Defective Charges, Lack of Evidence, Legal Flaws: AG explains why he discontinued some cases

This article is closed for comments.

Read Comments Comments (28)

  • This is total garbage 10 months ago

    Who does this moron think he is fooling and who cares about his biased and politically motivated opinions. When did he become a certified valuer of properties to come out with this trash. Is he more learned in the Law than th ...
    read full comment

  • PRINCE KWASI ADADE (OFIE P33) 10 months ago

    WHY NOT ALLOW THE CASES TO GET TO THE END FOR THE COURT TO DETERMINE THE CHARGES AS DEFECTIVE, FIND THE LEGAL FLAWS AND DETERMINE LACK OF EVIDENCE????????

  • Vivian 10 months ago

    8yrs wasted and nothing could be proven and you want us to continue on it. Garbage

  • Karikakchar 10 months ago

    The AG doesn't need to explain. Once his party is in power all their appointees are angels. There can't be anything wrong with an NDC appointee once the party is in power. No need for any explanations it doesn't add up

  • Kumasi Guy 10 months ago

    Prince Kwasi Adade you are a big joker what you are thinking is because of politics your incompetent Attorney General Godfred Dame didn't have any meaningful evidence against them for the past eight years the case has been dr ...
    read full comment

  • Kawaadwen 10 months ago

    You comment as if the money the have steal is for only ndc. Why not make court determine if they are guilty or not.

  • John 10 months ago

    Get your facts straight before criticizing the Attorney General's decision. You may disagree with him, but what he said is true.

  • Shamu 10 months ago

    Attorney General did the right thing. Is very foolish for this Criminal syndicates to prosecute somebody for 8 years without an anend for such a long time. That is crazy.

  • OTCHERE 10 months ago

    THOSE WHO PREFERRED THE CHARGES, WERE THEY ABLE TO PROVE IT AFTER EIGHT YEARS? THE LEAD PROSECUTORS RUN AWAY FROM THE COCOBOD CASE LONG BEFORE NPP LOST POWER

  • Kweku. Com 10 months ago

    If the prosecutors were not able to prove them why did the courts not dismiss them .

  • OTCHERE 10 months ago

    THE ACCUSED PERSONS WERE IN GHANA FOR THE PAST EIGHT YEARS DURING INVESTIGATIONS AND SUBSEQUENT TRIALS. ALWAYS PRESENT IN COURT AND NEVER RUN AWAY FROM THE JURISDICTION. THAT IS WHAT INNOCENT BUT WRONGLY ACCUSED PERSONS DO. ...
    read full comment

  • Justrac Africa Ltd 10 months ago

    TRACK your vehicle/motorbike with ease. With Justrac GPS Tracker one can Shutdown engine remotely, Real-time tracking, Voice monitoring, playback route by your phone etc. PRICE: GHS750. Call/WhatsApp: 0501796870 for more info ...
    read full comment

  • Kweku. Com 10 months ago

    Yoo we hear. Why didn't the attorney general allow the courts to set them free. An internal memo is a proposal by someone the majority can overrule it.

  • Zakarakis 10 months ago

    Waoo. This is REAL LEGAL BRAIN POWER. His doctorate in law is not a FLUKE. Indeed NDC is miles ahead of NPP in BRAIN POWER!!!!!

  • Yaw Kwab 10 months ago

    Weak and little brains. You don't know anything? You don't know what you're talking about. How is this "real legal brain"? Mmobo

  • Kwame Asante 10 months ago

    I hope people like Manasseh Azure will revise their notes. As for bentil and his NPP crooks there you are.

  • Analyst 10 months ago

    It would look foolish for the new AG to continue these cases that the past AG couldn't get head or tail of for 8 years and for which reason the past AG recommended their discontinuation.

  • Busanga Idea-Talensi 10 months ago

    For Akuffu Addo he is a clearing agent but for Mahama not clearing agent Mmoa in power and no wonder Kevin Talior is romotely controling Mahama in his wife kitchen

  • Pelicles. 10 months ago

    AG Ayine, you are a big fool. Who do you think you are fooling, yourself or your NDC dotards who cannot think normally?

    In the case of Dauda, why do you think he can single-handedly alter a contract that was debated upon b ...
    read full comment

  • Cole 10 months ago

    You can't read. The G saysDauda was accused of causing loss of $200m but when you look at the case he did not cause govt to loose 200m. Cos there are houses. If you factor the houses maybe any loss will be say $29m.
    So if y ...
    read full comment

  • Lopez 10 months ago

    The AG should listen to himself, he's is quick to exonerate the current president JDM from having a hand in his current clearing of his former appointees but happy to endorse claims by his Ndc party members that Nana Akuffo A ...
    read full comment

  • Obuobisa 10 months ago

    Little interest if you decide to drop all these cases but don't create the impression that you did it on your own volition. On whose behalf are you acting? Can you take this decision without consulting or seeking the approval ...
    read full comment

  • Yorker 10 months ago

    If so why did you allow the trial proceed to the end? What happens to the poor Ghanaian who does not belong to any political party?

  • Kaakeiku 10 months ago

    Extend same legal basis for others and not only NDC ciminals

  • Tony 10 months ago

    The courts have competent people to come to credible determination of the end of all these cases. My worry is the speed with which the new AG decided to discontinue the cases. It was as if he was programmed to clear the peopl ...
    read full comment

  • Ebiemo 10 months ago

    Justice delayed, is Justice denied. Aaaaba! 8 yrs for trying your political opponents and still couldn't come out with convictions despite changing judges multiple times. They should charge Godfred for causing financial loss ...
    read full comment

  • Kwesi 10 months ago

    Atta Akyea ----> "$500M" not "$5M"

  • Ayaaba 10 months ago

    These cases were all intended to persecute and frustrate prominent individuals who had contributed significantly to the nation, Ghana. Indeed, they deserve compensation from the state for the waste of their time.