not work

  • KK 10 years ago

    They are not new. You only chose by convenience to ignore them. The truth is what we all demand.

  • BLUE SHEET 10 years ago

    LAWYER ERRORS WHO IS AN EX-CONVICT SHOULD KNOW BETTER.

  • concerned ghanaian 10 years ago

    WHEN THE SUPREME COURT GAVE THE PETITIONERS 5 DAYS TO SUBMIT THEIR AFFIDAVIT WITH ALL EVIDENCE ATTACHED, I THOUGHT IT WAS IMPOSSIBLE AND UNFAIR. SOMEHOW THEY WERE ABLE TO SUBMIT THE EVIDENCE TO ALL THE PARTIES.
    THE RESPO ...
    read full comment

  • Akpaklika Mewua Lo Ode 10 years ago

    The respondents knew they had nothing to hide. They were genuinely expressing their true knowledge of the events that took place on Election day.

    So therefore if the petiotioners think they have a case, they should have sc ...
    read full comment

  • NANA FRINPONG. 10 years ago

    if the NPP know that they have nothing to hide why dont they alow the NDC to bring those document to see if indeed what they NPP were saying is true or not?
    to me this clearly show that NPP is looking in to only one part of ...
    read full comment

  • John Kpeglo 10 years ago

    Why are they so strong in OBJECTING to introduction/identification of "PinkSHITS," to borrow the words of Amicus Amekudzi curae!

  • pope 10 years ago

    A TOOTH FOR A TOOTH AN EYE FOR AN EYE PERIOD.

  • NPP ACTIVIST. Tepa. 10 years ago

    As the days go by,I am beginning to lost trust in my party NPP´s evidence presented to the court.If thse are the evidence for which they want over four millions votes do to be anul,them I am sorry,they have no case.No judge ...
    read full comment

  • ABU OKYEMAN KIBI 10 years ago

    IDIOT STOP YOUR LIES THAT YOU ARE A PARTY MEMBER.,FOOLISH YOU.TEPA ,YOU ARE NOT FOR US SO GO TO HELL.WHY ARE YOU FAKING,BANZA.

  • Plumber 10 years ago

    As far the SC court is concerned, there was one election covering 26,000 polling stations, which generated 26,000 pimk sheets, and no party can prevent them from seeing all these. The Law of evidence does not limit one to onl ...
    read full comment

  • TROUBLE-MAKER 10 years ago

    They can fool themselves but certainly NOT Tsatsu Tsikata.Akufo Addo wants to be president by any means possible,heh?
    Be prepared to hand over any documents for the case you brought to proceed. You cannot pick and choose.

    ...
    read full comment

  • Dumega Prosper Jnr. 10 years ago

    Nonsense to just accept anyone without clean sheets to become the President of Ghana. NPP can probably bite more than they can chew!! Ghana cannot be for a grab as the NPP offerred 5 % of the oil deals to only 3 people and j ...
    read full comment

  • MATIGARI 10 years ago

    TELLM THAT BIG MOUTHED WOMAN TO SHUT UP!

  • abe 10 years ago

    NPP are hiding something that's why they don't want new documents to be tendered in but Ghanaians are not fool u know. The truth will come out soon

  • Truth 10 years ago

    We all want the truth so why block

  • K.K. 10 years ago

    NANA ATO, HOW CAN WIDESPREAD CLERICAL ERRORS NOT BE IRREGULARITY. YOUR TEACHERS SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF YOU FOR WASTING THEIR TIME.

  • KWABENA OHEMENG,LONDON. 10 years ago

    The respondents have every legal right to prove to the court that it was not only in constituencies that Mahama won that mistakes took place.What is the basis of the petitioner's argument if the same errors happened in consti ...
    read full comment

  • Dumega Prosper Jnr. 10 years ago

    Do these NPP certificate less Petitioners know that equity and fairness is very fundamental to the legality of the courts!!

  • ANDROPOV 10 years ago

    AHOOFE GLORIA. OSOFO BA

  • G. K. Berko 10 years ago

    If we really want the TRUTH, no document relevant to proving it must be barred. No technicalities must be employed to hide the TRUTH.

    Our Courts have the reputation of ruling serious cases based on sheer technicalities, ...
    read full comment

  • G. K. Berko 10 years ago

    (I had a power outage that cut me off...)

    I was saying that the issue is too important to be decided on technicalities. Besides The SC must not give any entity an excuse to brand it a pro-NPP or a NDC-hating outfit.

    If ...
    read full comment

  • Asante 10 years ago

    Why would"nt they do that?ndc has put the law of the judges in their hands,where is the origional pink sheet they are contestion? he has it all but refused to submite them,whos fault was it?God punish them all.

  • Dumega Prosper Jnr. 10 years ago

    How dare the lawyers who camwe out of the JSS classrooms who Tsatsu had to have sleepless nights to make them at leat into what they assume today ever give up any peoper chalklenge in the Face of the duplicated and quadrupple ...
    read full comment