You are here: HomeOpinionsArticles2015 01 16Article 342661

NDC Wasted Six Years To Build A Shaky Foundation

This article is closed for comments.

Read Comments Comments (8)

  • Jimi Jimifo Rawlings 9 years ago

    YOU NPP PEOPLE TALK TOO MUCH. WHAT YOU SHOULD WORRY ABOUT IS THIS: THE NDC CRIMINALS WILL RIG (OR TRY TO RIG) THE 2016 ELECTIONS. HOW ARE YOU 'TOO-KNOWN' NPP PEOPLE GOING TO STOP THEM?? OR WILL YOU AGAIN SIT DOWN LIKE DONKEYS ...
    read full comment

  • Kwabena 9 years ago

    Paul, the 30% is interest rate, not inflation rate, as accurately stated in the article.

  • Paul 9 years ago

    Kwabena, thanks for drawing my attention to my error. On the other hand, the interest rate is NOT 30% as reported here, but rather 23.48% (Bank of Ghana's own daily rate reported for 16th January 2015).

    Between 2002 and 20 ...
    read full comment

  • Paul 9 years ago

    Please check your facts. The latest figures suggest an annual inflation rate of 17, not 30% as you suggest. Propaganda can only take you so far, but can also make you appear uninformed and a laughing stock at times.

  • Sammy 9 years ago

    Paul and Jimi Jimifo
    Nava forget dat Ur so call NDC has done nothing as they promise to do for Ghanaians wen given de mandate oooo

    A university in Eastern, 200 community SHS. Let consider only dis 2 cos dat was ur main m ...
    read full comment

  • Matemeho Truth 9 years ago

    The only legacy this NDC administration has built and left for us is, they have taught every Ghanaian how to be Corrupt,Supper Liars, Prudent Thieves with invincible tentacles that leave a hole in every pocket within reach an ...
    read full comment

  • nana opoku wiafe 9 years ago

    I then urge breathe people to be wise in adjourned 2016 election. I can't force you or anyone to vote for A or B but I can educate you to vote for right person. please let's think for our children future ...!

  • Kwabena 9 years ago

    Paul, the article quotes the 30% as interest rate, and not inflation rate as you made allusion to. That, therefore in not propaganda, neither does it make the paper or the writer uninformed nor a laughing stock, as you wanted ...
    read full comment