Full Judgment: An MP's seat is vacated if they switch parties within Parliament - Supreme Court

This article is closed for comments.

Read Comments Comments (131)

  • the value is the same 1 year ago

    the value is the same speaker bagbin was right after all

  • Capricorn 1 year ago

    Who gives a shit about your bullcrab delivery.

  • The ruling is excellent. Majority is won at the polling station 1 year ago

    The NDC judges are saying that the high court should have handled the case but failed to declare whether the supreme court can supersede the high court.

  • FIELD MARSHALL 1 year ago

    NPP IS A CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION.....

  • Errortorial Commission of Ghana -EC 1 year ago

    So CJ Tookenoo and her UnanimousFC 5 are saying that the MP can be in one party in parliament and in another party outside parliamnet ---Hahahahaha
    This Concert is just beginning in Ghana where Mps can belong to multiple par ...
    read full comment

  • Errortorial Commission of Ghana -EC 1 year ago

    So CJ Tookenoo and her UnanimousFC 5 are saying that the MP can be in one party in parliament and in another party outside parliament ---Hahahahaha
    This Concert is just beginning in Ghana where MPs can belong to multiple par ...
    read full comment

  • Errortorial Commission of Ghana -EC 1 year ago

    NPP memberof parliament in parliament but NDC member and candidate outside parliament! This is why we are Ghana where the supreme court is the supreme culprit in bastardizing the constitution! Truly, the problems in the judic ...
    read full comment

  • Dallas1 1 year ago

    Bro, youve hit the nail righ on the the head!

  • Dallas 1 year ago

    I hate impersonation ok.

  • Stephano 1 year ago

    My brother, it is the cheap fools Akufo Addo has been making the Chief Justice and Supreme Court judges that is bringing the problem to Ghana. We have had CJs and SC judges in this country but not these partisan ones. Nothing ...
    read full comment

  • Joe Pike 1 year ago

    Wise guy

  • FRANKIE 1 year ago

    This is just a mockery of our democracy. What these compromised and corrupt judges must remember is that justice resides in the conscience of the people, not in the bosom of the judiciary. DAMN!

  • Dogo 1 year ago

    This ruling doesn't make sense. So those MP's switching sides can work and act in the name of two political parties at the same time? The MP can campaign as an NDC candidate whiles representing the NPP in parliament until the ...
    read full comment

  • Errortorial Commission of Ghana -EC 1 year ago

    @Dogo, That is what the Supreme court is saying. Are we all sure the Supreme court is capable of interpreting the constitution of Ghana? Ghana is in deep trouble!

  • Stephano 1 year ago

    That is what corruption, partisanship and tribalism give birth to. They give birth to weird decisions and mediocrity. Our SC judges may have gone for their looted money by now and we now have to live with the tortuous and amb ...
    read full comment

  • HE The Ugly Dwarf 1 year ago

    We shall see when there is a boom!

  • New order 1 year ago

    In fact Ghanaweb are you trying to make money by bombarding us with useless adverts, by the way if a kotoko players I am out of the team ,he is still a player ? Common sense can not be found in books .

  • Enoch 1 year ago

    With these sort of evil old heartless fools.... 2024 Election will be a waste of time .... they are ready to help NPP win the Election by stealing ....

  • Drake 1 year ago

    Gyimii, he is still a player but cannot play for Kotoko.
    Stop thinking you made some sense.

  • Oziizi Ozaa 1 year ago

    Gertrude has confirmed what we all knew. She is shallow. It makes us wonder how she got to where she is!!!! She is the clone of Tiwaa Addo-Danquah, Akufo Addo's alibi. Cecilia Dapaa steals millions of dollars. Go to EOCO ...
    read full comment

  • The Spear 1 year ago

    She's very confused. I doubt if she understands simple English. If she doesn't the way she proves it, that puts herself and the whole country in jeopardy. She doesn't make any sense at all; the Speaker is still right!

  • Hannan 1 year ago

    Hot girls are waiting for you on == www.Hot4.eu

  • Slow 1 year ago

    There is really difference between knowledge and wisdom

  • THE SECOND HAND PRESIDENT WILL LOOSE AGAIN 1 year ago

    This ruling is only sensible to sensible people

  • Slow 1 year ago

    There is really difference between knowledge and wisdom

  • Godfred 1 year ago

    I have read the ruling and the ruling itself is unconstitutional. Under NPP’s own constitution, those members are no longer part of the party, also the only reason they can’t re enter parliament is because of the same con ...
    read full comment

  • Kim 1 year ago

    So per what they are saying second deputy speaker must vacant his sit

  • Godfred 1 year ago

    No sir, he remains per the ruling

  • KOFI 1 year ago

    Their ruling just do not make sense. In effect, there will be rogue MPs in our parliament. Just political justling to continue to make money from us.
    Therefore an MP can stay in parliament on behalf of 2 political parties o ...
    read full comment

  • ABONSAM FIREMAN, TOOTING BROADWAY, LONDON. 1 year ago

    SO WHAT NONSENSE IS GOING ON, STUPID!!! THE UNANIMOUS FC IS THE BUTT OF THE JOKE IN THE WHOLE WORLD!!! I DARE SAY!!! NKWASEAS3M SAAAAAAA...

  • NzemaK 1 year ago

    Torkenoo the CJ does not understand English. Good Day guys

  • Stephano 1 year ago

    That's the problem created by the midget octogenarian by appointing a former slay queen as the CJ. We are doomed.

  • Orji 1 year ago

    SC are more confused than NPP party

  • Evans 1 year ago

    Hehe he he, what the heck is going on, this reasoning is so so ridiculous, and they call themselves interpretors of the Constitution, shambolic Supreme Court.

  • Nixon Eshun, Tema East Constituency 1 year ago

    Great insight by the Justices of the Apex Court. If my wedding date is 1st February 2025, can I answer in the affirmative that I'm married on a form asking about my Marital Status? A mere filing of Application for another Par ...
    read full comment

  • Nzema K 1 year ago

    Wrong Example..

    Can you file a public notice to have wedding with another man in 2025 and still be in your current marriage

  • Stephano 1 year ago

    You think laws and their structures are designed and built on myopic and childish minds? Get away from here with your shallow mind and let deep thinkers comment on the issue.

  • Bozz 1 year ago

    Where is the difference from what the speaker said?

  • King 1 year ago

    Read and understand before you comment.

  • Edward 1 year ago

    Sad indeed for Mother Ghana. Almost all the cases cited by the Supreme Court to justify their decision are the "Unanimous FC" bogus and politically biased decisions like the Gyakye Quayson case. Supreme Court was only to inte ...
    read full comment

  • dav 1 year ago

    so in this case when formena mp diside to join npp in this parliament to form majolity is not credible

  • Kkk1 1 year ago

    The judgement lacks substance, mp’s are recognized from political and independent position, if one political party can’t cross to the other so should it mean through whichever direction in same cohort of parliament simpl ...
    read full comment

  • DR BISHOP BARRISTER KOKU ADELADZA ESQ 1 year ago

    THE SUPREME COURT WHICH IS THE APEX COURT IN GHANA, ARE PERFECTLY RIGHT IN THEIR JUDGEMENT, BECAUSE THE FOUR PARLIAMENTARIAN, CEASE TO BE THE BONAFIDE MEMBERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE PARTIES, STARTING FROM 7TH DECEMBER 2024.

  • Godfred 1 year ago

    You are not smart, by your saying both NPP and NDC have 2 people standing for the next election with one disguised as independent. A political party can only have 1 rep standing for any election. This is a ‘NOW” situation ...
    read full comment

  • Stephano 1 year ago

    Yes, you're a dumb head like your partisan SC judges. You mean they still belong to their original parties when their heads are printed on banners and ballot papers as 'Independent Candidate'?

  • Godfred 1 year ago

    You are not smart, by your saying both NPP and NDC have 2 people standing for the next election with one disguised as independent. A political party can only have 1 rep standing for any election. This is a ‘NOW” situation ...
    read full comment

  • Julius Asare 1 year ago

    The Supreme Court is corrupted now!

  • Time 1 year ago

    I am confused

  • Arafat Husain. 1 year ago

    So if we are about ten months to the election's will they still be there and voted for this C J is not normal

  • Akwasi 1 year ago

    Retiring in shame, they have destroyed Ghana’s democracy and the independence of the judiciary

  • Pantampram 1 year ago

    The problem with our judges is the English language! They read but have no understanding of the language!!
    The constitution is written in simple English language so everyone can understand but sadly it's not that simple afte ...
    read full comment

  • Carlos 1 year ago

    Some of these people happen to occupy such sensitive positions through luck but not because they deserve it, Ghana is bleeding.

  • Koo 1 year ago

    My brothers and sisters…put your political lenses aside and be honest and objective at least for once. Do these statements/judgments make sense at all. Supreme Court was only acting on orders of the npp. JM kindly set up C ...
    read full comment

  • Koo 1 year ago

    My brothers and sisters…put your political lenses aside and be honest and objective at least for once. Do these statements/judgments make sense at all. Supreme Court was only acting on orders of the npp. JM kindly set up C ...
    read full comment

  • Ashley 1 year ago

    How is JM going to do that when id is not the President? JM will not win the next election!!!

  • Pelicles 1 year ago

    If you are a human with brains in your head, think and stop being daft fool who is trying vainly to be part of humanity. What is John Mahama in this conversation? Who is he and does he have what it takes to do what pleases yo ...
    read full comment

  • Meet Russian hacker base in uk all bank loading cc top fixed crdit score 1 year ago

    : Bank wire transfer to all countries
    We are sending wire transfer and direct flashing to any country
    Chase wasap him 0 04 47853053870

    Capital one bank
    PNC
    Access bank
    TD bank
    And other banks accepted
    Bank f ...
    read full comment

  • KingsKing 1 year ago

    You guys have time for these criminals smelling like rat calling themselves judges.
    Rawlings action number two is just around the corner.

  • Kofi 1 year ago

    This is absolute misjustice to the state. Let me give you this marriage analogy. Would you be able to live under the same roof with a spouse who has initiated divorce processes or you would prefer to be separated until the di ...
    read full comment

  • KH 1 year ago

    Meaning a soldier who openly declares his or her intention to join the enemy forces will be allowed to remain in his or her current unit. I am wondering if NPP or NDC will allow the affected MPs to their confidential caucus ...
    read full comment

  • Nana Kwesi 1 year ago

    Correct for three points. I’m surprised our judges seem corrupt.

  • Akua 1 year ago

    HOW CN THEY BE LOYAL TO THE PARTY THEY WANT TO MOVE AWY FROM ? THIS DOES NOT MAKE SENSE AT ALL AND IT IS ONLY IN GHANA THAT SUCH A JUDGEMENT CAN BE MADE

  • Jah blez 1 year ago

    Mear political and useless judgement

  • System 1 year ago

    Please Judges what is the meaning of Party in this context? Please define what a Party is?

    Does Party include an independent MP as well or it excludes it ?

    If it does include the independent MP, will the Speaker then be ...
    read full comment

  • Ntente 1 year ago

    Wow! What a judgement. A white stone is not white so long as it is in the hands of your perceived opponent.
    The Speaker of parliament is perfectly Right! So Our Madam CJ, please do you mean that the affected four(4) PMs st ...
    read full comment

  • Thief of Staff - Akosua Frema 1 year ago

    It's irrelevant and useless. Liars, thieves, hypocrites, rapists, demons, crooks, criminals, cowards, slayers, pretenders, traitors, fools, wizards, witches, betrayers, opportunists and murderers!!! Kwasiaa4 buuluubuuluuu!!!

  • Kangaroo court 1 year ago

    Supreme Court is even confused about their own ruling

  • Mens 1 year ago

    Why is this so confusing? This is a simple matter

  • First offer 1 year ago

    This is what greed,nepotism and politics can lead to. The nation can go down permanently if such behavior and attitude are not expunged from few greedy individuals that hold power today. Even an illiterate won’t make such a ...
    read full comment

  • Citizen8 1 year ago

    This is pure commonsense such that but for bloated egos, partisan interests, etc we've no reason to be debating this issue at all.

  • Cc 1 year ago

    How come those who made the law don't know the law?

  • Cc 1 year ago

    How come those who made the law don't know the law?

  • Okomfo 1 year ago

    This was a slum dunk decision. Even those of us who have never been through law school understand that unless MP decides to change party affiliation in the current parliament, he/she remains a member of the party that broug ...
    read full comment

  • Godfred 1 year ago

    You can’t contest for a future parliament if you have not denounced the party you are in “NOW”. You also can not claim independent if you contest as a political party agent “NOW”. Stop being illiterate and think. Pe ...
    read full comment

  • Jodi FORSON 1 year ago

    So how is that different from the reason why the Speaker declared those seats vacant!

  • CAD 1 year ago

    Eii Judiciary coup d'etat. Unanimous FC in action

  • NAKA 1 year ago

    The Supreme Court judges appear dangerously confused about the very laws they were appointed to interpret. Affiliation is defined consistently across all political categories, whether it’s Party A, Party B, or Independent. ...
    read full comment

  • Opoku 1 year ago

    Please that's not what the constitution says I disagree with you totally

  • NDC/NPP are both the same 1 year ago

    You go explain taya

  • AKWASI adwepa 1 year ago

    SHAME! SHAME! SHAME
    What is difficult about the law. People vote for you on a ticket. You come to parliament on that ticket. If you change that ticket you vacate your seat. You don't talk about a future parliament. Shame.

  • Wiseman 1 year ago

    This is the reason why it is rumoured that judges are interred facedown in their coffins. Nation wreckers!

  • Akoto 1 year ago

    You can't see this comment because you're using a China phone

  • Fred 1 year ago

    So what is the difference between this ruling and the one we already know which was applied?
    Any MP who crosses carpet from Party A to Party B, has the intention to remain and serve the party he or she has crossed to, and th ...
    read full comment

  • Cash money 1 year ago

    If you don't understand this simple judgement then you need Free shs

  • Ghana nti 1 year ago

    This is the most stupid reasons has ever heard in Ghana

  • Nana Bediatuo 1 year ago

    Jerry Rawlings was right after all. Sir forgive us. What a ruling from the apex court. Confusion galore. Indeed a partisan judiciary is a threat to democracy. So where is the ruling. May God punish them all.

  • Paluta 1 year ago

    If Soo then asiamah of fomena is implicated cos he came in as independent but has switched to do business with NPP and still remains in the same parliament.

  • Edna 1 year ago

    I think I agree with you. And what that means is that we don't currently have a majority leader neither do we have a minority leader. The committees of Parliament have to be reconstituted. Speaker was wrong in making NPP majo ...
    read full comment

  • Donatus 1 year ago

    Sorry, the supreme court cannot even explain their ruling. Shame!

  • Boldsteven Mother Serpent of Corruption 1 year ago

    5-0 Justices. Common sense. How do you vacate a seat in the future which you are not guaranteed of winning. How do you vacate a seat if you don't occupy it presently and the justices will attribute to the future. This is poli ...
    read full comment

  • Citizen Gh. 1 year ago

    Supreme Court of Ghana! Eeeeiii!!???? What a nonsense of a judgement? I have so many questions to ask these judges. So many questions. What's this???
    This explanation doesn't make sense to me one bit. Pls stop making the Sup ...
    read full comment

  • Apuuh 1 year ago

    Supreme Court by this ruling , is saying that the old adage “ You can’t eat your cake and have it”, is not true.
    By their reasoning, they are saying one can eat his cake and still have the same cake in his or her hand ...
    read full comment

  • Forlifive 1 year ago

    Reading from this judgment, all what the court is saying has happened?? So why that awkward ruling??. Infact bad precedence in my opinion.

  • Errortorial Commission of Ghana -EC 1 year ago

    The UnanimousFc supreme court has made more of us more CONFUSED in Ghana as Afenyo-Monkey said. --LOL
    So CJ Tookenoo and her UnanimousFC 5 are saying that the MP can be in one party in parliament and in another party outside ...
    read full comment

  • A.M. 1 year ago

    We have two months until an election. I am a member of ZZZ Party representing Osu Klottey, and I have decided that for the next parliament, I want to represent the people through the YYY Party or as an independent candidate. ...
    read full comment

  • NAKA 1 year ago

    The Supreme Court’s recent approach to political affiliation is concerning, as it demonstrates a lack of consistency in interpreting the laws meant to uphold democratic accountability and transparency. By permitting represe ...
    read full comment

  • Errortorial Commission of Ghana -EC 1 year ago

    Are we all sure the Supreme court is capable of interpreting the constitution of Ghana? Ghana is in deep sh!t

  • Dallas1 1 year ago

    This is what you get when you vote a social misfit as president.

  • Rogue Lawyer 1 year ago

    Ridiculous
    Was it not this same UFC,
    Who in Gyakye Quison case , they said election is a process and it start from the date you file your nomination?

  • Korbla 1 year ago

    Wow! This is a serious observation you have made. Very interesting.

  • Coach 1 year ago

    Dear Supreme Court,
    Having read your judgement, I think speaker Bagbin's inferences - in relation to the 4 Maps - was right.

    Now since this is a matter of high public interest, may I suggest that you review your own deci ...
    read full comment

  • Koliko 1 year ago

    It seems Ghana is in danger. Are we a serious country with this type of judgement?

  • Political judges 1 year ago

    We knew the outcome before this nonsense of a judgement.

  • Abrantie 1 year ago

    This is crazy

  • Batule 1 year ago

    Switch party within parliament is the matter. The independent Switch is another option. If there is a new party then you can switch and nothing happens. Switch to the man with the mask, where the white woman was in prison. An ...
    read full comment

  • Tony 1 year ago

    The most stupid ruling I've ever seen I'm my life.....SO WHAT HAPPENS TO THE INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE??....HASN'T HE JOINED THE NPP IN PARLIAMENT TOO??....

  • Citizen8 1 year ago

    @Tony, you've made it abundantly clear that when people fail to know they don't know they openly expose their own stupidity by erroneously thinking others are rather stupid. Indeed ignorance is expensive.

  • Castro 1 year ago

    What kind of selfish thinking is this? Now we getting to understand why I’m our history, some judges went missing. Always twisting the law to favor their paid masters.

  • Whiteman 1 year ago

    Don't think Npp will remain in power forever. If you publicly made your political self known you will be treated as such. The EC will be first to be sacked when NDC wins. The next person is you chief justice then others follo ...
    read full comment

  • Nii 1 year ago

    The interpretation of the ruling vindicate the speaker.

  • Ayensu 1 year ago

    This is the exact interpretation and conclusion that the vast majority of people reached. Throughout the discourse, no one assumed that article 97 referred to a future parliament.

  • Donatus 1 year ago

    Are perfectly right, how can anybody think that it is about the future? What if they don't win? What if the world comes to an end before 7th December?

  • #Choose8 1 year ago

    Are these judges on some hard stuff?

  • Jah Alone 1 year ago

    The CJ should go back to her books because their ruling has made us confused and nothing to learn from it.
    There must be a constitutional review so that the supreme court judges can apply to be CJ.in the near future.
    As fo ...
    read full comment

  • Ken 1 year ago

    The judgement of the Supreme Court is equivalent to sanctioning political prostitution by our Members of Parliament.

  • Watchman 1 year ago

    The SC justices placed strong emphasis on the intent of the MPs to contest as independent candidate in the generation. The question is did the MPs actually register to contest the election as independent candidates? If they h ...
    read full comment

  • Korbla 1 year ago

    The notice of poll from the EC is proof of their intent to contest as independent candidates

  • Kabila 1 year ago

    The killed judges had the real justice 8f they lived this way

  • Kabila 1 year ago

    The killed judges had the real justice 8f they lived this way. May God forgive those 4hat killed anaty Quah

  • Kabila 1 year ago

    Those who killed Amateuy Quah should be arrested for crime

  • Kk 1 year ago

    May murderous thinkers and doers like Amartey Kwei who is perishing in hell with his sponsors locate you and your family and wipe you out. Ndc murderous individuals.

  • Kk 1 year ago

    Thank you SC. This is common sense. Shame in the anarchist Bagbin. Now see how you have been disgraced. Shame on you.

  • A. B 1 year ago

    I don't have problem of the ruling but how come supreme Court Judges have different view of ONE constitution of Ghana? 3 judges are on different view and 2 judges has same like how, so we don't have a clear constitution

  • The Supreme Court has exposed itself big time 1 year ago

    I am speechless! Torkonu FC! Maame, come see oooo! Supreme Criminals! I have always said this that our judiciary needs reset. Also, former president Kuffor is conflicted. He says the speaker should compromise for his legacy s ...
    read full comment

  • Molemole 1 year ago

    VERY VERY STUPID STATEMENT TO MAKE

  • CloudGhana Internet 1 year ago

    Are you looking for high-speed internet at an affordable rate? CloudGhana has you covered! Please call 0202699116 for further inquiries.

  • MR BIG MOUTH 1 year ago

    LET REMOVE OR EXTRACT THIS JUDGEMENT FROM OUR LAW SCHOOL/BOOK OR RECORD'S FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS NOT TO READ THIS. IT EMBARRASSING FOR A COUNTRY LIKE GHANA. FIRST WEEK STUDENTS IN TEMASCO WILL NOT WASTE OUR TIME LIKE THIS

  • Onyansanii 1 year ago

    Why won't papa jay spray this people like cockroaches.
    By this ruling papa jay is vindicated by the June 4 actions.
    Is it by force to pease the one who appointed you. Rulling by Agyapadi3 documents instead of the constitut ...
    read full comment

  • Nabilla 1 year ago

    Only closed minds do not understand this ruling... Bagbin acted as though he was the High court.. Besides this ruling put to bed issues of law concerning, the present parliament and the future parliament..

  • Nabilla 1 year ago

    On page 29 of the Judgement, reference has been made to several instances that MPs contested as independents yet still sat in parliament.. Many examples about that are there for all.. Hawa Yakubu was an independent while cont ...
    read full comment

  • Abdul Sumed 1 year ago

    you part ways with your Party when you decided to go Independent after your Party rejected you at Parliamentary primaries. When you remain in parliamentary you practically do not belong to that Party which you defied by goin ...
    read full comment