Tweneboa-who-ever-you-are, Addison confuses you not everyone.
Tweneboa-who-ever-you-are, Addison confuses you not everyone.
Hory 10 years ago
Tweneboa or who ever you are, I dont think you are even smart enough, we all heard and I dont think anyone needs your commentary now. If Addison confused you, that is not surprising and by the way there are some many more ou ... read full comment
Tweneboa or who ever you are, I dont think you are even smart enough, we all heard and I dont think anyone needs your commentary now. If Addison confused you, that is not surprising and by the way there are some many more out there like you, so why don't you just zip it whilst we all wait for the judges verdict on what has confused you. Please stop writing, I don't think your opinion is needed now as you are even confused
********** 10 years ago
It will be better if you join the panel judge hearing the case rather than this constant disturbing of reade4w on this site.
It will be better if you join the panel judge hearing the case rather than this constant disturbing of reade4w on this site.
Nana Yaw 10 years ago
You're the only confused one. Wait and see August 29
You're the only confused one. Wait and see August 29
Kwobia,Toronto 10 years ago
Sorry,I could not follow Addison's oral address.Now,I realise that I've not been the only one.His address had no flow or logic.
Sorry,I could not follow Addison's oral address.Now,I realise that I've not been the only one.His address had no flow or logic.
Menua Kwadwo 10 years ago
Unfortunately for you, the judgement in this case will be delivered by nine eminent judges who followed the oral address.
Unfortunately for you, the judgement in this case will be delivered by nine eminent judges who followed the oral address.
Sankofa 10 years ago
And the judges will still be as confused as all of us.
How many pink sheets were submitted in evidence by the petitioners?
And the judges will still be as confused as all of us.
How many pink sheets were submitted in evidence by the petitioners?
Prof 10 years ago
Addison's address was clear and true so if you are confused it is because you are not by his side.
Addison's address was clear and true so if you are confused it is because you are not by his side.
ANSAH 10 years ago
I WOULD HAVE BEEN HAPPIER IS 'PROF' HAD GIVEN HIS REAL NAME. OBVIOUSLY HE IS NOT A PROFESSOR BECAUSE HE UNDERSTOOD EVERYTHING ADDISION SAID FROM THE TRASH BAG.
I WOULD HAVE BEEN HAPPIER IS 'PROF' HAD GIVEN HIS REAL NAME. OBVIOUSLY HE IS NOT A PROFESSOR BECAUSE HE UNDERSTOOD EVERYTHING ADDISION SAID FROM THE TRASH BAG.
k. minta 10 years ago
Any kindergarten child would understand Addison's explanation about the pink sheets.It is only warped minds that would refuse to understand simple arithmetic. If you're confused wait until August 29th.
Any kindergarten child would understand Addison's explanation about the pink sheets.It is only warped minds that would refuse to understand simple arithmetic. If you're confused wait until August 29th.
Akuffo Addo 10 years ago
Confusion all over. Oh what a poor case. President at all cost indeed.
Confusion all over. Oh what a poor case. President at all cost indeed.
anas 10 years ago
you are rather confused
you are rather confused
KOO 10 years ago
It is no wonder that propaganda is now playing a major role for some people.This writer and Tsatsu the dreaded law man have now realized that the only way to win the case before SC is to rely on technicalities.They simply do ... read full comment
It is no wonder that propaganda is now playing a major role for some people.This writer and Tsatsu the dreaded law man have now realized that the only way to win the case before SC is to rely on technicalities.They simply do not have any explanation for the rot that went on during the elections.
********** 10 years ago
Precisely my brother, Chachu is behaving like a a conman. He asserts that the petitioners did not serve the number of pink sheets that they stated on their affidavit, and cals for, an audit. He then refuses to tell the court ... read full comment
Precisely my brother, Chachu is behaving like a a conman. He asserts that the petitioners did not serve the number of pink sheets that they stated on their affidavit, and cals for, an audit. He then refuses to tell the court how many sheets he received, to assist in the audit. When it became clear that he has backfired on that, he rushed to the court claiming that boxes of pink sheets have been smuggled in, accusing the court of fraudulent dealings (I wonder why he was not cited for contempt).
Now here we, are with the 10th and 11th panel members Magie Jackson and Akua asmasi constantly disturbing us with their nonsense4
NAA4U 10 years ago
WHAT DID ADDISON SAY IN HIS ADDRESS? THAT WHAT THE RESPONDENTS ARE SAYING, WE HAVE ANSWERED THEM IN OUR ADDRESS.......? IS THAT WHAT A PETITIONER'S ORAL ADDRESS MUST BE LIKE? DIDNT TSATSU, LITHUR AND QUARSHIE IDUN WRITE THE A ... read full comment
WHAT DID ADDISON SAY IN HIS ADDRESS? THAT WHAT THE RESPONDENTS ARE SAYING, WE HAVE ANSWERED THEM IN OUR ADDRESS.......? IS THAT WHAT A PETITIONER'S ORAL ADDRESS MUST BE LIKE? DIDNT TSATSU, LITHUR AND QUARSHIE IDUN WRITE THE ADDRESS BUT THEY SUMMARISED IT ORALLY? WHY DIDNT ADDISON DO SAME? HE ALL ALONG BEHAVED LIKE, THE RESPONDENTS MUST PROVE HIS CASE FOR HIM
Korbe K 10 years ago
People should not confuse the number of pink sheets with the number of votes that the complainants want annulled . The plaintiffs want a certain number of votes annulled and if that could be achieved with 1000 pink sheets tha ... read full comment
People should not confuse the number of pink sheets with the number of votes that the complainants want annulled . The plaintiffs want a certain number of votes annulled and if that could be achieved with 1000 pink sheets that will be fine with them. Please educate the NDC supporters to focus on what contains on the pink sheets and not the number of pink sheets
frankloy 10 years ago
The number of votes is contained in a set of pink sheets. So why is the number of pink sheets not important. This is where the case runs into difficulties. To annul the results the justices will have to establish that those s ... read full comment
The number of votes is contained in a set of pink sheets. So why is the number of pink sheets not important. This is where the case runs into difficulties. To annul the results the justices will have to establish that those same infractions did not occur on other pink sheets. The case would have been much stronger if they had used pink sheets from all polling stations. The best they could if they find in favour of the NPP is to ask the EC to look again at all pinks sheets and apply the same rule that the NPP is seeking and declare a result.
Ama 10 years ago
They said petitioners had no case and that the S.C will throw the case out, now look at them now ooo. Thank God you're not a judge and so your opinion of confusion is yours alone and not Philips. Check the judges and you will ... read full comment
They said petitioners had no case and that the S.C will throw the case out, now look at them now ooo. Thank God you're not a judge and so your opinion of confusion is yours alone and not Philips. Check the judges and you will realize that they understand what's at stake well well.
Albert 10 years ago
Does it mean the NDC can also tell all their pollen agents in the Ashanti and Eastern region next four years not to sign any pink sheet after the election so that it's considered as irregularities then by so doing they can go ... read full comment
Does it mean the NDC can also tell all their pollen agents in the Ashanti and Eastern region next four years not to sign any pink sheet after the election so that it's considered as irregularities then by so doing they can go to court and ask the court to annul all those votes before the elections are declared? There is no law that will punish the pollen agent for not signing ,why should there be a law for punishing the innocent voter who did nothing wrong? A word to a wise, is enough.
QUEEN 10 years ago
Nana Akua Tweneboah-Koduah/Margaret Jackson is JITTERY
Nana Akua Tweneboah-Koduah/Margaret Jackson is JITTERY
tiger shark 10 years ago
Should I one day Need a lawyer one day and addison is the only lawyer availiable i will prefer not to hire him.
Should I one day Need a lawyer one day and addison is the only lawyer availiable i will prefer not to hire him.
Follower-Court Proceedings 10 years ago
It is normal to find people like the author of this article who will never understand certain issues because they cannot understand. We all watch Addition clarifying this issue to the panel of judges who did not question him ... read full comment
It is normal to find people like the author of this article who will never understand certain issues because they cannot understand. We all watch Addition clarifying this issue to the panel of judges who did not question him further. so what are you saying? check yourself critically, I am sure there is a mixed up "up there"
Sankofa 10 years ago
So how many pink sheets were submitted in evidence?
So how many pink sheets were submitted in evidence?
AUGUST 29, 2013
Nothing matters now !
Tweneboa-who-ever-you-are, Addison confuses you not everyone.
Tweneboa or who ever you are, I dont think you are even smart enough, we all heard and I dont think anyone needs your commentary now. If Addison confused you, that is not surprising and by the way there are some many more ou ...
read full comment
It will be better if you join the panel judge hearing the case rather than this constant disturbing of reade4w on this site.
You're the only confused one. Wait and see August 29
Sorry,I could not follow Addison's oral address.Now,I realise that I've not been the only one.His address had no flow or logic.
Unfortunately for you, the judgement in this case will be delivered by nine eminent judges who followed the oral address.
And the judges will still be as confused as all of us.
How many pink sheets were submitted in evidence by the petitioners?
Addison's address was clear and true so if you are confused it is because you are not by his side.
I WOULD HAVE BEEN HAPPIER IS 'PROF' HAD GIVEN HIS REAL NAME. OBVIOUSLY HE IS NOT A PROFESSOR BECAUSE HE UNDERSTOOD EVERYTHING ADDISION SAID FROM THE TRASH BAG.
Any kindergarten child would understand Addison's explanation about the pink sheets.It is only warped minds that would refuse to understand simple arithmetic. If you're confused wait until August 29th.
Confusion all over. Oh what a poor case. President at all cost indeed.
you are rather confused
It is no wonder that propaganda is now playing a major role for some people.This writer and Tsatsu the dreaded law man have now realized that the only way to win the case before SC is to rely on technicalities.They simply do ...
read full comment
Precisely my brother, Chachu is behaving like a a conman. He asserts that the petitioners did not serve the number of pink sheets that they stated on their affidavit, and cals for, an audit. He then refuses to tell the court ...
read full comment
WHAT DID ADDISON SAY IN HIS ADDRESS? THAT WHAT THE RESPONDENTS ARE SAYING, WE HAVE ANSWERED THEM IN OUR ADDRESS.......? IS THAT WHAT A PETITIONER'S ORAL ADDRESS MUST BE LIKE? DIDNT TSATSU, LITHUR AND QUARSHIE IDUN WRITE THE A ...
read full comment
People should not confuse the number of pink sheets with the number of votes that the complainants want annulled . The plaintiffs want a certain number of votes annulled and if that could be achieved with 1000 pink sheets tha ...
read full comment
The number of votes is contained in a set of pink sheets. So why is the number of pink sheets not important. This is where the case runs into difficulties. To annul the results the justices will have to establish that those s ...
read full comment
They said petitioners had no case and that the S.C will throw the case out, now look at them now ooo. Thank God you're not a judge and so your opinion of confusion is yours alone and not Philips. Check the judges and you will ...
read full comment
Does it mean the NDC can also tell all their pollen agents in the Ashanti and Eastern region next four years not to sign any pink sheet after the election so that it's considered as irregularities then by so doing they can go ...
read full comment
Nana Akua Tweneboah-Koduah/Margaret Jackson is JITTERY
Should I one day Need a lawyer one day and addison is the only lawyer availiable i will prefer not to hire him.
It is normal to find people like the author of this article who will never understand certain issues because they cannot understand. We all watch Addition clarifying this issue to the panel of judges who did not question him ...
read full comment
So how many pink sheets were submitted in evidence?