Read Comments Comments (1)

• Ghana 1 year ago

  This is a very bogus report by all standards. Clearly the committee failed to probe issues relating to the testimony of the IGP in relation to his dealings with Bugri Naabu. No findings were made to confirm the veracity or ot ...
  read full comment

  This is a very bogus report by all standards. Clearly the committee failed to probe issues relating to the testimony of the IGP in relation to his dealings with Bugri Naabu. No findings were made to confirm the veracity or otherwise of the claim by the IGP that he hasn't spoken to Bugri Naabu for over a year. Why didn't the committee, with all its powers under the 1992 constitution and the standing orders of parliaments failed to request for the call log of the IGP and Bugri Naabu to interrogate same. Why did the committee refuse to interrogate the allegation of extra judicial killing when the whistle was blown on such happenings. The committee could have recommended to the Attorney-General to cause criminal investigations to be conducted into the alleged killings. The committee also failed to deal with the general promotion issues and lazily concluded that same matter was before a court. The case in court is different from the general promotion issues discussed on the leaked tape. It is also interesting to note that the chairman of the committee failed to sign the report, and this is very unusual. The chairman should, as a matter of urgency, explain to Ghanaians why he refused to sign the report. Does he have a dissenting opinion on the way the committee investigated the matter? There are more questions to be answered on this bogus report.

  reply