the value is the same speaker bagbin was right after all
the value is the same speaker bagbin was right after all
Capricorn 1 year ago
Who gives a shit about your bullcrab delivery.
Who gives a shit about your bullcrab delivery.
The ruling is excellent. Majority is won at the polling station 1 year ago
The NDC judges are saying that the high court should have handled the case but failed to declare whether the supreme court can supersede the high court.
The NDC judges are saying that the high court should have handled the case but failed to declare whether the supreme court can supersede the high court.
FIELD MARSHALL 1 year ago
NPP IS A CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION.....
NPP IS A CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION.....
Errortorial Commission of Ghana -EC 1 year ago
So CJ Tookenoo and her UnanimousFC 5 are saying that the MP can be in one party in parliament and in another party outside parliamnet ---Hahahahaha
This Concert is just beginning in Ghana where Mps can belong to multiple par ... read full comment
So CJ Tookenoo and her UnanimousFC 5 are saying that the MP can be in one party in parliament and in another party outside parliamnet ---Hahahahaha
This Concert is just beginning in Ghana where Mps can belong to multiple parties (in-parliament party and outside parliament party)...LOL
Making mockery of the constitution of Ghana!
Errortorial Commission of Ghana -EC 1 year ago
So CJ Tookenoo and her UnanimousFC 5 are saying that the MP can be in one party in parliament and in another party outside parliament ---Hahahahaha
This Concert is just beginning in Ghana where MPs can belong to multiple par ... read full comment
So CJ Tookenoo and her UnanimousFC 5 are saying that the MP can be in one party in parliament and in another party outside parliament ---Hahahahaha
This Concert is just beginning in Ghana where MPs can belong to multiple parties (in-parliament party and outside parliament party)...LOL
Making a mockery of the parliament of Ghana - what a comic relief!
Errortorial Commission of Ghana -EC 1 year ago
NPP memberof parliament in parliament but NDC member and candidate outside parliament! This is why we are Ghana where the supreme court is the supreme culprit in bastardizing the constitution! Truly, the problems in the judic ... read full comment
NPP memberof parliament in parliament but NDC member and candidate outside parliament! This is why we are Ghana where the supreme court is the supreme culprit in bastardizing the constitution! Truly, the problems in the judiciary are worse than DDEP and galamsey!
Dallas1 1 year ago
Bro, youve hit the nail righ on the the head!
Bro, youve hit the nail righ on the the head!
Dallas 1 year ago
I hate impersonation ok.
I hate impersonation ok.
Stephano 1 year ago
My brother, it is the cheap fools Akufo Addo has been making the Chief Justice and Supreme Court judges that is bringing the problem to Ghana. We have had CJs and SC judges in this country but not these partisan ones. Nothing ... read full comment
My brother, it is the cheap fools Akufo Addo has been making the Chief Justice and Supreme Court judges that is bringing the problem to Ghana. We have had CJs and SC judges in this country but not these partisan ones. Nothing of NPP works correctly because it is always tarnished with greed and rascality.
Joe Pike 1 year ago
Wise guy
Wise guy
FRANKIE 1 year ago
This is just a mockery of our democracy. What these compromised and corrupt judges must remember is that justice resides in the conscience of the people, not in the bosom of the judiciary. DAMN!
This is just a mockery of our democracy. What these compromised and corrupt judges must remember is that justice resides in the conscience of the people, not in the bosom of the judiciary. DAMN!
Dogo 1 year ago
This ruling doesn't make sense. So those MP's switching sides can work and act in the name of two political parties at the same time? The MP can campaign as an NDC candidate whiles representing the NPP in parliament until the ... read full comment
This ruling doesn't make sense. So those MP's switching sides can work and act in the name of two political parties at the same time? The MP can campaign as an NDC candidate whiles representing the NPP in parliament until the elections are held? Is that what they are saying? Ahh this is irrational ruling.
Errortorial Commission of Ghana -EC 1 year ago
@Dogo, That is what the Supreme court is saying. Are we all sure the Supreme court is capable of interpreting the constitution of Ghana? Ghana is in deep trouble!
@Dogo, That is what the Supreme court is saying. Are we all sure the Supreme court is capable of interpreting the constitution of Ghana? Ghana is in deep trouble!
Stephano 1 year ago
That is what corruption, partisanship and tribalism give birth to. They give birth to weird decisions and mediocrity. Our SC judges may have gone for their looted money by now and we now have to live with the tortuous and amb ... read full comment
That is what corruption, partisanship and tribalism give birth to. They give birth to weird decisions and mediocrity. Our SC judges may have gone for their looted money by now and we now have to live with the tortuous and ambiguous judgements.
HE The Ugly Dwarf 1 year ago
We shall see when there is a boom!
We shall see when there is a boom!
New order 1 year ago
In fact Ghanaweb are you trying to make money by bombarding us with useless adverts, by the way if a kotoko players I am out of the team ,he is still a player ? Common sense can not be found in books .
In fact Ghanaweb are you trying to make money by bombarding us with useless adverts, by the way if a kotoko players I am out of the team ,he is still a player ? Common sense can not be found in books .
Enoch 1 year ago
With these sort of evil old heartless fools.... 2024 Election will be a waste of time .... they are ready to help NPP win the Election by stealing ....
With these sort of evil old heartless fools.... 2024 Election will be a waste of time .... they are ready to help NPP win the Election by stealing ....
Drake 1 year ago
Gyimii, he is still a player but cannot play for Kotoko.
Stop thinking you made some sense.
Gyimii, he is still a player but cannot play for Kotoko.
Stop thinking you made some sense.
Oziizi Ozaa 1 year ago
Gertrude has confirmed what we all knew. She is shallow. It makes us wonder how she got to where she is!!!! She is the clone of Tiwaa Addo-Danquah, Akufo Addo's alibi. Cecilia Dapaa steals millions of dollars. Go to EOCO ... read full comment
Gertrude has confirmed what we all knew. She is shallow. It makes us wonder how she got to where she is!!!! She is the clone of Tiwaa Addo-Danquah, Akufo Addo's alibi. Cecilia Dapaa steals millions of dollars. Go to EOCO and meet Tiwaa for clearance. The NPP loses majority group in parliament. Go to Torkornoo for clearance. Paa Kwesi Nduom is making too much. Go to Addison for clearance.The opposition is gaining traction in the media. Go to NMC's Yaw Boadu-Ayeboafoh to be cleared.
The Spear 1 year ago
She's very confused. I doubt if she understands simple English. If she doesn't the way she proves it, that puts herself and the whole country in jeopardy. She doesn't make any sense at all; the Speaker is still right!
She's very confused. I doubt if she understands simple English. If she doesn't the way she proves it, that puts herself and the whole country in jeopardy. She doesn't make any sense at all; the Speaker is still right!
Hannan 1 year ago
Hot girls are waiting for you on == www.Hot4.eu
Hot girls are waiting for you on == www.Hot4.eu
Slow 1 year ago
There is really difference between knowledge and wisdom
There is really difference between knowledge and wisdom
THE SECOND HAND PRESIDENT WILL LOOSE AGAIN 1 year ago
This ruling is only sensible to sensible people
This ruling is only sensible to sensible people
Slow 1 year ago
There is really difference between knowledge and wisdom
There is really difference between knowledge and wisdom
Godfred 1 year ago
I have read the ruling and the ruling itself is unconstitutional. Under NPP’s own constitution, those members are no longer part of the party, also the only reason they can’t re enter parliament is because of the same con ... read full comment
I have read the ruling and the ruling itself is unconstitutional. Under NPP’s own constitution, those members are no longer part of the party, also the only reason they can’t re enter parliament is because of the same constitution siting no by election 3 months to elections.
Kim 1 year ago
So per what they are saying second deputy speaker must vacant his sit
So per what they are saying second deputy speaker must vacant his sit
Godfred 1 year ago
No sir, he remains per the ruling
No sir, he remains per the ruling
KOFI 1 year ago
Their ruling just do not make sense. In effect, there will be rogue MPs in our parliament. Just political justling to continue to make money from us.
Therefore an MP can stay in parliament on behalf of 2 political parties o ... read full comment
Their ruling just do not make sense. In effect, there will be rogue MPs in our parliament. Just political justling to continue to make money from us.
Therefore an MP can stay in parliament on behalf of 2 political parties or with a political party and as an Independent in a current parliament.
ABONSAM FIREMAN, TOOTING BROADWAY, LONDON. 1 year ago
SO WHAT NONSENSE IS GOING ON, STUPID!!! THE UNANIMOUS FC IS THE BUTT OF THE JOKE IN THE WHOLE WORLD!!! I DARE SAY!!! NKWASEAS3M SAAAAAAA...
SO WHAT NONSENSE IS GOING ON, STUPID!!! THE UNANIMOUS FC IS THE BUTT OF THE JOKE IN THE WHOLE WORLD!!! I DARE SAY!!! NKWASEAS3M SAAAAAAA...
NzemaK 1 year ago
Torkenoo the CJ does not understand English. Good Day guys
Torkenoo the CJ does not understand English. Good Day guys
Stephano 1 year ago
That's the problem created by the midget octogenarian by appointing a former slay queen as the CJ. We are doomed.
That's the problem created by the midget octogenarian by appointing a former slay queen as the CJ. We are doomed.
Orji 1 year ago
SC are more confused than NPP party
SC are more confused than NPP party
Evans 1 year ago
Hehe he he, what the heck is going on, this reasoning is so so ridiculous, and they call themselves interpretors of the Constitution, shambolic Supreme Court.
Hehe he he, what the heck is going on, this reasoning is so so ridiculous, and they call themselves interpretors of the Constitution, shambolic Supreme Court.
Nixon Eshun, Tema East Constituency 1 year ago
Great insight by the Justices of the Apex Court. If my wedding date is 1st February 2025, can I answer in the affirmative that I'm married on a form asking about my Marital Status? A mere filing of Application for another Par ... read full comment
Great insight by the Justices of the Apex Court. If my wedding date is 1st February 2025, can I answer in the affirmative that I'm married on a form asking about my Marital Status? A mere filing of Application for another Parliamentary Term should never mean a switch of allegiance if my Political affiliations changes on the EC Form. Democracy has won again
Nzema K 1 year ago
Wrong Example..
Can you file a public notice to have wedding with another man in 2025 and still be in your current marriage
Wrong Example..
Can you file a public notice to have wedding with another man in 2025 and still be in your current marriage
Stephano 1 year ago
You think laws and their structures are designed and built on myopic and childish minds? Get away from here with your shallow mind and let deep thinkers comment on the issue.
You think laws and their structures are designed and built on myopic and childish minds? Get away from here with your shallow mind and let deep thinkers comment on the issue.
Bozz 1 year ago
Where is the difference from what the speaker said?
Where is the difference from what the speaker said?
King 1 year ago
Read and understand before you comment.
Read and understand before you comment.
Edward 1 year ago
Sad indeed for Mother Ghana. Almost all the cases cited by the Supreme Court to justify their decision are the "Unanimous FC" bogus and politically biased decisions like the Gyakye Quayson case. Supreme Court was only to inte ... read full comment
Sad indeed for Mother Ghana. Almost all the cases cited by the Supreme Court to justify their decision are the "Unanimous FC" bogus and politically biased decisions like the Gyakye Quayson case. Supreme Court was only to interpret but they went over and above that to make an unlawful command. If you are following your past mistakes (Unanimous FC" rulings then you will continue to make mistake. I am glad 2 sensible judges dissented on ground of jurisdiction. That speaks a lot.
dav 1 year ago
so in this case when formena mp diside to join npp in this parliament to form majolity is not credible
so in this case when formena mp diside to join npp in this parliament to form majolity is not credible
Kkk1 1 year ago
The judgement lacks substance, mp’s are recognized from political and independent position, if one political party can’t cross to the other so should it mean through whichever direction in same cohort of parliament simpl ... read full comment
The judgement lacks substance, mp’s are recognized from political and independent position, if one political party can’t cross to the other so should it mean through whichever direction in same cohort of parliament simple, mp is in to do business for constituency he/she represent first before party association
DR BISHOP BARRISTER KOKU ADELADZA ESQ 1 year ago
THE SUPREME COURT WHICH IS THE APEX COURT IN GHANA, ARE PERFECTLY RIGHT IN THEIR JUDGEMENT, BECAUSE THE FOUR PARLIAMENTARIAN, CEASE TO BE THE BONAFIDE MEMBERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE PARTIES, STARTING FROM 7TH DECEMBER 2024.
THE SUPREME COURT WHICH IS THE APEX COURT IN GHANA, ARE PERFECTLY RIGHT IN THEIR JUDGEMENT, BECAUSE THE FOUR PARLIAMENTARIAN, CEASE TO BE THE BONAFIDE MEMBERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE PARTIES, STARTING FROM 7TH DECEMBER 2024.
Godfred 1 year ago
You are not smart, by your saying both NPP and NDC have 2 people standing for the next election with one disguised as independent. A political party can only have 1 rep standing for any election. This is a ‘NOW” situation ... read full comment
You are not smart, by your saying both NPP and NDC have 2 people standing for the next election with one disguised as independent. A political party can only have 1 rep standing for any election. This is a ‘NOW” situation not future.
Stephano 1 year ago
Yes, you're a dumb head like your partisan SC judges. You mean they still belong to their original parties when their heads are printed on banners and ballot papers as 'Independent Candidate'?
Yes, you're a dumb head like your partisan SC judges. You mean they still belong to their original parties when their heads are printed on banners and ballot papers as 'Independent Candidate'?
Godfred 1 year ago
You are not smart, by your saying both NPP and NDC have 2 people standing for the next election with one disguised as independent. A political party can only have 1 rep standing for any election. This is a ‘NOW” situation ... read full comment
You are not smart, by your saying both NPP and NDC have 2 people standing for the next election with one disguised as independent. A political party can only have 1 rep standing for any election. This is a ‘NOW” situation not future.
Julius Asare 1 year ago
The Supreme Court is corrupted now!
The Supreme Court is corrupted now!
Time 1 year ago
I am confused
I am confused
Arafat Husain. 1 year ago
So if we are about ten months to the election's will they still be there and voted for this C J is not normal
So if we are about ten months to the election's will they still be there and voted for this C J is not normal
Akwasi 1 year ago
Retiring in shame, they have destroyed Ghana’s democracy and the independence of the judiciary
Retiring in shame, they have destroyed Ghana’s democracy and the independence of the judiciary
Pantampram 1 year ago
The problem with our judges is the English language! They read but have no understanding of the language!!
The constitution is written in simple English language so everyone can understand but sadly it's not that simple afte ... read full comment
The problem with our judges is the English language! They read but have no understanding of the language!!
The constitution is written in simple English language so everyone can understand but sadly it's not that simple after all!!
Carlos 1 year ago
Some of these people happen to occupy such sensitive positions through luck but not because they deserve it, Ghana is bleeding.
Some of these people happen to occupy such sensitive positions through luck but not because they deserve it, Ghana is bleeding.
Koo 1 year ago
My brothers and sisters…put your political lenses aside and be honest and objective at least for once. Do these statements/judgments make sense at all. Supreme Court was only acting on orders of the npp. JM kindly set up C ... read full comment
My brothers and sisters…put your political lenses aside and be honest and objective at least for once. Do these statements/judgments make sense at all. Supreme Court was only acting on orders of the npp. JM kindly set up CONSTITUTION REVIEW TEAM. The no 1 person to touch is Araba Torkornoo and all the all their npp judges. Political judiciary is a threat to our democracy.
Koo 1 year ago
My brothers and sisters…put your political lenses aside and be honest and objective at least for once. Do these statements/judgments make sense at all. Supreme Court was only acting on orders of the npp. JM kindly set up C ... read full comment
My brothers and sisters…put your political lenses aside and be honest and objective at least for once. Do these statements/judgments make sense at all. Supreme Court was only acting on orders of the npp. JM kindly set up CONSTITUTION REVIEW TEAM. The no 1 person to touch is Araba Torkornoo and all the all their npp judges. Political judges
Ashley 1 year ago
How is JM going to do that when id is not the President? JM will not win the next election!!!
How is JM going to do that when id is not the President? JM will not win the next election!!!
Pelicles 1 year ago
If you are a human with brains in your head, think and stop being daft fool who is trying vainly to be part of humanity. What is John Mahama in this conversation? Who is he and does he have what it takes to do what pleases yo ... read full comment
If you are a human with brains in your head, think and stop being daft fool who is trying vainly to be part of humanity. What is John Mahama in this conversation? Who is he and does he have what it takes to do what pleases you? Why didn't he set up constitutional review team when he was president?
Remember that the constitution we are currently using was written under NDC government, okay? I don't know of any amendment/s NPP had done to it.
Meet Russian hacker base in uk all bank loading cc top fixed crdit score 1 year ago
: Bank wire transfer to all countries
We are sending wire transfer and direct flashing to any country
Chase wasap him 0 04 47853053870
Capital one bank
PNC
Access bank
TD bank
And other banks accepted
Bank f ... read full comment
: Bank wire transfer to all countries
We are sending wire transfer and direct flashing to any country
Chase wasap him 0 04 47853053870
Capital one bank
PNC
Access bank
TD bank
And other banks accepted
Bank flashing to all countries
Bank flashing stays in the account for 28 days before it disappears and it's transferrable
We have a very experienced engineer working on these now
Bitcoin flashing to all
Direct deposit bank loading to America, Loading
Debit card and credit load contact 00447853053870 hamzaben
KingsKing 1 year ago
You guys have time for these criminals smelling like rat calling themselves judges.
Rawlings action number two is just around the corner.
You guys have time for these criminals smelling like rat calling themselves judges.
Rawlings action number two is just around the corner.
Kofi 1 year ago
This is absolute misjustice to the state. Let me give you this marriage analogy. Would you be able to live under the same roof with a spouse who has initiated divorce processes or you would prefer to be separated until the di ... read full comment
This is absolute misjustice to the state. Let me give you this marriage analogy. Would you be able to live under the same roof with a spouse who has initiated divorce processes or you would prefer to be separated until the divorce is completed?
KH 1 year ago
Meaning a soldier who openly declares his or her intention to join the enemy forces will be allowed to remain in his or her current unit. I am wondering if NPP or NDC will allow the affected MPs to their confidential caucus ... read full comment
Meaning a soldier who openly declares his or her intention to join the enemy forces will be allowed to remain in his or her current unit. I am wondering if NPP or NDC will allow the affected MPs to their confidential caucus meetings where election plans and strategies will be discussed.
Nana Kwesi 1 year ago
Correct for three points. I’m surprised our judges seem corrupt.
Correct for three points. I’m surprised our judges seem corrupt.
Akua 1 year ago
HOW CN THEY BE LOYAL TO THE PARTY THEY WANT TO MOVE AWY FROM ? THIS DOES NOT MAKE SENSE AT ALL AND IT IS ONLY IN GHANA THAT SUCH A JUDGEMENT CAN BE MADE
HOW CN THEY BE LOYAL TO THE PARTY THEY WANT TO MOVE AWY FROM ? THIS DOES NOT MAKE SENSE AT ALL AND IT IS ONLY IN GHANA THAT SUCH A JUDGEMENT CAN BE MADE
Jah blez 1 year ago
Mear political and useless judgement
Mear political and useless judgement
System 1 year ago
Please Judges what is the meaning of Party in this context? Please define what a Party is?
Does Party include an independent MP as well or it excludes it ?
If it does include the independent MP, will the Speaker then be ... read full comment
Please Judges what is the meaning of Party in this context? Please define what a Party is?
Does Party include an independent MP as well or it excludes it ?
If it does include the independent MP, will the Speaker then be right to declare the seat of an independent MP who changes his or her original designition and decide to join and work with the new party in Parliament?
Please am inferring from your judgement, the independent MP for Fomena announced that he has joined the majority in Parliament and has since been working with them. Can that seat be declared vacant, l want to be humbly educated.
When you say future, please what do you mean?
Please in our criminal code " intending to commit a crime either today or in the future" in itself is a crime.
Are you by this saying that if an MP who went to Parliament via a particular party, should be allowed to go Scot free after denouncing his party today?
Please, there is inconsistency here because an intention today whether criminal or otherwise must attract remedial action today. If a person intends to commit an offense tomorrow and his caught today he is liable to be punished today.
Please are you by this judgement encouraging MPs to enter Parliament via a particular party and Cross to another without any consequences?
Please, per judgement l think there's no need for political parties to have their constitution.
What is the constitutions of the political parties saying about a Member who act contrary to that of the party? In this case if a member contest against the party's choice of candidates what happens to the person as captured by the party constitution?
I think the answer is automatic forfeiture of membership, why are the MPs still being referred to as members of the previous parties in Parliament.
Well am sure the laws are made for all persons irrespective of the class, greed , color, education and gender. Am a humble reader who needs education, thank you.
Ntente 1 year ago
Wow! What a judgement. A white stone is not white so long as it is in the hands of your perceived opponent.
The Speaker of parliament is perfectly Right! So Our Madam CJ, please do you mean that the affected four(4) PMs st ... read full comment
Wow! What a judgement. A white stone is not white so long as it is in the hands of your perceived opponent.
The Speaker of parliament is perfectly Right! So Our Madam CJ, please do you mean that the affected four(4) PMs still have not have their identities intact? Even their own parties and constituencies know their identities have changed when they made the decisions.
Supreme Court is even confused about their own ruling
Supreme Court is even confused about their own ruling
Mens 1 year ago
Why is this so confusing? This is a simple matter
Why is this so confusing? This is a simple matter
First offer 1 year ago
This is what greed,nepotism and politics can lead to. The nation can go down permanently if such behavior and attitude are not expunged from few greedy individuals that hold power today. Even an illiterate won’t make such a ... read full comment
This is what greed,nepotism and politics can lead to. The nation can go down permanently if such behavior and attitude are not expunged from few greedy individuals that hold power today. Even an illiterate won’t make such arguments
Citizen8 1 year ago
This is pure commonsense such that but for bloated egos, partisan interests, etc we've no reason to be debating this issue at all.
This is pure commonsense such that but for bloated egos, partisan interests, etc we've no reason to be debating this issue at all.
Cc 1 year ago
How come those who made the law don't know the law?
How come those who made the law don't know the law?
Cc 1 year ago
How come those who made the law don't know the law?
How come those who made the law don't know the law?
Okomfo 1 year ago
This was a slum dunk decision. Even those of us who have never been through law school understand that unless MP decides to change party affiliation in the current parliament, he/she remains a member of the party that broug ... read full comment
This was a slum dunk decision. Even those of us who have never been through law school understand that unless MP decides to change party affiliation in the current parliament, he/she remains a member of the party that brought him/her to parliament irrespective of the intended future party affiliation and/or elections. NDC lawyers/MPs should know better. Or is it a question of their limited understanding of English language ?? Maybe it is time to conduct parliamentary business in Twi/Ga/Hausa/Brong/Ewe/Dagomba so as to avoid any ambiguity in translations, in the near future
Godfred 1 year ago
You can’t contest for a future parliament if you have not denounced the party you are in “NOW”. You also can not claim independent if you contest as a political party agent “NOW”. Stop being illiterate and think. Pe ... read full comment
You can’t contest for a future parliament if you have not denounced the party you are in “NOW”. You also can not claim independent if you contest as a political party agent “NOW”. Stop being illiterate and think. People like you are the reason Ghana is a shit hole country.
Jodi FORSON 1 year ago
So how is that different from the reason why the Speaker declared those seats vacant!
So how is that different from the reason why the Speaker declared those seats vacant!
CAD 1 year ago
Eii Judiciary coup d'etat. Unanimous FC in action
Eii Judiciary coup d'etat. Unanimous FC in action
NAKA 1 year ago
The Supreme Court judges appear dangerously confused about the very laws they were appointed to interpret. Affiliation is defined consistently across all political categories, whether it’s Party A, Party B, or Independent. ... read full comment
The Supreme Court judges appear dangerously confused about the very laws they were appointed to interpret. Affiliation is defined consistently across all political categories, whether it’s Party A, Party B, or Independent. Switching from one affiliation to another—no matter the party or independent status—is clearly a change of affiliation. Yet, their ruling implies that shifting from Party A or Party B to Independent is somehow permissible, raising serious questions about their understanding of Ghana’s 1992 Constitution. This level of confusion from the nation’s highest court poses a grave threat to the integrity of our legal system and the stability of Ghana’s democracy.
Opoku 1 year ago
Please that's not what the constitution says I disagree with you totally
Please that's not what the constitution says I disagree with you totally
NDC/NPP are both the same 1 year ago
You go explain taya
You go explain taya
AKWASI adwepa 1 year ago
SHAME! SHAME! SHAME
What is difficult about the law. People vote for you on a ticket. You come to parliament on that ticket. If you change that ticket you vacate your seat. You don't talk about a future parliament. Shame.
SHAME! SHAME! SHAME
What is difficult about the law. People vote for you on a ticket. You come to parliament on that ticket. If you change that ticket you vacate your seat. You don't talk about a future parliament. Shame.
Wiseman 1 year ago
This is the reason why it is rumoured that judges are interred facedown in their coffins. Nation wreckers!
This is the reason why it is rumoured that judges are interred facedown in their coffins. Nation wreckers!
Akoto 1 year ago
You can't see this comment because you're using a China phone
You can't see this comment because you're using a China phone
Fred 1 year ago
So what is the difference between this ruling and the one we already know which was applied?
Any MP who crosses carpet from Party A to Party B, has the intention to remain and serve the party he or she has crossed to, and th ... read full comment
So what is the difference between this ruling and the one we already know which was applied?
Any MP who crosses carpet from Party A to Party B, has the intention to remain and serve the party he or she has crossed to, and there therefore must vacant his/her seat.
We know this already!!! This ruling is a smoke screen and is the same as the status quo. Who crosses carpet and says I will not remain and serve the party he or she crosses to? This is insane ruling!!!
Cash money 1 year ago
If you don't understand this simple judgement then you need Free shs
If you don't understand this simple judgement then you need Free shs
Ghana nti 1 year ago
This is the most stupid reasons has ever heard in Ghana
This is the most stupid reasons has ever heard in Ghana
Nana Bediatuo 1 year ago
Jerry Rawlings was right after all. Sir forgive us. What a ruling from the apex court. Confusion galore. Indeed a partisan judiciary is a threat to democracy. So where is the ruling. May God punish them all.
Jerry Rawlings was right after all. Sir forgive us. What a ruling from the apex court. Confusion galore. Indeed a partisan judiciary is a threat to democracy. So where is the ruling. May God punish them all.
Paluta 1 year ago
If Soo then asiamah of fomena is implicated cos he came in as independent but has switched to do business with NPP and still remains in the same parliament.
If Soo then asiamah of fomena is implicated cos he came in as independent but has switched to do business with NPP and still remains in the same parliament.
Edna 1 year ago
I think I agree with you. And what that means is that we don't currently have a majority leader neither do we have a minority leader. The committees of Parliament have to be reconstituted. Speaker was wrong in making NPP majo ... read full comment
I think I agree with you. And what that means is that we don't currently have a majority leader neither do we have a minority leader. The committees of Parliament have to be reconstituted. Speaker was wrong in making NPP majority when Asiamah said he would do business with them. This ruling has not helped the NPP either and Speaker must act fast to make the nation an interesting place to be.
Donatus 1 year ago
Sorry, the supreme court cannot even explain their ruling. Shame!
Sorry, the supreme court cannot even explain their ruling. Shame!
Boldsteven Mother Serpent of Corruption 1 year ago
5-0 Justices. Common sense. How do you vacate a seat in the future which you are not guaranteed of winning. How do you vacate a seat if you don't occupy it presently and the justices will attribute to the future. This is poli ... read full comment
5-0 Justices. Common sense. How do you vacate a seat in the future which you are not guaranteed of winning. How do you vacate a seat if you don't occupy it presently and the justices will attribute to the future. This is political judgment not the interpretation of Article 97.
Citizen Gh. 1 year ago
Supreme Court of Ghana! Eeeeiii!!???? What a nonsense of a judgement? I have so many questions to ask these judges. So many questions. What's this???
This explanation doesn't make sense to me one bit. Pls stop making the Sup ... read full comment
Supreme Court of Ghana! Eeeeiii!!???? What a nonsense of a judgement? I have so many questions to ask these judges. So many questions. What's this???
This explanation doesn't make sense to me one bit. Pls stop making the Supreme Court of Ghana, a mockery amongst the courts in the world. This is shameful!!
Apuuh 1 year ago
Supreme Court by this ruling , is saying that the old adage “ You can’t eat your cake and have it”, is not true.
By their reasoning, they are saying one can eat his cake and still have the same cake in his or her hand ... read full comment
Supreme Court by this ruling , is saying that the old adage “ You can’t eat your cake and have it”, is not true.
By their reasoning, they are saying one can eat his cake and still have the same cake in his or her hand.
Consequently,SC judges are saying that sit at NPP side in Parliament and at the same time go out there and campaign against the same party you represent sit in Parliament. What an endorsement of dishonesty.
Man made law (Positive law) is a scam.
Forlifive 1 year ago
Reading from this judgment, all what the court is saying has happened?? So why that awkward ruling??. Infact bad precedence in my opinion.
Reading from this judgment, all what the court is saying has happened?? So why that awkward ruling??. Infact bad precedence in my opinion.
Errortorial Commission of Ghana -EC 1 year ago
The UnanimousFc supreme court has made more of us more CONFUSED in Ghana as Afenyo-Monkey said. --LOL
So CJ Tookenoo and her UnanimousFC 5 are saying that the MP can be in one party in parliament and in another party outside ... read full comment
The UnanimousFc supreme court has made more of us more CONFUSED in Ghana as Afenyo-Monkey said. --LOL
So CJ Tookenoo and her UnanimousFC 5 are saying that the MP can be in one party in parliament and in another party outside parliament ---Hahahahaha
This Concert is just beginning in Ghana where MPs can belong to multiple parties (in-parliament party and outside parliament party)...LOL
Making a mockery of the parliament of Ghana - what a comic relief!
A.M. 1 year ago
We have two months until an election. I am a member of ZZZ Party representing Osu Klottey, and I have decided that for the next parliament, I want to represent the people through the YYY Party or as an independent candidate. ... read full comment
We have two months until an election. I am a member of ZZZ Party representing Osu Klottey, and I have decided that for the next parliament, I want to represent the people through the YYY Party or as an independent candidate. My loyalty to the party ZZZ is in question immediately l say that. I want to divorce you next month but expect you to cook and take care of me until then. The interpretation should be that there must be 3 seating arrangements. Party ZZZ, Party YYY, and the Independent Party members. Whoever has the majority takes the majority seat.
NAKA 1 year ago
The Supreme Court’s recent approach to political affiliation is concerning, as it demonstrates a lack of consistency in interpreting the laws meant to uphold democratic accountability and transparency. By permitting represe ... read full comment
The Supreme Court’s recent approach to political affiliation is concerning, as it demonstrates a lack of consistency in interpreting the laws meant to uphold democratic accountability and transparency. By permitting representatives to shift from a party affiliation to Independent status without viewing it as a formal change of affiliation, the Court effectively opens a loophole in the law. This decision undermines the constitutional principles set forth in the 1992 Constitution, which clearly defines affiliation as a core aspect of electoral representation.
The Court’s interpretation threatens Ghana’s multi-party democracy by encouraging representatives to alter affiliations mid-term, potentially without the consent of the voters who elected them based on their original party allegiance. This creates a dangerous precedent, where elected officials may feel emboldened to prioritize personal gain over the will of the electorate, with no clear accountability. Such rulings have a destabilizing effect on the political landscape, as they allow for selective interpretations that benefit certain affiliations while disregarding others.
Furthermore, by applying affiliation rules selectively, the Court undermines its own credibility as a neutral arbiter of justice. Past cases have demonstrated the Court’s willingness to hold representatives accountable for changing from one party to another, yet this current ruling introduces an exception that lacks a clear legal foundation. This inconsistency poses a risk to the integrity of the judiciary and raises questions about the impartiality of its decisions.
The Court’s stance creates legal ambiguity that threatens to weaken democratic institutions and erode public trust in the judicial system. As representatives look to this ruling as a precedent, Ghana’s political system risks further instability, with potential shifts in political loyalties creating a climate of unpredictability. This lack of clarity, consistency, and impartiality in the highest court’s interpretation of the law is a serious concern for the future of Ghana’s democracy. The Supreme Court’s current approach jeopardizes the stability of the country’s legal and democratic institutions, calling into question its role as a guardian of constitutional integrity and democratic principles.
Errortorial Commission of Ghana -EC 1 year ago
Are we all sure the Supreme court is capable of interpreting the constitution of Ghana? Ghana is in deep sh!t
Are we all sure the Supreme court is capable of interpreting the constitution of Ghana? Ghana is in deep sh!t
Dallas1 1 year ago
This is what you get when you vote a social misfit as president.
This is what you get when you vote a social misfit as president.
Rogue Lawyer 1 year ago
Ridiculous
Was it not this same UFC,
Who in Gyakye Quison case , they said election is a process and it start from the date you file your nomination?
Ridiculous
Was it not this same UFC,
Who in Gyakye Quison case , they said election is a process and it start from the date you file your nomination?
Korbla 1 year ago
Wow! This is a serious observation you have made. Very interesting.
Wow! This is a serious observation you have made. Very interesting.
Coach 1 year ago
Dear Supreme Court,
Having read your judgement, I think speaker Bagbin's inferences - in relation to the 4 Maps - was right.
Now since this is a matter of high public interest, may I suggest that you review your own deci ... read full comment
Dear Supreme Court,
Having read your judgement, I think speaker Bagbin's inferences - in relation to the 4 Maps - was right.
Now since this is a matter of high public interest, may I suggest that you review your own decision - noting a fundamental error of law that is perceived as a gross miscarriage of justice ...?!
Koliko 1 year ago
It seems Ghana is in danger. Are we a serious country with this type of judgement?
It seems Ghana is in danger. Are we a serious country with this type of judgement?
Political judges 1 year ago
We knew the outcome before this nonsense of a judgement.
We knew the outcome before this nonsense of a judgement.
Abrantie 1 year ago
This is crazy
This is crazy
Batule 1 year ago
Switch party within parliament is the matter. The independent Switch is another option. If there is a new party then you can switch and nothing happens. Switch to the man with the mask, where the white woman was in prison. An ... read full comment
Switch party within parliament is the matter. The independent Switch is another option. If there is a new party then you can switch and nothing happens. Switch to the man with the mask, where the white woman was in prison. Another new party founder failed to make sugar Komenda worx. But he has still money to move the whole country. TV station, a new party founded and still Cash. Afriyie the tractor supporter has enough to campaign on his own. Cecilia.
Tony 1 year ago
The most stupid ruling I've ever seen I'm my life.....SO WHAT HAPPENS TO THE INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE??....HASN'T HE JOINED THE NPP IN PARLIAMENT TOO??....
The most stupid ruling I've ever seen I'm my life.....SO WHAT HAPPENS TO THE INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE??....HASN'T HE JOINED THE NPP IN PARLIAMENT TOO??....
Citizen8 1 year ago
@Tony, you've made it abundantly clear that when people fail to know they don't know they openly expose their own stupidity by erroneously thinking others are rather stupid. Indeed ignorance is expensive.
@Tony, you've made it abundantly clear that when people fail to know they don't know they openly expose their own stupidity by erroneously thinking others are rather stupid. Indeed ignorance is expensive.
Castro 1 year ago
What kind of selfish thinking is this? Now we getting to understand why I’m our history, some judges went missing. Always twisting the law to favor their paid masters.
What kind of selfish thinking is this? Now we getting to understand why I’m our history, some judges went missing. Always twisting the law to favor their paid masters.
Whiteman 1 year ago
Don't think Npp will remain in power forever. If you publicly made your political self known you will be treated as such. The EC will be first to be sacked when NDC wins. The next person is you chief justice then others follo ... read full comment
Don't think Npp will remain in power forever. If you publicly made your political self known you will be treated as such. The EC will be first to be sacked when NDC wins. The next person is you chief justice then others follow.
Nii 1 year ago
The interpretation of the ruling vindicate the speaker.
The interpretation of the ruling vindicate the speaker.
Ayensu 1 year ago
This is the exact interpretation and conclusion that the vast majority of people reached. Throughout the discourse, no one assumed that article 97 referred to a future parliament.
This is the exact interpretation and conclusion that the vast majority of people reached. Throughout the discourse, no one assumed that article 97 referred to a future parliament.
Donatus 1 year ago
Are perfectly right, how can anybody think that it is about the future? What if they don't win? What if the world comes to an end before 7th December?
Are perfectly right, how can anybody think that it is about the future? What if they don't win? What if the world comes to an end before 7th December?
#Choose8 1 year ago
Are these judges on some hard stuff?
Are these judges on some hard stuff?
Jah Alone 1 year ago
The CJ should go back to her books because their ruling has made us confused and nothing to learn from it.
There must be a constitutional review so that the supreme court judges can apply to be CJ.in the near future.
As fo ... read full comment
The CJ should go back to her books because their ruling has made us confused and nothing to learn from it.
There must be a constitutional review so that the supreme court judges can apply to be CJ.in the near future.
As for this CJ,to me I say not,not,not.
Ken 1 year ago
The judgement of the Supreme Court is equivalent to sanctioning political prostitution by our Members of Parliament.
The judgement of the Supreme Court is equivalent to sanctioning political prostitution by our Members of Parliament.
Watchman 1 year ago
The SC justices placed strong emphasis on the intent of the MPs to contest as independent candidate in the generation. The question is did the MPs actually register to contest the election as independent candidates? If they h ... read full comment
The SC justices placed strong emphasis on the intent of the MPs to contest as independent candidate in the generation. The question is did the MPs actually register to contest the election as independent candidates? If they have not registered with the electoral commission to context as independent candidates then the justices are correct in their construction of Art 97. The speaker acted in haste to declare their seat vacant.
Korbla 1 year ago
The notice of poll from the EC is proof of their intent to contest as independent candidates
The notice of poll from the EC is proof of their intent to contest as independent candidates
Kabila 1 year ago
The killed judges had the real justice 8f they lived this way
The killed judges had the real justice 8f they lived this way
Kabila 1 year ago
The killed judges had the real justice 8f they lived this way. May God forgive those 4hat killed anaty Quah
The killed judges had the real justice 8f they lived this way. May God forgive those 4hat killed anaty Quah
Kabila 1 year ago
Those who killed Amateuy Quah should be arrested for crime
Those who killed Amateuy Quah should be arrested for crime
Kk 1 year ago
May murderous thinkers and doers like Amartey Kwei who is perishing in hell with his sponsors locate you and your family and wipe you out. Ndc murderous individuals.
May murderous thinkers and doers like Amartey Kwei who is perishing in hell with his sponsors locate you and your family and wipe you out. Ndc murderous individuals.
Kk 1 year ago
Thank you SC. This is common sense. Shame in the anarchist Bagbin. Now see how you have been disgraced. Shame on you.
Thank you SC. This is common sense. Shame in the anarchist Bagbin. Now see how you have been disgraced. Shame on you.
A. B 1 year ago
I don't have problem of the ruling but how come supreme Court Judges have different view of ONE constitution of Ghana? 3 judges are on different view and 2 judges has same like how, so we don't have a clear constitution
I don't have problem of the ruling but how come supreme Court Judges have different view of ONE constitution of Ghana? 3 judges are on different view and 2 judges has same like how, so we don't have a clear constitution
The Supreme Court has exposed itself big time 1 year ago
I am speechless! Torkonu FC! Maame, come see oooo! Supreme Criminals! I have always said this that our judiciary needs reset. Also, former president Kuffor is conflicted. He says the speaker should compromise for his legacy s ... read full comment
I am speechless! Torkonu FC! Maame, come see oooo! Supreme Criminals! I have always said this that our judiciary needs reset. Also, former president Kuffor is conflicted. He says the speaker should compromise for his legacy seek. So where is the mandate of the people who elected the defected parliamentarian. The originators of the constitution inserted in that article so that the mandate of people is sought. No wisdom in this reasoning.
Molemole 1 year ago
VERY VERY STUPID STATEMENT TO MAKE
VERY VERY STUPID STATEMENT TO MAKE
CloudGhana Internet 1 year ago
Are you looking for high-speed internet at an affordable rate? CloudGhana has you covered! Please call 0202699116 for further inquiries.
Are you looking for high-speed internet at an affordable rate? CloudGhana has you covered! Please call 0202699116 for further inquiries.
MR BIG MOUTH 1 year ago
LET REMOVE OR EXTRACT THIS JUDGEMENT FROM OUR LAW SCHOOL/BOOK OR RECORD'S FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS NOT TO READ THIS. IT EMBARRASSING FOR A COUNTRY LIKE GHANA. FIRST WEEK STUDENTS IN TEMASCO WILL NOT WASTE OUR TIME LIKE THIS
LET REMOVE OR EXTRACT THIS JUDGEMENT FROM OUR LAW SCHOOL/BOOK OR RECORD'S FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS NOT TO READ THIS. IT EMBARRASSING FOR A COUNTRY LIKE GHANA. FIRST WEEK STUDENTS IN TEMASCO WILL NOT WASTE OUR TIME LIKE THIS
Onyansanii 1 year ago
Why won't papa jay spray this people like cockroaches.
By this ruling papa jay is vindicated by the June 4 actions.
Is it by force to pease the one who appointed you. Rulling by Agyapadi3 documents instead of the constitut ... read full comment
Why won't papa jay spray this people like cockroaches.
By this ruling papa jay is vindicated by the June 4 actions.
Is it by force to pease the one who appointed you. Rulling by Agyapadi3 documents instead of the constitution shameless bunch of people
Nabilla 1 year ago
Only closed minds do not understand this ruling... Bagbin acted as though he was the High court.. Besides this ruling put to bed issues of law concerning, the present parliament and the future parliament..
Only closed minds do not understand this ruling... Bagbin acted as though he was the High court.. Besides this ruling put to bed issues of law concerning, the present parliament and the future parliament..
Nabilla 1 year ago
On page 29 of the Judgement, reference has been made to several instances that MPs contested as independents yet still sat in parliament.. Many examples about that are there for all.. Hawa Yakubu was an independent while cont ... read full comment
On page 29 of the Judgement, reference has been made to several instances that MPs contested as independents yet still sat in parliament.. Many examples about that are there for all.. Hawa Yakubu was an independent while contesting to be as NPP candidate.. Same to John Achuluwor.. Up to 8 examples are mentioned in this ruling... The current Speaker sat in parliament watching all that but used one example to declare seats vacant.. This speaker appears to be arrogant and despotic... Shamefully using just one example about the last parliament to do NDC politics...
Abdul Sumed 1 year ago
you part ways with your Party when you decided to go Independent after your Party rejected you at Parliamentary primaries. When you remain in parliamentary you practically do not belong to that Party which you defied by goin ... read full comment
you part ways with your Party when you decided to go Independent after your Party rejected you at Parliamentary primaries. When you remain in parliamentary you practically do not belong to that Party which you defied by going Independent.
Please let us be real.
the value is the same speaker bagbin was right after all
Who gives a shit about your bullcrab delivery.
The NDC judges are saying that the high court should have handled the case but failed to declare whether the supreme court can supersede the high court.
NPP IS A CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION.....
So CJ Tookenoo and her UnanimousFC 5 are saying that the MP can be in one party in parliament and in another party outside parliamnet ---Hahahahaha
This Concert is just beginning in Ghana where Mps can belong to multiple par ...
read full comment
So CJ Tookenoo and her UnanimousFC 5 are saying that the MP can be in one party in parliament and in another party outside parliament ---Hahahahaha
This Concert is just beginning in Ghana where MPs can belong to multiple par ...
read full comment
NPP memberof parliament in parliament but NDC member and candidate outside parliament! This is why we are Ghana where the supreme court is the supreme culprit in bastardizing the constitution! Truly, the problems in the judic ...
read full comment
Bro, youve hit the nail righ on the the head!
I hate impersonation ok.
My brother, it is the cheap fools Akufo Addo has been making the Chief Justice and Supreme Court judges that is bringing the problem to Ghana. We have had CJs and SC judges in this country but not these partisan ones. Nothing ...
read full comment
Wise guy
This is just a mockery of our democracy. What these compromised and corrupt judges must remember is that justice resides in the conscience of the people, not in the bosom of the judiciary. DAMN!
This ruling doesn't make sense. So those MP's switching sides can work and act in the name of two political parties at the same time? The MP can campaign as an NDC candidate whiles representing the NPP in parliament until the ...
read full comment
@Dogo, That is what the Supreme court is saying. Are we all sure the Supreme court is capable of interpreting the constitution of Ghana? Ghana is in deep trouble!
That is what corruption, partisanship and tribalism give birth to. They give birth to weird decisions and mediocrity. Our SC judges may have gone for their looted money by now and we now have to live with the tortuous and amb ...
read full comment
We shall see when there is a boom!
In fact Ghanaweb are you trying to make money by bombarding us with useless adverts, by the way if a kotoko players I am out of the team ,he is still a player ? Common sense can not be found in books .
With these sort of evil old heartless fools.... 2024 Election will be a waste of time .... they are ready to help NPP win the Election by stealing ....
Gyimii, he is still a player but cannot play for Kotoko.
Stop thinking you made some sense.
Gertrude has confirmed what we all knew. She is shallow. It makes us wonder how she got to where she is!!!! She is the clone of Tiwaa Addo-Danquah, Akufo Addo's alibi. Cecilia Dapaa steals millions of dollars. Go to EOCO ...
read full comment
She's very confused. I doubt if she understands simple English. If she doesn't the way she proves it, that puts herself and the whole country in jeopardy. She doesn't make any sense at all; the Speaker is still right!
Hot girls are waiting for you on == www.Hot4.eu
There is really difference between knowledge and wisdom
This ruling is only sensible to sensible people
There is really difference between knowledge and wisdom
I have read the ruling and the ruling itself is unconstitutional. Under NPP’s own constitution, those members are no longer part of the party, also the only reason they can’t re enter parliament is because of the same con ...
read full comment
So per what they are saying second deputy speaker must vacant his sit
No sir, he remains per the ruling
Their ruling just do not make sense. In effect, there will be rogue MPs in our parliament. Just political justling to continue to make money from us.
Therefore an MP can stay in parliament on behalf of 2 political parties o ...
read full comment
SO WHAT NONSENSE IS GOING ON, STUPID!!! THE UNANIMOUS FC IS THE BUTT OF THE JOKE IN THE WHOLE WORLD!!! I DARE SAY!!! NKWASEAS3M SAAAAAAA...
Torkenoo the CJ does not understand English. Good Day guys
That's the problem created by the midget octogenarian by appointing a former slay queen as the CJ. We are doomed.
SC are more confused than NPP party
Hehe he he, what the heck is going on, this reasoning is so so ridiculous, and they call themselves interpretors of the Constitution, shambolic Supreme Court.
Great insight by the Justices of the Apex Court. If my wedding date is 1st February 2025, can I answer in the affirmative that I'm married on a form asking about my Marital Status? A mere filing of Application for another Par ...
read full comment
Wrong Example..
Can you file a public notice to have wedding with another man in 2025 and still be in your current marriage
You think laws and their structures are designed and built on myopic and childish minds? Get away from here with your shallow mind and let deep thinkers comment on the issue.
Where is the difference from what the speaker said?
Read and understand before you comment.
Sad indeed for Mother Ghana. Almost all the cases cited by the Supreme Court to justify their decision are the "Unanimous FC" bogus and politically biased decisions like the Gyakye Quayson case. Supreme Court was only to inte ...
read full comment
so in this case when formena mp diside to join npp in this parliament to form majolity is not credible
The judgement lacks substance, mp’s are recognized from political and independent position, if one political party can’t cross to the other so should it mean through whichever direction in same cohort of parliament simpl ...
read full comment
THE SUPREME COURT WHICH IS THE APEX COURT IN GHANA, ARE PERFECTLY RIGHT IN THEIR JUDGEMENT, BECAUSE THE FOUR PARLIAMENTARIAN, CEASE TO BE THE BONAFIDE MEMBERS OF THEIR RESPECTIVE PARTIES, STARTING FROM 7TH DECEMBER 2024.
You are not smart, by your saying both NPP and NDC have 2 people standing for the next election with one disguised as independent. A political party can only have 1 rep standing for any election. This is a ‘NOW” situation ...
read full comment
Yes, you're a dumb head like your partisan SC judges. You mean they still belong to their original parties when their heads are printed on banners and ballot papers as 'Independent Candidate'?
You are not smart, by your saying both NPP and NDC have 2 people standing for the next election with one disguised as independent. A political party can only have 1 rep standing for any election. This is a ‘NOW” situation ...
read full comment
The Supreme Court is corrupted now!
I am confused
So if we are about ten months to the election's will they still be there and voted for this C J is not normal
Retiring in shame, they have destroyed Ghana’s democracy and the independence of the judiciary
The problem with our judges is the English language! They read but have no understanding of the language!!
The constitution is written in simple English language so everyone can understand but sadly it's not that simple afte ...
read full comment
Some of these people happen to occupy such sensitive positions through luck but not because they deserve it, Ghana is bleeding.
My brothers and sisters…put your political lenses aside and be honest and objective at least for once. Do these statements/judgments make sense at all. Supreme Court was only acting on orders of the npp. JM kindly set up C ...
read full comment
My brothers and sisters…put your political lenses aside and be honest and objective at least for once. Do these statements/judgments make sense at all. Supreme Court was only acting on orders of the npp. JM kindly set up C ...
read full comment
How is JM going to do that when id is not the President? JM will not win the next election!!!
If you are a human with brains in your head, think and stop being daft fool who is trying vainly to be part of humanity. What is John Mahama in this conversation? Who is he and does he have what it takes to do what pleases yo ...
read full comment
: Bank wire transfer to all countries
We are sending wire transfer and direct flashing to any country
Chase wasap him 0 04 47853053870
Capital one bank
PNC
Access bank
TD bank
And other banks accepted
Bank f ...
read full comment
You guys have time for these criminals smelling like rat calling themselves judges.
Rawlings action number two is just around the corner.
This is absolute misjustice to the state. Let me give you this marriage analogy. Would you be able to live under the same roof with a spouse who has initiated divorce processes or you would prefer to be separated until the di ...
read full comment
Meaning a soldier who openly declares his or her intention to join the enemy forces will be allowed to remain in his or her current unit. I am wondering if NPP or NDC will allow the affected MPs to their confidential caucus ...
read full comment
Correct for three points. I’m surprised our judges seem corrupt.
HOW CN THEY BE LOYAL TO THE PARTY THEY WANT TO MOVE AWY FROM ? THIS DOES NOT MAKE SENSE AT ALL AND IT IS ONLY IN GHANA THAT SUCH A JUDGEMENT CAN BE MADE
Mear political and useless judgement
Please Judges what is the meaning of Party in this context? Please define what a Party is?
Does Party include an independent MP as well or it excludes it ?
If it does include the independent MP, will the Speaker then be ...
read full comment
Wow! What a judgement. A white stone is not white so long as it is in the hands of your perceived opponent.
The Speaker of parliament is perfectly Right! So Our Madam CJ, please do you mean that the affected four(4) PMs st ...
read full comment
It's irrelevant and useless. Liars, thieves, hypocrites, rapists, demons, crooks, criminals, cowards, slayers, pretenders, traitors, fools, wizards, witches, betrayers, opportunists and murderers!!! Kwasiaa4 buuluubuuluuu!!!
Supreme Court is even confused about their own ruling
Why is this so confusing? This is a simple matter
This is what greed,nepotism and politics can lead to. The nation can go down permanently if such behavior and attitude are not expunged from few greedy individuals that hold power today. Even an illiterate won’t make such a ...
read full comment
This is pure commonsense such that but for bloated egos, partisan interests, etc we've no reason to be debating this issue at all.
How come those who made the law don't know the law?
How come those who made the law don't know the law?
This was a slum dunk decision. Even those of us who have never been through law school understand that unless MP decides to change party affiliation in the current parliament, he/she remains a member of the party that broug ...
read full comment
You can’t contest for a future parliament if you have not denounced the party you are in “NOW”. You also can not claim independent if you contest as a political party agent “NOW”. Stop being illiterate and think. Pe ...
read full comment
So how is that different from the reason why the Speaker declared those seats vacant!
Eii Judiciary coup d'etat. Unanimous FC in action
The Supreme Court judges appear dangerously confused about the very laws they were appointed to interpret. Affiliation is defined consistently across all political categories, whether it’s Party A, Party B, or Independent. ...
read full comment
Please that's not what the constitution says I disagree with you totally
You go explain taya
SHAME! SHAME! SHAME
What is difficult about the law. People vote for you on a ticket. You come to parliament on that ticket. If you change that ticket you vacate your seat. You don't talk about a future parliament. Shame.
This is the reason why it is rumoured that judges are interred facedown in their coffins. Nation wreckers!
You can't see this comment because you're using a China phone
So what is the difference between this ruling and the one we already know which was applied?
Any MP who crosses carpet from Party A to Party B, has the intention to remain and serve the party he or she has crossed to, and th ...
read full comment
If you don't understand this simple judgement then you need Free shs
This is the most stupid reasons has ever heard in Ghana
Jerry Rawlings was right after all. Sir forgive us. What a ruling from the apex court. Confusion galore. Indeed a partisan judiciary is a threat to democracy. So where is the ruling. May God punish them all.
If Soo then asiamah of fomena is implicated cos he came in as independent but has switched to do business with NPP and still remains in the same parliament.
I think I agree with you. And what that means is that we don't currently have a majority leader neither do we have a minority leader. The committees of Parliament have to be reconstituted. Speaker was wrong in making NPP majo ...
read full comment
Sorry, the supreme court cannot even explain their ruling. Shame!
5-0 Justices. Common sense. How do you vacate a seat in the future which you are not guaranteed of winning. How do you vacate a seat if you don't occupy it presently and the justices will attribute to the future. This is poli ...
read full comment
Supreme Court of Ghana! Eeeeiii!!???? What a nonsense of a judgement? I have so many questions to ask these judges. So many questions. What's this???
This explanation doesn't make sense to me one bit. Pls stop making the Sup ...
read full comment
Supreme Court by this ruling , is saying that the old adage “ You can’t eat your cake and have it”, is not true.
By their reasoning, they are saying one can eat his cake and still have the same cake in his or her hand ...
read full comment
Reading from this judgment, all what the court is saying has happened?? So why that awkward ruling??. Infact bad precedence in my opinion.
The UnanimousFc supreme court has made more of us more CONFUSED in Ghana as Afenyo-Monkey said. --LOL
So CJ Tookenoo and her UnanimousFC 5 are saying that the MP can be in one party in parliament and in another party outside ...
read full comment
We have two months until an election. I am a member of ZZZ Party representing Osu Klottey, and I have decided that for the next parliament, I want to represent the people through the YYY Party or as an independent candidate. ...
read full comment
The Supreme Court’s recent approach to political affiliation is concerning, as it demonstrates a lack of consistency in interpreting the laws meant to uphold democratic accountability and transparency. By permitting represe ...
read full comment
Are we all sure the Supreme court is capable of interpreting the constitution of Ghana? Ghana is in deep sh!t
This is what you get when you vote a social misfit as president.
Ridiculous
Was it not this same UFC,
Who in Gyakye Quison case , they said election is a process and it start from the date you file your nomination?
Wow! This is a serious observation you have made. Very interesting.
Dear Supreme Court,
Having read your judgement, I think speaker Bagbin's inferences - in relation to the 4 Maps - was right.
Now since this is a matter of high public interest, may I suggest that you review your own deci ...
read full comment
It seems Ghana is in danger. Are we a serious country with this type of judgement?
We knew the outcome before this nonsense of a judgement.
This is crazy
Switch party within parliament is the matter. The independent Switch is another option. If there is a new party then you can switch and nothing happens. Switch to the man with the mask, where the white woman was in prison. An ...
read full comment
The most stupid ruling I've ever seen I'm my life.....SO WHAT HAPPENS TO THE INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE??....HASN'T HE JOINED THE NPP IN PARLIAMENT TOO??....
@Tony, you've made it abundantly clear that when people fail to know they don't know they openly expose their own stupidity by erroneously thinking others are rather stupid. Indeed ignorance is expensive.
What kind of selfish thinking is this? Now we getting to understand why I’m our history, some judges went missing. Always twisting the law to favor their paid masters.
Don't think Npp will remain in power forever. If you publicly made your political self known you will be treated as such. The EC will be first to be sacked when NDC wins. The next person is you chief justice then others follo ...
read full comment
The interpretation of the ruling vindicate the speaker.
This is the exact interpretation and conclusion that the vast majority of people reached. Throughout the discourse, no one assumed that article 97 referred to a future parliament.
Are perfectly right, how can anybody think that it is about the future? What if they don't win? What if the world comes to an end before 7th December?
Are these judges on some hard stuff?
The CJ should go back to her books because their ruling has made us confused and nothing to learn from it.
There must be a constitutional review so that the supreme court judges can apply to be CJ.in the near future.
As fo ...
read full comment
The judgement of the Supreme Court is equivalent to sanctioning political prostitution by our Members of Parliament.
The SC justices placed strong emphasis on the intent of the MPs to contest as independent candidate in the generation. The question is did the MPs actually register to contest the election as independent candidates? If they h ...
read full comment
The notice of poll from the EC is proof of their intent to contest as independent candidates
The killed judges had the real justice 8f they lived this way
The killed judges had the real justice 8f they lived this way. May God forgive those 4hat killed anaty Quah
Those who killed Amateuy Quah should be arrested for crime
May murderous thinkers and doers like Amartey Kwei who is perishing in hell with his sponsors locate you and your family and wipe you out. Ndc murderous individuals.
Thank you SC. This is common sense. Shame in the anarchist Bagbin. Now see how you have been disgraced. Shame on you.
I don't have problem of the ruling but how come supreme Court Judges have different view of ONE constitution of Ghana? 3 judges are on different view and 2 judges has same like how, so we don't have a clear constitution
I am speechless! Torkonu FC! Maame, come see oooo! Supreme Criminals! I have always said this that our judiciary needs reset. Also, former president Kuffor is conflicted. He says the speaker should compromise for his legacy s ...
read full comment
VERY VERY STUPID STATEMENT TO MAKE
Are you looking for high-speed internet at an affordable rate? CloudGhana has you covered! Please call 0202699116 for further inquiries.
LET REMOVE OR EXTRACT THIS JUDGEMENT FROM OUR LAW SCHOOL/BOOK OR RECORD'S FOR FUTURE GENERATIONS NOT TO READ THIS. IT EMBARRASSING FOR A COUNTRY LIKE GHANA. FIRST WEEK STUDENTS IN TEMASCO WILL NOT WASTE OUR TIME LIKE THIS
Why won't papa jay spray this people like cockroaches.
By this ruling papa jay is vindicated by the June 4 actions.
Is it by force to pease the one who appointed you. Rulling by Agyapadi3 documents instead of the constitut ...
read full comment
Only closed minds do not understand this ruling... Bagbin acted as though he was the High court.. Besides this ruling put to bed issues of law concerning, the present parliament and the future parliament..
On page 29 of the Judgement, reference has been made to several instances that MPs contested as independents yet still sat in parliament.. Many examples about that are there for all.. Hawa Yakubu was an independent while cont ...
read full comment
you part ways with your Party when you decided to go Independent after your Party rejected you at Parliamentary primaries. When you remain in parliamentary you practically do not belong to that Party which you defied by goin ...
read full comment