The sentence is too lenient. He should have been given about 18 or 20 years without the possibility of a parole at Ankarful prison, the most notorious and horrible of them all. Why not let him die and rot in Prison custody in ... read full comment
The sentence is too lenient. He should have been given about 18 or 20 years without the possibility of a parole at Ankarful prison, the most notorious and horrible of them all. Why not let him die and rot in Prison custody instead?
The sentence is too lenient. He should have been given about 18 or 20 years without the possibility of a parole at Ankarful prison, the most notorious and horrible of them all. Why not let him die and rot in Prison custody in ...
read full comment