Why don't you represent Woyome and appeal against the ruling?
Why don't you represent Woyome and appeal against the ruling?
SARPONG 11 years ago
If you look at the Supreme Court ruling as factual, you will get the wrong impression as this Kwesi Kwaku guy but the SC in not trying to waste anybody's time after looking at Woyome fraudulent papers just applied the basic l ... read full comment
If you look at the Supreme Court ruling as factual, you will get the wrong impression as this Kwesi Kwaku guy but the SC in not trying to waste anybody's time after looking at Woyome fraudulent papers just applied the basic law here. Woyome never had a contract technicality rule, PARLIAMENT NEVER APPROVED IT.
The SC did this because of Woyome's own assertion that he didn't have contract per se with the government but the company that sought his services was contracted with the government. Woyome is a SHASTA and you treat Shastas in shasta law.
For those of us who have been following this case from the beginning, we know Woyome just wanted to defraud the state because the contractor who sub contracted with Woyome came out and said they had paid Woyome for the services he rendered to them and they or the government do not owe him.
It's so amazing how Woyome did not take this case to court during Npp time when the said contract was abrogated but wait for a friendly administration that did not go to court but rather decided to settle this case with him after he Woyome has used some money to bail ndc government out in sending ndc soccer fans to South Africa to watch the world cup in 2010.
This money was just a reward from Ndc to Woyome for sending ndc soccer fans to South Africa.
Asiwome 11 years ago
So if he didn't have a contract, why did the SC state the contract was not approved by parliament? They would have said he didn't have a contract. Question is who subcontracted whom? If Woyome was the middle man or agent, and ... read full comment
So if he didn't have a contract, why did the SC state the contract was not approved by parliament? They would have said he didn't have a contract. Question is who subcontracted whom? If Woyome was the middle man or agent, and the contractors were the workers, the way I understand it, who should have held the contract with the Government?
SARPONG 11 years ago
Waterville had the contract with government who subcontracted with Woyome to seek loans from banks for them.
Woyome branded a letter of recommendation from a deputy Minister when seeking a loan from Bank of Austria as a c ... read full comment
Waterville had the contract with government who subcontracted with Woyome to seek loans from banks for them.
Woyome branded a letter of recommendation from a deputy Minister when seeking a loan from Bank of Austria as a contract despite the fact that even in the letter of recommendation, the deputy Minister made it clear to the bank that the government is not responsible for any loan granted and it is based on that letter the SC ruled that the said contract was not approved by parliament.
( KOLA outside LONDON ) 11 years ago
Kwesi Kweku you sounds like a total idiot. Woyomi knew from the very onset that he was going to cheat by stealing from the Tax payers money in coraboration with his corrupt thieves in the NDC government, so don't be silly and ... read full comment
Kwesi Kweku you sounds like a total idiot. Woyomi knew from the very onset that he was going to cheat by stealing from the Tax payers money in coraboration with his corrupt thieves in the NDC government, so don't be silly and shut your snout, you pig!
Mahmoud 11 years ago
You're right Kola, that's exactly what I was going to say. The Guy is a conman and should pay 103.4 million Cedis instead because the currency has lost its value since he collected the amount in 2009-2010.
You're right Kola, that's exactly what I was going to say. The Guy is a conman and should pay 103.4 million Cedis instead because the currency has lost its value since he collected the amount in 2009-2010.
Concerned 11 years ago
How come that the Kola outside London rather writes perfect English and the one inside London is a total illiterate. Anyway contracts comes in different forms and guises so like Sarpong said, the SC cut out all the bullshit b ... read full comment
How come that the Kola outside London rather writes perfect English and the one inside London is a total illiterate. Anyway contracts comes in different forms and guises so like Sarpong said, the SC cut out all the bullshit by simply asking the frontman for the ndc thieves to fuck off. Now the only question is,how many years should woyome and the rest of the gang get.Ugly betty should get life because she is so ugly she gives children nightmares
Kojo Nsiah 11 years ago
You are an idiot and frankly you're pathetic. Why are you running your mouth about NDC being a sympathetic govt to Woyome? Did you know that when the taking was good, your npp guys were all over Woyome, enjoying his largess. ... read full comment
You are an idiot and frankly you're pathetic. Why are you running your mouth about NDC being a sympathetic govt to Woyome? Did you know that when the taking was good, your npp guys were all over Woyome, enjoying his largess. As a matter of fact, was Sir John not Woyome's buddy? Did Sir John not receive a Toyota RAV 4 gratis from Woyome? And when Sir John was interviewed in the media in 2009, did he not admit that he knew Woyome as a member of NPP?
Given all this, what is your evidence that Woyome considered NDC govt a sympathetic one?
Get a fuccking brain before u speak next time.
Prosper Ametor 11 years ago
Hahahahaha, now Woyome who calls himself as ndc financier is npp. The same Woyome who stole to build ndc headquarters. You illiterates ndc fool soldiers are really sorry sons of whores.
Hahahahaha, now Woyome who calls himself as ndc financier is npp. The same Woyome who stole to build ndc headquarters. You illiterates ndc fool soldiers are really sorry sons of whores.
( KOLA outside LONDON ) 11 years ago
Kojo Nsiah go and have your bath but before that clean your amalgamated incomplete teeth.
YOU ODOURING ODIOT!!!
Kojo Nsiah go and have your bath but before that clean your amalgamated incomplete teeth.
YOU ODOURING ODIOT!!!
SARPONG 11 years ago
My friend don't ever think your support is not appreciated. I really appreciate your knockout punches to Kola. Keep the idiot down where he belongs.
My friend don't ever think your support is not appreciated. I really appreciate your knockout punches to Kola. Keep the idiot down where he belongs.
Dapaah 11 years ago
I agree with the ruling by SC
I agree with the ruling by SC
Kofi Ata, Cambridge, UK 11 years ago
First, let me make a comment on your name. I know of Kwesi Kojo (who was born at Sunday midnight and the parents decide to give him the names of the two days). Yours is a bit difficult to understand unless your mother was in ... read full comment
First, let me make a comment on your name. I know of Kwesi Kojo (who was born at Sunday midnight and the parents decide to give him the names of the two days). Yours is a bit difficult to understand unless your mother was in labour from Wednesday to Sunday. Please let's note that Ghanaian or Akan first name have meanings and significance and therefore we should not trivialised them.
Now to the matter you raised in your article. I have not read the written decision of the SC but the fact is that Woyome NEVER had a contract with government of Ghana. He was a sub-contractor for Waterville, who initially had a contract with the government of Ghana.
Waterville and Isofoton were contracted by the then government of Ghana to deliver some projects for the Africa Cup under an agreement. The terms and conditions of the agreement included a clause which stated that, the agreement would come into effect after approval by parliament. However, before the government could take the agreement to parliament for approval, it became clear that both Waterville and Isofoton were having difficulties raising funds to deliver the projects and the government decided to cancel the contracts and re-awarded them to a Chinese company. This was because the projects not being ready on time could have embarrassed the government as the Africa Cup could not have been postponed. Waterville and Isofoton were paid for the work done at the time through the Chinese company (Quantum Meruit). After the government cancelled the contracts with Waterville and Isofoton, there was no need to take their agreements to parliament for approval. Instead, the government took the new agreement with the Chines company to parliament for approval. NDC is only trying to blame the Kufuor government for colluding with Waterville, Isofoton and Woyeme for fraudulently and criminally duping the state. They all knew that all the three never had a biding contracts or agreements with government of Ghana and yet they went ahead and paid the claims.
In conclusion, no none had been punished for the failure of fault of another. In other words, the situation you described in your article never arose.
Denis 11 years ago
Kofi falsely assumes that since there was an agreement that the contract will come into effect only after parliamentary oversight then that is set in sones.equity does not allow the law to be used as a conduit for fraud and s ... read full comment
Kofi falsely assumes that since there was an agreement that the contract will come into effect only after parliamentary oversight then that is set in sones.equity does not allow the law to be used as a conduit for fraud and so when the law is used to gain advantage and the process is abused for one's benefit and selfish ends then the courts should use equity to cure it for the sake of justice.
The latitude allowed by the courts to remedy abuse through the use of both the spirit and letter of the law to arrive at decisions is what makes the law what it is.The quest for justice is always the goal and not statutes set in stones.
Agya Kwame 11 years ago
Kwesi Kweku or whatever he calls himself, another UK toilet cleaner who thinks that he knows better than the Supreme Court of Ghana.
Kwesi Kweku or whatever he calls himself, another UK toilet cleaner who thinks that he knows better than the Supreme Court of Ghana.
ll 11 years ago
ee
ee
OBIKYIRE 11 years ago
The writer of this article is very dishonest. What is the education of our contractors. To secure a contract of this magnitude ,consorting with foreign bankers etc. Someone of that caliber need to know the do's and dont't of ... read full comment
The writer of this article is very dishonest. What is the education of our contractors. To secure a contract of this magnitude ,consorting with foreign bankers etc. Someone of that caliber need to know the do's and dont't of a contract.He is astute in reading the fine prints ,so please do not get Ghanaians angry with your stupid excuses.
Pelicles 11 years ago
Did you hear Woyome himself saying he had no CONTRACT WITH THE GOVERNMENT? So, what are you up to? It seems you are the only guy who has more sense than those who ruled in favor of the nation.
Did you hear Woyome himself saying he had no CONTRACT WITH THE GOVERNMENT? So, what are you up to? It seems you are the only guy who has more sense than those who ruled in favor of the nation.
Kwame Bediako 11 years ago
Kwesi Kweku,a peculiar name with a peculiar mindset.Woyome was fully aware that the payment was a big fraud.
Kwesi Kweku,a peculiar name with a peculiar mindset.Woyome was fully aware that the payment was a big fraud.
Mimi 11 years ago
All judgement debt we are paying now are the result of Kuffour & the NPP's greed to amass wealth & they really did.Thanks to the" angelic posture" of the late Mills, most NPP ministers should have been in jail by now.
All judgement debt we are paying now are the result of Kuffour & the NPP's greed to amass wealth & they really did.Thanks to the" angelic posture" of the late Mills, most NPP ministers should have been in jail by now.
truth 11 years ago
Atroooo to get by. Lord will expose all.
Atroooo to get by. Lord will expose all.
Osofo 11 years ago
Ignorance of the law does not permit you to break it. What work did he do to get such a gargantuan payment?
Ignorance of the law does not permit you to break it. What work did he do to get such a gargantuan payment?
Whatever 11 years ago
You've written the truth but small point of correction though, the SC silently admitted that woyome had a contract in their ruling. Read the ruling again. What maybe they wanted was for woyome to order parliament to approve h ... read full comment
You've written the truth but small point of correction though, the SC silently admitted that woyome had a contract in their ruling. Read the ruling again. What maybe they wanted was for woyome to order parliament to approve his contract that he won through tender. Na how should I say it? They used the power of the state to bully the man after Kufour cheated him
Concerned 11 years ago
Whatever,if it did not meet the conditions required for it to be a contract,then my friend, it is not a contract.
Question is, have you seen any contract? A letter facilitaing the work of a subcontractor is not a contract
Whatever,if it did not meet the conditions required for it to be a contract,then my friend, it is not a contract.
Question is, have you seen any contract? A letter facilitaing the work of a subcontractor is not a contract
Whatever 11 years ago
A letter facilitating the work of a subcontractor is even an enhancement of a contractual connection. The problem with you is that you think contract is something palpable and that it has a physical presence, it is NOT. Contr ... read full comment
A letter facilitating the work of a subcontractor is even an enhancement of a contractual connection. The problem with you is that you think contract is something palpable and that it has a physical presence, it is NOT. Contract can only have a physical manifestation and NOT presence. At the minimum, it is your intention and given consideration of an offer which establishes a contract. Under the law, you bind yourself to a contract by your own actions and reaction.
One does't need to accept an offer before a contract is established. All one need to do is to signal your intent and give mere consideration and a contract is established. That is LAW Read the law on contracts, common law and statutory law alike. After that read the procurement act well. A contract is established upon conclusion of the tender and NOT after parliament approval. Tender carries series of steps also construed in the legal sense as 'consideration that has been given' by a contractor or subcontractor in response to the opening of open tender process or any other offer from the state that signal the states intention to enter into a contract.
Concerned 11 years ago
Simple question for you. Was the contract between the gov and woyome or woyome and another party. If A gives a contract to B to weed his house. B employs C to assist. C arrives at the hse of A and A opens the gate and allows ... read full comment
Simple question for you. Was the contract between the gov and woyome or woyome and another party. If A gives a contract to B to weed his house. B employs C to assist. C arrives at the hse of A and A opens the gate and allows him. B fully pays C. Where in this arrangement do you see a contractual relation between A and C. C has been fully paid yet he somehow manages to sue A. Only in NDC Ghana
G. K. Berko 11 years ago
Only someone born on two non-contiguous days would come up with such a reason to support Woyome's dubious claims.
How did the Government deceive Woyome? As an astute Business mogul as Woyome would have all see him, one wou ... read full comment
Only someone born on two non-contiguous days would come up with such a reason to support Woyome's dubious claims.
How did the Government deceive Woyome? As an astute Business mogul as Woyome would have all see him, one would think he had competent Lawyers to confer with on Contracts of that magnitude. So, would his Lawyers be so clueless that they would not see through any deception by the Government?
But to sum up all this just consider this: If someone buys a stolen item from another and the one is caught with it, the Law does not allow the purchaser to keep it. Period!
Have a nice day!
CLASS ONE TECHER 11 years ago
Let us look at this matter in the round. On what grounds did the Government abrogate the contract with Waterville, such that all those whose services were engaged had genuine or "made up' aborted expenses? Can a Government ex ... read full comment
Let us look at this matter in the round. On what grounds did the Government abrogate the contract with Waterville, such that all those whose services were engaged had genuine or "made up' aborted expenses? Can a Government expect to abrogate contracts just because they were made by a previous regime? Was the contract granted to the Chinese by president Kuffour to build the stadia approved by Parliament?
MORO 11 years ago
You are right my brother Kwesi but as usual,the fatherless idiots would insult you. I´m not a fun of Woyome but I think he has been given a raw deal. It is left with him to do what is best fro him. If I were him, I would mak ... read full comment
You are right my brother Kwesi but as usual,the fatherless idiots would insult you. I´m not a fun of Woyome but I think he has been given a raw deal. It is left with him to do what is best fro him. If I were him, I would make sure all those who have contributed to my loss would pay with their lives.I think that is what would soon be the best way to settle things in this country, because you if you don´t belong to party A or B, you are nobody to be treated like human being. Woyome,over to you!
Turkson 11 years ago
My brother Kwesi, this is Ghana for you. I wonder how often parliament had aproved contracts awarded by Kufour to his cronies for the 8 good years that he accidentally found himself looting this country. Yes, Woyome does not ... read full comment
My brother Kwesi, this is Ghana for you. I wonder how often parliament had aproved contracts awarded by Kufour to his cronies for the 8 good years that he accidentally found himself looting this country. Yes, Woyome does not belong to them and therefore he is nobody. This is a miscarriage of justice, cheating and bogus ruling of the court. Somewhere along the line, they admitted that the guy,Woyome did had contract with the government but that,the said contracty was not approve by parliament. How can you people be so wicked and divisive to such extend? Is it the responsibility of Woyome to push parliament to approve a contract that he has won on tender? Fellow Ghanaians, be prepared for the worse in this country for as long as we have those NPP fanatics and tribal bigots out there at the courts! I would urge each and every Ghanaian to think of the best way of solving his or her problems becasue, we do not have laws in this country. Are we not in this country when Kufour awarded juicy contracts to his stupid ugly childern and cronies without parliamentary approval? Were his ministers not importing things into this country without any due deligence? If Mr Woyome is a fool, then he should let them go free. As the NDC chairmam once said,there are many ways of "killing a cat". It is not the duty of Woyome to impress upon Kufour´s criminal gangs to approve his contracts. By the way, which parliament gave the Chinese the approval to execute the contract? Kufour single hadded award that contract to the Chinese because of the kickback. What about that? That is why he will not die now but live and suffer and rot before he die. Mr Woyome, wake up, for there are many ways of "killing a cat" Ghana is for all of us. Do not allow these tribal NPP group to cheat you! We are aware of the millions of dollars that the y paid to their family members in the name of judgement debt. Do not allow them to have a peaceful sleep! Keep them running on their toes all of their lives!
JB 11 years ago
YOU ARE A FOOL
YOU ARE A FOOL
NA 11 years ago
The SC ruling on the case is a call for advesarial legal system- this is great because the justices are applying and invoking the " Intrumentalism" theory of law:a pragmatic instrument of creativity and boldness for solving ... read full comment
The SC ruling on the case is a call for advesarial legal system- this is great because the justices are applying and invoking the " Intrumentalism" theory of law:a pragmatic instrument of creativity and boldness for solving our judicial problem. Woyome can still sue the government for a breach of "good faith" and claim some compensation; for the sector ministry failure to present the contract for parliamentary approval. Entrepreneur Lawyers should be smiling to squeeze the government for money.The sector ministry and parliament should be held responsible.
Concerned 11 years ago
Woyome is a subcontractor who has been fully paid by the contractors. If anyone is going to sue anybody,assuming there is a breach of contract,it should be the contractors,not the sub contractor.
Woyome is a subcontractor who has been fully paid by the contractors. If anyone is going to sue anybody,assuming there is a breach of contract,it should be the contractors,not the sub contractor.
NA 11 years ago
If there was a contract between the contractors and the gov't, will that contract bind the sub-contractors in the Specific performance by the contract document? Assuming the gov't is suing the contractors for breach of contra ... read full comment
If there was a contract between the contractors and the gov't, will that contract bind the sub-contractors in the Specific performance by the contract document? Assuming the gov't is suing the contractors for breach of contract, will that affect the sub-contrators?. All I am saying is entrepreneur lawyers can re-package the case and sue the government. This case has a smoken gun deeply rooted in corruption. With adversarial legalism where parties and interest groups can sue and appeal the case, the true culprits who created this mess will be made to account for what they failed to do for the nation.Thank you for been a gentle man.
atta 11 years ago
First of all no UK or any court in the world will reward the stupidity of a contractor who does not do due diligence. Secondly ignorance of the law is no excuse. It is the contractors responsibility to ensure that all I's are ... read full comment
First of all no UK or any court in the world will reward the stupidity of a contractor who does not do due diligence. Secondly ignorance of the law is no excuse. It is the contractors responsibility to ensure that all I's are dotted and T's are crossed do that they get paid after they render the service. Fur diligence is done by contractors aol the time so it is not something new or impossible for them to do. In this case wayome is feigning negligence to justify his attempt to defraud the state and the judges were not going to allow that.
better Ghana 11 years ago
The SC ruling is correct and it will hold in the UK. You can contact me on quots148@googlemail.com for further clarification. I am procurement professional and I know what I am talking about. Thanks
The SC ruling is correct and it will hold in the UK. You can contact me on quots148@googlemail.com for further clarification. I am procurement professional and I know what I am talking about. Thanks
Kweku 11 years ago
Woyome must cough out that money. All those he shared it with must be asked to bring the money back.
51 million GHS is too huge an amount to be given to one Ghanaian for no work done. How did they even come to that figure ... read full comment
Woyome must cough out that money. All those he shared it with must be asked to bring the money back.
51 million GHS is too huge an amount to be given to one Ghanaian for no work done. How did they even come to that figure? It is not just 1 or 2 million but 51 million. Haba!
Even if it is not legally criminal, it is grossly immoral in a poor country like Ghana. That is even all the more reason the money must not only be paid back, some people must go to prison for this!!!
Why don't you represent Woyome and appeal against the ruling?
If you look at the Supreme Court ruling as factual, you will get the wrong impression as this Kwesi Kwaku guy but the SC in not trying to waste anybody's time after looking at Woyome fraudulent papers just applied the basic l ...
read full comment
So if he didn't have a contract, why did the SC state the contract was not approved by parliament? They would have said he didn't have a contract. Question is who subcontracted whom? If Woyome was the middle man or agent, and ...
read full comment
Waterville had the contract with government who subcontracted with Woyome to seek loans from banks for them.
Woyome branded a letter of recommendation from a deputy Minister when seeking a loan from Bank of Austria as a c ...
read full comment
Kwesi Kweku you sounds like a total idiot. Woyomi knew from the very onset that he was going to cheat by stealing from the Tax payers money in coraboration with his corrupt thieves in the NDC government, so don't be silly and ...
read full comment
You're right Kola, that's exactly what I was going to say. The Guy is a conman and should pay 103.4 million Cedis instead because the currency has lost its value since he collected the amount in 2009-2010.
How come that the Kola outside London rather writes perfect English and the one inside London is a total illiterate. Anyway contracts comes in different forms and guises so like Sarpong said, the SC cut out all the bullshit b ...
read full comment
You are an idiot and frankly you're pathetic. Why are you running your mouth about NDC being a sympathetic govt to Woyome? Did you know that when the taking was good, your npp guys were all over Woyome, enjoying his largess. ...
read full comment
Hahahahaha, now Woyome who calls himself as ndc financier is npp. The same Woyome who stole to build ndc headquarters. You illiterates ndc fool soldiers are really sorry sons of whores.
Kojo Nsiah go and have your bath but before that clean your amalgamated incomplete teeth.
YOU ODOURING ODIOT!!!
My friend don't ever think your support is not appreciated. I really appreciate your knockout punches to Kola. Keep the idiot down where he belongs.
I agree with the ruling by SC
First, let me make a comment on your name. I know of Kwesi Kojo (who was born at Sunday midnight and the parents decide to give him the names of the two days). Yours is a bit difficult to understand unless your mother was in ...
read full comment
Kofi falsely assumes that since there was an agreement that the contract will come into effect only after parliamentary oversight then that is set in sones.equity does not allow the law to be used as a conduit for fraud and s ...
read full comment
Kwesi Kweku or whatever he calls himself, another UK toilet cleaner who thinks that he knows better than the Supreme Court of Ghana.
ee
The writer of this article is very dishonest. What is the education of our contractors. To secure a contract of this magnitude ,consorting with foreign bankers etc. Someone of that caliber need to know the do's and dont't of ...
read full comment
Did you hear Woyome himself saying he had no CONTRACT WITH THE GOVERNMENT? So, what are you up to? It seems you are the only guy who has more sense than those who ruled in favor of the nation.
Kwesi Kweku,a peculiar name with a peculiar mindset.Woyome was fully aware that the payment was a big fraud.
All judgement debt we are paying now are the result of Kuffour & the NPP's greed to amass wealth & they really did.Thanks to the" angelic posture" of the late Mills, most NPP ministers should have been in jail by now.
Atroooo to get by. Lord will expose all.
Ignorance of the law does not permit you to break it. What work did he do to get such a gargantuan payment?
You've written the truth but small point of correction though, the SC silently admitted that woyome had a contract in their ruling. Read the ruling again. What maybe they wanted was for woyome to order parliament to approve h ...
read full comment
Whatever,if it did not meet the conditions required for it to be a contract,then my friend, it is not a contract.
Question is, have you seen any contract? A letter facilitaing the work of a subcontractor is not a contract
A letter facilitating the work of a subcontractor is even an enhancement of a contractual connection. The problem with you is that you think contract is something palpable and that it has a physical presence, it is NOT. Contr ...
read full comment
Simple question for you. Was the contract between the gov and woyome or woyome and another party. If A gives a contract to B to weed his house. B employs C to assist. C arrives at the hse of A and A opens the gate and allows ...
read full comment
Only someone born on two non-contiguous days would come up with such a reason to support Woyome's dubious claims.
How did the Government deceive Woyome? As an astute Business mogul as Woyome would have all see him, one wou ...
read full comment
Let us look at this matter in the round. On what grounds did the Government abrogate the contract with Waterville, such that all those whose services were engaged had genuine or "made up' aborted expenses? Can a Government ex ...
read full comment
You are right my brother Kwesi but as usual,the fatherless idiots would insult you. I´m not a fun of Woyome but I think he has been given a raw deal. It is left with him to do what is best fro him. If I were him, I would mak ...
read full comment
My brother Kwesi, this is Ghana for you. I wonder how often parliament had aproved contracts awarded by Kufour to his cronies for the 8 good years that he accidentally found himself looting this country. Yes, Woyome does not ...
read full comment
YOU ARE A FOOL
The SC ruling on the case is a call for advesarial legal system- this is great because the justices are applying and invoking the " Intrumentalism" theory of law:a pragmatic instrument of creativity and boldness for solving ...
read full comment
Woyome is a subcontractor who has been fully paid by the contractors. If anyone is going to sue anybody,assuming there is a breach of contract,it should be the contractors,not the sub contractor.
If there was a contract between the contractors and the gov't, will that contract bind the sub-contractors in the Specific performance by the contract document? Assuming the gov't is suing the contractors for breach of contra ...
read full comment
First of all no UK or any court in the world will reward the stupidity of a contractor who does not do due diligence. Secondly ignorance of the law is no excuse. It is the contractors responsibility to ensure that all I's are ...
read full comment
The SC ruling is correct and it will hold in the UK. You can contact me on quots148@googlemail.com for further clarification. I am procurement professional and I know what I am talking about. Thanks
Woyome must cough out that money. All those he shared it with must be asked to bring the money back.
51 million GHS is too huge an amount to be given to one Ghanaian for no work done. How did they even come to that figure ...
read full comment