IDIOTS Andy C.Y. Kwawukume will only write a hypocrite nonsense just brag. Martin Amidu sued only Woyome simply because the gargantuan amount of 52 Million Cedis was paid to Alfred Agbesi Woyome ALONE. What is difficult to un ... read full comment
IDIOTS Andy C.Y. Kwawukume will only write a hypocrite nonsense just brag. Martin Amidu sued only Woyome simply because the gargantuan amount of 52 Million Cedis was paid to Alfred Agbesi Woyome ALONE. What is difficult to understand about why Amidu sued Woyome ALONE?
Andy C.Y. Kwawukume! you better fuck off with your hypocrite Ewe NDC PARTISAN NONSENSE!
Odoi 9 years ago
Andy will defend any Ewe thief just like the Ewe chiefs in singlets wo came to Accra to defend their favorite son!
Andy will defend any Ewe thief just like the Ewe chiefs in singlets wo came to Accra to defend their favorite son!
SARPONG 9 years ago
Idiot Andy K, if you don't see the fraud, then maybe you have been blinded by your own bigotry blanket.
The fraud lies in his conspiracy with the Ndc Attorney General Office not to go to court to defend Woyome fraudulent c ... read full comment
Idiot Andy K, if you don't see the fraud, then maybe you have been blinded by your own bigotry blanket.
The fraud lies in his conspiracy with the Ndc Attorney General Office not to go to court to defend Woyome fraudulent claim because they all benefited from this fraud including the Ndc party.
Ask yourself why Woyome did not sue for all those years Npp was in power.
You will never see any fraud as long as the fraudulent crime was committed by an Ewe.
C.Y. ANDY-K 9 years ago
I have always maintained that I don't mind being called a fool and even an idiot in cyberspace or elsewhere so long as the person calling me so show me some wisdom, some intellect, some superior knowledge in telling what make ... read full comment
I have always maintained that I don't mind being called a fool and even an idiot in cyberspace or elsewhere so long as the person calling me so show me some wisdom, some intellect, some superior knowledge in telling what makes me such a fool or an idiot. But when I can clearly see that the person calling me as such is just a raving moron, or even a mad man, just determined to puke on me, I take drastic action to retaliate! Of course, after warning the moron or mad man who is bent on pinching my "pioto" anytime I enter the bath house. So you are all WARNED! My edited and improved "These Akans" is ready for posting but is on ice just as now 9-series continuation Ethnic Imbroglio in Ghana! The former has special section titled "These Asantes" while the latter dwelt extensively on the exploits of the Asantes of old in Eweland. In due time, everything shall be unraveled but right now, we are dealing with the Woyome Case.
So I am asking all of you spewing insults at me if you had addressed the issues I raised and found them wanting? If it were a conspiracy, and I suspect it was and said so, why then are the other conspirators not in court???????????
Please answer this simple question alone.
Andy-K
SARPONG 9 years ago
The other conspirators will be in court when Woyome start singing like a canary. As it is right now, Woyome might end up paying less than he defrauded the nation of since when he was paid this amount the cedi was exchanged at ... read full comment
The other conspirators will be in court when Woyome start singing like a canary. As it is right now, Woyome might end up paying less than he defrauded the nation of since when he was paid this amount the cedi was exchanged at $1.00 to GHc1.85 Now in actual monetary terms, he is being asked to pay about half of what he stole from the people and maybe the Ndc co-conspirators are making contributions to help him make the payment to protect themselves.
Do you know why Barton Oduro came out to say he still believe Wayome deserves the money? It was a code statement sent to assure Wayome that NDC government is still behind him and that is why the government has not instituted any legal means to dorce him to pay the money.
As to why people like Betty Mould, Barton Oduro, Okudzeto Ablakwah and others have not been sent to court, I
can assure you that it will not happen under this Ndc administration.
C.Y. ANDY-K 9 years ago
It is at least heart warming to know that some of you have now realised that there were conspirators. But wait a moment!
Who hatched the conspiracy, since you guys know much more about that than some of us watching from af ... read full comment
It is at least heart warming to know that some of you have now realised that there were conspirators. But wait a moment!
Who hatched the conspiracy, since you guys know much more about that than some of us watching from afar? Was it Woyome? Methinks he was hired by Waterville after they dismissed their lawyer, one Mr Tettey, who was on the same mission for them? Right? Are the Italian Directors of Waterville, reputed friends of Mr Kufuor, card members of the NDC too? If someone hired you to go and kill someone, should you the hitman alone be prosecuted? You see my beef with Mr Amidu? He doesn't impress me!
The NDC is presently prosecuting some leading members of the party, including an MP, for their roles in the GYEEDA, SADA or whatever case/s. So what makes you think that those people u mentioned would not have also been charged if a case could be made against them had the likes of you kept a public outcry against them too, instead of focusing on Woyome all these years? At least, Barton Oduro would not have been appointed to his new role in Parliament (and being still cocky) and Ablakwah might have been dropped from office and Neequaye T wouldn't be in consideration to become Solicitor General! Those actions are also forms of punishing political appointees who erred.
Andy-K
Dr. SAS, Attorney at Law 9 years ago
There is no case of fraud against Woyome, strictly speaking. The man went to court on what can best be termed as a very dubious claim. The court however agreed with him, and the government (the defendant) readily paid him the ... read full comment
There is no case of fraud against Woyome, strictly speaking. The man went to court on what can best be termed as a very dubious claim. The court however agreed with him, and the government (the defendant) readily paid him the award without appealing the trial court's decision.
Those who should be answering questions are the trial judge who did not sua sponte throw out the frivolous case, the state attorneys that received a back kick from the loot and all those others that failed to perform their fiduciary duty to the state and caused it great financial loss. I personally don't see the role of Martin Amidu in the whole matter, no matter how well-intentioned he may be.
I am at a loss as to how the Supreme Court arrived at its spurious conclusion. It is a travesty of justice which is so far in pattern with its hitherto pedestrian rulings to which you, Andy, have been a staunch supporter to date.
Akadu Mensema 9 years ago
Lawyer SAS:
When did Woyome go to court for the money? Tell us about the court and judge that adjudicated the case! Who was the trial judge?
Lawyer SAS:
When did Woyome go to court for the money? Tell us about the court and judge that adjudicated the case! Who was the trial judge?
ADJOA WANGARA 9 years ago
Dr. SAS, Attorney at Law, "Kwasea" shut the fuck! you primitive Ewe!
You are as MAD as Rawlings!
Primitive Ewe fool!
Dr. SAS, Attorney at Law, "Kwasea" shut the fuck! you primitive Ewe!
You are as MAD as Rawlings!
Primitive Ewe fool!
SARPONG 9 years ago
Hmmmm, SAS, what about it being a conspiratorial fraud between Woyome and the Ndc Attorney General Office to deliberately not to go to court?
You are the lawyer but I think the Supreme Court got it right. The fact that he ... read full comment
Hmmmm, SAS, what about it being a conspiratorial fraud between Woyome and the Ndc Attorney General Office to deliberately not to go to court?
You are the lawyer but I think the Supreme Court got it right. The fact that he waved a letter of recommendation as a contract and the AG accepted it does not mean he can walk away with taxpayers money. Presenting false documentation as a contract in order to deceive the state is a crime.
Dr. SAS, Attorney at Law 9 years ago
The court can only rule on matters before it, and in this instance, the issue before it was neither conspiracy to commit fraud nor deception by false pretenses. If these were the issues, the court would have so said, and brou ... read full comment
The court can only rule on matters before it, and in this instance, the issue before it was neither conspiracy to commit fraud nor deception by false pretenses. If these were the issues, the court would have so said, and brought in other parties to answer for the crimes.
Here, the issue is whether Woyome went through due process in procuring the judgment debt. Insofar as he brought a case against the government which failed to defend itself and willingly paid him the money, nobody should turn around and punish him for receiving the money. Rather, those inept officials who participated in the charade and profited thereby...... they are those who should be answering questions. Usually, nobody is punished for bringing a frivolous, or even a fraudulent lawsuit against the government; but it is the duty of the court to throw such a suit out, or for the government to defend the taxpayer against the suit. Where the system completely fails and wrongly pays up, the plaintiff cannot be blamed. We should rather make those that made the systemic failure possible accountable.
STONER KOBYLYNTON 9 years ago
Dr. Sas, so in your legal opinion, do you conclude that Mr Woyome should go free with the money and rather hold those inept officials responsible for causing financial damage to the state? Can you come with any citation to su ... read full comment
Dr. Sas, so in your legal opinion, do you conclude that Mr Woyome should go free with the money and rather hold those inept officials responsible for causing financial damage to the state? Can you come with any citation to support your opinion? E&OE.
Dr. SAS, Attorney at Law 9 years ago
In my opinion, Woyome should go scot free because I cannot think of any cause of action under which he can be culpable. It is true that he brought a fake case against the government, but the government pleaded guilty and paid ... read full comment
In my opinion, Woyome should go scot free because I cannot think of any cause of action under which he can be culpable. It is true that he brought a fake case against the government, but the government pleaded guilty and paid up. He cannot be criminalized for bringing a fake case because people do this all the time. For example, somebody can accuse you of raping her, if you go and plead guilty to the crime, you will go to jail....unless the court, by its own wisdom, finds you not guilty; or the prosecutor decides not to go forward with the case.
Woyome filed a false claim against the government which did not raise any defenses. The government went into some agreement with him which the court also approved. If there were fraud, the government should have exposed it and vigorously defended itself, and the court should have rejected the deal at the initial stages. None of these occurred.
Thus any malfeasance goes against the individuals who made this charade possible.
The Supreme Court ruling that parliament did not approve of the contract is legally asinine and potentially populist. Besides, it goes against the grain of international business law and lore.
I understand that what happened here was unprecedented in its unconscionability, but unless the right remedies are applied, we risk the same pattern of corruption in the future. Every culprit involved on the government side should be answering serious questions of felony. When this happens, you will find that the rot runs deep indeed.
STONER KOBYLYNTON 9 years ago
Dr. Sas, I am appalled with your opinion on this issue and moreover you failed to answer my question. Again do you consider Mr. Woyome not to pay the money back to the state because some officials failed to do their work and ... read full comment
Dr. Sas, I am appalled with your opinion on this issue and moreover you failed to answer my question. Again do you consider Mr. Woyome not to pay the money back to the state because some officials failed to do their work and they have to pay the money to the state? Again, would you be able to give one citation to support your argument and opinion?
Dr. SAS, Attorney at Law 9 years ago
I am not in the emotional business here. You asked me a legal case which I answered; why should I be the one citing case law?
If you have a contrary opinion, argue your case with reference to any case law. Remember that it m ... read full comment
I am not in the emotional business here. You asked me a legal case which I answered; why should I be the one citing case law?
If you have a contrary opinion, argue your case with reference to any case law. Remember that it may well be the case that this matter is unprecedented.
In any case, think again of somebody that took you to court on a false assumption that you owe him money. Instead of defending you, your lawyer goes to negotiate a deal which makes you liable for the whole amount. Who do you hold accountable? Think!
ADJOA WANGARA 9 years ago
YOUR EWE MOTHER AND FATHER WILL GO FREE TO BACK TO TOGO! "KWASEA"
YOUR EWE MOTHER AND FATHER WILL GO FREE TO BACK TO TOGO! "KWASEA"
SARPONG 9 years ago
Adjoa, please there is no need for insult here. Dr SAS is strictly going with what the law stipulates and we might not agree with him but he is teaching us something worth learning. He has his law blinkers on which is what as ... read full comment
Adjoa, please there is no need for insult here. Dr SAS is strictly going with what the law stipulates and we might not agree with him but he is teaching us something worth learning. He has his law blinkers on which is what as a lawyer he should do.
I believe Dr SAS as an ordinary citizen not speaking as a lawyer believes Woyome did not deserve the money but he cannot allow his emotion to cloud what the law says.
KKO 9 years ago
Dr SAS,
As a layman, I agree with the points you have raised. The real rogues of this matter are the people at the AG's Department, the Late President Atta Mills and the current Vice President who was the Governor of the Cen ... read full comment
Dr SAS,
As a layman, I agree with the points you have raised. The real rogues of this matter are the people at the AG's Department, the Late President Atta Mills and the current Vice President who was the Governor of the Central Bank at the time.
Wofa Atta smelt a rat in the whole transaction and on two separate occasions asked that the payment be stopped, but he did not have the balls to follow up his instructions. Instead, when the case surfaced, he shamelessly caused the arrest of OB Amoah.
Then there was the Governor who obviously did not do any homework and agreed that such a huge sum be paid to a single individual who was not even directly involved in the said project.
Finally, the judge who awarded Woyome that huge amount epitomises our justice system, very dysfunctional, and if anybody doubts that, they should do a spreadsheet of the judgements of all the judges who sat on the Election 2012 case and compare point by point (which I have done).
Our country is in real trouble!
Kofi Ata, Cambridge, UK 9 years ago
Dr SAS, I do not share your position that Woyome should go free simply because he went through due process to obtain the fraudulent judgement debt payments. Simply because it has now been detected that he defrauded the state. ... read full comment
Dr SAS, I do not share your position that Woyome should go free simply because he went through due process to obtain the fraudulent judgement debt payments. Simply because it has now been detected that he defrauded the state.
I agree with you that all those state officials involved in the claim, including the judge should be held accountable for system failure. In fact, I believe I have said this in one of my articles on the Woyomegate or another on civil servants that they all colluded with orgnisations and individuals to loot the state. The ongoing Judgement Debt Commission hearings have persuaded me that I was right.
Prior to giving a default judgement in favour of a claim for reasons of no defence, the judge must make sure that the claim has merit, particularly in a claim against the state and with such huge amount. The fact is abundantly clear that Woyome could not have committed this fraud without collusion from all or most of the state officials, especially Mr Samuel Nerquaye-Tetteh, Chief State Attorney. My person view is that all these officials should be dismissed and prosecuted for the role they played but that will never happen in Ghana. In fact information from Ghana indicateds that Nerquaye Tetteh will soon be promoted as Solicitor General of Ghana.
Regarding the SC court ruling, I share your concerns that the ruling could not be safe if the SC accepted that there was a contract that the government failed to seek parliamentary approval and so was null and void. In that case, Waterville, Isofoton and Woyome (assuming they all had contracts) could not be punished for the failure of the government. However, my understanding is that the words used by the SC were "purported agreement or contract". Until, I read the written decision, I will reserve my opinion on this.
Nonetheless, as far as my understanding of this case is concerned, all three (Waterville, Isofoto and Woyome) did not have a valid contract because the government terminated the contracts and re-awarded them to a Chinese company because Waterville, Isofoton and Woyome were unable to raise the required funds to deliver the projects despite government assistance to them in that direction. That was why the contracts were not taken to parliament for approval (as they were terminated by the government). Waterville and Isofoton were paid for work done after the contracts were terminated and I believe Woyome as a sub-contractor of Waterville might have been paid by Waterville for work done on their behalf.
As for Andy's confusion, I am not sure if he is jut playing the devil's advocate or really confused. I say so because from what we now know (all the known, knowns, the unknown knowns and the unknown unknowns) as well as from some of his comments on Ghanaweb on this matter, I am finding it difficult to understand where his confusion lies.
Andy, I do believe that the case is political and has anything to do with ethnicity. Political because I suspect that NDC might have assisted and benefited from the fraud. In the early days they strongly defended Woyome and blamed NPP for causing the judgement debt. It was a scheme to steal from the state and put the blame on their political opponents.
Dr. SAS, Attorney at Law 9 years ago
You still did not show why Woyome should be punished. Woyome was awarded his claim by a court of competent jurisdiction which should have examined whether the claim has merit. It did not. The government side agreed with the j ... read full comment
You still did not show why Woyome should be punished. Woyome was awarded his claim by a court of competent jurisdiction which should have examined whether the claim has merit. It did not. The government side agreed with the judgment and paid the huge amount. Any qui tam action, as brought by anyone should be against those that made the charade possible. It is my submission now that the proper thing is for the government to have vigorously and diligently defended the case and timely appealed if necessary. By their agreement to negotiate payment, the government has implicitly forfeited its right to appeal.
Woyome therefore has no case to answer. The Supreme Court should have known better.
Understand, my good friend, that the law is not some peremptory device for the satiation of populist emotions. In its highest form, the law is a science whose conclusion is founded on verifiable logic. But those Supreme Court judges make it look like a game of chance.
Kofi Ata, Cambridge, UK 9 years ago
Dr SAS I did say in my first paragraph that he obtained the judgement debt verdict and payments by fraud. Is that not a reason for prosecution and recovery of the money he is not entitled to? For the avoidance of any doubt, ... read full comment
Dr SAS I did say in my first paragraph that he obtained the judgement debt verdict and payments by fraud. Is that not a reason for prosecution and recovery of the money he is not entitled to? For the avoidance of any doubt, he could also be charged for deceiving public official/s as well as perjury.
I have seen, heard and read of people in the UK who have used fraudulent means to secure court judgments in their favour and received payments (especially, in civil claims including libel and defamation). Subsequently, when their deceptions and lies have been unearthed, they have been prosecuted for perjury, fraud and or deception; jailed and the money claimed fully recovered. Why do you think it should be different in Ghana?
For your information, a former Director of Communications at 10 Downing Street (the Prime Minister's Spin Doctor, Mr Andy Coulson) and a former newspaper editor gave evidence in a libel appeal case. The claimant had previously won the claim, awarded damages and received the payment from the newspaper. He was subsequently found to have committed perjury during his libel claim trial and was tried, found guilty, jailed and the money recovered after the appeal. In a recent phone hacking trial involving the former Prime Minister's Director of Communications, it became clear that he was aware of and involved in phone hacking whilst he was the newspaper editor. As a result the evidence he gave in the libel appeal case was no longer reliable. In fact, he lied and has been charged by the Crown Prosecution Service for perjury and currently awaiting trail. The man who was found guilty has also launched an appeal against his conviction as a result of lies by one key witness.
The problem in Ghana is that laws, rules and regulations are not enforced. Here, they are enforced to the letter to the extent that one of the most powerful men in Communications as the Prime Minister's head of Communication is now in jail for phone hacking and also awaiting a second trial for perjury. That would never happen in Ghana.
I am not sure why the case went to the SC (unless the processes had already reached the Appeal Court), I see the SC case as part of the appeal process.
"By their agreement to negotiate payment, the government has implicitly forfeited its right to appeal".
Dr SAS, I am not a lawyer but I find the above position of yours very strange if not abnormal. Which law states that if a party genuinely entered into negotiations on the basis that the facts of the matter were accurate at the time but subsequently becomes aware that the facts were on the contrary and that the other party relied on deception and fraudulent means, that party could not go back to reclaim the money by appeal? where does the forfeiture of the right of appeal comes in?
Remember that Law is a Social Science and not natural Science where H2O is water and as you said it is based on logic. I disagreed on the word verifiable because it is subjective and that is why on one case different judges and Justices would reach different outcomes.
Woyome himself has admitted that he never had a contract with government so his claim was and still is untenable, was fraud and criminal. It's as simple as that.
Dr. SAS, Attorney at Law 9 years ago
It is trite law that if you participate in and sign on to a settlement agreement with your Cyclopean eyes open, you cannot turn around and appeal against the agreement, notwithstanding your state of awareness. The policy rea ... read full comment
It is trite law that if you participate in and sign on to a settlement agreement with your Cyclopean eyes open, you cannot turn around and appeal against the agreement, notwithstanding your state of awareness. The policy reasoning is to avoid drenching the court system with claims of people who induce "unawareness" on and off like electricity.
What you are trying to imply here is the instance where new material facts emerge that bear substantially on a case; but under this particular case at bar, no material fact exists which was not then known or couldn't have been known to the prying fact finder.
Kwadwo 9 years ago
Are you aware that you cannot file a false claim in either federal or State Courts in the US and get away get away with it if you you are caught? In most cases, the petitioner affirms under oath that what is stated in the co ... read full comment
Are you aware that you cannot file a false claim in either federal or State Courts in the US and get away get away with it if you you are caught? In most cases, the petitioner affirms under oath that what is stated in the complaint are true. Therefore, you can be prosecuted for perjury for just filing a false claim, and also criminally held liable if you obtain money settlement or judgment from that suit. Are you even aware that settlements can be set aside and the parties prosecuted if there was collusion involved? Why did you think the trial judge that approved the so called settlement told the AG's office not to pay the whole amount to Woyome? Going through the court process to perpetrate fraud will not shield you even if you settle the case. Try that with with one of your clients and see what will happen with the two of you.
Kwadwo 9 years ago
Correction.
Correction.
Dr. SAS, Attorney at Law 9 years ago
You are assuming facts not in evidence.....
No court has made any finding that Woyome filed a false claim. Rather a high court agreed that his case has merit and awarded a judgment for him. You cannot retroactively claim tha ... read full comment
You are assuming facts not in evidence.....
No court has made any finding that Woyome filed a false claim. Rather a high court agreed that his case has merit and awarded a judgment for him. You cannot retroactively claim that he filed a false claim.
You should read all my postings to educate yourself.
kwadwo. 9 years ago
Where did the trial Judge make a finding that Woyome has a meritorious claim? The AG's office failed to defend the claim and Womens Simply Obtained Default Judgment. They settled the case a day he was paid the whole amount ev ... read full comment
Where did the trial Judge make a finding that Woyome has a meritorious claim? The AG's office failed to defend the claim and Womens Simply Obtained Default Judgment. They settled the case a day he was paid the whole amount even when a Judge told them to withhold some of it. The case was never tried.Are you telling the world that Woyome cannot be prosecuted for filing a false claim later after the settlement? You seem to be confusing meritorious claim and a fraudulent claim.Fraud is fraud and you cannot use the settlement as a cover and that is why he is being prosecuted. I don't need your postings to educate myself on the law because it is simply your opinion and I disagree with you. I can tell you that he will be convicted based on what has emerged in the trial though the AG is doing a poor job.
C.Y. ANDY-K 9 years ago
Kofi,
I wrote in capital letters that I wasn't confused any longer. Of course, I wasn't confused about the case when I first wrote that in 2012. When I wrote then that I was confused or baffled now, it is actually about ho ... read full comment
Kofi,
I wrote in capital letters that I wasn't confused any longer. Of course, I wasn't confused about the case when I first wrote that in 2012. When I wrote then that I was confused or baffled now, it is actually about how some of you are viewing the case in spite of all the glaring evidence that point to something else. Like you said, I am simply playing the Devil's Advocate, in an attempt to draw attention to the gaping holes in the way the case was being handled. Those holes are still there and I am just drawing attention to them again.
Yes, the case has much political ramifications but is the Brotherhood of Nitwits that are trying their best to give it a tribal angle too. I mentioned Betty Mould boasting of negotiating and paying reduced judgement debts incurred by the NPP and saving Ghana loads of money as one achievement of her tenure in office when she came under attack for losing all those cases brought against NPP officials. That was before the Woyome case broke out.
Kofi, rather than accusing the NDC as a party of being involved in the fraud, it is more plausible to accuse some key and known persons of collusion with the claimants and sharing the booty. There is no link whatsoever showing that the NDC as a party benefited: individuals did. Their leader, Mills, even tried to stop the payments. Let us stick to the known facts, not conjectures.
You know, this Woyome case is just like the Election Petition to me: I didn't try very much to read most of the trash coming out and keep a tab or dossier on it. But I can recollect the murky way Kufour reportedly engineered the termination of the contract and the torpedoing of Woyome's financial structuring bid. I think what should have happened then is to pay off Woyome something small for his "expenses" travelling to and from Austria, etc. and the matter would have rested.
In my opinion, even if there were a valid contract approved by Parliament and Woyome had succeeded in securing the funds, so long as those funds were not utilised, no 2% of the money should be paid! Of course, some negotiated compensation should be paid for abrogating the contract on a mutual basis, not by heart by the govt. as the Kufuor regime was doing, thus landing us into all those disputes.
Andy-K
SARPONG 9 years ago
But Dr SAS, if you are accused of rape and for whatever reason you agree and goes to jail and later found not to be true, they set you free and we have been seeing that in USA especially in rape and murder cases through the I ... read full comment
But Dr SAS, if you are accused of rape and for whatever reason you agree and goes to jail and later found not to be true, they set you free and we have been seeing that in USA especially in rape and murder cases through the INNOCENT PROJECT.
The fact that wrong was accepted the first time does not mean it cannot be corrected. The fact that the first defenders and guidance of our rresources failed to guard our money and gave it to Woyome does not mean we cannot recover our money.
A lot of people accused of rape and murders have been set free after spending decades in prison and through DNA have been found not to be guilty despite the fact that some of these people admitted to the crimes they were convicted.
I found it hard to believe that if somebody fraudulently obtained money he or she does not deserve the state has no other recourse to recover its property.
Dr. SAS, Attorney at Law 9 years ago
Your analogy should be akin to the one I previously made: somebody claims you owe him money, and your lawyer agrees with him and pays him with your money. Who do you hold accountable? Your lawyer of course!
If you disagree, ... read full comment
Your analogy should be akin to the one I previously made: somebody claims you owe him money, and your lawyer agrees with him and pays him with your money. Who do you hold accountable? Your lawyer of course!
If you disagree, you fire your lawyer and appeal against the decision. The government did none of the above. And Amidu, as a citizen, should have brought a qui tam action against the government for failing to do its duty. Woyome does not come in.
If you set up an analogy, it should be in proximity with the reality of the facts, or else you will conflate the issues. A civil suit and a criminal case are on totally different paths.
SARPONG 9 years ago
Exactly. Civil and criminal cases are different. The supreme court case is civil and Woyome is found not to deserve the money and he is being asked to refund the money.
He is still on trial at the high court for fraudulent ... read full comment
Exactly. Civil and criminal cases are different. The supreme court case is civil and Woyome is found not to deserve the money and he is being asked to refund the money.
He is still on trial at the high court for fraudulently obtaining this money. Maybe he would be found not guilty criminally.
Dr. SAS, Attorney at Law 9 years ago
It is all about civil procedure; if you stick to the analogy I presented, you will see that the defendant acquiesced in the judgment and did not question it. An individual cannot just get up and appeal the case in the Supreme ... read full comment
It is all about civil procedure; if you stick to the analogy I presented, you will see that the defendant acquiesced in the judgment and did not question it. An individual cannot just get up and appeal the case in the Supreme Court when the party in suit has agreed to pay for money owed, no matter how fraudulently construed.
The constitution does not contemplate that citizens will take up an appeal on behalf of the government where the government fails to bring one.
The constitution is clear that a citizen can originate a suit against a government entity acting ultra vires, not appeal on behalf of the government on a settled matter of law in a court of competent jurisdiction.
Yes; a criminal case is different from a civil matter, but viewed from the standpoint of civil procedure, there can still be no case against Woyome. He won his judgment, and so those who made him win must answer the questions and pay the price.
Asante Fordjour 9 years ago
Hi Learned Attorney,
I'm interested in your briefs which I wish to join. But before I could argue on the question of whether or not Woyome intended indeed to defraud the State in the case under consideration, could you res ... read full comment
Hi Learned Attorney,
I'm interested in your briefs which I wish to join. But before I could argue on the question of whether or not Woyome intended indeed to defraud the State in the case under consideration, could you respectfully, explain the phrase:
[1]"It is true that he brought a fake case against the government..." in line three (3) and four (4)of your submission?
[2] My emphasis is on "fake case", bearing in mind that you have employed words such “fraudulent pretences”, elsewhere in your arguments?
[3] I refresh your memory that in ordinary or plain English, fake is defined “as a thing that is not genuine; a forgery or sham.”
[4] A referred legal dictionary defines false pretences as: “False representations of material past or present facts, known by the wrongdoer to be false, and made with the intent to defraud a victim into passing title in property to the wrongdoer.”
I’m reminded that Woyome’s criminal hearing is still pending at a High Court in Ghana. Accordingly, your response to these issues would be most appreciated in abstract.
Dr. SAS, Attorney at Law 9 years ago
1. Fake insofar as there was no contract between Woyome and the government, a fact the man himself agreed. The fact that Woyome brought a breach of contract claim against the government when there was no contract makes his cl ... read full comment
1. Fake insofar as there was no contract between Woyome and the government, a fact the man himself agreed. The fact that Woyome brought a breach of contract claim against the government when there was no contract makes his claim fake/sham/false.
2. Concerning "false pretences", I was simply stating that the court did not have that issue before it, and therefore did not pronounce on it. I was trying to clarify this point to those who think the court's ruling is based on some sort of fraud.
3. Thus whether or not Woyome intended to defraud the state is not even a point in issue. The question is whether or not he followed procedure to win a case against the government. And here I say "yes" and fault the Supreme Court's ruling on that basis. I also think those that made it possible for Woyome to succeed in his claims did a bad job and should be the ones to be rather held answerable.
Asante Fordjour 9 years ago
Thanks for the explanation. I understand the premise of your argument and wish not to press further. Because the prosecution still has the burden to establish the criminal intent against the defendant- and here, Mr Woyome.
Thanks for the explanation. I understand the premise of your argument and wish not to press further. Because the prosecution still has the burden to establish the criminal intent against the defendant- and here, Mr Woyome.
Mr. Figure-Out 9 years ago
Stop making mockery of yourselves. Even prof Mills in his own wisdom found out that something was wrong with the Woyome payments and instructed the very people who negotiated for it to happen to go back to court and retrieve ... read full comment
Stop making mockery of yourselves. Even prof Mills in his own wisdom found out that something was wrong with the Woyome payments and instructed the very people who negotiated for it to happen to go back to court and retrieve the money so what is your beef? If we need the best legal brains to school us on the supreme court ruling, it would certainly not be you and Trokosi Andy K. Waterville was selected to have a job done, some commitments were made but no contractual agreement was reached. Woyome did not tender in any paper document of the said contract in court apart from the letters he purported to have received from certain individuals. Every contact has its concomitant conditions and until such conditions are met it seizes to exits. What is the puzzle here that warrant you guys to drag forumers into this useless debate. The Supreme Court has spoken and it is final. No amount of ugly junkie noises can distract us from dealing with those Trokosi criminals who are trying to hold the nation to ransom. Make yourselves useful by helping to rid the nation of corrupt officials.
ANCIENT MAN 9 years ago
THAT "THERE IS NO CASE OF FRAUD AGAINST WOYOME, STRICTLY SPEAKING". (1) AMIDU WENT TO COURT AGAINST WOYOME BECAUSE THE CONSTITUTION GAVE-AND STILL GIVES -HIM THAT RIGHT;(2)HE PURSUED THE CASE AS A PUBLIC INTEREST ACTION (3) A ... read full comment
THAT "THERE IS NO CASE OF FRAUD AGAINST WOYOME, STRICTLY SPEAKING". (1) AMIDU WENT TO COURT AGAINST WOYOME BECAUSE THE CONSTITUTION GAVE-AND STILL GIVES -HIM THAT RIGHT;(2)HE PURSUED THE CASE AS A PUBLIC INTEREST ACTION (3) AND SINCE HE WAS THE PROPONENT OF THE CASE, IT WAS HIS RIGHT TO DECIDE WHICH PERSON TO GO FOR ,EVEN THOUGH THERE COULD HAVE BEEN SEVERAL OR JOINT CONSPIRATORS. PERIOD. I REST MY CASE.
Dr. SAS, Attorney at Law 9 years ago
You mean well, but I don't see where you are going. The court gave Woyome the judgment on an unmeritorious claim without establishing any fraud against him. How can we retrospectively charge him with fraud on a matter for whi ... read full comment
You mean well, but I don't see where you are going. The court gave Woyome the judgment on an unmeritorious claim without establishing any fraud against him. How can we retrospectively charge him with fraud on a matter for which the court rendered judgment in his favor? Implicit in that judgment and the subsequent payment of the money is the idea that he presented a valid claim. We should be questioning those who made his claim valid, not Woyome who used due process with all its presumed prophylactic safeguards. After all, the court agreed with him and the government reimbursed him.
SARPONG 9 years ago
Dr SAS, I can see your point here. Maybe we cannot pursue a criminal case of fraud against by arguing that Woyome at the time of making a claim for the money believed that the letter of recommendation he obtained from one of ... read full comment
Dr SAS, I can see your point here. Maybe we cannot pursue a criminal case of fraud against by arguing that Woyome at the time of making a claim for the money believed that the letter of recommendation he obtained from one of the deputy Ministers constituted a contract but that does not me he can walk away with money he obtained wrongly.
In the supreme court, he was not under trial for fraud because if he were, he would have been sentenced to prison time but it was a civil case to retrieve money obtained wrongly and Judges rightly agreed with Martin Amidu.
Woyome is still on trial in the high court for fraud.Maybe he would be found not criminally guilty and avoid jail time just like O.J Simpson case where he was not found not guilty in the criminal case but was civilly found guilty.
ANCIENT MAN 9 years ago
BECAUSE THE SUPREME COURT CASE WAS FILED BY AMIDU IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST,AND ALSO AS A COURT OF "FINAL JURISDICTION" TO CLEAR ALL DOUBTS ONCE AND FOR AL.
BECAUSE THE SUPREME COURT CASE WAS FILED BY AMIDU IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST,AND ALSO AS A COURT OF "FINAL JURISDICTION" TO CLEAR ALL DOUBTS ONCE AND FOR AL.
Kwadwo 9 years ago
Buddy, don't let SAS of the hook so easily. He is wrongly arguing that Woyome walks because he used the legal process to obtain a settlement or consent judgment. That is a crack of shit. Let him file a fraudulent claim in Co ... read full comment
Buddy, don't let SAS of the hook so easily. He is wrongly arguing that Woyome walks because he used the legal process to obtain a settlement or consent judgment. That is a crack of shit. Let him file a fraudulent claim in Court here on behalf of his client and collude with an insurance agent for settlement and see what will happens to them. This is what Woyome's criminal case is all about. Sadly, the folks at the AG's office who helped him engineer this fraud in Court against the state are not been prosecuted. But Woyome will be held criminally liable for using the judicial process to perpetrate fraud. It cannot use the " judicial process"as a defense and get away with it.
ANCIENT MAN 9 years ago
YOU SEEM TO FOCUS ON THE SHADOW OF THE CASE(THE CIRCUMSTANTIAL ISSUES) RATHER THAN THE SUBSTANTIVE POINT: WAS FRAUD COMMITTED ?YES,BY LEGAL DEFINITION OF "FRAUD". BY WHOM?=THE DEFENDANT AND PERSONS KNOWN OR UNKNOWN;WHY WOYOME ... read full comment
YOU SEEM TO FOCUS ON THE SHADOW OF THE CASE(THE CIRCUMSTANTIAL ISSUES) RATHER THAN THE SUBSTANTIVE POINT: WAS FRAUD COMMITTED ?YES,BY LEGAL DEFINITION OF "FRAUD". BY WHOM?=THE DEFENDANT AND PERSONS KNOWN OR UNKNOWN;WHY WOYOME ALONE? BECAUSE THE APPELLANT (AMIDU, IN THIS CASE, OPTED FOR THE VIABLE OPTION LIKELY TO SUCCEED AT LAW. WOYOME'S DEFENCE TEAM SEEM TO ME TO HAVE SACRIFICED A CRUCIAL PROCEDURAL GAMBIT = THEY SHOULD HAVE APPLIED TO COURT FOR SERVICE OF "INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE FOR OUR CLIENTS TO CONCLUSIVELY PROVE HIS INNOCENCE". THAT SITUATION THEREFORE LEFT WOYOME TO CARRY THE CAN ALONE FOR THE OTHERS. REMEMBER THE CARDINAL RULE OF PROCEDURE ;"THE COURT WILL AND MUST NOT ASSIST/AMMEND A DEFICIENT PRESENTATION!! FULL-STOP.
SARPONG 9 years ago
I thought the word "INNOCENCE " does not exist in the lexicon of law but rather "NOT GUILTY "
I have not read any judgement that reads he or she is innocent but rather not guilty which means the person might have done what ... read full comment
I thought the word "INNOCENCE " does not exist in the lexicon of law but rather "NOT GUILTY "
I have not read any judgement that reads he or she is innocent but rather not guilty which means the person might have done what he or she was accused but the could not prove its case.
Theo 9 years ago
Sarpong, are you a lawyer? As a layman, I find your understanding of the law amazing.
Sarpong, are you a lawyer? As a layman, I find your understanding of the law amazing.
Denis 9 years ago
You are atypical example of a little learning is a dangerous thing.What rubbish is that you are spewing.
You are atypical example of a little learning is a dangerous thing.What rubbish is that you are spewing.
C.Y. ANDY-K 9 years ago
Dr SAS,
I can see that you are embroiled in the mess, doing your best to unravel the puzzle to the simple minds and layman who thrive on emotions.
I didn't read where my views on this Woyome case is different from your ... read full comment
Dr SAS,
I can see that you are embroiled in the mess, doing your best to unravel the puzzle to the simple minds and layman who thrive on emotions.
I didn't read where my views on this Woyome case is different from yours, so how am I partly right? You are equally baffled about the SC decision just as myself, and I didn't even dwell on the decision of no contract cos Parliament didn't approve it, a purely technical decision. It opens a Pandora's Box for all rogue politicians to enter into deals with companies, receive goods and services, and then refuse to pay up cos Parliament hasn't approved the contract! So contractors and suppliers beware of what you buy into with govt officials in Ghana! Caveat emptor! It is no longer the good, old handshake and business is sealed!
Now, I am baffled at your last sentence in which you accused me of siding with the "pedestrian rulings" of presumably the SC. Why are you trying to hang something like that round my neck? If you are hacking back to the election petition circus which outlived its billing and those who turned up ran out of the pop-corns and candy floss I asked to them to take along, I quite remember you agreeing with me too that it was a fickle, frivolous case. I was hoping the Justices would use their initiative to throw it out but they decided to play the roles of clowns to the fullest too. As for me, I didn't make an appearance at the circus and my brief comments were critical at some of the rulings. So, you see, I am no staunch supporter of any pedestrian SC decisions. If anything at all, I am one of the most vocal critics of our judicial system and state of lawlessness in Ghana and it shows in this very article too in many places.
Andy-K
N/B
You had commented a lot and only have 10 chances to do so.
Dr. SAS, Attorney at Law 9 years ago
1. Payment to the Chief Attorney's wife cannot be rationalized as proper. The law does not separate a man and his wife under the circumstances, and that payment is a thinly veiled kickback.
2. Your ardent support for the S ... read full comment
1. Payment to the Chief Attorney's wife cannot be rationalized as proper. The law does not separate a man and his wife under the circumstances, and that payment is a thinly veiled kickback.
2. Your ardent support for the Supreme Court Contempt proceedings against some individuals evidences your penchant for hailing pedestrian rulings.
3. Woyome patently had no contract with the government at any time. He worked for a group which paid him for his work.
4. But I agree with you that the culprits are those who made it possible for Woyome to win his claim.
C.Y. ANDY-K 9 years ago
I see.
1. I guess you didn't notice that I was being cynical about that payment, not supporting its dubious payment, an outright bribe. I even went on to explain the unwholesome practice in the system whereby both plaintif ... read full comment
I see.
1. I guess you didn't notice that I was being cynical about that payment, not supporting its dubious payment, an outright bribe. I even went on to explain the unwholesome practice in the system whereby both plaintiffs and defendants contract either the Police or staff within the judiciary to assist them. For instance, one makes the folder to disappear and another makes it to appear and everybody gets some tips and is happy and the case continues after 2 years delay! Phew!
2. Now, those blokes were clearly in contempt and worse! Their going to prison did a lot of good for them: it opened their eyes somehow. Ken Kuranchie, for instance, became aware of the fact that Ghanaians are not classified among the civilised people, a fact which is lost on 95% of the contributors on Ghanaweb, for instance! Some of them should have been jailed too!
3. Did I say he had? He said so himself that he didn't but was contracted by others, Waterville, to seek the money which all of them were owed. That claim hasn't been disproved. All of you are pretending to be unaware of the fact that he gave the bulk of the money away to others, Waterville being chief beneficiary!
4. Thanks for agreeing with me on that score but I'd have made Waterville First Respondent!
Andy-K
James Bamfo 9 years ago
Andy-K is a hooligan who needs to be dissected before he feels whole. Please, be a frequent user of condoms, okay; we don't need another "you" here to always exhibit your stupidity.
Andy-K is a hooligan who needs to be dissected before he feels whole. Please, be a frequent user of condoms, okay; we don't need another "you" here to always exhibit your stupidity.
C.Y. ANDY-K 9 years ago
You are a mindless buffoon. Is this all that you can contribute to the issues raised?
Andy-K
You are a mindless buffoon. Is this all that you can contribute to the issues raised?
Andy-K
BB 9 years ago
Woyome shared all the lotts amond the NDC and Ewe crooks
Woyome shared all the lotts amond the NDC and Ewe crooks
C.Y. ANDY-K 9 years ago
What does a pinhead like you also know and you want to comment on something even legal brains and highly educated people are struggling with?
Tweah!
Andy-K
What does a pinhead like you also know and you want to comment on something even legal brains and highly educated people are struggling with?
Tweah!
Andy-K
Peter Dogbe 9 years ago
Let Woyome show the world a copy of whatever "contract" he claims he had with the NPP govt!!!!!!
Let Woyome show the world a copy of whatever "contract" he claims he had with the NPP govt!!!!!!
IDIOTS Andy C.Y. Kwawukume will only write a hypocrite nonsense just brag. Martin Amidu sued only Woyome simply because the gargantuan amount of 52 Million Cedis was paid to Alfred Agbesi Woyome ALONE. What is difficult to un ...
read full comment
Andy will defend any Ewe thief just like the Ewe chiefs in singlets wo came to Accra to defend their favorite son!
Idiot Andy K, if you don't see the fraud, then maybe you have been blinded by your own bigotry blanket.
The fraud lies in his conspiracy with the Ndc Attorney General Office not to go to court to defend Woyome fraudulent c ...
read full comment
I have always maintained that I don't mind being called a fool and even an idiot in cyberspace or elsewhere so long as the person calling me so show me some wisdom, some intellect, some superior knowledge in telling what make ...
read full comment
The other conspirators will be in court when Woyome start singing like a canary. As it is right now, Woyome might end up paying less than he defrauded the nation of since when he was paid this amount the cedi was exchanged at ...
read full comment
It is at least heart warming to know that some of you have now realised that there were conspirators. But wait a moment!
Who hatched the conspiracy, since you guys know much more about that than some of us watching from af ...
read full comment
There is no case of fraud against Woyome, strictly speaking. The man went to court on what can best be termed as a very dubious claim. The court however agreed with him, and the government (the defendant) readily paid him the ...
read full comment
Lawyer SAS:
When did Woyome go to court for the money? Tell us about the court and judge that adjudicated the case! Who was the trial judge?
Dr. SAS, Attorney at Law, "Kwasea" shut the fuck! you primitive Ewe!
You are as MAD as Rawlings!
Primitive Ewe fool!
Hmmmm, SAS, what about it being a conspiratorial fraud between Woyome and the Ndc Attorney General Office to deliberately not to go to court?
You are the lawyer but I think the Supreme Court got it right. The fact that he ...
read full comment
The court can only rule on matters before it, and in this instance, the issue before it was neither conspiracy to commit fraud nor deception by false pretenses. If these were the issues, the court would have so said, and brou ...
read full comment
Dr. Sas, so in your legal opinion, do you conclude that Mr Woyome should go free with the money and rather hold those inept officials responsible for causing financial damage to the state? Can you come with any citation to su ...
read full comment
In my opinion, Woyome should go scot free because I cannot think of any cause of action under which he can be culpable. It is true that he brought a fake case against the government, but the government pleaded guilty and paid ...
read full comment
Dr. Sas, I am appalled with your opinion on this issue and moreover you failed to answer my question. Again do you consider Mr. Woyome not to pay the money back to the state because some officials failed to do their work and ...
read full comment
I am not in the emotional business here. You asked me a legal case which I answered; why should I be the one citing case law?
If you have a contrary opinion, argue your case with reference to any case law. Remember that it m ...
read full comment
YOUR EWE MOTHER AND FATHER WILL GO FREE TO BACK TO TOGO! "KWASEA"
Adjoa, please there is no need for insult here. Dr SAS is strictly going with what the law stipulates and we might not agree with him but he is teaching us something worth learning. He has his law blinkers on which is what as ...
read full comment
Dr SAS,
As a layman, I agree with the points you have raised. The real rogues of this matter are the people at the AG's Department, the Late President Atta Mills and the current Vice President who was the Governor of the Cen ...
read full comment
Dr SAS, I do not share your position that Woyome should go free simply because he went through due process to obtain the fraudulent judgement debt payments. Simply because it has now been detected that he defrauded the state. ...
read full comment
You still did not show why Woyome should be punished. Woyome was awarded his claim by a court of competent jurisdiction which should have examined whether the claim has merit. It did not. The government side agreed with the j ...
read full comment
Dr SAS I did say in my first paragraph that he obtained the judgement debt verdict and payments by fraud. Is that not a reason for prosecution and recovery of the money he is not entitled to? For the avoidance of any doubt, ...
read full comment
It is trite law that if you participate in and sign on to a settlement agreement with your Cyclopean eyes open, you cannot turn around and appeal against the agreement, notwithstanding your state of awareness. The policy rea ...
read full comment
Are you aware that you cannot file a false claim in either federal or State Courts in the US and get away get away with it if you you are caught? In most cases, the petitioner affirms under oath that what is stated in the co ...
read full comment
Correction.
You are assuming facts not in evidence.....
No court has made any finding that Woyome filed a false claim. Rather a high court agreed that his case has merit and awarded a judgment for him. You cannot retroactively claim tha ...
read full comment
Where did the trial Judge make a finding that Woyome has a meritorious claim? The AG's office failed to defend the claim and Womens Simply Obtained Default Judgment. They settled the case a day he was paid the whole amount ev ...
read full comment
Kofi,
I wrote in capital letters that I wasn't confused any longer. Of course, I wasn't confused about the case when I first wrote that in 2012. When I wrote then that I was confused or baffled now, it is actually about ho ...
read full comment
But Dr SAS, if you are accused of rape and for whatever reason you agree and goes to jail and later found not to be true, they set you free and we have been seeing that in USA especially in rape and murder cases through the I ...
read full comment
Your analogy should be akin to the one I previously made: somebody claims you owe him money, and your lawyer agrees with him and pays him with your money. Who do you hold accountable? Your lawyer of course!
If you disagree, ...
read full comment
Exactly. Civil and criminal cases are different. The supreme court case is civil and Woyome is found not to deserve the money and he is being asked to refund the money.
He is still on trial at the high court for fraudulent ...
read full comment
It is all about civil procedure; if you stick to the analogy I presented, you will see that the defendant acquiesced in the judgment and did not question it. An individual cannot just get up and appeal the case in the Supreme ...
read full comment
Hi Learned Attorney,
I'm interested in your briefs which I wish to join. But before I could argue on the question of whether or not Woyome intended indeed to defraud the State in the case under consideration, could you res ...
read full comment
1. Fake insofar as there was no contract between Woyome and the government, a fact the man himself agreed. The fact that Woyome brought a breach of contract claim against the government when there was no contract makes his cl ...
read full comment
Thanks for the explanation. I understand the premise of your argument and wish not to press further. Because the prosecution still has the burden to establish the criminal intent against the defendant- and here, Mr Woyome.
Stop making mockery of yourselves. Even prof Mills in his own wisdom found out that something was wrong with the Woyome payments and instructed the very people who negotiated for it to happen to go back to court and retrieve ...
read full comment
THAT "THERE IS NO CASE OF FRAUD AGAINST WOYOME, STRICTLY SPEAKING". (1) AMIDU WENT TO COURT AGAINST WOYOME BECAUSE THE CONSTITUTION GAVE-AND STILL GIVES -HIM THAT RIGHT;(2)HE PURSUED THE CASE AS A PUBLIC INTEREST ACTION (3) A ...
read full comment
You mean well, but I don't see where you are going. The court gave Woyome the judgment on an unmeritorious claim without establishing any fraud against him. How can we retrospectively charge him with fraud on a matter for whi ...
read full comment
Dr SAS, I can see your point here. Maybe we cannot pursue a criminal case of fraud against by arguing that Woyome at the time of making a claim for the money believed that the letter of recommendation he obtained from one of ...
read full comment
BECAUSE THE SUPREME COURT CASE WAS FILED BY AMIDU IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST,AND ALSO AS A COURT OF "FINAL JURISDICTION" TO CLEAR ALL DOUBTS ONCE AND FOR AL.
Buddy, don't let SAS of the hook so easily. He is wrongly arguing that Woyome walks because he used the legal process to obtain a settlement or consent judgment. That is a crack of shit. Let him file a fraudulent claim in Co ...
read full comment
YOU SEEM TO FOCUS ON THE SHADOW OF THE CASE(THE CIRCUMSTANTIAL ISSUES) RATHER THAN THE SUBSTANTIVE POINT: WAS FRAUD COMMITTED ?YES,BY LEGAL DEFINITION OF "FRAUD". BY WHOM?=THE DEFENDANT AND PERSONS KNOWN OR UNKNOWN;WHY WOYOME ...
read full comment
I thought the word "INNOCENCE " does not exist in the lexicon of law but rather "NOT GUILTY "
I have not read any judgement that reads he or she is innocent but rather not guilty which means the person might have done what ...
read full comment
Sarpong, are you a lawyer? As a layman, I find your understanding of the law amazing.
You are atypical example of a little learning is a dangerous thing.What rubbish is that you are spewing.
Dr SAS,
I can see that you are embroiled in the mess, doing your best to unravel the puzzle to the simple minds and layman who thrive on emotions.
I didn't read where my views on this Woyome case is different from your ...
read full comment
1. Payment to the Chief Attorney's wife cannot be rationalized as proper. The law does not separate a man and his wife under the circumstances, and that payment is a thinly veiled kickback.
2. Your ardent support for the S ...
read full comment
I see.
1. I guess you didn't notice that I was being cynical about that payment, not supporting its dubious payment, an outright bribe. I even went on to explain the unwholesome practice in the system whereby both plaintif ...
read full comment
Andy-K is a hooligan who needs to be dissected before he feels whole. Please, be a frequent user of condoms, okay; we don't need another "you" here to always exhibit your stupidity.
You are a mindless buffoon. Is this all that you can contribute to the issues raised?
Andy-K
Woyome shared all the lotts amond the NDC and Ewe crooks
What does a pinhead like you also know and you want to comment on something even legal brains and highly educated people are struggling with?
Tweah!
Andy-K
Let Woyome show the world a copy of whatever "contract" he claims he had with the NPP govt!!!!!!