This is my last formal rebuttal to Philip Kobina Baidoo, Jr. I promised to do this even after some of my core readers have consistently advised me to ignore him as the man is not worth any seriou ... read full comment
Dear readers,
Good day.
This is my last formal rebuttal to Philip Kobina Baidoo, Jr. I promised to do this even after some of my core readers have consistently advised me to ignore him as the man is not worth any serious writer's intellectual resources, attention and time.
And as you all may probably have known I have said enough already in terms of exposing his lies, misrepresentations, misparaphrasings of sources, quoting authors out of context, lifting and sampling ideas from right-wing websites without crediting the authors of those websites, and his lack of general understanding of the basics of the topics he has chosen to write about.
Again, I have not done this alone. Other knowledgeable readers have exposed Baidoo's shallow thinking, lies, analytic and factual errors, and serious gaps in his thinking.
An example is the way in which Kojo T, Andy-K and others tore into article yesterday. He could not even address the core of Kojo T's and Andy-K's solid arguments, only to conveniently skirt the substantive questions as he is wont to do in his articles?
How can anyone spent a whopping six-months of his time for research only to come up with such faulty, shallow, and largely erroneously written essys such as Baidoo's? In fact Baidoo has to write another series of essays to explain why this is the case.
Lest I am not misunderstood, I have undertaken to say one or two words under Baidoo's articles and to write three formal rebuttals not necessarily because of Baidoo's "general ignorance" about most of the things he discusses in his articles, because some of us already know where he stands in that "general ignorance," but because of the general readership of Ghanaweb.
Other (and myself) critics of Baidoo have provided enough information, in terms of additional source materials, for some of our readers who wish to read further.
We shall also make available a list of highly technical texts to those who want to go further than the basics which Baidoo always , inexplicably and explicably, got twisted and wrong.
In sum, I shall never probably respond to Baidoo's articles again. I think Andy-K and Kojo T did him in yesterday. That should be enough. That said, I shall come up with more provocative pieces in the coming weeks. There is no need wasting my time on Baidoo. Baidoo is not worth the time of any serious man or woman.
All errors are mine.
Have a great week.
Thanks.
Theo 8 years ago
You are an idiot with a lot of time on your hand. Find something worthwhile to do with your time instead of this unproductive venture that does not solve an iota of problems facing Ghana.
You are an idiot with a lot of time on your hand. Find something worthwhile to do with your time instead of this unproductive venture that does not solve an iota of problems facing Ghana.
YAW 8 years ago
Your dignified silence on Baidoo"s article was very much appreciated. Shame you did not apply the same principle on this one. I will leave this lovely saying from Sam Rayburn for your perusal.
"No one has a finer command o ... read full comment
Your dignified silence on Baidoo"s article was very much appreciated. Shame you did not apply the same principle on this one. I will leave this lovely saying from Sam Rayburn for your perusal.
"No one has a finer command of language than the person who keeps his mouth shut".
I have read your comment,Theo, and I am no wiser than the silence you maintained on Baidoo"s article.
Mahmoud 8 years ago
Busia did not say that he was going to stay in power indefinitely as Nkrumah did, and he did not declare Ghana as a one-party state either. He was given a 5year mandate to deliver for Ghanaians to judge whether to extend his ... read full comment
Busia did not say that he was going to stay in power indefinitely as Nkrumah did, and he did not declare Ghana as a one-party state either. He was given a 5year mandate to deliver for Ghanaians to judge whether to extend his tenure or go for a different leader. But the communist relicts that were still hiding in our midst got panicked and overthrew him prematurely because they were afraid of his achievements. Truly, the man was so good that he knew exactly what he was coming to do for his country, and hit the ground running from the first day he got into office.
On the other hand, Nkrumah had been in power for sixteen years and turned himself into a president for life when he realized that his popularity had waned. In the sixties and after he had squandered the huge reserve, the country started to go down the drain politically and economically and Ghanaians visibly yearned for a change. But since Nkrumah shut all the doors that would have enabled them to exercise their political will and change him democratically through the ballot box; they had no choice but to force him through a military coup. Therefore, the coup that removed Kwame Nkrumah from office was the only legitimate coup in the history of Ghana.
francis kwarteng 8 years ago
BY DR. SAS, ATTORNEY AT LAW
READ:
"....Biological sciences affirm the notion that all humankind are equal, and that exposure to knowledge and culture accounts for why some are more inclined than others to achieve greatnes ... read full comment
BY DR. SAS, ATTORNEY AT LAW
READ:
"....Biological sciences affirm the notion that all humankind are equal, and that exposure to knowledge and culture accounts for why some are more inclined than others to achieve greatness, power and wealth...Therefore the defining variable in mental development is “opportunity” which establishes the most legitimate intellectual differentials in the cognitive abilities of groups and individuals.../
\...It is in the context of all this knowledge that Ghana’s first president, soon after independence, deemed it fit and proper to concentrate on the formal school system to boost the African personality and to merge the tribes under one great banner of nationhood . Dr. Kwame Nkrumah’s vision for Ghana was the elevation of the confidence of the African and the unity of the nation and her people. This vision extended beyond Ghana’s borders to include the whole of Africa. What Nkrumah conceived of nationhood made philosophical sense because without knowledge and unity, no country can claim nationhood. If ignorance makes people show greater allegiances to tribes at the expense of the nation, then the survival of the nation is under serious threat. For a country to be a nation, her people will have to subsume ethnicity under the aegis of the national interest. The present conflicts amongst the tribes, though so far verbal, is a testimony that our country comprises nations within the state. In effect, we of this generation have repudiated the concept of nationhood with our ethnic animosity and undermined the very tenets under which the nation was founded..." (6 February 2007, Ghanaweb, Samuel Adjei Sarfo, J.D., AKA, Dr. SAS, Attorney at Law).
Nii Teiko 8 years ago
You are a complete disgrace and disingenuous to ghanaweb 'residents'. What do you take us for? Neither of the two trokosi duo, Kojo T nor Andy K, made any serious intellectual imput to the on going discourse to warrant suc ... read full comment
You are a complete disgrace and disingenuous to ghanaweb 'residents'. What do you take us for? Neither of the two trokosi duo, Kojo T nor Andy K, made any serious intellectual imput to the on going discourse to warrant such recognition by you. As far as related comments to Baidoo's latest essay is concerned , brothers like Marcus Ampadu and many others made some meaningful effort, trying to tear apart Baidoo's contention. Settling on these two trokosi to make your point reaffirm our long held view that you are one of the name stealing Trokosis Nyebros. Stop being a coward and openly declare your true identity. Nobody will kill you for being born to trokosi parents.
MARCUS AMPADU 8 years ago
Thank you Nii Teiko. I have been wondering why Kwarteng & Prof. Lungu have been avoiding my comments of late. That wouldn't stop me from expressing my opinion though.
I am more concerned about the future generations of Gha ... read full comment
Thank you Nii Teiko. I have been wondering why Kwarteng & Prof. Lungu have been avoiding my comments of late. That wouldn't stop me from expressing my opinion though.
I am more concerned about the future generations of Ghanaians&Africans.
MARCUS AMPADU 8 years ago
Irrespective of the "general readership of Ghanaweb" , your " more provocative pieces in the coming weeks" , should be devoted to exploring a doctrine of sustainability for Ghana that would invariably make our future more sec ... read full comment
Irrespective of the "general readership of Ghanaweb" , your " more provocative pieces in the coming weeks" , should be devoted to exploring a doctrine of sustainability for Ghana that would invariably make our future more secured, instead of wasting your precious time & energy on P. K. Baidoo Jr.
francis kwarteng 8 years ago
Dear Marcus,
How are you?
Please don't take that I ignore your sentiments when I don't directly respond to them.
For instance, when you take another look at the first comments (titled "Readers: Important Info On Baid ... read full comment
Dear Marcus,
How are you?
Please don't take that I ignore your sentiments when I don't directly respond to them.
For instance, when you take another look at the first comments (titled "Readers: Important Info On Baidoo") I made on this article I used the words "OTHER" and "OTHERS" which directly cover you, Marcus Ampadu, and other critics of Baidoo.
Yet a reader like Nii Teiko reads the names Kojo T and Andy-K and overlooks the word "OTHERS" following Andy-K and Kojo T. In fact this is what I wrote and I quote:
"An example is the way in which Kojo T, Andy-K and others tore into article yesterday..."
But on Ghanaweb some readers don't appreciate nuances and subtleties when they read.
All these readers see are ethnicities, partisan politics, conflict, ethnocentricism (tribalism), and the like, where this is not my intention.
Which ethnicities did I exclude from "OTHER" and "OTHERS"? Why inject ethnocentrism (tribalism) into an article ("trokosi") where that is needless or un-called for?
What have Andy-K's and Kojo T's brilliant expose of Baidoo's analytic weaknesses and "general ignorance" got to do with ethnocentrism? Nothing.
Andy-K's commentaries are what researchers, think tanks, political scientists, sociologists, political economists (like Elinor Ostrom (2009 Nobel Laureate Economics), Leonid Hurwicz (2007 Nobel Laureate Economics, Amartya Sen (1998 Nobel Laureate Economics) to mention but two), economists, Afrocentrists, moral philosophers, etc., have and are advancing.
These thinkers come from various ethnic and racial backgrounds. In that case, what has "trokosi" got to do with Andy-K's well-founded and well-researched commentaries which overturns Baidoo's uninformed articles?
Have you Marcus wondered why Nii Teiko, an Akan, uses a Ga name to promote his parochial views?
Marcus, have you bothered to find out that Nii Teiko is not even a Ga as he is pretending here? Of course Teiko's ethnicity means nothing to me particularly, but why hide behind a Ga moniker to promote ethnocentrism (tribalism) against another?
I will have wished you Marcus should have called him to order which you did not. That aside, this two-part series on Noam Chomsky is essentially about literary criticism, critical reading/listening skills, basic research methods, and creative, analytic, and scientiic thinkng among others.
Are you Marcus saying these skills are unneccessary for our shaping future? This is what Nii Teiko missed in the article since he did not see any value in or attach any value to the words "OTHER" and "OTHERS" in my comments.
A committee set up my the Mayor/Governor of New York to look into some of the shortcomings that led to Sept. 11 concluded that poor reading/listening skiils of SECURITY GUARDS (to mention but one), particularly immigrants, contributed to that happenings of that fateful day.
As a result, New York security schools made acquiring reading/listening skills part of security certification programs. And there is no denying the fact the business cost of poor reading skills to our economies.
Judgment debts may be part of this generality. Ingestion of counterfeit drugs and inability to correctly read or follow dotors' prescriptions by some patients are also part of the generality.
It also apears we do not see a direct correlation between good reading/listening skills and creative, analytic thinking and the natural sciences and mathematics.
So, Marcus Amapdu, everything about my this two-part series on Noam Chomsky and Baidoo is about the future. And I don't always have to go about explicitly using the worse "future" for others to understand that I am taking the future.
I have already discussed radical educational reforms in Ghana and across Africa and have specifically mentioned critical reading/listening skills as part of the solutions.
This two-part series on Baidoo and Noam Chomsky is a continuation of that discussion. Is it because I did not specifically mention "future" and "Ghana"?
And if you read this piece closely, I made mention of how Pres. Truman's speech out to have been read by Baidoo. I discussed the 1947 speech, the Cold War, etc., meaning that Chomsky, unlike Baidoo, used unfolding events, that is the "future," as part of his analytic prism into Presn. Truman's legacy.
This is what I menat by "analytic and holistic thinking" in the article. I used the phrase as a substitute for "scientific thinking." How important is scientific thinking to the future?
Elsewhere I mentioned "stochastic model," "mathematical modeling," "time series analysis," deterministic, stochastic and hybrid models," "analytics," etc., what do you think all these concepts mean?
As you can see there is a discussion of the "future" in this particular essay and the one preceding it. And like I said before, I need always have to explicitly mention the word "future" before anyone knows I am looking at or discussing the "future." It is all right there in my two articles.
In sum, the words "OTHER" and "OTHERS" have you in there. I hope I am clear?
Have a great week.
Thanks.
MARCUS AMPADU 8 years ago
Kwarteng, it is obvious that your knowledge of what constitutes the body of knowledge, I.e. the discipline, called futuristics or futurology is limited to say the least.
I am not talking about the "future" per se, I am ref ... read full comment
Kwarteng, it is obvious that your knowledge of what constitutes the body of knowledge, I.e. the discipline, called futuristics or futurology is limited to say the least.
I am not talking about the "future" per se, I am referring to the discipline of forecasting the future.
In 1964 the French social Scientist Bertrand de Jouvenel published L'Art de la conjecture ( The Art of Conjecture), in which he offered a systematic philosophical rationale for the field of prediction the future.
Of course to anticipate social patterns, to design new institutions, and craft alternatives, one has to use scenario writing, Delphi technique, cross impact matrix, stochastic model, time series analysis, even computer modeling.
People go to school to major in futuristics; Kwarteng it involves more than critical reading
/listening skills.
francis kwarteng 8 years ago
Marcus,
Is it only critical,listening skills you took from my response?
Did you see me mention the science of analystics, time series analysis, stochastic models...?
I can seem to understand you anymore!
Thanks.
Marcus,
Is it only critical,listening skills you took from my response?
Did you see me mention the science of analystics, time series analysis, stochastic models...?
I can seem to understand you anymore!
Thanks.
c.y. ANDY-K 8 years ago
Ha! ha! ha! Nyebro Yaw, don't throw your hands into the air and give up on them yet. Just take a breather, concentrate on other things and come back stronger. You'd find them in the same holes - same rat holes - they have dug ... read full comment
Ha! ha! ha! Nyebro Yaw, don't throw your hands into the air and give up on them yet. Just take a breather, concentrate on other things and come back stronger. You'd find them in the same holes - same rat holes - they have dug for themselves and got stuck in! I met them in same on Okyeame, etc., in the '90s, took them on straight to the cleaners, and walked all over of them, only for them to rise up and continue because I didn't deliver the fatal blow to kill them off. That's why when I read Marcus Ampadu claiming that your rejoinder to Baidoo Esq. was an overkill designed to humiliate him, I had wanted to write against that accusation.
Marcus and others trying to critcise yoru style are trying to mark you down to a medicore level they subscribe to. Theirs got nothing to do with with the polemical discourse associated with the devt ans civilisng process. In fact, as Kuhn has written and taught us, not even the "scientific" discourse. A reading of some of the polemical tracts whites had written associated had written in the panopy of competition for power, change, etc., not to mention the actions (the protests, the violence, etc.) that were taken, makes your writings pale into insignificance. But write, we must surely write! At the moment it is the only effective weapon we have to fight our detractors. But we shall not drink their hemlock, nor be forced to commit sucicide because they accused us of committing sacrilege, their sacrilege!
Years back, when the Nigerian Philip Emeagwali ahd become famous for his feat, I read that the formula he used was actually based by one proposed by Germam mathematician couple in the 1930s. They were so much laughed at and mocked by their fellow mathematics for being nuts that the man committed suicide, followed by the wife! Reminded me of how the Inquisition, after losing the Disputations with Galileo decided to subject him to the rack to force him to stop making the factual claims he was making about the universe and reveal his allegedly deceptive tricks like how he made the telescope and managed to paint into it the heavenly bodies they saw when they (the learned Dons, Cardinals and doctors of learning in the Catholic Church) looked into Galileo's telescope. Poor Galileo was forced to recant instead of being subjected to torture in order to tell lies! It was well into the 1980s when the Catholic Church grudgingly admitted that Galileo was right but they were also right too! Gosh! You see, we are dealing with Catholics! Even if proven wrong, they are still right!
Enough!
Andy-K
francis kwarteng 8 years ago
Dear Nyebro Yao,
Good day.
Thanks for the encouragement, vision, and powerful historical analogies. I simply love them all. Great.
And like you said, I am not giving up yet. I have to continue from where you left on ... read full comment
Dear Nyebro Yao,
Good day.
Thanks for the encouragement, vision, and powerful historical analogies. I simply love them all. Great.
And like you said, I am not giving up yet. I have to continue from where you left on the Okyeame days (and even what you continued to do in the 2000s).
As for their hemlock, I have an antidote for it. We shall give it back to them to drink. They are already drinking.
Lest I forget, I cannot overlook the beatings you and Kojo T gave Baidoo in connection with his latest article.
Hahahahahaha...The man (Baidoo) did not know that individuals have won Nobel Prizes (in economics) and other prestigious internal awards for the very powerful ideas (economics, political economy, history, politics, sociology, organizational theory, philosophy, keynesian/command economy strategies, political science, etc) which you unleased upon him that day. I felt sad for him.
Guess what, Nyebro Yao? I sometimes wonder which planet Baidoo leaves on. The man is not even serious about the stuff he writes about.
There was one case in which I wondered if he could understand you when you used "command economies" in your commentary, when he could not tell readers a summary from a verbatim quote (vice versa)!
Yet he had the nerves to tell his readers Noam Chomsky is a liar! He had to lie about Chomsky in order to establish his own lies...What a man! He also says he is a principled man and a Christian. Apuuuuu...!
And yes, I will continue to write.
Have a great week.
Thanks.
MARCUS AMPADU 8 years ago
Feels like a tag team, Andy-K, I am not preventing Kwarteng from doing what he does best, that is researching and writing. I just want him to expand his research effort by directing him to Bertrand de Jouvenel, the author of ... read full comment
Feels like a tag team, Andy-K, I am not preventing Kwarteng from doing what he does best, that is researching and writing. I just want him to expand his research effort by directing him to Bertrand de Jouvenel, the author of The Art of Conjecture, where the word futuristics, future forecasting was first used. My intention was not to pull Kwarteng down to prevent him from writing. I suggest you also learn about the discipline of forecasting the future. It would benefit all of us.
MARCUS AMPADU 8 years ago
F. K., I am not disrespecting your effort as a researcher cum writer. I just wanted to direct your research effort to the discipline of futuristics or futurology. It is a body of knowledge we in Ghana and Africa could use.
... read full comment
F. K., I am not disrespecting your effort as a researcher cum writer. I just wanted to direct your research effort to the discipline of futuristics or futurology. It is a body of knowledge we in Ghana and Africa could use.
Start with The Art of Conjecture by Bertrand de Jouvenel.
Dr. SAS, Attorney at Law 8 years ago
I stand by whatever good things I have said about Nkrumah and will never regret it. This should only demonstrate that I am amenable to his praise whenever possible.
But nothing I have ever said about the man contradicts my ... read full comment
I stand by whatever good things I have said about Nkrumah and will never regret it. This should only demonstrate that I am amenable to his praise whenever possible.
But nothing I have ever said about the man contradicts my view that he was a dictator.
We Danquists are not like the Nkrumaists who suffer from bi-polar disease and see things only in black and white. We can see in nuances.
And as to my brother Kwarteng's articles, I have stopped reading them because they have nothing to do with the present or the future, as Marcus has already pointed out. And I am tempted to believe that my brother's brain is rooted in the bigoted past, just as Nii Teiko here who cannot see beyond his concretized view of a certain group of Ghanaians.
In the end, we can only mourn over his wasted talent made totally useless by his subservience to a veritable dictator, his cronies and town-criers. When he gets to be a hundred years and regretful of his wasted times, he can never say that I did not warn him.
MARCUS AMPADU 8 years ago
So much about foreign ideological perspectives and intellectuals. Our conversations should be about crafting a more sustainable Ghana in the future both Nkrumah and Danquah would be proud of.
So much about foreign ideological perspectives and intellectuals. Our conversations should be about crafting a more sustainable Ghana in the future both Nkrumah and Danquah would be proud of.
Dr. SAS, Attorney at Law 8 years ago
We Danquists were sitting at our somewhere when Prof. Kwarteng and his renegade gang of Nkrumaists started serializing their insults here. They were quite gratuitous in insulting Danquah and Busia over nothing, claiming that ... read full comment
We Danquists were sitting at our somewhere when Prof. Kwarteng and his renegade gang of Nkrumaists started serializing their insults here. They were quite gratuitous in insulting Danquah and Busia over nothing, claiming that they were confederates, murderers, traitors, anarchists, nation-wreckers and so on. At the height of their nonsense, they thought they owned the patence in insults, until we answered them in kind......
And instead of you Marcus Ampadu coming in to make peace, you took a strong side with them, regularly questioning my sanity and the credibilty of the noble Danquists, the patriots and the martyrs. Now are you prepared to question your own sanity in attempting to make peace? Where is your locus?
We the noble Danquists, patriots and martyrs did not start this, but we will finish it. By now, you yourself should sense that the people are rallying to us. Of the horde of Nkrumaists cacophones that featured their trash against us, we now have only the faceless Lungu and the confused Kwarteng leading the charge. Their message is devoid of any sense except in tautological praise of a dictator who has nothing to show by way of relevant legacy, ideology and even philosophy.
The time is too far gone for you to call for rapprochement, so shove off hypocrite!
MARCUS AMPADU 8 years ago
SAS I don't dabble, unlike you, in insults and name calling; your irrational thinking undoubtedly is a disservice to Ghana at the critical time our country is searching for answers to solve her many challenges.
Rapprochem ... read full comment
SAS I don't dabble, unlike you, in insults and name calling; your irrational thinking undoubtedly is a disservice to Ghana at the critical time our country is searching for answers to solve her many challenges.
Rapprochement is not what I'm looking for, antithetically, my mission is clear, unbiased thinking.
The straw man arguments between Nkrumahists and Danquists, in my opinion, is fallacious; and the sooner we can it the better for our nation.
Dear readers,
Good day.
This is my last formal rebuttal to Philip Kobina Baidoo, Jr. I promised to do this even after some of my core readers have consistently advised me to ignore him as the man is not worth any seriou ...
read full comment
You are an idiot with a lot of time on your hand. Find something worthwhile to do with your time instead of this unproductive venture that does not solve an iota of problems facing Ghana.
Your dignified silence on Baidoo"s article was very much appreciated. Shame you did not apply the same principle on this one. I will leave this lovely saying from Sam Rayburn for your perusal.
"No one has a finer command o ...
read full comment
Busia did not say that he was going to stay in power indefinitely as Nkrumah did, and he did not declare Ghana as a one-party state either. He was given a 5year mandate to deliver for Ghanaians to judge whether to extend his ...
read full comment
BY DR. SAS, ATTORNEY AT LAW
READ:
"....Biological sciences affirm the notion that all humankind are equal, and that exposure to knowledge and culture accounts for why some are more inclined than others to achieve greatnes ...
read full comment
You are a complete disgrace and disingenuous to ghanaweb 'residents'. What do you take us for? Neither of the two trokosi duo, Kojo T nor Andy K, made any serious intellectual imput to the on going discourse to warrant suc ...
read full comment
Thank you Nii Teiko. I have been wondering why Kwarteng & Prof. Lungu have been avoiding my comments of late. That wouldn't stop me from expressing my opinion though.
I am more concerned about the future generations of Gha ...
read full comment
Irrespective of the "general readership of Ghanaweb" , your " more provocative pieces in the coming weeks" , should be devoted to exploring a doctrine of sustainability for Ghana that would invariably make our future more sec ...
read full comment
Dear Marcus,
How are you?
Please don't take that I ignore your sentiments when I don't directly respond to them.
For instance, when you take another look at the first comments (titled "Readers: Important Info On Baid ...
read full comment
Kwarteng, it is obvious that your knowledge of what constitutes the body of knowledge, I.e. the discipline, called futuristics or futurology is limited to say the least.
I am not talking about the "future" per se, I am ref ...
read full comment
Marcus,
Is it only critical,listening skills you took from my response?
Did you see me mention the science of analystics, time series analysis, stochastic models...?
I can seem to understand you anymore!
Thanks.
Ha! ha! ha! Nyebro Yaw, don't throw your hands into the air and give up on them yet. Just take a breather, concentrate on other things and come back stronger. You'd find them in the same holes - same rat holes - they have dug ...
read full comment
Dear Nyebro Yao,
Good day.
Thanks for the encouragement, vision, and powerful historical analogies. I simply love them all. Great.
And like you said, I am not giving up yet. I have to continue from where you left on ...
read full comment
Feels like a tag team, Andy-K, I am not preventing Kwarteng from doing what he does best, that is researching and writing. I just want him to expand his research effort by directing him to Bertrand de Jouvenel, the author of ...
read full comment
F. K., I am not disrespecting your effort as a researcher cum writer. I just wanted to direct your research effort to the discipline of futuristics or futurology. It is a body of knowledge we in Ghana and Africa could use.
...
read full comment
I stand by whatever good things I have said about Nkrumah and will never regret it. This should only demonstrate that I am amenable to his praise whenever possible.
But nothing I have ever said about the man contradicts my ...
read full comment
So much about foreign ideological perspectives and intellectuals. Our conversations should be about crafting a more sustainable Ghana in the future both Nkrumah and Danquah would be proud of.
We Danquists were sitting at our somewhere when Prof. Kwarteng and his renegade gang of Nkrumaists started serializing their insults here. They were quite gratuitous in insulting Danquah and Busia over nothing, claiming that ...
read full comment
SAS I don't dabble, unlike you, in insults and name calling; your irrational thinking undoubtedly is a disservice to Ghana at the critical time our country is searching for answers to solve her many challenges.
Rapprochem ...
read full comment