You are here: HomeNews2018 09 10Article 683676

Opinions of Monday, 10 September 2018

Columnist: Edward Bawa

Edward Bawa writes: BOST again! Okley and Akoful must step aside

Edward Bawa, member of Parliament's Mines and Energy Committee Edward Bawa, member of Parliament's Mines and Energy Committee

The Member of Parliament for Bongo in the Upper East Region, Edward Abambire Bawa has raised issues with how the Bulk Oil Storage and Transportation (BOST) company has gone ahead to pay an additional $3million to Springfield Energy in a dispute, against the advice of the company's legal counsel after Alfred Obeng exited as Managing Director.

Mr Alfred Obeng on September 27, 2017 reportedly ordered the payment of $4million as part of the $9 million interest payment Springfield claimed in a dispute.

According to the MP, the new Managing Director, Mr George Mensah Okley and head of Finance, Mr John Kojo Akoful who is a former acting MD under whose tenure the dispute started have gone ahead and paid an additional $3 million against the advice of their legal counsel that Springfield does not deserve $9million as an interest payment.

Mr Edward Bawa has therefore called for an interdiction of Mr Okley and Mr Akoful to allow for a full-scale investigation of the issues to ascertain the facts and a full audit of the systems at BOST to identify challenges and propose solutions to the challenges to forestall future occurrences.

Read the Member of Parliament's opinion on the BOST issue below


Over the years the Bulk Oil Distribution Companies (BDCs) have had a relationship with the Bulk Oil Storage and Transportation company (BOST), in which BDCs without tank farms store their products at the tank farms of BOST at a fee.

In some occasions, these products are not accounted for by BOST for various reasons. This occasions what is referred to as product losses, a liability chargeable to BOST.

It is therefore with this background that:

• Springfield Energy brought its product to BOST tank farm in 2013 October for storage.

Part of the product could not be accounted for. Springfield Energy took advantage of this loss and made a claim of $20,226,717.75 which was far more than the actual quantity lost. This was at a time when Mr. John Kojo Akoful, now the head of Finance, was the Acting M.D. of BOST.

• Therefore on the 18th November 2015, Springfield Energy filed a writ against BOST at an Accra High Court, claiming the following:

I. Recovery of $20, 226,717.75 for their lost products

II. At the Interest rate of 19% from October 2015 till the final payment of the principal;

III. Loss of profit of $3,420,000.00

• When Mr. Awuah Darko assumed office as the M.D. of BOST, and having studied the documents on this case, challenged all the claims of Springfield and hence engaged Ernst and Young Audit Firm to audit the transaction to ascertain the actual quantity of products lost. Ernst and Young found out that the actual quantity of product lost was worth $11,104,143.2.

Both BOST and Springfield agreed and accepted this finding.

• A summary judgement was awarded to Springfield for its claim by the Accra High Court.

At this point Mr. Awuah Darko engaged external lawyers to fight the case.

BOST filed a stay of execution at the court to enable them appeal against the judgement.

The High Court granted it partially and ordered the payment of the cost of actual product lost as ascertained by the auditors and agreed by both parties.

This was $11,104,143.29. On the 20th December 2016, BOST under Awuah Darko paid the said principal amount of $11,104,143.29 through a Five Year Term loan from Fidelity Bank.

The remaining unresolved issue of the 19% interest rate being claimed by Springfield on the principal is still pending at the High Court and Court of Appeal.

• Springfield in September 2017, under Mr. Alfred Obeng's tenure as M.D., approached BOST to have the matter settled out of court.

The Head of Finance, Mr. John Kojo Ankoful (under whose tenure as acting MD when this product loss was occasioned), and the Head of Legal Department, Mrs Harriet Amoah negotiated the settlement agreement of $9 million with Springfield.

This was supposed to be the interest on the principal($11,104,143.29). Alfred Obeng ordered the payment of $4million as part of the $9 million interest payment before the settlement agreement was even signed. This was on the 27th September 2017.

It is important to note that this was without the presence or advice of the external lawyers who were handling the case in court.

• The Head of Legal Department, Mrs Harriet Amoah then sent the Settlement agreement to the External Lawyers for their perusal and in a response via email the external lawyers clearly advised against further payment to Springfield because Springfield in the opinion of the lawyers, was not entitled to an amount of $9 million as interest payment.

For the purposes of clarity the following were the exact words of the lawyers: "We have not revised our view that Springfield Energy is smartly trying to blow hot and cold at the same time.

We therefore stand by our professional advice given earlier that BOST should not cave in to the blackmail of Springfield to hand them underserved millions of dollars from the public purse.

The modus operandi of Springfield is not new. It has been so since the inception of this case. Let Springfield boldly go to the court, prove their case in accordance with the law and let the court deliver its judgement.

BOST will then have the option of satisfying the judgement or if it is unhappy challenge the judgement higher up.

That way it would be seen that BOST stood its grounds and fought a good battle to protect the public purse. That way nobody can accuse all those involved in the case of creating, looting and sharing. This is our position on the matter “

• As a result of this advice the settlement agreement was not executed - both parties did not sign and therefore no one can refer to any duly executed settlement agreement. BOST made it clear to Springfield that they cannot claim interest on their products and at the same time loss of profit on the same product. In the opinion of BOST the two are the same.

• Against the legal advice of BOST external lawyers, George Mensah Okley, the M.D. and John Kojo Akoful, the head of Finance order the payment of an additional $3 million as interest payment.

BIG QUESTION: why would Mr. GEORGE MENSAH OKLEY, the New M.D. AND MR, JOHN KOJO AKOFUL, the former acting MD and now the head of Finance go ahead and pay $3 million against the advice of their legal counsel?

To supply the required response to this question which is boggling the minds of many Ghanaians, I proposed the following:

1. The interdiction of the two officers

2. A full-scale investigation of the issues to ascertain the facts

3. A full audit of the systems at BOST to identify challenges of this nature, and propose solutions to these challenges to forestall future occurrences.

I hope and pray the New Minister for Energy will take keen interest in this matter and act appropriately.


Join our Newsletter