You are here: HomeOpinionsArticles2013 08 11Article 282029

Supreme Court Arithmetic

This article is closed for comments.

Read Comments Comments (24)

  • Freedom and Justice 10 years ago

    In fact this whole thing has completely wasted Ghana's time!!! This is like a bad Nigerian movie...

  • Freedom and Justice 10 years ago

    ...for being able to tolerate this BS!!! NPP perpetrating this hoax on Ghanaians just to save face is just mean...

  • moyo 10 years ago

    The self defeating assertion that NPP parliamentary votes was more than NDC and trying to draw a correlation between the parliamentary and the presidential elections is very interesting. If that is the case, it would have bee ...
    read full comment

  • KB 10 years ago

    Thank you Mr.Writer, infact Addisons arguement is soo illogical i was surprised he made it at the highest court of the land. And having people supporting that arguement forcefully makes me very sad. It tells you there is some ...
    read full comment

  • princewilly@ymail.com 10 years ago

    A guy sees his new neighbor out in his backyard, so he decides to get acquainted. After introductions, he asks the new neighbor what he does for a living.
    The new neighbor says, "I'm a professor." The first neigbhbor then as ...
    read full comment

  • Kalira 10 years ago

    Oh npp

  • Hafiz. Techiman 10 years ago

    Does Addison know that it took Bagbin less than 17000 to come to parliament whilst Napo went with more than 50000? Npp be realistic.pls add NDC mp's vote in U/W and compare to only 4 npp mp's in Ksi.

  • Ebo 10 years ago

    A very good and logical analysis.I love it.NPP has really shot itself in the legs.They really don´t know what directions to take. From the very word go, all well meaning Ghanaians know that the NPP has no case and that they ...
    read full comment

  • Danny Asuo 10 years ago

    What this writer thinks is not logic is making all NDC members nervous. This writer is mathematically challenged, Addison's addition is simple but you are making things complicated for yourself. Facts have been presented, NDC ...
    read full comment

  • Nii Ankrah 10 years ago

    Think carefully,the difference of over 400,000 is simply rigging.Multiple pink sheets were used.The Blackman should for once think intelligently

  • BOY KOFI 10 years ago

    Ask yourself,where did the votes of parties without MPs go for the presidency?Addison saw that the petitioners have made a very big mistake by depending solely on the face of the pink sheets.Therefore,he tried to add another ...
    read full comment

  • BOY KOFI 10 years ago

    Let me make it clear here that we are dealing strictly with presidential election petition not parliamentary.The official declared results show that the 6 other defeated candidates together got only 1.56% of the valid votes c ...
    read full comment

  • Okra 10 years ago

    It will be alright if you guys are just confused or do not really understand number games. But if you are just trying to confuse people with your propaganda then let me point to you that the mathematicians who coach Addison o ...
    read full comment

  • BOY KOFI 10 years ago

    There are millions of floating voters,explain me your lousy mathematics why the difference is not correct.Thank you.

  • Sankofa 10 years ago

    That is where you go wrong.

    People attested to the fact that they were NPP supporters who voted NPP in the parliamentary, but for Mahama in the presidential.

    Some people voted in the special voting for the presidential, ...
    read full comment

  • Okra 10 years ago

    All the parties with and without MPs put together pulled only 151,280. Assuming all those people voted for NPP and NDC MPs there is no way of nowing hw much of those votes went in favour of NPP MPs and NDC MPs. You are confus ...
    read full comment

  • BOY KOFI 10 years ago

    My good friend,let's be clear here,the petition is about Presidential élections not Parliamentary.Good,why didn't Addison bring this lousy evidence in court during the real hearing but tried awefully to sneak this in his res ...
    read full comment

  • James Armstrong 10 years ago

    Tsatsu's presentation was not only legalistic but very scholarly and totally put him apart from the others. I believe by now Addison will be full of envy and jealous of this brain called Tsatsu who has been acknowledged beyo ...
    read full comment

  • Whatever 10 years ago

    I'm wondering who advice Addison to advance that immature argument to the judges who have such broad mind? was it Akuffo Addo himself?

  • Yaw Ohemeng 10 years ago

    What Addison said was that the differential was curious and sure it is. It is right to observe that the differential comes from the minority parties. But what will make them abandon their Presidential candidates en bloc and t ...
    read full comment

  • Sankofa 10 years ago

    Yaw, see my posting elsewhere in this thread.

    Look carefully at the results of the elections as published. It is quite clear that John Mahama's votes were spread across the country, while Nana Addo's votes were concentrate ...
    read full comment

  • AB 10 years ago

    Yaw, just look at Wenchi for example where Mahama won and the NPP Parliamentary candidate won. How do you reconcile that with what you stated in your second paragraph. It is painful to loose in an election but lets put reason ...
    read full comment

  • NPP KWASEAFUO PARTY 10 years ago

    How can one expect this fools to understand simple math?

  • NPP KWASEAFUO PARTY 10 years ago

    BEFORE Addison gave his address to the court, he was preceded by the maestro and this was the maestro's concluding statement to the court,

    "The Petitioners claim is factually empty with no supportable evidence being produc ...
    read full comment