Law School saga: Ackumey disagrees with SC

Read Article

Comments (10)

This article is closed for comments.

Read Comments Comments (10)

OPOKU 6 years ago

HAVE YOU EVER AGREED TO ANY SENSIBLE THING IN YOUR LIFE?

HAVE YOU EVER AGREED TO ANY SENSIBLE THING IN YOUR LIFE?
Puma 6 years ago

Opoku, thanks you. Besides is he still a lawyer. He and his friend David Annan. Anyone who takes this guy as his lawyer before any court will end up in jail

Opoku, thanks you. Besides is he still a lawyer. He and his friend David Annan. Anyone who takes this guy as his lawyer before any court will end up in jail
Nkrumah 6 years ago

Chris Ackummey struggled to pass at UCC in 1974 and struggled to go through Law School. Those of us who know him remember him as a DUNCE.

Chris Ackummey struggled to pass at UCC in 1974 and struggled to go through Law School. Those of us who know him remember him as a DUNCE.
Enock 6 years ago

Unconstitutional or illegal merit is no merit either, there are requirements for students to meet before applying to enter the law school, if those requirements and conditions are met, why place an extra burden of entrance ex ...
read full comment

Unconstitutional or illegal merit is no merit either, there are requirements for students to meet before applying to enter the law school, if those requirements and conditions are met, why place an extra burden of entrance exams and interviews on applicants? Excelling in entrance exams and interview may not necessarily make one a good student of law nor a great lawyer. Besides, every school has its own mechanisms of "weeding out" non-performing students so the fear of producing "bad" lawyers per the notion of influx of students into the law school due to non existent of "extra" requirements cannot be substantiated.
Ground zero 6 years ago

Mr Ackumey you are too wicked and selfish, you don't want poor but lucky students to also become lawyers. Shamed you.

Mr Ackumey you are too wicked and selfish, you don't want poor but lucky students to also become lawyers. Shamed you.
Dr Robert K Glah 6 years ago

Ackumey is backward- looking lawyer and not conscious of the integrity and the high standards of the legal profession and lawyers. More lawyers of integrity are needed in Ghana and Africa and their education should not be obs ...
read full comment

Ackumey is backward- looking lawyer and not conscious of the integrity and the high standards of the legal profession and lawyers. More lawyers of integrity are needed in Ghana and Africa and their education should not be obstructed and denied.

The examination system must be open; no secrecy in setting questions and answering by students. Students must know the amount of materials to produce for every question and issues to respond to and how to respond before they go into the examination hall.

That is what legal education and training of lawyers is all about.

However, Mr Ackumey held the view that “we might end up having all sorts of people who might not be of merit or qualify to enter the Law School so, actually, I am against it”.

For him, there must be a way of screening the total number of applicants to fill the limited number of spaces at the Ghana Law School, adding that Prof Asare’s case is “victory without merit”.
ADE 6 years ago

ACKUMEY NEEDS MENTAL TREATMENT. OR IS IT THAT HE IS STUPID?

ACKUMEY NEEDS MENTAL TREATMENT. OR IS IT THAT HE IS STUPID?
Baababora 6 years ago

So, one can now enter the law school without any screening. Now we are introducing the same thing we did for the BECE, where every body is promoted at the end of term. See what we are getting? Anybody with a protocol LLB will ...
read full comment

So, one can now enter the law school without any screening. Now we are introducing the same thing we did for the BECE, where every body is promoted at the end of term. See what we are getting? Anybody with a protocol LLB will now get a protocol Makola Law degree. God save us.
May be we should just scrape the Law School.
ben 6 years ago

Whatever this guy says does n

Whatever this guy says does n
Gabriel 6 years ago

You know why they do the interview? To select their children, relatives, and friend's children and relatives first. Thank u Supreme Court.

You know why they do the interview? To select their children, relatives, and friend's children and relatives first. Thank u Supreme Court.

Law School saga: Ackumey disagrees with SC

Read Comments .st0{display:none;fill:#14BDD3;} .st1{display:none;} .st2{display:inline;fill:#FC0F0F;} .st3{display:inline;fill:#FFFFFF;} .st4{display:inline;fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:6;stroke-miterlimit:10;} Comments (10)

Read Comments Comments (10)