Read Comments Comments (12)

• KB 10 months ago

  You don't know what you're talking about. You need knowledge.

  You don't know what you're talking about. You need knowledge.

  reply
• Nana Manso 10 months ago

  All these CSOs or whatever they call themselves are working for their paymasters. These are the most ridiculous submissions ever made against nuclear energy. It shows a total lack of knowledge about the subject matter by thes ...
  read full comment

  All these CSOs or whatever they call themselves are working for their paymasters. These are the most ridiculous submissions ever made against nuclear energy. It shows a total lack of knowledge about the subject matter by these so-called belly full experts. The media should not give them audience any longer. I'm so disappointed in them. They need knowledge

  reply
• Nuclear energy 10 months ago

  We have too many f00lish experts in this country

  We have too many f00lish experts in this country

  reply
• Samurai 10 months ago

  Go to the Ghana Atomic Energy Commission and Nuclear Regulatory Authority and let them educate you before jumping to conclusions

  Go to the Ghana Atomic Energy Commission and Nuclear Regulatory Authority and let them educate you before jumping to conclusions

  reply
• Kwame 10 months ago

  These people are not aware that we have a mini nuclear reactor at Kwabenya currently. It has been in operation for many years without accident.
  Nuclear reactors unlike coal fired and fossil oil fired electricity generators ...
  read full comment

  These people are not aware that we have a mini nuclear reactor at Kwabenya currently. It has been in operation for many years without accident.
  Nuclear reactors unlike coal fired and fossil oil fired electricity generators don't have any adverse effect on the environment.
  There is however an advantage in having a nuclear reactor which can be useful for agriculture, animal and human health.
  For the past 75 years there has been only three nuclear reactor accidents, first in US Long Island, Chernobil in the Soviet Union and another in Japan in Fukushima.

  reply
• Ann Empire 10 months ago

  It's actually sad how ignorant we still are as a country at this day and age. For the record, Countries like USA, South Africa, Turkey, France and China have been relying on Nuclear energy as their major power supply.
  Nuclea ...
  read full comment

  It's actually sad how ignorant we still are as a country at this day and age. For the record, Countries like USA, South Africa, Turkey, France and China have been relying on Nuclear energy as their major power supply.
  Nuclear Power is one of the cheapest and safest source of energy!!! Indeed, for lack of knowledge people perish. Read to live.

  reply
• Alexander 10 months ago

  Your campaign against Ghana’s nuclear energy project lacks critical balance and overlooks the transformative potential of nuclear energy for Africa’s energy future. While the CSOs highlight risks such as radioactive waste ...
  read full comment

  Your campaign against Ghana’s nuclear energy project lacks critical balance and overlooks the transformative potential of nuclear energy for Africa’s energy future. While the CSOs highlight risks such as radioactive waste and security concerns, they fail to acknowledge that countries like South Africa and Russia have safely harnessed nuclear energy, with nuclear contributing 5% and 20% to their energy mixes, respectively, providing reliable, clean power for decades.
  
  Contrary to the claim that nuclear is unsafe, it remains one of the safest energy technologies globally, with rigorous international safety standards comparable to the aviation industry. Its long service life (over 60 years) and the density of nuclear fuel make it highly cost-effective, ensuring energy security for nations. Additionally, nuclear power plants produce minimal greenhouse gas emissions, making them a critical ally in combating climate change and complementing renewable energy sources like solar and wind, which require steady baseload energy to ensure reliability.
  
  The activists fail to mention the negative consequences of Germany’s nuclear phase-out, which has led to increased energy tariffs and a resurgence of coal usage, undermining climate goals. Meanwhile, nations like France and Sweden have achieved affordable, clean, and dependable energy largely through nuclear power, reinforcing its viability.
  
  For Ghana and Africa, embracing nuclear energy is essential for meeting the growing energy demand, enabling industrialization, and reducing over-reliance on polluting fossil fuels. Instead of opposing nuclear energy, I believe the CSOs should focus on advocating for robust safety and regulatory frameworks to maximize its benefits. Africa cannot afford to be left behind in the global nuclear renaissance, as this technology offers a sustainable path to energy independence, economic growth, and environmental preservation.

  reply
• Kumnipa 10 months ago

  These are Western paid stooges in the name of CSOs as usual out trying so hard to sabotage the energy sector of Ghana and Africa as a whole. Ignorant nations wreckers.

  These are Western paid stooges in the name of CSOs as usual out trying so hard to sabotage the energy sector of Ghana and Africa as a whole. Ignorant nations wreckers.

  reply
• MAN 10 months ago

  Africa faces a severe energy crisis, with 571.1 million people in Sub-Saharan Africa lacking electricity in 2022, representing 83% of the global electricity deficit. Notably, 18 of the 20 countries with the worst energy acces ...
  read full comment

  Africa faces a severe energy crisis, with 571.1 million people in Sub-Saharan Africa lacking electricity in 2022, representing 83% of the global electricity deficit. Notably, 18 of the 20 countries with the worst energy access gaps are in Africa, including Nigeria (86 million), the Democratic Republic of Congo (78 million), and Ethiopia (55 million). How can we claim to prioritise development when a majority of our people still live in darkness? In Ghana, fossil fuels accounted for 62% and hydropower 38% of the grid electricity generation in 2023, while solar and wind contributed only 0.61%, highlighting the need for reliable alternatives.
  Nuclear energy is the best solution to Africa’s energy challenges. It provides consistent, large-scale electricity with a capacity factor exceeding 90%, unlike intermittent renewables. Globally, nuclear is among the safest energy sources, with strict regulations ensuring safe waste management. It also generates high-skilled jobs, as seen in the United States, where nearly 500,000 people are employed in the sector.
  Critics wrongly claim that nuclear energy is expensive and unsafe. In reality, it is cost-effective, low-carbon, and essential for climate action. Ghana’s plan to integrate nuclear power aligns with international best practices, ensuring long-term energy security.
  The real question is: Can Africa afford to ignore a proven, scalable, and clean energy source when millions remain in energy poverty? Instead of outright opposition, CSOs should advocate for education on nuclear energy, ensuring informed decision-making based on facts, not fear. Ghana’s future depends on embracing every viable energy source, and nuclear must be part of that equation.

  reply
• Enock 10 months ago

  Information on nuclear waste is misleading. About 90% of Nuclear waste contains useful material including fissile material that can be recycled as fuel for nuclear power reactors.
  Even high-level nuclear wastes are initially ...
  read full comment

  Information on nuclear waste is misleading. About 90% of Nuclear waste contains useful material including fissile material that can be recycled as fuel for nuclear power reactors.
  Even high-level nuclear wastes are initially stored onsite and can be there for the plant's operational life (about 60 years). Regulations ensure that nuclear waste is taken care of right from the beginning of the nuclear programme.
  
  Also, “Nuclear Power Plants” are not “nuclear weapons”. The low-enriched nuclear fuel is not sufficient to be used as a nuclear bomb and therefore this also is misinforming.
  
  Nuclear power is key to the world’s realisation of meeting its Climate Change goals. Why do you think a Country such as China is advancing rapidly in building new Nuclear power plants?
  
  Finally, Nuclear energy is one of the safest sources of electricity generation. Nuclear Power does not emit Greenhouse Gas (GHG) during electricity generation.
  The long-term economic benefits of Nuclear power cannot be compared with Renewables like Solar and Wind. Solar and Wind are intermittent energy sources and cannot be considered a base load for sustainable energy production and industrialisation.

  reply
• Gordon 10 months ago

  The opposition to nuclear energy in Ghana and Africa at large, claiming it will lead to increasing debt, environmental damage, and energy crises, is not only misleading but also ignores the undeniable benefits and potential o ...
  read full comment

  The opposition to nuclear energy in Ghana and Africa at large, claiming it will lead to increasing debt, environmental damage, and energy crises, is not only misleading but also ignores the undeniable benefits and potential of nuclear energy. These claims appear to be crafted to incite fear and sway public opinion against a proven, reliable, and sustainable energy source that Africa desperately needs. It's puzzling that nuclear energy is deemed unsuitable for Ghana and Africa, yet it's a proven, reliable, and sustainable energy source for the rest of the world. Why should Africa be denied access to this clean and efficient energy source?
  
  Energy sufficiency is the backbone of industrialization and economic growth in developed nations, and Africa is no exception. With over 600 million people across the continent lacking access to electricity - a statistic that represents one of the lowest rates of electricity access globally - Africa’s energy poverty has stifled industrial and social development. This energy gap is further compounded by a heavy reliance on carbon-emitting fossil fuels, which exacerbate climate change and environmental degradation.
  
  Nuclear energy offers a transformative solution. It provides a reliable, carbon-free baseload energy source that can power industries, support economic growth, and uplift communities. Unlike intermittent renewables like solar and wind, nuclear energy can operate continuously, ensuring a stable energy supply that Africa’s burgeoning industries and growing population desperately require.
  
  Contrary to the claims of high risk, nuclear energy stands among the safest energy technologies available today, with safety standards comparable to, or even surpassing, those of the aviation industry. Decades of technological advancements and rigorous international regulations ensure the safe operation of nuclear facilities. Countries worldwide, including those in Asia and some in Europe, have demonstrated that nuclear power plants can operate for decades without significant incidents when properly managed.
  
  Ghana’s journey in nuclear technology is not new. As far back as 1961, the government of President Kwame Nkrumah initiated the Kwabenya Nuclear Reactor Project, signalling a bold vision for energy independence and innovation. Since then, Ghana has successfully operated a research reactor for decades, training skilled nuclear engineers and building a robust regulatory framework. These efforts highlight the country’s capability to safely adopt and manage nuclear power for peaceful purposes.
  
  The opposition’s narrative around waste management and environmental risks fails to recognize that modern nuclear technology includes advanced solutions for spent fuel and radioactive waste. Furthermore, Ghana has already demonstrated expertise in handling such issues through its safe operation of the Ghana Research Reactor-1 (GHARR-1). This expertise, coupled with international collaborations and oversight make it a step to ensure that Ghana is well-prepared to manage nuclear power plant responsibly.

  reply
• Alexander 10 months ago

  Your campaign against Ghana’s nuclear energy project lacks critical balance and overlooks the transformative potential of nuclear energy for Africa’s energy future. While the CSOs highlight risks such as radioactive waste ...
  read full comment

  Your campaign against Ghana’s nuclear energy project lacks critical balance and overlooks the transformative potential of nuclear energy for Africa’s energy future. While the CSOs highlight risks such as radioactive waste and security concerns, they fail to acknowledge that countries like South Africa and Russia have safely harnessed nuclear energy, with nuclear contributing 5% and 20% to their energy mixes, respectively, providing reliable, clean power for decades.
  
  Contrary to the claim that nuclear is unsafe, it remains one of the safest energy technologies globally, with rigorous international safety standards comparable to the aviation industry. Its long service life (over 60 years) and the density of nuclear fuel make it highly cost-effective, ensuring energy security for nations. Additionally, nuclear power plants produce minimal greenhouse gas emissions, making them a critical ally in combating climate change and complementing renewable energy sources like solar and wind, which require steady baseload energy to ensure reliability.
  
  The activists fail to mention the negative consequences of Germany’s nuclear phase-out, which has led to increased energy tariffs and a resurgence of coal usage, undermining climate goals. Meanwhile, nations like France and Sweden have achieved affordable, clean, and dependable energy largely through nuclear power, reinforcing its viability.
  
  For Ghana and Africa, embracing nuclear energy is essential for meeting the growing energy demand, enabling industrialization, and reducing over-reliance on polluting fossil fuels. Instead of opposing nuclear energy, I believe the CSOs should focus on advocating for robust safety and regulatory frameworks to maximize its benefits. Africa cannot afford to be left behind in the global nuclear renaissance, as this technology offers a sustainable path to energy independence, economic growth, and environmental preservation.

  reply