CJ's Removal: Including the in-camera issue

This article is closed for comments.

Read Comments Comments (9)

  • andy botchwey 6 months ago

    Sorry but you have just written a very jaundiced gibberish. It is true that opinions are like noses...... but

  • Nii 6 months ago

    WHAT IS YOUR OBJECTION PLEASE

  • andy botchwey 6 months ago

    I need objective opinions not someone who is rehashing what the suspended CJ and her supporters. I call this gibberish and any other so-called opinion that would rehash what the opposite side is saying without introducing a n ...
    read full comment

  • The Spear 6 months ago

    I am of the opinion that this guy doesn't understand the reach of the constitution.

    It seems to me guys like this would only agree in principle to what's going on if the CJ murdered people. With this kind of reasoning, ho ...
    read full comment

  • kwabena 6 months ago

    Mr Otu, reasonings like this makes the country backward. Pick and choose........... No integrity

  • The Motherland 6 months ago

    Nii Otu Quaye, you mean you made out time to write up all that nonsense? Sorry but you made a fool only of your poor self. Only the gullible Npp goons would be convinced as they were convinced even without reading your junk.

  • Johnie 6 months ago

    Did you actually read the petitions? Even the issue of travels and allowances had nothing to do with what you have written. The actual issue in contention is whether the suspended CJ has the right to use official travel relat ...
    read full comment

  • The Devil's Advocate 6 months ago

    The law is the law until it does not suit the twisted psyc ophantic minds of the NPP and their goons

  • Kwame 6 months ago

    When an employee misconducted him or herself that constitutes ground for his or her dismissal.
    The courts said that when and employee is queried and he answered the query, that in itself constitutes a fair hearing.