Idiotic so-called leaders can't see thru 17 hours ago
No matter how many pros and cons are generated, the real reason is that the Europeans want to halve the frequency lof player releases for Afcon, but our literal coconut heads, led by Motsepe, can't see that.
Dismiss the idea ... read full comment
No matter how many pros and cons are generated, the real reason is that the Europeans want to halve the frequency lof player releases for Afcon, but our literal coconut heads, led by Motsepe, can't see that.
Dismiss the idea, keep us biennial.
SKY 4 hours ago
Why not chose middle ground and opt for 3 years?
Why not chose middle ground and opt for 3 years?
Asiedu 17 hours ago
Two-year AFCON will disrupt the local league. Maintain the four- year cycle.
Two-year AFCON will disrupt the local league. Maintain the four- year cycle.
@Asiedu 16 hours ago
And your rotten local non-league, where the average attendance is 1,000, is more exciting to you than Afcon?
And your rotten local non-league, where the average attendance is 1,000, is more exciting to you than Afcon?
Yao 12 hours ago
@Asiedu, you are too generous as the average attendance in the local league is about 500.
@Asiedu, you are too generous as the average attendance in the local league is about 500.
Issaka 16 hours ago
Two years is best it brings excitement every two years
Two years is best it brings excitement every two years
@Isaac 16 hours ago
And it prepares our players better for the world cup than the quadrennial because of the higher frequency of Afcon.
And it prepares our players better for the world cup than the quadrennial because of the higher frequency of Afcon.
Abacha 12 hours ago
2 years is the best. It gives players the opportunity to represent their country well.
2 years is the best. It gives players the opportunity to represent their country well.
Markito 9 hours ago
if CAF's arguing one of the reasons to revert to 4 years is to reduce pressure on players, BUT is still proposing ANOTHER NEW 2 yearly league, that's counterproductive? CAF should maintain the 2 years, players can increas ... read full comment
if CAF's arguing one of the reasons to revert to 4 years is to reduce pressure on players, BUT is still proposing ANOTHER NEW 2 yearly league, that's counterproductive? CAF should maintain the 2 years, players can increase their caps, set beautiful records . Football brings development, and rotating the hosting can be used to develop infrastructure of various African countries
Kofi 8 hours ago
EUFA started this agenda that 2 years AFCON normally takes away the African players in the European League and CAF bought into it. Surprisingly EUFA then introduced the Nations League so the their national will be more engage ... read full comment
EUFA started this agenda that 2 years AFCON normally takes away the African players in the European League and CAF bought into it. Surprisingly EUFA then introduced the Nations League so the their national will be more engaged and also help in the FIFA rankings as they will be playing more matches.
I wonder my the CAF executives are so daft . They have their own personal agenda to fulfill.
Asaase-J 8 hours ago
Leave it alone, every two years. Stop being dictated to. Has Europe changed hers? Corrupt winnies
Leave it alone, every two years. Stop being dictated to. Has Europe changed hers? Corrupt winnies
Ad Ghana 8 hours ago
Planning an event, concert, program or you have new products in stock that need great advertisements?? Then contact Adverts Ghana for expert digital and social media advertising.
www.advertsghana.com or 0244605868
Planning an event, concert, program or you have new products in stock that need great advertisements?? Then contact Adverts Ghana for expert digital and social media advertising.
www.advertsghana.com or 0244605868
No matter how many pros and cons are generated, the real reason is that the Europeans want to halve the frequency lof player releases for Afcon, but our literal coconut heads, led by Motsepe, can't see that.
Dismiss the idea ...
read full comment
Why not chose middle ground and opt for 3 years?
Two-year AFCON will disrupt the local league. Maintain the four- year cycle.
And your rotten local non-league, where the average attendance is 1,000, is more exciting to you than Afcon?
@Asiedu, you are too generous as the average attendance in the local league is about 500.
Two years is best it brings excitement every two years
And it prepares our players better for the world cup than the quadrennial because of the higher frequency of Afcon.
2 years is the best. It gives players the opportunity to represent their country well.
if CAF's arguing one of the reasons to revert to 4 years is to reduce pressure on players, BUT is still proposing ANOTHER NEW 2 yearly league, that's counterproductive? CAF should maintain the 2 years, players can increas ...
read full comment
EUFA started this agenda that 2 years AFCON normally takes away the African players in the European League and CAF bought into it. Surprisingly EUFA then introduced the Nations League so the their national will be more engage ...
read full comment
Leave it alone, every two years. Stop being dictated to. Has Europe changed hers? Corrupt winnies
Planning an event, concert, program or you have new products in stock that need great advertisements?? Then contact Adverts Ghana for expert digital and social media advertising.
www.advertsghana.com or 0244605868