You are here: HomeOpinionsArticles2013 07 27Article 280590

Supreme Court Will Deliver An Impartial Verdict

This article is closed for comments.

Read Comments Comments (31)

  • KOLA,LONDON MAIN 10 years ago

    You should be specific on what you want to say. It looks like you beating about the bush or more so shooting yourself in the foot when the whole world knows that Kuffuor is not only a thief but an aggressive one.

    Do you no ...
    read full comment

  • DR. Bokor Jnr 10 years ago

    Condoms are being taxed, dumsor is non-stop but candles are being taxed too,petrol prices are on the rice, the cedi is falling like mahama's dignity and reputation, GYEEDA report is out and the government is keeping it a secr ...
    read full comment

  • PINKSHIT 10 years ago

    correct yourself oga Dr"...petrol prices are on the rice and beans = WAAKYE...

  • KOLA PROGRESSING FORWARD 10 years ago

    Author: KOLA,LONDON MAIN
    Date: 2013-07-26 21:33:05
    Comment to: New CEO for MTN Ghana


    "Not mention arm robbery."

    WHO IS ROBBING ARMS IN GHANA, BOROFO KANKAN KOLA?

    "Do you not know that Akronfuor only came() milk u ...
    read full comment

  • Agyeman. 10 years ago

    Just because the supreme court might deliver an impartial verdict doesn't mean it'll be seen that way by the many Ghanaian tribalists,avowed partisans,regionalists and opportunists.The Ghanaian political animal can be benevol ...
    read full comment

  • Yaw Amofa 10 years ago

    I wish they all read this article.

  • Apoopoo 10 years ago

    What does this article have to do with U.S. lawyers? How does this article have anything to do with the Ghanaian Supreme Court ruling? There is a conflict with Ghana's judiciary system in that the judiciary must function unde ...
    read full comment

  • APONKYE KOLA 10 years ago

    The following TROKOSI comedy series being performed and lead by the chief educated illiterate KOLA is coming on in 20 theater houses throughout the country.

  • Kwobia ( Toronto ) 10 years ago

    The EC has been mandated to manage elections.The SC would most certainly not want
    To over turn decisions by the EC without extremely serious thought.Does the SC want petitioners following every election?

  • Kwobia ( Toronto ) 10 years ago

    The EC has been mandated to manage elections.The SC would most certainly not want
    To over turn decisions by the EC without extremely serious thought.Does the SC want petitioners following every election?

  • Kwobia ( Toronto ) 10 years ago

    The EC has been mandated to manage elections.The SC would most certainly not want
    To over turn decisions by the EC without extremely serious thought.Does the SC want petitioners following every election?

  • Kwobia ( Toronto ) 10 years ago

    The EC has been mandated to manage elections.The SC would most certainly not want
    To over turn decisions by the EC without extremely serious thought.Does the SC want petitioners following every election?

  • Kwobia ( Toronto ) 10 years ago

    The EC has been mandated to manage elections.The SC would most certainly not want
    To over turn decisions by the EC without extremely serious thought.Does the SC want petitioners following every election?

  • Kwobia ( Toronto ) 10 years ago

    The EC has been mandated to manage elections.The SC would most certainly not want
    To over turn decisions by the EC without extremely serious thought.Does the SC want petitioners following every election?

  • Kwobia ( Toronto ) 10 years ago

    The EC has been mandated to manage elections.The SC would most certainly not want
    To over turn decisions by the EC without extremely serious thought.Does the SC want petitioners following every election?

  • Kwobia ( Toronto ) 10 years ago

    The EC has been mandated to manage elections.The SC would most certainly not want
    To over turn decisions by the EC without extremely serious thought.Does the SC want petitioners following every election?

  • Kwobia ( Toronto ) 10 years ago

    The EC has been mandated to manage elections.The SC would most certainly not want
    To over turn decisions by the EC without extremely serious thought.Does the SC want petitioners following every election?

  • Kwobia ( Toronto ) 10 years ago

    The EC has been mandated to manage elections.The SC would most certainly not want
    To over turn decisions by the EC without extremely serious thought.Does the SC want petitioners following every election?

  • Kwobia ( Toronto ) 10 years ago

    The EC has been mandated to manage elections.The SC would most certainly not want
    To over turn decisions by the EC without extremely serious thought.Does the SC want petitioners following every election?

  • Kwobia ( Toronto ) 10 years ago

    The EC has been mandated to manage elections.The SC would most certainly not want
    To over turn decisions by the EC without extremely serious thought.Does the SC want petitioners following every election?

  • Kwobia ( Toronto ) 10 years ago

    The EC has been mandated to manage elections.The SC would most certainly not want
    To over turn decisions by the EC without extremely serious thought.Does the SC want petitioners following every election?

  • Kwobia ( Toronto ) 10 years ago

    The EC has been mandated to manage elections.The SC would most certainly not want
    To over turn decisions by the EC without extremely serious thought.Does the SC want petitioners following every election?

  • Kwobia ( Toronto ) 10 years ago

    The EC has been mandated to manage elections.The SC would most certainly not want
    To over turn decisions by the EC without extremely serious thought.Does the SC want petitioners following every election?

  • Kwobia ( Toronto ) 10 years ago

    The EC has been mandated to manage elections.The SC would most certainly not want
    To over turn decisions by the EC without extremely serious thought.Does the SC want petitioners following every election?

  • Kwobia ( Toronto ) 10 years ago

    The EC has been mandated to manage elections.The SC would most certainly not want
    To over turn decisions by the EC without extremely serious thought.Does the SC want petitioners following every election?

  • Bernard 10 years ago

    And by the way, which institution is going to conduct another election if the SC declares a re_run? Is it the same EC with Dr. Afari Gyan as the Chairman that the petitioners had gone heaven and earth to criminalised? Will ...
    read full comment

  • Kwobia ( Toronto ) 10 years ago

    The EC has been mandated to manage elections.The SC would most certainly not want
    To over turn decisions by the EC without extremely serious thought.Does the SC want petitioners following every election?

  • Yaw Sebey. kumasi 10 years ago

    The NPP are just a bunch of criminals parading as politicians.Would they listen to this nice piece? No! As they why they are not talking about the NDC guy who was also jailed, only heaven knows.If this is not a diabolical mis ...
    read full comment

  • Joe Digi 10 years ago

    Do not expect any Fair judgement because they will have to please their employer so it is going to be in favour of NDC

  • osei yaw - london 10 years ago

    I should say that, the Supreme Court is not going to deliver a "virdict" but make a statement; and

    - the Supreme Court stating that, they went out of their way to tolerate NPP's loud mouthed Akim Akufo Ado's nonsensical pe ...
    read full comment

  • AKAN NAMES AS PROPAGANDA 10 years ago

    Using Ayigbe names also dignifies Ayigbefuo. It shows that they exist so all theses Akan names leaves them out of the political scene.