Vacant Seats Judgement: Why two Supreme Court judges voted to dismiss Afenyo-Markin's suit

Read Article

Comments (12)

This article is closed for comments.

Read Comments Comments (12)

Saige 1 year ago

It's because they are all akuffo Addo appointees and Akyem Sakawa Supreme Court Jesters!

It's because they are all akuffo Addo appointees and Akyem Sakawa Supreme Court Jesters!
MONEY FLOWS WHEN YOU GAIN THIS VERY SKILL 1 year ago

Have you prepared your 2025 earning plans? You can get this as XMAS GIFT for yourself or that young man you ought to help. Once you understand the fact that you EARN from what you LEARN - you are 90% into financial freedom. S ...
read full comment

Have you prepared your 2025 earning plans? You can get this as XMAS GIFT for yourself or that young man you ought to help. Once you understand the fact that you EARN from what you LEARN - you are 90% into financial freedom. Start the new month with a new stream of income based on service delivery! Get this resource, and you're guaranteed to earn up to 1,000 times your investment in just 1-2 days of practice after training. Master valuable skills to earn good money daily just after three weeks of training with this book. Join thousands who have transformed their lives with Chukky Oparandu's guidebook on Amazon (search 'Chukky Oparandu' on Amazon or use selar.co/m/chukky). Invest in yourself or gift it to others today, break free from unemployment, & unlock financial independence! #SmartphoneRepair #SkillsForSuccess. Also, get his blockbuster book, "IT Career: A Roadmap" ChristmasIsHere - 182
Qur'an is toilet paper 1 year ago

I spit on sick dog prophet mohammed

I spit on sick dog prophet mohammed
Bob Santo 1 year ago

But is that not exactly what they've done of which the constitution is explicit they should vacate their seat?

But is that not exactly what they've done of which the constitution is explicit they should vacate their seat?
Edem 1 year ago

This should tell you that SC is fair and competent and professional in their judgement.

This should tell you that SC is fair and competent and professional in their judgement.
Donatus 1 year ago

What the 5 majority is saying is that if your spouse declares intention to marry another person next year, continuing dishing out the goodies until next year.

What the 5 majority is saying is that if your spouse declares intention to marry another person next year, continuing dishing out the goodies until next year.
Poku 1 year ago

Marriage is too sacrosanct to be compared to Parliament. I hope you understand that Parliament is for 4 years while marriage is expected to be for life. I don't even think a spouse will be too proud to state future intention ...
read full comment

Marriage is too sacrosanct to be compared to Parliament. I hope you understand that Parliament is for 4 years while marriage is expected to be for life. I don't even think a spouse will be too proud to state future intention to divorce and marry another. I know jokes are not real.
Citizen8 1 year ago

@Poku, Donatus exemplifies the simplicity with which the average Ghanaian looks at serious issues. Our mental laziness is legendary.

@Poku, Donatus exemplifies the simplicity with which the average Ghanaian looks at serious issues. Our mental laziness is legendary.
the Villager 1 year ago

In fact, whose interest has Andrew Asiama serve in parliament? His own. He is at the centre of all this brouhaha, Today he is a member of npp but sitting in parliament as independent.

In fact, whose interest has Andrew Asiama serve in parliament? His own. He is at the centre of all this brouhaha, Today he is a member of npp but sitting in parliament as independent.
Hannan 1 year ago

> Welcome to the best sex dating site == www.Hot4.eu

> Welcome to the best sex dating site == www.Hot4.eu
AB 1 year ago

I have done a painstaking scrutiny of 97 g and have come to the conclusion that the 5 judges are right. Leaving your party and seeking to remain in parliament in its proper sense means that you cannot enter parliament on one ...
read full comment

I have done a painstaking scrutiny of 97 g and have come to the conclusion that the 5 judges are right. Leaving your party and seeking to remain in parliament in its proper sense means that you cannot enter parliament on one party's ticket and later decide to abandon that party and move to another party in that parliament. That will mean that you are reducing the numbers of your previous party and increasing the numbers of your new party within the same parliament
007 1 year ago

Then with this explanation, and taking into consideration the inputs of the 5 judges, Hon. Asiamah(Fomena MP) must vacate his seat. How can one whose former party(now current party-NPP) write to Parliament that they don't rec ...
read full comment

Then with this explanation, and taking into consideration the inputs of the 5 judges, Hon. Asiamah(Fomena MP) must vacate his seat. How can one whose former party(now current party-NPP) write to Parliament that they don't recognise him as a member and expel him then come into Parliament as a MP on the ticket of an Independent Candidate now stand on the ticket of that party that expelled him after being recognised by that party and allow him to go through the processes and procedures that NPP demands, win their primaries and still be in Parliament as an Independent Candidate. He is currently in Parliament on the ticket of an Independent Candidate but is a NPP member..How is that so..this flaws the ruling,honestly

Welcome,

SIGN IN

Welcome,

RESET PASSWORD

Hello,

Terms and conditions

REGISTER

News

Vacant Seats Judgement: Why two Supreme Court judges voted to dismiss Afenyo-Markin's suit

Read Comments .st0{display:none;fill:#14BDD3;} .st1{display:none;} .st2{display:inline;fill:#FC0F0F;} .st3{display:inline;fill:#FFFFFF;} .st4{display:inline;fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:6;stroke-miterlimit:10;} Comments (12)

Read Comments Comments (12)