You are here: HomeOpinionsArticles2013 08 31Article 284030

Rejoinder To Reuters Article By Kwasi Kpodo

This article is closed for comments.

Read Comments Comments (16)

  • C.Y. ANDY-K 10 years ago

    This is clearly a belated rejoinder! The call has been made in Mr Kpodo's and Reuter's favour. That article was a classy article beyond the comprehension of this writer and many others as shown by the misinterpretation of wha ...
    read full comment

  • Nemesis 10 years ago

    PLS HEAD FOR THE SAME MENTAL HOSPITAL ABOUT TO ADMIT AHOOFE AND ROCKO!!! DO NOT PASS GO!!!

  • Akadu Mensema 10 years ago

    Of course, we know that this is a "belated" rejoinder. Belated or not the fact remains that your kinsman Kpodo erred big time and that is the author's viewpoint!

  • K. Boateng 10 years ago

    stupid, primitive, ignorant and shallow minded akradu or whatever he/she calls him/her self, sees everything through tribal lense. what a pathetic stone age fool.

  • C.Y. ANDY-K 10 years ago

    For you and your ilk, everything is tribalistic! Very clear you blokes don't even understand the meaning of tribalism!

    So you knew that it is belated rejoinder but you don't know that his, Kwasi's, prediction proved corre ...
    read full comment

  • K. Boateng 10 years ago

    "...we call for investigations into his conduct".

    You and who call for investigation and investigation into what? Do you know how long Kpodo has a journalist, leading to his international reputation? Should we also call fo ...
    read full comment

  • Facebook lawyer 10 years ago

    So who is no playing propaganda? You have been exposed big time

  • TROUBLE-MAKER 10 years ago

    "In this article he claims without any evidence he that the supreme court are likely to reject the petition brought before it"

    Could it be that Mr.Kpodo anticipated defeat in the petitioners fraudulent case brought brough ...
    read full comment

  • Joe Bash 10 years ago

    Mr Mills, you need to understand the work of an international news organisation like Reuthers. Reuthers did not say the petitioners will lose rather said its LIKELY they will lose. Reuthers have been predicting outcomes of ev ...
    read full comment

  • Kwabena Twumasi-Ankrah (London) 10 years ago

    The crust of the matter is that Kpodo and the NDC knew beforehand the outcome of the judgement before it was delivered. He and the NDC only wanted to hide behind a reputable international agency like Reuters.

  • Honestly 10 years ago

    F. H. Mills, the more you SYMPATHIZERS of the losers make your post -verdict noises the more ridiculous you appear. Before the verdict everyone tried to make analysis and many NPP supporters did so. What is your problem? Plea ...
    read full comment

  • Kwakutey 10 years ago

    LOSING AN ELECTION CAN BE PAINFUL, BUT LOSING AN ELECTION PETITION BEFORE NINE JUDGES BEFORE TV CAMERAS AND BEING WATCH THROUGHOUT THE WORLD CAN BE AWFULLY DEVASTATING. PLEASE WE SHOULD ALL SYMPATHIZE WITH NPP SUPPORTERS WHO ...
    read full comment

  • K. Boateng 10 years ago

    Okoampa and Adofo have written some of their childish and usual militant, tribalist articles. They never fail.

  • Alicia 10 years ago

    Only a fool will claim that he or she expected the petitioners to win based on the evidence presented. Reuters have always been accurate with their predictions and results even in boxing. Reuters felt Ike Quartey and Pacman b ...
    read full comment

  • Klogo 10 years ago

    Thanks for your thoughts. This is what makes their case the greatest fabrication of all times. And Mind you, the evidence presented was only in NDC strongholds. This must have been a well rehearsed plan of action supported wi ...
    read full comment

  • Bongo Bongo 10 years ago

    C.Y. ANDY-K you have summed this up. REUTERS are not just any other news producers, they are world class. The rebuttals etc. will not end here these will continue until the next election and beyond keeping Ghanaweb busy lol.