FULL TEXT: Supreme Court suspends Speaker Bagbin’s ruling declaring four seats vacant in Parliament

This article is closed for comments.

Read Comments Comments (9)

  • 24 hour NDC majority 2 years ago

    This is the 24 hour economy in action.

  • Awesome Archie 2 years ago

    So now you believe in the 24hour economy after all, ofui?

  • Fools 2 years ago

    Supreme Court cannot suspend parliament decision bcos of separation of powers...

  • Enock 2 years ago

    If you guys really care about the representation of constituents in Parliament, you would not deny SALL representation all these years. You will regret it when you meet the real judge (God) sooner than you think

  • Obuor 2 years ago

    Nonsense.the same God empowered us to be masters of our own.
    Why always bring ur faith in politics?
    Wat abt those who do not even accept that God exist?
    Pure nonsense

  • Rexford Adu 2 years ago

    The Gang of 4, the victims, what appeal or their appointed ensigns made on the Ruling by the Speaker. First as an appeal to the Speaker, second to NPP Caucus and finally to the Supreme Court? Or the effect is the 'Majority' t ...
    read full comment

  • Joko 2 years ago

    Even though the ruling by Bagbin ( and the precedent by Ocquaye ) two lawyers is quite idiotic considering the purpose of the clauses in Article 97, I don’t think the Supreme Court has the mandate to injunct Parliament.
    Th ...
    read full comment

  • Kk 2 years ago

    That unanimous fc is becoming a foolish institution gradually by allowing the useless president to control their actions

  • Parliamentary Majority 2 years ago

    The MPs have vacated their seats and therefore their parliamentary seats cannot be declared vacant. They are still MPs. The spirit of the Constitution is the the parties cannot whip them in line. So for eg. NPP no longer has ...
    read full comment