Ceasefire - Emile Short pokes Anas, Amidu

This article is closed for comments.

Read Comments Comments (32)

  • ghanaman 10 years ago

    “There should be ceasefire. The major objective for both of them should be to promote the anti-corruption agenda and they must settle their differences in an amicable manner.”

  • Johnny 10 years ago

    Would they listen?The only way they can come together is for Anas to listen to Martin Amidu's advice by staying away from John Mahama.

  • WISEMAN 10 years ago

    yOU ARE A REAL FOOL. fOR REAL

  • OLD SOLDIER 10 years ago

    Author:-OBAA YAA
    ...So, the people around the president including his wife and those Team “B” staffers were aware of the president failing health. Therefore, who were they kidding when they ruin insults on whoever questi ...
    read full comment

  • due process He is a real lawyer 10 years ago

    AMIDU IS RIGHT

  • Sheer Numbers 10 years ago

    Justice Short, you are real voice of region.

  • CANNOT INVESTIGATE GOVT WHO PAYS 10 years ago

    IF HE ACCEPTS MONEY TO UNDER UNDER COVER ACTIVITIES IN WHICH GOVT IS INTERESTED HE CANNOT INVESITGATE THE GOVT OFFICIALS WHO PAY HIM AND WHO ALSO KNOW HIS REAL IDENTITY
    iF HE WANTS TO BE FREE TO INVESTIGATE POLITICAL CORRUPT ...
    read full comment

  • LUCKY SHE IS MAHAMA'S SUNDAY SCHOOL T 10 years ago

    CHIEF JUSTICE WOOD IS LUCKY THE INVESTIGATONS WERE NOT DONE WHEN ATTA MILLS WAS ALIVE BECUASE THE NDC UNDER MILLS WAS LOOKING FOR EVIDENCE TO REMOVE THE CHEIF JUSTICE
    MAHAMA HAS SAVED THE CHIEF JUSTICE BECAUSE SHE WAS A FORM ...
    read full comment

  • Brian Williams 10 years ago

    They should continue with their banter. Maybe the whole truth will come out. Is there a recording of parliamentarians taking bribes?

  • zion a. ayariga 10 years ago

    No wonder they say in Africa if an elderly passed away in your home you have lose it all. wow ,instead of Martin hailing that young man and helping him to fight the cancer ,he is rather dragging him down. Ghana is too big for ...
    read full comment

  • KWAKU GBLOENAWO 10 years ago

    The fighting is only covering up the truth. Typically Ghanaian, Emile Short is asking for the dirt to be swept under the carpet. The fighting will stop when the truth is told.

  • Ghanaman THE REAL 10 years ago

    I find it difficult to understand what Mr Amidu's beef with Anas is! Who gave he Amidu the monopoly of the truth or otherwise? Any Ghanaian has a right to dig for the truth towards uprooting the blatant corruption kancre from ...
    read full comment

  • Kofi 10 years ago

    Allow Martin to show his true colors. He has always been cheap, petty self centred, envious of others, opportunist. Everyone is going to see his true colors

  • Kato Guy 10 years ago

    Kwasea!!

  • Grammar Police 10 years ago

    They don't share one throat!

  • EZEKIEL 10 years ago

    A very wise move from a senior citizen !! Amidu, you cannot do it alone. Since MOST PERCEIVE you are SINCERE, rather TEAM UP with Anas to EXPOSE MORE !!!!!!
    T...together
    E...everybody
    A...achieves
    M...more

    A word to t ...
    read full comment

  • Sammy 10 years ago

    The problem is with Amidu and not Anas. Tell him.

  • Anthony 10 years ago

    Short is fake and coward. He should be bold to scold Amidu for his irresponsible attacks on Tiger Eye PI and Anas. Amidu is selfish and bogus anti corruption crusader. Amidu is sick , disturbed and demented over his removal ...
    read full comment

  • Dodoo 10 years ago

    Thanks Daddy Emil. Old age and wisdom at work.

    Over to you Amidu and Anas.

  • Siisi 10 years ago

    It surprises me how Martin Amidu comes by his accolade as an anti corruption crusader, particularly in the light of the current goings on. His one significant act of opposing and revealing the Woyome payment appears to have g ...
    read full comment

  • Daniel Mensah 10 years ago

    Thanks for your advice sir, the two are well respected when we talk of anti corruption. they should come together to help the nation.

  • muarys 10 years ago

    We want to see the true of the matter, if they ceasefire who wil b right n wrong

  • Jalil 10 years ago

    Comrade, I am compelled by amidus recent attacks on Anas to think that there is something wrong with the man. The reason been that instead of amidu supporting Anas to fight corruption and poor financial management in Ghana he ...
    read full comment

  • Samson 10 years ago

    I beg to disagree with Mr Short. Mr Amidu is wrong and he should be told so. Amidu made allegations which he has not been able to back up.
    His strategy is to use the usual tricks of lawyers, engage in 'legal gymnastics' cred ...
    read full comment

  • Samson 10 years ago

    MR AMIDU, YOU DARE NOT COMPETE WITH HIM BECAUSE YOU WILL LOSE.

  • AMIDU IS a DEEP AND FINE LEGAL MIND 10 years ago

    STOP INSULTING AMIDU
    ANAS SAYS HIS COMPANY IS FOR PROFIT
    YOU CANNOT FIGHT CORRUPRTION AND MAKE PROFIT FROM IT
    THAT IS CONFLICT OF INTEREST
    FIGHTING CORRUPTION SHOULD ALWAYS BE A SELFLESS NOT FOR PROFIT ACT

  • Togbe 10 years ago

    Misplaced call. Tell amidu to grow up. He is just envious of anas for getting low publicity compare to anas.

  • Bill 10 years ago

    Amidu should have offered advice to Anas instead playing to the gutter

  • witch hunter 10 years ago

    Let Amidu understand that he is not the only lawyer in the country he must be told that Anas is a qualified lawyer and can take him on well within the contex of law.

  • Kofi Virginia 10 years ago

    Martin is full of himself. What about the corrupt judges that were exposed. So, should ordinary citizens not be able to do this whether they are registered or not? Everybody is their own strongman in Ghana. Poor country and f ...
    read full comment

  • Abeiku SW2 London 10 years ago

    Thank you Sir

  • SAYASTIS 10 years ago

    What impression is Mr. Short creating in the minds of some Ghanaians with all his legal knowledge and the position held as CHRAJ boss? Promoting APPEASMENT,
    instead of enhancing the rule of law by saying it as it is?