I said SC decision is corrupt; not judges – Gabby

Read Article

Comments (112)

This article is closed for comments.

Read Comments Comments (112)

Guv 10 years ago

YOU FORWARDED 20 BOGUS LAWYERS TO COURT WITH NO EVIDENCE, WITNESS.

YOU FORWARDED 20 BOGUS LAWYERS TO COURT WITH NO EVIDENCE, WITNESS.
BEN- NPP 10 years ago

BECAUSE OF AGAMBIRE HE REFUSES TO COME TO JOY TV: THIS DAYS

BECAUSE OF AGAMBIRE HE REFUSES TO COME TO JOY TV: THIS DAYS
KWAHUHENE BOAT NEW YORK USA 10 years ago

WHY DID ATUGUBA SAID 6-3 IN DISMISSING THE CASE INSTEAD OF 5-4.WE WILL GO FOR A REVIEW

WHY DID ATUGUBA SAID 6-3 IN DISMISSING THE CASE INSTEAD OF 5-4.WE WILL GO FOR A REVIEW
JOHN TAIFA 10 years ago

sTUPID GUY DONT SPIN THE judgement, the case was thrown out overall, the 6-3 5-4 pertain to only three of the points

sTUPID GUY DONT SPIN THE judgement, the case was thrown out overall, the 6-3 5-4 pertain to only three of the points
okofo 10 years ago

What's stupid about the guy? Only fools who have no regard for the law will rubbish Gabby's argument which refers to the CONSTITUTION. Which part of the constitution ALLOWS the judges to DISREGARD UNSIGNED PINK SHEETS, OVER-V ...
read full comment

What's stupid about the guy? Only fools who have no regard for the law will rubbish Gabby's argument which refers to the CONSTITUTION. Which part of the constitution ALLOWS the judges to DISREGARD UNSIGNED PINK SHEETS, OVER-VOTING and VOTING WITHOUT VERIFICATION?

The petitioners didn't go to court for the personal OPINIONS of those judges, but rather to consult the CONSTITUTION and apply what the law says on electoral irregularities. The judges who rubbished the infringements admitted by Afari Gyan before them have CORRUPTED the law, because instead of applying the law as stated in Article 49(3)of the 1992 constitution, they used their SUBJECTIVE opinion in declaring the verdict. This is a wrong precedent for our nascent democracy. Do you underatand? Those judges that disregarded our constitution have questions to answer the people of Ghana.

You sound like one of those who don't base their arguments on issues or the law: a typical NDC characteristic huh?
Ben 10 years ago

WHO DOESN'T KNOW THAT?

WHO DOESN'T KNOW THAT?
ATSU, HO 10 years ago

SOME TIMES WE HAVE A CASE BUT THE WAY W PRESENT IT IS THE ISSUE. I CAN SEE THE POINT GABBY IS TRYING TO MAKE BUT WHY USE THE WORD CURRUPT EXCEPT YOU WANT TO BE OSTENTATIOUS

SOME TIMES WE HAVE A CASE BUT THE WAY W PRESENT IT IS THE ISSUE. I CAN SEE THE POINT GABBY IS TRYING TO MAKE BUT WHY USE THE WORD CURRUPT EXCEPT YOU WANT TO BE OSTENTATIOUS
JOHN TAIFA 10 years ago

so you are wiser than the nine judges
the law lies in the bossom of the judges. what they say is the constitution, you may read it but they interperate it stop fooling people

so you are wiser than the nine judges
the law lies in the bossom of the judges. what they say is the constitution, you may read it but they interperate it stop fooling people
Guv 10 years ago

IT SEEMS EVERYWHERE NPP GOES THERE IS TROUBLE. EVEN IF THEY GO TO ICC, THEY WILL HAVE ISSUES.

IT SEEMS EVERYWHERE NPP GOES THERE IS TROUBLE. EVEN IF THEY GO TO ICC, THEY WILL HAVE ISSUES.
okofo 10 years ago

What makes you think the judges are wiser than 24 million Ghanaians?

What you're saying is that when the constitution explicitly says it's "red", we should take it when the judges see it as 'blue"? Is that what your unders ...
read full comment

What makes you think the judges are wiser than 24 million Ghanaians?

What you're saying is that when the constitution explicitly says it's "red", we should take it when the judges see it as 'blue"? Is that what your understanding of "interpretation" of the law is? That doesn't make sense!!

Discerning Ghanaians have respect for judges, but will not compromise on their constitution!!!
JOHN TAIFA 10 years ago

That is the beauty of democracy. the alternative is anarchy what you are preaching. good day

That is the beauty of democracy. the alternative is anarchy what you are preaching. good day
okofo 10 years ago

You have twisted mindset: a typical NDC characteristic who have disregard for the law. Have a good day yourself.

You have twisted mindset: a typical NDC characteristic who have disregard for the law. Have a good day yourself.
william 10 years ago

this guy thinks wearing a gown, carrying files and heading a political party 'campaign office' called 'think tank' is = being wise!

this guy thinks wearing a gown, carrying files and heading a political party 'campaign office' called 'think tank' is = being wise!
AGYAAKU 10 years ago

How can a decision be corrupt when those who took that decision are otherwise? Are you now shaking in your pants after bragging to impress those you have been misleading all these while. COWARD! You will talk true!

How can a decision be corrupt when those who took that decision are otherwise? Are you now shaking in your pants after bragging to impress those you have been misleading all these while. COWARD! You will talk true!
jospheap 10 years ago

Why run away are you now afraid to be hold in comtempt

Why run away are you now afraid to be hold in comtempt
okofo 10 years ago

You don't even understand what a CONTEMPT is. Do you?

You don't even understand what a CONTEMPT is. Do you?
Fosa 10 years ago

Hey Guy we are not under dictatorship regime. The court is finished we can say whatever that went wrong. They can't dictate to us or say what they want but what is true. There is no wise man in Ghana. Always somebody is a foo ...
read full comment

Hey Guy we are not under dictatorship regime. The court is finished we can say whatever that went wrong. They can't dictate to us or say what they want but what is true. There is no wise man in Ghana. Always somebody is a fool or stupid. Do we have a wise people in Ghana? Backward people. We shall burn all the time. You are also stupid because all Ghanaians a stupid. oh yes. shocking to me. Where did you learn those words from; FOOL FOOL or STUPID STUPID. Learn good words in school. "PRIMITIVEP EOPLE"
HASSAN 10 years ago

MASSA, CALL A SPADE A SPADE. WHAT IS OVER VOTING? THESE CORRUPT JUDGES ARE USELESS. EVEN THE MAKOLA WOMAN KNOWS WHAT OVER VOTING IS. BUT YOU HAVE THESE SO CALLED LEARNED JUDGES MAKING VERY BAD DECISIONS. IF WE ALL AGREE THAT ...
read full comment

MASSA, CALL A SPADE A SPADE. WHAT IS OVER VOTING? THESE CORRUPT JUDGES ARE USELESS. EVEN THE MAKOLA WOMAN KNOWS WHAT OVER VOTING IS. BUT YOU HAVE THESE SO CALLED LEARNED JUDGES MAKING VERY BAD DECISIONS. IF WE ALL AGREE THAT BALLOTS FOUND IN THE BOX EXCEEDS BALLOTS ISSUED CONSTITUTE OVER VOTING, THE PETITIONERS SHOULD HAVE 9-0. BUT WHAT DO WE SEE? GABBY BE BOLD. THEY ARE FUCKING CORRUPT.
okofo 10 years ago

We have to UPHOLD the constitution not judges!!

The last time Rawlings didn'r apply the constitution, 3 High Court judges were murdered with impunity.

These judges should have known better aba!!

We have to UPHOLD the constitution not judges!!

The last time Rawlings didn'r apply the constitution, 3 High Court judges were murdered with impunity.

These judges should have known better aba!!
Abdulahi Ziblim 10 years ago

What does Gabby think he is doing? Cheating the intelligence of Ghanaians. If the decision is corrupt who are those that made the decision? Was it not the judges? “the decision is corrupt because it gave a corrupted interp ...
read full comment

What does Gabby think he is doing? Cheating the intelligence of Ghanaians. If the decision is corrupt who are those that made the decision? Was it not the judges? “the decision is corrupt because it gave a corrupted interpretation of the [1992] Constitution.." Is the decision a human being that gave a corrupt interpretation of the constitution or the judges made the decision and therefore are the ones that gave a corrupt interpretation of the constitution? Gabby has been caught in the webb and should stop attempting to cheat our intelligence. You are not the last but actually the fist to attempt to castigate the judges - they are not children not to understand what you said and what it actually means.
BENCO 10 years ago

THIS GABBY IS A COWARD AND SLICKSTER.NOW YOU ARE TRYING TO PARSE YOUR WORDS.TRY AND BE BOLD YOU DAMN REVISIONIST.AKYEM DUAA.

THIS GABBY IS A COWARD AND SLICKSTER.NOW YOU ARE TRYING TO PARSE YOUR WORDS.TRY AND BE BOLD YOU DAMN REVISIONIST.AKYEM DUAA.
BEN- NPP 10 years ago

AGAMBIRE WILL DEAL WITH HIM

AGAMBIRE WILL DEAL WITH HIM
KOFI PAPABI 10 years ago

We know one judge who took a 2 million dollar bribe to vote for Mahama

We know one judge who took a 2 million dollar bribe to vote for Mahama
EKOW MUNKO 10 years ago

Rumor monger where is your proof? Such lies tarnish images of hard working people.Will you please stop this behavior.

Rumor monger where is your proof? Such lies tarnish images of hard working people.Will you please stop this behavior.
mends 10 years ago

Juudge Anin Yeboah took 3 million dollar bribe to vote for Akufo-Addo

Juudge Anin Yeboah took 3 million dollar bribe to vote for Akufo-Addo
KWESI 10 years ago

IF IT GOES FOR NPP IS GOOD BUT IF NOT IS BAD DISGRACE NPP

IF IT GOES FOR NPP IS GOOD BUT IF NOT IS BAD DISGRACE NPP
k k 10 years ago

the whole judges are corrupt.

the whole judges are corrupt.
Concerned Patriot 10 years ago

The truth of the matter is that there is no justice in Ghana! The judges were corrupt all thro the hearing. Ghana's Rule of Law must be thrown into the dustbin! You go and steal twenty Cedis and see the police and the judges ...
read full comment

The truth of the matter is that there is no justice in Ghana! The judges were corrupt all thro the hearing. Ghana's Rule of Law must be thrown into the dustbin! You go and steal twenty Cedis and see the police and the judges applying that stupid chrges but NDC,EC,SC,etc, have stolen our votes and no one to press charges. Oh Ghana! I'm so ashamed to be a Ghanaian. No justice.
GOWAN 10 years ago

Well it stands to reason that, by categorical syllogism, one can safely infer that, the Justices out of the nine, who ruled to dismiss the petition on all counts are corrupt, and also those who upheld some provisions and dism ...
read full comment

Well it stands to reason that, by categorical syllogism, one can safely infer that, the Justices out of the nine, who ruled to dismiss the petition on all counts are corrupt, and also those who upheld some provisions and dismissed others, are also equally corrupt. The two are not mutually exclusive Gabby.
My advice to you is to tone down a bit and let's do this analysis devoid of the emotions, and high handedness.
okofo 10 years ago

It all comes to reference of the CONSTITUTION. Its' about what the constitution says on the irregularities.

The one question we need to ask ourselves is "Did the judges apply the law as stated in our statutes, or they rel ...
read full comment

It all comes to reference of the CONSTITUTION. Its' about what the constitution says on the irregularities.

The one question we need to ask ourselves is "Did the judges apply the law as stated in our statutes, or they relied on their subjective opinions"? This is the inquiry Gabby is putting out at the public sphere. We must be honest in the strictest sense of the constitution. Anything otherwise is chaos. Don't you think so?
GOWAN 10 years ago

In the absence of the exhaustive document on the ruling and the various statutes that were relied upon to arrive at this flawed or excellent judgment, depending on which aisle of the political divide you belong to, words such ...
read full comment

In the absence of the exhaustive document on the ruling and the various statutes that were relied upon to arrive at this flawed or excellent judgment, depending on which aisle of the political divide you belong to, words such as "corrupt judgment" or words to such effect from Gabby or the statement that seeks to impugn on the integrity and intelligence of his Lordship Justice Anin Yeboah, are all unwarranted and in bad taste.
In any case, the judgment would be premised on the constitution and the relevant statutes and this most definitely would be subject to their opinions and it's relation to the case, and the evidence so adduced, and other extraneous factors, outside the remit of the court. Is that right for our democracy? That's a cause and effect, which would be answered down the line, as we progress as a country on this well trodden path of democracy.
BBC NEWS!!!!!!!!!!!!! 10 years ago

STAND BY UR WORDS. NPP IS FULL OF COWARDS.

STAND BY UR WORDS. NPP IS FULL OF COWARDS.
African Star 10 years ago

This guy is a total miscreant and gobby coward.

This guy is a total miscreant and gobby coward.
conny 10 years ago

I absolutely agree with you. What are our judges saying, that over voting is good, voting without biometric verification which is law can be ignored and it's okay, signatures absent on pink sheets which is also protected by o ...
read full comment

I absolutely agree with you. What are our judges saying, that over voting is good, voting without biometric verification which is law can be ignored and it's okay, signatures absent on pink sheets which is also protected by our constitution can also be ignored. These are what our so called supreme court judges are telling us to do? I wonder whether they themselves will use the law to obtain justice in their daily tasks. By the way, why did they correct the 6/3 to 5/4, If errors are not meant to be corrected. I feel pity for Ghana. We still do not have strong institutions, judges look at the truth and denies it. Please you have time, read psalm 94, it tells what God will do to corrupt judges. I pray for the few judges who boldly were truthful to the law and i know God will reward them.
conny 10 years ago

your name tells where you come from. People who come from where you come from do not reason but only follow people from where they come from. Meaning, one says the sky is green, all of you will believe it even if there are ...
read full comment

your name tells where you come from. People who come from where you come from do not reason but only follow people from where they come from. Meaning, one says the sky is green, all of you will believe it even if there are doubts. Time to change, 'nyebro'
abeeku van dee 10 years ago

your white beard doesn't profile you to be a wise man.

your white beard doesn't profile you to be a wise man.
okofo 10 years ago

Conny. You're full of wisdom. May the Lord bless you!!

Conny. You're full of wisdom. May the Lord bless you!!
GBEVU 10 years ago

WHO IS THIS? IS HE ALSO .... WHAT HAS HE ALSO ACHIEVED IN LIFE BEFORE CHALLENGING THE RULLING? WHAT DOES HE KNOW?

WHO IS THIS? IS HE ALSO .... WHAT HAS HE ALSO ACHIEVED IN LIFE BEFORE CHALLENGING THE RULLING? WHAT DOES HE KNOW?
GBEVU 10 years ago

How can NPP say that they lost the election because of irregularities? They have not been able to prove its occurrence and for that matter how it favored NDC. NPPs logic is seriously seared. Why do I say this? Can you imagin ...
read full comment

How can NPP say that they lost the election because of irregularities? They have not been able to prove its occurrence and for that matter how it favored NDC. NPPs logic is seriously seared. Why do I say this? Can you imagine two boxers in a ring, same ring, and one losing the fight and blaming it on the slippery nature of the boxing ring? Assuming that it was true that the ring was slippery, were both boxers not in the same ring so that both boxers were equally impacted? Why would NPP claim victory for the same condition that impacted them during the election? Another analogy, why would a failed candidate in an examination claim pass candidates were favored by difficult questions set by the examiner? This failure can only be attributed to inadequate preparation by the failed candidate. NPPs message did not convince electorates – free education… everything was hooked unto free education. All die be die deducted marks, kill all Ewes, Gas by leading members, at all cost… and twisting of facts on discussion programmes, the candidates, yen akanfo> etc. They should stop accusing the SC judges of bias when they have not been able to produce a single evidence to prove even a single vote cast by filling complaint form. This case is a frivolous case indeed, it should have been thrown out long ago. When you listen to them you marvel, they are twisting the judgment to mean that SC has given the green light for over voting, voting without BMV, presiding officers need not sign the documents. Only seared minds could be making such deductions.
Sipole 10 years ago

When you go to court to say that a bank branch does not exist, and its later proven that you have on 22 times withdrawn cash from that branch. What do you think the Judges will do to you?

When you go to court to say that a bank branch does not exist, and its later proven that you have on 22 times withdrawn cash from that branch. What do you think the Judges will do to you?
Sipole 10 years ago

If the judgment was corrupt, what about the EVIDENCE you took to the court? I have never seen such a "dehydrated" evidence in my life.

If the judgment was corrupt, what about the EVIDENCE you took to the court? I have never seen such a "dehydrated" evidence in my life.
MAXIMUS 10 years ago

I am not a lawyer, but I believe strongly that the verdict given was corrupt. One does not need a law degree to that the verdict was bad.
The same token I agree with men of wisdom the way the noble Nana Akufo-Addo responded. ...
read full comment

I am not a lawyer, but I believe strongly that the verdict given was corrupt. One does not need a law degree to that the verdict was bad.
The same token I agree with men of wisdom the way the noble Nana Akufo-Addo responded. He said he did not agree, but will not challenge it, that was to prevent innocent blood shed.
As far as I know allowing Atuguba the presidency of the judges was already a defeat for the NPP before the case begun.
This one thing I know for sure, that God almighty is Supreme, and His righteousness endures foreever.
The wicked thought that he had won, until his end was revealed.
Esi Araba. 10 years ago

ABBY IS NO LAWYER. HE DID NOT PASS HIS EXAMS AT lEGON. THEY PUSHED HIM THROUGH BECAUSE OF cronyism. hE IS MAKING NOISE BECAUSE HIS BLOOD RELATIVE LOST AND HE IS NOT BASING HIS ARGUMENTS ON FACTS. WHAT A DISGRACED PERSONAL ...
read full comment

ABBY IS NO LAWYER. HE DID NOT PASS HIS EXAMS AT lEGON. THEY PUSHED HIM THROUGH BECAUSE OF cronyism. hE IS MAKING NOISE BECAUSE HIS BLOOD RELATIVE LOST AND HE IS NOT BASING HIS ARGUMENTS ON FACTS. WHAT A DISGRACED PERSONALITY!!!
CAPE COAST BOY 10 years ago

HE WHO FIGHT AND RUN AWAY LIVES TO FIGHT ANOTHER DAY .

HE WHO FIGHT AND RUN AWAY LIVES TO FIGHT ANOTHER DAY .
Kwame Addo 10 years ago

Gabby’s comments and utterance about SC’s verdict is not only unfortunate but also unnecessary. Gabby is a lawyer and knows very well that courts do not always uphold verdict in favour of the plaintiff. In any case, there ...
read full comment

Gabby’s comments and utterance about SC’s verdict is not only unfortunate but also unnecessary. Gabby is a lawyer and knows very well that courts do not always uphold verdict in favour of the plaintiff. In any case, there is plaintiff’s version, the respondent’s version and the truth. The court rules based on evidence presented to them. And the fact that court does not rule in plaintiff’s favour doesn't make the court corrupt. Article 49 of the constitution demands signatures of presiding officer and parties representatives, however it didn't indicate the absence of the signature of the presiding officer invalidate the votes count. That's how the judges looked at. If you didn't trust the court and you could be your own judge, why petition the court? Do you think any sensible court will annul close to 4 million votes to enable Nana Addo win? What were your meaning of LET MY VOTE COUNT? What do you take these people for? Why didn't you petition the court to annul all votes cast in Ashanti Region but other regions? Gabby knows very well that it is illogical for NPP to win only 2 regions and win majority. These comments against SC are very disgraceful, balderdash, illogical and without legal reasoning and therefore must be condemn.
okofo 10 years ago

If Article 49 says presiding officers MUST sign the pink sheets, that's what we should follow in order to avoid chaos. If anybody does otherwise, it's infringement on the law and MUST be PUNISHED, like any other infringments, ...
read full comment

If Article 49 says presiding officers MUST sign the pink sheets, that's what we should follow in order to avoid chaos. If anybody does otherwise, it's infringement on the law and MUST be PUNISHED, like any other infringments, so future potential offenders will be DETRRED. but where is the PUNISHMENT to serve that purpose in this case? Afari Gyan's famous "NO VERIFICATION, NO VOTE" was extraporated from that part of our statutes.

We'll be in trouble soon if we conduct ourselves in a manner that's contrary to what the CONSTITUTION stipulates under the pretence of so called "interpretation" of the law.

Yes "LET MY VOTE COUNT" was the banner, but it has an assumption or implication of a CLAUSE, that it followed the LAID DOWN RULES, otherwise it's "NOT WORTH THE COUNT".

Your statement, "Do you think any sensible court will annul close to 4 million votes to enable Nana Addo to win", is uncallled for unless you think the election is about Nana Addo: That statement will be deemed to be subjective, because NOBODY asked the judges to apply their "opinion" or "sense", but the LAW. The reason why we have chaos in our body politic is our inability to apply the law, as is, and still find flimsy excuses to justify them.

Finally, Ghana's election is based on POPULAR VOTES as against REGIONAL VOTES, so two most populous regions could place enough votes behind a particular party to win election.

Stop accusing Gabby of making unreasonable claims, because the opposite is tha case. Gabby is questioning the rationale behind the judges rubbishing of Article 49 of our constitution.

If the law did not specifically say the word "ANNUL", you must likewise understand that it neither said "IGNORE". Between that, the sensible thing the judges should have done in order to be "INDEPENDENT of any blame was to, at least, re-run the election at polling stations where Afari Gyan admitted irregularities occured. If they did that, whatever outcome of the re-run would have been the voice of the electorate, and the role judges played would be deemed to be "refrees". The judges SHOULD have themselves to blame for acting contrally to Artcle 49 of our CONSTITUTION.
Dedede 10 years ago

Gabby don't be a wimp. Be bold and say what is on your without been afraid.

Gabby don't be a wimp. Be bold and say what is on your without been afraid.
eric 10 years ago

Just go straight to the point. The verdict is corrupt not the judges.Who are you trying to fool? By the way who gave the decision?

Just go straight to the point. The verdict is corrupt not the judges.Who are you trying to fool? By the way who gave the decision?
NANA YAW 10 years ago

MONKEY FACE GABBY.....WHY ARE YOU RUNNING AWAY? WHO MADE THE corrupt DECISION? NOT THE JUDGES? STUPID UGLY FACE SHOPLIFTER.........

MONKEY FACE GABBY.....WHY ARE YOU RUNNING AWAY? WHO MADE THE corrupt DECISION? NOT THE JUDGES? STUPID UGLY FACE SHOPLIFTER.........
EKOW MUNKO 10 years ago

QUESTION IS WHO MADE THE DECISION THEN ?WAS IT NOT THE JUDGES ? WHY? IS AFRAID NOW?

QUESTION IS WHO MADE THE DECISION THEN ?WAS IT NOT THE JUDGES ? WHY? IS AFRAID NOW?
JK 10 years ago

Now he is qualifying the unwarranted statements that he made.

Now he is qualifying the unwarranted statements that he made.
Julor Agyekum Kwakwe JAK 10 years ago

Look at that fool calling himself a lawyer. Ashantis and Akyems are the same backward idiot bush people.

Look at that fool calling himself a lawyer. Ashantis and Akyems are the same backward idiot bush people.
Bravo USA 10 years ago

Corrupt people make corrupt judgment. Don't walk back your irresponsible statements. You have a corrupt mind therefore you are corrupt.

Corrupt people make corrupt judgment. Don't walk back your irresponsible statements. You have a corrupt mind therefore you are corrupt.
Kwaku Bempah 10 years ago

Dear sir

I find your comment unconviencing due to the fact that you think the final ruling of the SC decision is corrupt but you are not accusing the court or the judges of corruption. If the final ruling is corrupt obvio ...
read full comment

Dear sir

I find your comment unconviencing due to the fact that you think the final ruling of the SC decision is corrupt but you are not accusing the court or the judges of corruption. If the final ruling is corrupt obviousely the Judges are corrupt, Anyway There is no much defference between the election results and the SC ruling. what I mean is that the margin of votes NDC won by and the SC 5:4 VOTING is not conviencing. there must be something wrong somewhere.
thanks

Bempah
Bunny Wailer 10 years ago

Cowards die many times before their death!!

Cowards die many times before their death!!
NANA IS USING BAWUMIA 10 years ago

WHO CARE HOW MANY SYMPOSIA YOU HOLD. YOU HAVE LOST AND NANA ADDO CAN NEVER BECOME PRESIDENT OF GHANA. THAT IS THE END OF THE MATTER.

WHO CARE HOW MANY SYMPOSIA YOU HOLD. YOU HAVE LOST AND NANA ADDO CAN NEVER BECOME PRESIDENT OF GHANA. THAT IS THE END OF THE MATTER.
messa 10 years ago

THE COURT BIGGEST FAILURE IS IT ALLOW AUTHORITY TO BE THE TRUTH,AND PREVENTED THE TRUTH FROM BEING AUTHORITY
SHAME ON GHANA CAWARD JUDGES

THE COURT BIGGEST FAILURE IS IT ALLOW AUTHORITY TO BE THE TRUTH,AND PREVENTED THE TRUTH FROM BEING AUTHORITY
SHAME ON GHANA CAWARD JUDGES
TROUBLE-MAKER 10 years ago

Is the Supreme Court running itself without the Judges? This`s one of the Kejetia market lawyers operating in Kwame Nkrumah Ghana.
Hiaaa!!!

Is the Supreme Court running itself without the Judges? This`s one of the Kejetia market lawyers operating in Kwame Nkrumah Ghana.
Hiaaa!!!
MATIGARI 10 years ago

LITTLE EDUCATION THEY SAY IS DANGEROUS.VERY RECENTLY GABBY WHO GOT THROUGH THE LAW SCHOOL WITH MUCH DIFFICULTY CLAIMS TO HAVE KNOWN THE LAW MORE THAN HIS LECTURERS

LITTLE EDUCATION THEY SAY IS DANGEROUS.VERY RECENTLY GABBY WHO GOT THROUGH THE LAW SCHOOL WITH MUCH DIFFICULTY CLAIMS TO HAVE KNOWN THE LAW MORE THAN HIS LECTURERS
Jay 10 years ago

Gabby could not pass his law exam. It took Justice Paku Kludze from Gbi-Kpeme to remark Gabby's law paper which enable Gabby to pass his exams.
Now we have to hear this guy tell us about court decision. Gabby who cannot pass ...
read full comment

Gabby could not pass his law exam. It took Justice Paku Kludze from Gbi-Kpeme to remark Gabby's law paper which enable Gabby to pass his exams.
Now we have to hear this guy tell us about court decision. Gabby who cannot pass his law exam.
Vodoo Xebieso 10 years ago

Did the "corrupt" decision arrive from nowhere? If from somewhere, then who made the decision? The judges. Therefore the decision can not be said to be corrupt; was made by the "corrupt" judges!!

The judges must drag this ...
read full comment

Did the "corrupt" decision arrive from nowhere? If from somewhere, then who made the decision? The judges. Therefore the decision can not be said to be corrupt; was made by the "corrupt" judges!!

The judges must drag this imbecile boy Gabby to court for insulting them.
Kuffour jnr 10 years ago

Lol

Lol
Paul Amuna 10 years ago

He stated in his opinions that he didn't much care if he was called in for contempt, and cited his uncle Dr JB Dankwah "who suffered for sticking to his convictions". Clearly he knows he was having a dig at the justices and c ...
read full comment

He stated in his opinions that he didn't much care if he was called in for contempt, and cited his uncle Dr JB Dankwah "who suffered for sticking to his convictions". Clearly he knows he was having a dig at the justices and created the impression he would speak his mind, damn the consequences.

So why is he spending time trying to "clarify" what he said? Surely if his great Uncle - Dr Dankwa had convictions, what is clear is that Otchere-Darko lacks them and is as irrelevant as he is inconsistent.
GENERAL DeGAULE 10 years ago

He wants to cast himself as the last warrior standing. But all he's got is a broken spear and rust eaten armour. There is nothing inside this lizard's stomach

He wants to cast himself as the last warrior standing. But all he's got is a broken spear and rust eaten armour. There is nothing inside this lizard's stomach
Akosua Tabuwaa 10 years ago

The SC is not made up of monkeys but Judges.

The SC is not made up of monkeys but Judges.
think straight 10 years ago

I SAID SC DECISION IS CORRUPT,NOT JUDGES=GABBY

I SAID SC DECISION IS CORRUPT,NOT JUDGES=GABBY
GENERAL DeGAULE 10 years ago

Gabby Asare Otchere-Darko says “the decision is corrupt because it gave a corrupted interpretation of the [1992] Constitution; it is like they [justices] sought to amend an entrenched constitutional provision.”

What a ...
read full comment

Gabby Asare Otchere-Darko says “the decision is corrupt because it gave a corrupted interpretation of the [1992] Constitution; it is like they [justices] sought to amend an entrenched constitutional provision.”

What a foolish observation. The petitioner alleged statutory violations and irregularities that are not defined to that extent by the Constitution. Unsigned pink sheets by Presiding Officers, duplicate serial numbers on pink sheets among other matters did not reveal electoral fraud or wilful misconduct on the part of election Officers.
More so, to seek the nullification of 4 million votes in a case presented with so many amendments, corrections and in an incoherent, inconsistent and incoherent manner by Counsel was a legal slight of hand. Considering that the petitioner did not have access to the Asokwa pink sheet.
They came to equity with dirty hands.
SLY 10 years ago

Anytime there is election and NPP wins it is fine, but if they loses then it a rig. You beter coil yourselves in your shells. Dirty urgly things.

Anytime there is election and NPP wins it is fine, but if they loses then it a rig. You beter coil yourselves in your shells. Dirty urgly things.
Dwomo 10 years ago

Mind your english. " THEY LOSES" shame on you.

Mind your english. " THEY LOSES" shame on you.
GHANAIAN OBSERVER 10 years ago

THE IMAGE OF GHANA'S SUPREME COURT IS ALREADY DENTED. WITH JUSTICES ATUGUBA AND BAMFO SIDING AND SHARING SECRET NOTES WITH NDC AFTER EVERY PROCEEDING; AND ATUGUBA OPEN COURT SHOUT AND YELLING AT PETITIONERS LAWYER; AND ATUGUB ...
read full comment

THE IMAGE OF GHANA'S SUPREME COURT IS ALREADY DENTED. WITH JUSTICES ATUGUBA AND BAMFO SIDING AND SHARING SECRET NOTES WITH NDC AFTER EVERY PROCEEDING; AND ATUGUBA OPEN COURT SHOUT AND YELLING AT PETITIONERS LAWYER; AND ATUGUBA’S MACHO AND AUTHORITARIAN ATTITUDE AND BEHAVIOR AS PRESIDENT OF THE COURT, HAS MADE GHANA'S SUPREME COURT USELESS, LAUGHING STOCK AND UNIMPORTANT JUDICIAL HEAD OF THE COUNTRY. IN THE EYES OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY AND GHANAIAN POPULACE AT HOME AND ABROAD, THE TOP COURT IS BIAS AND CORRUPT. GHANAIANS CAN NO LONGER DEPEND ON IT TO SAFEGUARD AND PROTECT THE CONSTITUTION. INDEED, IT IS VERY PATHETIC FOR CHIEF JUSTICE TO APPOINT PARTISAN AND BIAS JUDGE LIKE ATUGUBA TO HEAD SUCH SENSITIVE AND IMPORTANT CASE. ATUGUBA’S BEHAVIOR AND ATITUDE HAS BROUGHT ONE OF THE REPUTABLE AND HIGHLY RESPECTED COURT IN THE WORLD, GHANA SUPREME COURT INTO THE MUD. IT WILL TAKE YEARS FOR THE COURT TO REDEEM ITS IMAGE.
JNR AJASCO 10 years ago

the option of a review of the decision of the SC is not entirely for a petitioner or a respondent. The SC court does this only under exceptional circumstances. u re insulting the judges and yet want to ask for a review?

the option of a review of the decision of the SC is not entirely for a petitioner or a respondent. The SC court does this only under exceptional circumstances. u re insulting the judges and yet want to ask for a review?
OSEI 10 years ago

THE JUDGES BELONG TO THE NDC MAFIA, THE ATUGUBA BROTHERS, TSIKATA ETC. THE NORTHERN ALLIANCE AND ETC

THE JUDGES BELONG TO THE NDC MAFIA, THE ATUGUBA BROTHERS, TSIKATA ETC. THE NORTHERN ALLIANCE AND ETC
Jato.P 10 years ago

You are a lawyer, but I do not believe that you know the law more than the SC judges. Read their judgements before arriving at such a conclusion. In any case in my lay mans view if the judges agree that un signing of pink she ...
read full comment

You are a lawyer, but I do not believe that you know the law more than the SC judges. Read their judgements before arriving at such a conclusion. In any case in my lay mans view if the judges agree that un signing of pink sheets should stand as the law, political presiding officers will willfully refuse to sign pink sheets in future in strongholds of their opponents and this will be a recipe for disaster.
Raymond 10 years ago

This Hollow-headed Gabby was among one of the weakest students in our year batch at the law school. Today this stupid fool who was struggling at the law school is now on the air waves insulting SC Judges simply becos they rej ...
read full comment

This Hollow-headed Gabby was among one of the weakest students in our year batch at the law school. Today this stupid fool who was struggling at the law school is now on the air waves insulting SC Judges simply becos they rejected his hot-headed uncle who wants to be President through "All Die Be Die" Mantra
YAA 10 years ago

THEY ARE COURRPT GABBY PLEASE SAY IT, THEY CANNOT DO ANYTHING TO YOU, BE A MAN. WHERE ARE THE MEN IN GHANA? SPEAK OUT GHANA!!!!! NPP HAS BEEN RUB

THEY ARE COURRPT GABBY PLEASE SAY IT, THEY CANNOT DO ANYTHING TO YOU, BE A MAN. WHERE ARE THE MEN IN GHANA? SPEAK OUT GHANA!!!!! NPP HAS BEEN RUB
Kofi Asem 10 years ago

This is what brainwashing does to ppl: make them hallucinate! I know this YAA lady very well; she's a perfect example of a brainwashed npp-dogma: anything that does not go in their favour is wrong! Pitiful!

This is what brainwashing does to ppl: make them hallucinate! I know this YAA lady very well; she's a perfect example of a brainwashed npp-dogma: anything that does not go in their favour is wrong! Pitiful!
Araba 10 years ago

Its amazing how this gabby man thinks corrupt judgements can be passed by incorrupt people! How is the judgement corrupt but not the ppl who passed it?

Its amazing how this gabby man thinks corrupt judgements can be passed by incorrupt people! How is the judgement corrupt but not the ppl who passed it?
Musah Osman 10 years ago

This blockheaded Otchere-Darko should give us a brake. He should rather aspire to reach that level and stop vilifying our learned judges.Very very soon you would be invited to face comtempt charges for your stupid comments.

This blockheaded Otchere-Darko should give us a brake. He should rather aspire to reach that level and stop vilifying our learned judges.Very very soon you would be invited to face comtempt charges for your stupid comments.
Ghanaba 10 years ago

Let's face the facts, the justices, especially Atuguba, are extremely currupt. They have sold their conscience for money. They think for themselves and not for Ghana. What they have done is a disgrace to Ghana and would have ...
read full comment

Let's face the facts, the justices, especially Atuguba, are extremely currupt. They have sold their conscience for money. They think for themselves and not for Ghana. What they have done is a disgrace to Ghana and would have serious effect on investors confidence. They must be investigated.
KWESI 10 years ago

HI GABBY YOU AND TSATU ARE ALL THE SAME

HI GABBY YOU AND TSATU ARE ALL THE SAME
OGYEABOUR, NC 10 years ago

YOU ARE RIGHT TO SAY THAT GABBY, THE Supreme court has legalised corruption in GHANA. IT IS SHAME!THE LAW IS NOT APPLIED BECAUSE OF BRIBERY AND CORRUPTION.

YOU ARE RIGHT TO SAY THAT GABBY, THE Supreme court has legalised corruption in GHANA. IT IS SHAME!THE LAW IS NOT APPLIED BECAUSE OF BRIBERY AND CORRUPTION.
dunaa 10 years ago

From the comments I see in various Ghanaian forums, I conclude that Ghanaians have an impulse to suppress opinions with which they do not agree. I do not know what Gabby meant by this statement, nor do I know what reasoning s ...
read full comment

From the comments I see in various Ghanaian forums, I conclude that Ghanaians have an impulse to suppress opinions with which they do not agree. I do not know what Gabby meant by this statement, nor do I know what reasoning stood behind the decision of the Supreme Court justices. I will accept both at face value however. The problem is not the decision or the comment by Gabby. The problem is that Ghanaian society is hopelessly corrupt. I believe that every one in the electoral process was corrupted. A bribe here, a bribe there and one gets elected or re-elected to office. This is Ghana we are discussing, where one has to bribe the nurses in the hospital if you are unfortunate enough to find yourself sick. You also have to bribe the mortuary people if you are unfortunate enough to find yourself dead! In between those two events, you have to bribe everyone you meet. I have this gut feeling that people at all levels of the election process were hopelessly compromised even before the election took place. People in the NDC found that during their time in opposition that they were destitute. They were determined not to ever be in that position again. Add new found oil money and you find the Woyome phenomena. In the final analysis, an election means something when the people who count the ballots are honest and incorruptible, and in Ghana that is a very commodity indeed.
Amenyo,Tema 10 years ago

No wonder his(Gabby's) Grandpa J B Danquah failed eight(8) times. Why won't he Gabby fail his exams also since it's hereditary. Shut up Mr. Failure.

No wonder his(Gabby's) Grandpa J B Danquah failed eight(8) times. Why won't he Gabby fail his exams also since it's hereditary. Shut up Mr. Failure.
JETUMA 10 years ago

THESE PEOPLE WILL NOT LEARN.MAKE YOUR OWN JUDGEMENT TOMORROW.

THESE PEOPLE WILL NOT LEARN.MAKE YOUR OWN JUDGEMENT TOMORROW.
NPP 10 years ago

Gabby but the supreme court judges are the people who take the decision,hahahaha your running away (dankasewa)

Gabby but the supreme court judges are the people who take the decision,hahahaha your running away (dankasewa)
kodjo 10 years ago

EC is corrupt, SC is corrupt, NDC is corrupt, Police is corrupt, ONLY NPP is clean!! These guys are so damned irritating, like a boil on your arse!!!

EC is corrupt, SC is corrupt, NDC is corrupt, Police is corrupt, ONLY NPP is clean!! These guys are so damned irritating, like a boil on your arse!!!
Mawusi 10 years ago

Who do you think you can fool. The decision was handed down by the judges so you cannot say the decision by itself is corrupt and not the judges. You are insulting the whole judicial process of Ghana. It's time you stop the n ...
read full comment

Who do you think you can fool. The decision was handed down by the judges so you cannot say the decision by itself is corrupt and not the judges. You are insulting the whole judicial process of Ghana. It's time you stop the nonsense, Gabby.
osei yao 10 years ago

Did NPP have agents at the polling stations where pink sheets were not signed? The Supreme Court might have taken the view that technology has overtaken the provision. The results were "texted" to the collation center with th ...
read full comment

Did NPP have agents at the polling stations where pink sheets were not signed? The Supreme Court might have taken the view that technology has overtaken the provision. The results were "texted" to the collation center with the agreement of all present.
Gabby accused the judges of something worst: they were ignorant and did not have enough intelligence to properly understand and interpret the constitution.
John Anamse 10 years ago

Gabby is deteriorating fast in his analysis these days.
There is a principle that if you belong to a group that frowns upon its members who analyse issues objectively, then you are likely to grow stale. That is what is happe ...
read full comment

Gabby is deteriorating fast in his analysis these days.
There is a principle that if you belong to a group that frowns upon its members who analyse issues objectively, then you are likely to grow stale. That is what is happening to Gabby and the NPP.
Gabby previously announced that he was going to retire from politics. I think that will serve him better and he might have to consider correcting the NPP intolerance or quit.
How can you say that a decision is corrupt but those who gave the decision are not corrupt.
The attempt to explain it away is even more ridiculous. If you do not have the judgment statements of the Justices, how do you conclude that the are corrupting the constitution.
Bite the bullet, may be you will get wounded and get healed afterwards.
osei kingsley, lagos 10 years ago

You are now making u turn.You people should establish companies in ghana and stop all these bla bla.Dankote owns alot of companies and also influencial in his country Nigeria here.He doesnt behave in a manner as you nation de ...
read full comment

You are now making u turn.You people should establish companies in ghana and stop all these bla bla.Dankote owns alot of companies and also influencial in his country Nigeria here.He doesnt behave in a manner as you nation detractors do in ghana.
JOE 10 years ago

DID YOU EVER PASS YOUR LAW EXAMINATIONS?
I RECOLLECT THE LAW CERTIFICATE WAS GIVEN TO YOU EX-GRATIA AT A TIME AKUFO ADO WAS KUFFUOS ATTORNEY GENERAL AFTER YOU HAVE FAILED SEVERAL TIMES AND WOULD HAVE FAILED AGAIN DUE TO ILLO ...
read full comment

DID YOU EVER PASS YOUR LAW EXAMINATIONS?
I RECOLLECT THE LAW CERTIFICATE WAS GIVEN TO YOU EX-GRATIA AT A TIME AKUFO ADO WAS KUFFUOS ATTORNEY GENERAL AFTER YOU HAVE FAILED SEVERAL TIMES AND WOULD HAVE FAILED AGAIN DUE TO ILLOGICAL REASONING!!!!
BOY KOFI 10 years ago

There is no difference of what you said before and what you are saying now,Gabby.Thank you.

There is no difference of what you said before and what you are saying now,Gabby.Thank you.
Eric. K. Appiah-Odame 10 years ago

Mr. Gabby,

After carefully reading through your article dated September 2, 2013 I fine no basis for you arguing that your words have been misconstrued. I quote your words; "I mean if an entrenched provision says that a pre ...
read full comment

Mr. Gabby,

After carefully reading through your article dated September 2, 2013 I fine no basis for you arguing that your words have been misconstrued. I quote your words; "I mean if an entrenched provision says that a presiding officer must sign [election results declaration forms] and the majority of the Supreme Court says that polling agents were there so even if the Presiding Officer did not sign it is ok, I think it is a corruption of the constitution and I owe no apologies for that.”
I ask, but you agree that there were people present who supervised the whole exercise of the voting and who are from your domain? Then your argument that you are not insinuating the judges are corrupt is a fallacy and unguarded. Unguarded because you meant the judges are corrupt, because they came up with the ruling.
Sorry for your inconsistency and I ask that you become content when you loose in a context and gunner strength to do a come-back next time. Please don't waste time on things that arte trivial.
Tsintsinbir 10 years ago

After denigrating the ruling of the SC as corrupt Gabby is now finding a hiding place. It is said that a man is his words so if the ruling of the SC is corrupt then corrupt men gave that ruling. Now that Gabby sees contempt a ...
read full comment

After denigrating the ruling of the SC as corrupt Gabby is now finding a hiding place. It is said that a man is his words so if the ruling of the SC is corrupt then corrupt men gave that ruling. Now that Gabby sees contempt and prison staring at him and that of Tsatsu he is shying away from his own words. Fearful afraid man.
Ike (NY) 10 years ago

Where is the Christian Council

Where is the Christian Council
Alex Kojo Sammy-Paris 10 years ago

Ahhhhhhh dema? i hope Mr Gabby will close this immediatly if u play rough....the selection that will touch u, u'will never forget in the great Jesus name with Amen! Ogyamanase speaking nd babye from now....God blesses is here ...
read full comment

Ahhhhhhh dema? i hope Mr Gabby will close this immediatly if u play rough....the selection that will touch u, u'will never forget in the great Jesus name with Amen! Ogyamanase speaking nd babye from now....God blesses is here in GHANA....nd AMEN!....
Daniel 10 years ago

Gabby why should you affried to say they are corrupt thanks.

Gabby why should you affried to say they are corrupt thanks.
Jay 10 years ago

So you want to nullify votes because the presiding office did not sign. Though all the political parties representatives signed that the results were were accurate?
This is why you gabby failed your law exams. The great Just ...
read full comment

So you want to nullify votes because the presiding office did not sign. Though all the political parties representatives signed that the results were were accurate?
This is why you gabby failed your law exams. The great Justice Paku an npp member has to remark your papers for you to pass you law exams.
Nana addo 10 years ago

stupid Gabby.

stupid Gabby.
THE LONE PROPHET OF JEHOVAH 10 years ago

Talking to the driver concerning the mate,ha now you runing,runing away from yourself Gabby?????

Talking to the driver concerning the mate,ha now you runing,runing away from yourself Gabby?????
STRAIGHT TALK 10 years ago

IS GABBY RUNNING AWAY?

IS GABBY RUNNING AWAY?
Paa Kodwo 10 years ago

THIS GABBY SHOULD BE ARRESTED IMMEDIADTLY AND CHARGED FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT FOR INSULTING THE INTEGRITY OF THE SITTING JUDGES AT THE SUPREME COURT OF GHANA.

WHAT TYPE OF PRIMITIVE HOME DOES HE COME FROM.

GHANA CANNOT AL ...
read full comment

THIS GABBY SHOULD BE ARRESTED IMMEDIADTLY AND CHARGED FOR CONTEMPT OF COURT FOR INSULTING THE INTEGRITY OF THE SITTING JUDGES AT THE SUPREME COURT OF GHANA.

WHAT TYPE OF PRIMITIVE HOME DOES HE COME FROM.

GHANA CANNOT ALLOW THESE EMPTY HEADS TO GROUND THE MACHINERY OF THE JUDICIAL SYSTEM IN GHANA.

THE SO CALLED DANQUAH INSTITUTE WHICH HE HEADS, HAS NOTHING BETTER TO OFFER TO THE STATE OF GHANA THAN CRIMINAL DISTURBANCES IN THE COUNTRY.

THIS FOLK NEED TO MEET THE FULL WEIGHT OF JUSTICE IN GHANA.

GHANA IS NOT A JUNGLE AND A BANANA REPUBLIC.

ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.
Paa Kodwo 10 years ago

IS THE SO CALLED DANQUAH INSTITUTE A ''THINK-TANK'' ORGANISATION.

THIS IS A CRIMINAL ORGANISATION THERE TO HALT THE ECONOMIC AND SOCISAL DEVELOPMENT OF OUR DEAR HOMELAND PRACTICED BY DANQUAH-DOMBO-BUSIA DURING THEIR PRIMIT ...
read full comment

IS THE SO CALLED DANQUAH INSTITUTE A ''THINK-TANK'' ORGANISATION.

THIS IS A CRIMINAL ORGANISATION THERE TO HALT THE ECONOMIC AND SOCISAL DEVELOPMENT OF OUR DEAR HOMELAND PRACTICED BY DANQUAH-DOMBO-BUSIA DURING THEIR PRIMITIVE POLITICAL LIFE
TIMES.

A THINK-TANK-THINK ABOUT IT
TAMBRO 10 years ago

GABBY'S CONTEMPTIOUS STATEMENT IS FAR MORE SERIOUS THAN WHAT TSATSU SAID AND HE NEEDS TO FACE THE SC FOR THAT.

GABBY'S CONTEMPTIOUS STATEMENT IS FAR MORE SERIOUS THAN WHAT TSATSU SAID AND HE NEEDS TO FACE THE SC FOR THAT.
pepeni 10 years ago

The law is what the judges say it is. Nothing more nothing less.

The law is what the judges say it is. Nothing more nothing less.
The Singing Lawyer Otool 10 years ago

Gabby, are you out of your mind? Is it some objects in the supreme court which gave the decision or human beings judges who provided the decision? No wonder you've grown belly goat beard.

Gabby, are you out of your mind? Is it some objects in the supreme court which gave the decision or human beings judges who provided the decision? No wonder you've grown belly goat beard.
Abongo 10 years ago

The SC is made up of judges and they made the decision so who is corrupt, the decision or the judges? Dam idiot.

The SC is made up of judges and they made the decision so who is corrupt, the decision or the judges? Dam idiot.
GEORGE UK 10 years ago

GABBY DON'T CHANGE YOUR MIND ABOUT YOUR PREVIOUS COMMENT. YOU COWARD AND OUGHT TO FEEL ASHAMED OF YOUR SELF.

GABBY DON'T CHANGE YOUR MIND ABOUT YOUR PREVIOUS COMMENT. YOU COWARD AND OUGHT TO FEEL ASHAMED OF YOUR SELF.
ASANTEWA 10 years ago

ABOLISH ELECTIONS IN GHANA

LET THE CHIEFS RULE US.

FOOLISH SC.

ABOLISH ELECTIONS IN GHANA

LET THE CHIEFS RULE US.

FOOLISH SC.
John 10 years ago

Well, most people say they are Christians and Muslims.Why not go by the constitution and the Religious Books? No- because we're corrupt. Where is justice?

Well, most people say they are Christians and Muslims.Why not go by the constitution and the Religious Books? No- because we're corrupt. Where is justice?
Nana Gyakabram 10 years ago

The Chief Justice has time and time again been talking about some Judges being corrupt. She knows what evidence she has to warrant her making such allegations and statements in public. The recent judgement by some so-called s ...
read full comment

The Chief Justice has time and time again been talking about some Judges being corrupt. She knows what evidence she has to warrant her making such allegations and statements in public. The recent judgement by some so-called shit and crackpot supreme court judges on the Akuffo Addo & co matters has really justified the assertions of the Chief Justice.

Atugubah and some others have been mentioned in a 2 million dollars plus one 4x4 bribery incident in this matter as an incentive for their willingness to pervert the course of Justice.

I am appealing to the so-called judges concerned to come out and publicly swear an oath to deny these allegations and the facts would then be brought to light.
Nana Gyakabram 10 years ago

Atugubah, please give up the blood money and go and kill yourself for letting Ghana down.

You swore to uphold the Constitution of Ghana, yet you allowed money (bribery) to cloud your judgement over justice.

You clearl ...
read full comment

Atugubah, please give up the blood money and go and kill yourself for letting Ghana down.

You swore to uphold the Constitution of Ghana, yet you allowed money (bribery) to cloud your judgement over justice.

You clearly indicated your willingness to accept money for the judgement when you uttered some words in the Sir John contempt trial. That is when you sent the signal out that you were ready for the money.

Shame unto you ATUGUBAH.

I said SC decision is corrupt; not judges – Gabby

Read Comments .st0{display:none;fill:#14BDD3;} .st1{display:none;} .st2{display:inline;fill:#FC0F0F;} .st3{display:inline;fill:#FFFFFF;} .st4{display:inline;fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:6;stroke-miterlimit:10;} Comments (112)

Read Comments Comments (112)