You guys should hold back your private matters private. Sorry for your divorce however, there is no need to cry out louder for public sympathy
You guys should hold back your private matters private. Sorry for your divorce however, there is no need to cry out louder for public sympathy
Kelvin 7 hours ago
Anyone can be part of owners in a company as soon as the person buys a share in that company. So give us a break.
Anyone can be part of owners in a company as soon as the person buys a share in that company. So give us a break.
No nails 6 hours ago
Hahahaha sore loser
Hahahaha sore loser
Jesus saves 3 hours ago
You know nothing about law
You know nothing about law
Ghanaian 8 hours ago
Rich solve this peacefully before it gets out of hand
Rich solve this peacefully before it gets out of hand
Diasempe George 8 hours ago
This is what Joana Quaye is saying for herself now after judgment has been given in the divorce matter. Did she give this evidence during the hearing in the divorce matter ? If not then why ?
Ghanaweb why have you not publi ... read full comment
This is what Joana Quaye is saying for herself now after judgment has been given in the divorce matter. Did she give this evidence during the hearing in the divorce matter ? If not then why ?
Ghanaweb why have you not published the defence of Richard in response to these evidence whether new or old ?
What did the judgment say in respect of this evidence ? Your publications in respect of this matter is one-sided and biased towards Joana. Please note that Joana cannot introduce new evidence at the appeal which was available upon a diligent search after judgment has been given.
Please publish the whole judgment for all to see.
Court filings are processes filed by the parties, that is wife or husband, which upon trial or hearing has to be proved by evidence and accepted as proved in the judgment for the court to rely on it and apply the law. If court filings are not proved during hearing and accepted as proved in the judgment it would not have any effect of the sharing of marital property. Many times wife or husband may make a claim in the court filings but fail to prove it by evidence, this claim would therefore have no effect of the judgment.
Macarious 7 hours ago
Money talks and bullshit walks. Richard Quaye stand firm and don't give in to the embittered mercenaries who are trying their utmost best to shame men. They just want to as it were, "show you" to prove their evil feminist poi ... read full comment
Money talks and bullshit walks. Richard Quaye stand firm and don't give in to the embittered mercenaries who are trying their utmost best to shame men. They just want to as it were, "show you" to prove their evil feminist point against men. You are fighting a good fight on behalf of all men who have been and will continue to be exploited by greedy disappointed women who want to harvest where they have not sown. Right on.
Johnny 7 hours ago
It seems you know the law more than those senior lawyers and Joana's lawyer who have called for an appeal. Are you aware the first ruling could be wrong?
It seems you know the law more than those senior lawyers and Joana's lawyer who have called for an appeal. Are you aware the first ruling could be wrong?
Bobby Stones 5 hours ago
The first ruling was definitely wrong and influence by issues or factors we don't know. Going by what the story is telling us, she definitely has shares in his business.
The first ruling was definitely wrong and influence by issues or factors we don't know. Going by what the story is telling us, she definitely has shares in his business.
Never use dishonest BEEDEG for your shipping 8 hours ago
Heartless people
Heartless people
Kwei 6 hours ago
The first court ruling wad on marriage assert, this is a company shareholder stake, once it's confirmed. I will advice her to sell her stake.
The first court ruling wad on marriage assert, this is a company shareholder stake, once it's confirmed. I will advice her to sell her stake.
Diasempe George 5 hours ago
She is not a shareholder currently. She seems to be saying that her husband changed the shareholding without her knowledge and consent. She should have raised this argument and prove that her 100,000 shares was stolen or take ... read full comment
She is not a shareholder currently. She seems to be saying that her husband changed the shareholding without her knowledge and consent. She should have raised this argument and prove that her 100,000 shares was stolen or taken away from her. If proved the judge would make the necessary orders and restore her shares. If not proved the judge would dismiss this claim and would find that she is not a shareholder and apply the law, she would not get any share of the company.
If she did not state that her shares were stolen or taken away without her consent and lead evidence to prove same during the trial at the High Court she cannot introduce this evidence at the Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal rarely take new evidence especially when the evidence was available at the time trial and could have been discovered upon diligent search. But if this piece of evidence was given but the High Court overuled it then the Court of Appeal would look at it to see whether the High Court was wrong or right. If the Court of Appeal finds the High Court wrong it would restore her 100,000 shares.
Her claim that other companies or businesses were acquired the money from the company would have to be proved at the High Court first before the Court of Appeal would consider it. It cannot be introduced by new evidence at the Appeal.
Ghanaweb should publish the judgment for all to see.
Django 5 hours ago
Masa are you a lawyer?? You’re writing a whole lot of rubbish. Don’t watch too much crime movies
Masa are you a lawyer?? You’re writing a whole lot of rubbish. Don’t watch too much crime movies
Diasempe George 2 hours ago
Yes I am a lawyer. What i have stated is the position of the law. Follow the case to the end and see what happens.
Yes I am a lawyer. What i have stated is the position of the law. Follow the case to the end and see what happens.
Clynns 3 hours ago
Bills micro what what is a criminal entity they give loan and collect 100% interest they are criminals and it's God who is beginning to let Ghanaians know their criminology..
Bills micro what what is a criminal entity they give loan and collect 100% interest they are criminals and it's God who is beginning to let Ghanaians know their criminology..
Macarious 1 hour ago
@ Clynns. Hey shut up. Nobody forced you to go and take a loan from Bills Micro credit. If you did not like their terms, why did you take their loan only to return their kind service with ungrateful abuse. There are many oth ... read full comment
@ Clynns. Hey shut up. Nobody forced you to go and take a loan from Bills Micro credit. If you did not like their terms, why did you take their loan only to return their kind service with ungrateful abuse. There are many other micro credit companies around town. Why didn't you go to any of them? Shameless idiot.
Kofi Amankwa 1 hour ago
Why don't u settle this matter privately, and go on with your marriage, the devil is at hand ,don't allow
Why don't u settle this matter privately, and go on with your marriage, the devil is at hand ,don't allow
Gra 54 minutes ago
Go to the commercial court.. not the divorce court. The divorce court was right in its decision. The commercial courts are the to settle business related issues, such as this
Go to the commercial court.. not the divorce court. The divorce court was right in its decision. The commercial courts are the to settle business related issues, such as this
WHO CARES? LETS THINK PLS
You guys should hold back your private matters private. Sorry for your divorce however, there is no need to cry out louder for public sympathy
Anyone can be part of owners in a company as soon as the person buys a share in that company. So give us a break.
Hahahaha sore loser
You know nothing about law
Rich solve this peacefully before it gets out of hand
This is what Joana Quaye is saying for herself now after judgment has been given in the divorce matter. Did she give this evidence during the hearing in the divorce matter ? If not then why ?
Ghanaweb why have you not publi ...
read full comment
Money talks and bullshit walks. Richard Quaye stand firm and don't give in to the embittered mercenaries who are trying their utmost best to shame men. They just want to as it were, "show you" to prove their evil feminist poi ...
read full comment
It seems you know the law more than those senior lawyers and Joana's lawyer who have called for an appeal. Are you aware the first ruling could be wrong?
The first ruling was definitely wrong and influence by issues or factors we don't know. Going by what the story is telling us, she definitely has shares in his business.
Heartless people
The first court ruling wad on marriage assert, this is a company shareholder stake, once it's confirmed. I will advice her to sell her stake.
She is not a shareholder currently. She seems to be saying that her husband changed the shareholding without her knowledge and consent. She should have raised this argument and prove that her 100,000 shares was stolen or take ...
read full comment
Masa are you a lawyer?? You’re writing a whole lot of rubbish. Don’t watch too much crime movies
Yes I am a lawyer. What i have stated is the position of the law. Follow the case to the end and see what happens.
Bills micro what what is a criminal entity they give loan and collect 100% interest they are criminals and it's God who is beginning to let Ghanaians know their criminology..
@ Clynns. Hey shut up. Nobody forced you to go and take a loan from Bills Micro credit. If you did not like their terms, why did you take their loan only to return their kind service with ungrateful abuse. There are many oth ...
read full comment
Why don't u settle this matter privately, and go on with your marriage, the devil is at hand ,don't allow
Go to the commercial court.. not the divorce court. The divorce court was right in its decision. The commercial courts are the to settle business related issues, such as this