GH¢10M defamation case: Kan-Dapaah refuses to answer Barker-Vormawor’s 17 questions

Read Article

Comments (24)

This article is closed for comments.

Read Comments Comments (24)

WEB SERVICES .L. 1 month ago

We DESIGN all kinds of Websites:
- Business/Corporate Websites.
- Real Estate Websites.
- NGO/Donations websites.
- Ecommerce website.
We are running PROMO for 5 years domain and hosting (website). Visit: www.JustracAf ...
read full comment

We DESIGN all kinds of Websites:
- Business/Corporate Websites.
- Real Estate Websites.
- NGO/Donations websites.
- Ecommerce website.
We are running PROMO for 5 years domain and hosting (website). Visit: www.JustracAfrica.com NGR
J0eY l0nD0N 1 month ago

Stop your spamming.

Stop your spamming.
Dr Mumbi Seraki 1 month ago

Hello youth of Ghana. You can take your own life with medicine. For instance 10 paracetamol at once.......or combine medicine and akpeteshie or weedicide.

Hello youth of Ghana. You can take your own life with medicine. For instance 10 paracetamol at once.......or combine medicine and akpeteshie or weedicide.
Who Killed Mills 1 month ago

So if the plaintiff cannot provide evidence to support his case why is he in court. But we all know a bit of waakye and chicken could help judges to become thieves. What is the law to addo. He doesn't know what it means. Reme ...
read full comment

So if the plaintiff cannot provide evidence to support his case why is he in court. But we all know a bit of waakye and chicken could help judges to become thieves. What is the law to addo. He doesn't know what it means. Remember he does not have a certificate. See how he has been inconsistent with assenting bills. E-Levy as they say he did not see why a legal challenge should stop him but all of a sudden he is saying they is a court case so let's wait. Based on what precedent.? Based on what law? Does the law work in a consistent manner? or it works the patapaa addo way
Unpredictable Oye Onye Kwasi Atta 1 month ago

Answering his questions will provide clarity as to who is lying. Otherwise we shall conclude you are hiding behind national security to lie and perpetuate crime plus evil

Answering his questions will provide clarity as to who is lying. Otherwise we shall conclude you are hiding behind national security to lie and perpetuate crime plus evil
Abuba 1 month ago

All these questions will not damage the plaintiff's case. You lied

All these questions will not damage the plaintiff's case. You lied
BA 1 month ago

If you cannot answer the questions, your suit fails. Simple as ABC

If you cannot answer the questions, your suit fails. Simple as ABC
Awulae 1 month ago

Do you read? And when you read, do you understand? Go back and read again, hopefully you will understand..

Do you read? And when you read, do you understand? Go back and read again, hopefully you will understand..
Kudjoe, USA. 1 month ago

Masa,just provide the video evidence and stop this crap!

Masa,just provide the video evidence and stop this crap!
Ama Koranteng 1 month ago

Idiotic. Why will these questions be answerd

Idiotic. Why will these questions be answerd
Kimu 1 month ago

These lawyers are smart. All they want to establish is that the bribery allegation is no directed to the minister as a person but to the ministry which is not a person to suffer any defamation. Wow.

These lawyers are smart. All they want to establish is that the bribery allegation is no directed to the minister as a person but to the ministry which is not a person to suffer any defamation. Wow.
Mr Perth 1 month ago

A clever idea but I don't expect the Minister to answer the questions for national security reasons. It is the Defendant's responsibility to provide evidence that the plaintiff tried to bribe him. The work of the national sec ...
read full comment

A clever idea but I don't expect the Minister to answer the questions for national security reasons. It is the Defendant's responsibility to provide evidence that the plaintiff tried to bribe him. The work of the national security is to find ways to protect the country and they cannot discuss in public how they go about their duties.
Mensah 1 month ago

The national security minister is an office not a person

The national security minister is an office not a person
One 1 month ago

This questions are a sandpit once the minister answers them, subsequent questions cant be negated or avoided. Its a trap and the minister's lawyers were smart to see it for what it was.

This questions are a sandpit once the minister answers them, subsequent questions cant be negated or avoided. Its a trap and the minister's lawyers were smart to see it for what it was.
NANA ADDO WON'T SIGN A SHIT 1 month ago

My friend, quit lying and provide the damn alleged evidence you made openly to the public of possessing them....
.....
You didn't tell the public about any 17 questions...
....
You said, you were offered some amount of ...
read full comment

My friend, quit lying and provide the damn alleged evidence you made openly to the public of possessing them....
.....
You didn't tell the public about any 17 questions...
....
You said, you were offered some amount of bribe by the interior Minister, which you have evidence.....
......
Why now presenting 17 questions instead of the alleged evidence..????
....
COMMOT FOR THERE, YOU ARE A DISGRACE
.....
Jimbo 1 month ago

So if the minister answers then what next? Why did Wormewor begged and the matter was dropped? Will he answer that question first?

So if the minister answers then what next? Why did Wormewor begged and the matter was dropped? Will he answer that question first?
K. P. U S of A 1 month ago

What is his name again Vorma who? Are you that stupid or you are trying to beg for mercy through the public? A learned person like you have been sued for lying without proof. Isn't this a defamation lawsuit against you and t ...
read full comment

What is his name again Vorma who? Are you that stupid or you are trying to beg for mercy through the public? A learned person like you have been sued for lying without proof. Isn't this a defamation lawsuit against you and there is a perpetual injunction and gag order on it? Why are you discussing this in public in the first place knowing it will be thrown out of court? You know and your lawyers have probably told you that you're gonna lose the case so you wanna make the public to decide and obviously blame NPP and the Courts of bias. This is absolute stupidity on your part bro for asking these silly questions.

Now let's say (some) politicians, lawyers or people in Authority in Ghana oo l beg, they LIE for a living so what make you think he'll answer your questions to incriminate himself or answer you truthfully. Because as the public knows right now, there's no video evidence from you yet, so you have also lied. How can thief man himself theif another thief man? Think fast, go and cut a deal and apologize or retract the statement before it is too late to tarnish your little reputation you hace and derail your image completely. Sometimes, you can't fight the establishment and WIN. And if you do that, it won't take your beauty or your name away. A word to the WiSe is in the NoRtH.
K. P. U S of A 1 month ago

*thief *have

*thief *have
Jimbo 1 month ago

Oh sorry he didn't beg. I am sorry but why doesn't he tender the so called evidence to prove his allegation? It is wrong to just go about lying oo. If he wants the state to join the suit fine. But what does he do next to defe ...
read full comment

Oh sorry he didn't beg. I am sorry but why doesn't he tender the so called evidence to prove his allegation? It is wrong to just go about lying oo. If he wants the state to join the suit fine. But what does he do next to defend himself? I am sure he is only buying time to delay proceedings. Hahaha
GH8 1 month ago

Which National Security Minister will answer these questions? Wow this is ridiculous. That he should disclose the discussions of National Security Council in public like that. Wow

Which National Security Minister will answer these questions? Wow this is ridiculous. That he should disclose the discussions of National Security Council in public like that. Wow
Hammer 1 month ago

But who is that Kan Dapaah self

But who is that Kan Dapaah self
Kali 1 month ago

When the court verdict delays know that the big man is the guilty party.

When the court verdict delays know that the big man is the guilty party.
OLD SOLDIER 1 month ago

THESE ARE VERY SIMPL AND HARMLESS QUESTIONS ONE SHOULDN'T RUN AWAY FROM?

THESE ARE VERY SIMPL AND HARMLESS QUESTIONS ONE SHOULDN'T RUN AWAY FROM?
Papa ordwe kaplorkor 1 month ago

Kan Dapaah, answer the 17 questions and what next ?. Afraid man.

Kan Dapaah, answer the 17 questions and what next ?. Afraid man.

GH¢10M defamation case: Kan-Dapaah refuses to answer Barker-Vormawor’s 17 questions

Read Comments .st0{display:none;fill:#14BDD3;} .st1{display:none;} .st2{display:inline;fill:#FC0F0F;} .st3{display:inline;fill:#FFFFFF;} .st4{display:inline;fill:none;stroke:#000000;stroke-width:6;stroke-miterlimit:10;} Comments (24)

Read Comments Comments (24)