Read Comments Comments (22)

• BREAKING NEWS: DEPORTEES FOR VISA DEAL CONFIRMED 2 months ago

  Why would Burkina Faso stand firm to refuse the US Deportees for Visa Agreement and Ghana couldn’t?
  What a Government of liars!

  Why would Burkina Faso stand firm to refuse the US Deportees for Visa Agreement and Ghana couldn’t?
  What a Government of liars!

  reply
• Owan Yaw aka Teteman Ubi 2 months ago

  And what has Burkina Faso’s foreign policy got to do with that of Ghana? Ghana does what is sees best for its interests. I bet some Burkinabes will find a way to secure Ghanaian passports to facilitate travel to the U.S.

  And what has Burkina Faso’s foreign policy got to do with that of Ghana? Ghana does what is sees best for its interests. I bet some Burkinabes will find a way to secure Ghanaian passports to facilitate travel to the U.S.

  reply
• GHANA 2 months ago

  BREAKING NEWS !!!!!!!!!
  THE YOUTH WITHOUT PARTY COLORS
  'Comparative Analysis of the NPP Governments under John Agyekum Kufuor and Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo
  
  In recent years, politically unaffiliated youth in Ghana have ...
  read full comment

  BREAKING NEWS !!!!!!!!!
  THE YOUTH WITHOUT PARTY COLORS
  'Comparative Analysis of the NPP Governments under John Agyekum Kufuor and Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo
  
  In recent years, politically unaffiliated youth in Ghana have increasingly sought to critically examine the contrasting leadership orientations of the two New Patriotic Party (NPP) governments — those led by President John Agyekum Kufuor (2001–2009) and President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo (2017–2024). Although both administrations emerge from the same political tradition, they exhibit distinct approaches to governance, cabinet composition, and policy implementation.
  
  President Kufuor’s administration is widely recognized for its reliance on technocratic expertise, intellectual competence, and experience. His cabinet included professionals from diverse fields such as economics, law, education, and international relations, reflecting his belief in meritocratic governance and evidence-based policy design (Boafo-Arthur, 2007). Kufuor’s leadership philosophy emphasized institutional capacity-building, macroeconomic stability, and good governance. Notably, his government pursued policies such as the Highly Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) initiative and the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS), which contributed to fiscal consolidation and social welfare expansion (Aryeetey & Kanbur, 2008).
  
  In contrast, President Akufo-Addo’s government is often characterized by its emphasis on trust, loyalty, and personal relationships. Several of his appointees are long-time allies, relatives, or individuals with deep political loyalty to the President and the NPP. This approach, while fostering internal cohesion and political loyalty, has been criticized for limiting technocratic diversity and promoting perceptions of nepotism (Ayee, 2021). Nonetheless, Akufo-Addo’s administration has also demonstrated strong political will in implementing ambitious flagship initiatives such as the Free Senior High School (Free SHS) policy and the One District, One Factory (1D1F) industrialization programme (Obeng-Odoom, 2020).
  
  However, any fair comparison between the two administrations must acknowledge their distinct historical and global contexts. Kufuor’s presidency coincided with a period of relative international stability and robust global economic growth, while Akufo-Addo’s tenure has been marked by severe external shocks, including the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia–Ukraine conflict, both of which significantly disrupted global supply chains and domestic fiscal balance (World Bank, 2023). These external crises have compounded Ghana’s macroeconomic challenges, leading to inflationary pressures, currency depreciation, and a resurgence of debt distress.
  
  In conclusion, while both leaders share the ideological foundation of the NPP — emphasizing liberal economic policies, private sector development, and democratic consolidation — their administrations diverge in leadership orientation and governance philosophy. Kufuor’s government can be described as technocratically driven and institutionally oriented, whereas Akufo-Addo’s administration appears loyalty-driven and relationship-oriented. A comprehensive assessment of their performances must therefore consider not only leadership style but also the broader domestic and global contexts that shaped their respective tenures.

  reply
• K Poku-London-UK 2 months ago

  The NPP FLAGBEARERSHIP election is an undemocratic experiment because why is the defeated NPP Executives still in power? Those NPP party Executives should have resigned enmass for new Executives to be elected but through the ...
  read full comment

  The NPP FLAGBEARERSHIP election is an undemocratic experiment because why is the defeated NPP Executives still in power? Those NPP party Executives should have resigned enmass for new Executives to be elected but through the NPP AKYEM Abuakwa CRIMINALS Akuffo Addo and Bawumia manipulation of issues, they are trying to manipulate the outcome of the election. It is a disgrace. It is undemocratic. The NPP grassroots must elect their constituency Executives first. Why why why?========

  reply
• GHANA 2 months ago

  BREAKING NEWS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  THE YOUTH WITHOUT PARTY COLORS
  'Comparative Analysis of the NPP Governments under John Agyekum Kufuor and Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo
  
  In recent years, politically unaffiliated youth in Ghana ...
  read full comment

  BREAKING NEWS !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
  THE YOUTH WITHOUT PARTY COLORS
  'Comparative Analysis of the NPP Governments under John Agyekum Kufuor and Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo
  
  In recent years, politically unaffiliated youth in Ghana have increasingly sought to critically examine the contrasting leadership orientations of the two New Patriotic Party (NPP) governments — those led by President John Agyekum Kufuor (2001–2009) and President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo (2017–2024). Although both administrations emerge from the same political tradition, they exhibit distinct approaches to governance, cabinet composition, and policy implementation.
  
  President Kufuor’s administration is widely recognized for its reliance on technocratic expertise, intellectual competence, and experience. His cabinet included professionals from diverse fields such as economics, law, education, and international relations, reflecting his belief in meritocratic governance and evidence-based policy design (Boafo-Arthur, 2007). Kufuor’s leadership philosophy emphasized institutional capacity-building, macroeconomic stability, and good governance. Notably, his government pursued policies such as the Highly Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) initiative and the National Health Insurance Scheme (NHIS), which contributed to fiscal consolidation and social welfare expansion (Aryeetey & Kanbur, 2008).
  
  In contrast, President Akufo-Addo’s government is often characterized by its emphasis on trust, loyalty, and personal relationships. Several of his appointees are long-time allies, relatives, or individuals with deep political loyalty to the President and the NPP. This approach, while fostering internal cohesion and political loyalty, has been criticized for limiting technocratic diversity and promoting perceptions of nepotism (Ayee, 2021). Nonetheless, Akufo-Addo’s administration has also demonstrated strong political will in implementing ambitious flagship initiatives such as the Free Senior High School (Free SHS) policy and the One District, One Factory (1D1F) industrialization programme (Obeng-Odoom, 2020).
  
  However, any fair comparison between the two administrations must acknowledge their distinct historical and global contexts. Kufuor’s presidency coincided with a period of relative international stability and robust global economic growth, while Akufo-Addo’s tenure has been marked by severe external shocks, including the COVID-19 pandemic and the Russia–Ukraine conflict, both of which significantly disrupted global supply chains and domestic fiscal balance (World Bank, 2023). These external crises have compounded Ghana’s macroeconomic challenges, leading to inflationary pressures, currency depreciation, and a resurgence of debt distress.
  
  In conclusion, while both leaders share the ideological foundation of the NPP — emphasizing liberal economic policies, private sector development, and democratic consolidation — their administrations diverge in leadership orientation and governance philosophy. Kufuor’s government can be described as technocratically driven and institutionally oriented, whereas Akufo-Addo’s administration appears loyalty-driven and relationship-oriented. A comprehensive assessment of their performances must therefore consider not only leadership style but also the broader domestic and global contexts that shaped their respective tenures.

  reply
• OSAFO KANTANKA 2 months ago

  I am afraid the NPP we knew has gone to the “DOGS”. It is DOOMED !!! FINISHED!!

  I am afraid the NPP we knew has gone to the “DOGS”. It is DOOMED !!! FINISHED!!

  reply
• Owan Yaw aka Teteman Ubi 2 months ago

  Prof. Oquaye’s comment is timely. While there has always been arm twisting and some form of corruption in political party activities (all parties are culprits), requesting GHS 4.0 million from candidates as development fees ...
  read full comment

  Prof. Oquaye’s comment is timely. While there has always been arm twisting and some form of corruption in political party activities (all parties are culprits), requesting GHS 4.0 million from candidates as development fees is a recipe for chaos and further enable corruption in the corridors of government should the NPP come back to power. One would question how much the former VP and former Minister for Agriculture pocketed before leaving office.

  reply
• Raymond 2 months ago

  Prof, I doff my hat !

  Prof, I doff my hat !

  reply
• K Poku-London-UK 2 months ago

  The NPP FLAGBEARERSHIP election is an undemocratic experiment because why is the defeated NPP Executives still in power? Those NPP party Executives should have resigned enmass for new Executives to be elected but through the ...
  read full comment

  The NPP FLAGBEARERSHIP election is an undemocratic experiment because why is the defeated NPP Executives still in power? Those NPP party Executives should have resigned enmass for new Executives to be elected but through the NPP AKYEM Abuakwa CRIMINALS Akuffo Addo and Bawumia manipulation of issues, they are trying to manipulate the outcome of the election. It is a disgrace. It is undemocratic. The NPP grassroots must elect their constituency Executives first. Why why why?

  reply
• Scammer Mahama the Gonja mafia. 2 months ago

  Gonja mafia John Mahama and his QNET govt should know that these bogus politically and selective persecutions and jailings are badges of honour, which these heroes are wearing with pride.
  
  Chairman Wontumi and Kwame Abroyen ...
  read full comment

  Gonja mafia John Mahama and his QNET govt should know that these bogus politically and selective persecutions and jailings are badges of honour, which these heroes are wearing with pride.
  
  Chairman Wontumi and Kwame Abroyen stay strong, healthy and Blessed.

  reply
• Kwam 2 months ago

  Hmmmm, seriously. Am not a politician.But how on earth will the NPP council of Elders sanction a whooping 4.6 million cedis for potential party flag bearership race. Your NPP party just list general elections less than 10mont ...
  read full comment

  Hmmmm, seriously. Am not a politician.But how on earth will the NPP council of Elders sanction a whooping 4.6 million cedis for potential party flag bearership race. Your NPP party just list general elections less than 10months ago. So is the party Soo broke to this extent? What happened to all the monies your government appointees made during the last eight years in government! It is a shame

  reply
• Kwam 2 months ago

  Hmmmm, seriously. Am not a politician.But how on earth will the NPP council of Elders sanction a whooping 4.6 million cedis for potential party flag bearership race. Your NPP party just lost general elections less than 10mont ...
  read full comment

  Hmmmm, seriously. Am not a politician.But how on earth will the NPP council of Elders sanction a whooping 4.6 million cedis for potential party flag bearership race. Your NPP party just lost general elections less than 10months ago. So is the party Soo broke to this extent? What happened to all the monies your government appointees made during the last eight years in government! It is a shame

  reply
• Pressman 2 months ago

  Unless this guy wants to do cheap talk to call attention to himself, person running for such office should have network of friends and admirers to support him to raise money for him.
  Any candidate who doesn’t have such net ...
  read full comment

  Unless this guy wants to do cheap talk to call attention to himself, person running for such office should have network of friends and admirers to support him to raise money for him.
  Any candidate who doesn’t have such network of followers is really not worthy of running for the office.
  If you are not aware, I must tell you that Professor Busia was totally supported and encouraged to run for office initially because of the monetary and financial support he received from followers.

  reply
• Marfo 2 months ago

  It is not a cheap talk. He meant his words.

  It is not a cheap talk. He meant his words.

  reply
• Achakanapaya 2 months ago

  Thieves and lair's organization. Never again Allah.

  Thieves and lair's organization. Never again Allah.

  reply
• Kwesi 2 months ago

  I agree with Prof. Oquaye . Where do they expect the candidates for flagbearership race to get the money from? This is the beginning of corruption, setting the foundation for it. It is suicidal, useless, evil, thoughtless and ...
  read full comment

  I agree with Prof. Oquaye . Where do they expect the candidates for flagbearership race to get the money from? This is the beginning of corruption, setting the foundation for it. It is suicidal, useless, evil, thoughtless and dangerous for democracy.

  reply
• Bk man 2 months ago

  You foolish Oldman you are part of this nonsense going on in the npp. You were corrupt.

  You foolish Oldman you are part of this nonsense going on in the npp. You were corrupt.

  reply
• Erik 2 months ago

  This a clear sign that the npp must be rejected in the 2028 election. Anyone of them who wins their primaries is certain to recoup his 4 million cedis with interest before he thinks of the country.

  This a clear sign that the npp must be rejected in the 2028 election. Anyone of them who wins their primaries is certain to recoup his 4 million cedis with interest before he thinks of the country.

  reply
• Millionaires Party? 2 months ago

  The Prof. is right! Soon, the NPP will be tagged as the “millionaires party” and the outcome will be disastrous for the party. If you don’t have millions you can’t become the NPP flag bearer! The big question is “ h ...
  read full comment

  The Prof. is right! Soon, the NPP will be tagged as the “millionaires party” and the outcome will be disastrous for the party. If you don’t have millions you can’t become the NPP flag bearer! The big question is “ how did these people get their riches?” Obviously, they came to amass wealth in the Nana Addo’s government? God will punish the NPP indefinitely.

  reply
• Kingsford Asiedu 2 months ago

  Presidential and parliamentary candidates are financed by party functionaries and not individual candidates. This is what happens in the US and this is what should be the criteria in the NPP. This my learned professor should ...
  read full comment

  Presidential and parliamentary candidates are financed by party functionaries and not individual candidates. This is what happens in the US and this is what should be the criteria in the NPP. This my learned professor should know.

  reply
• Kojo poku-London UK 2 months ago

  @ Kingford Asiedu
  
  You do NOT go into politics for money but as a dedicated public servant. That is what is in the West but in poor Africa,we go into politics to borrow over $1.5 trillion US dollars and looted and looted th ...
  read full comment

  @ Kingford Asiedu
  
  You do NOT go into politics for money but as a dedicated public servant. That is what is in the West but in poor Africa,we go into politics to borrow over $1.5 trillion US dollars and looted and looted them all by the Akyem Abuakwa CRIMINALS Akuffo Addo and Ken Ofori Atta with 84 family members

  reply
• Kwasi 2 months ago

  Elders instead of calling for dropping of this monstrous idea, rather playing sematics.

  Elders instead of calling for dropping of this monstrous idea, rather playing sematics.

  reply