You are here: HomeOpinionsArticles2013 04 29Article 272511

Quarshie Idun, Tony Lithur nail Mahama

This article is closed for comments.

Read Comments Comments (8)

  • iPad 11 years ago

    This is not a matter of the respondents lawyers not understanding the issues. It is a matter of facts and truth. One can not overturn facts I,e. data and figures - and the truth in front of intellectuals - period

  • Hk 11 years ago

    May be u have not understood the issue of cross examination. The lawyers don't need to pull out each and every pink sheet and analyse but rather have to take a sample of the pink sheets create doubts about them which will hav ...
    read full comment

  • FUI 11 years ago

    Good point HK, they can't bring out all the pink sheets or the case will never end. On the other hand, these respondents have done a terrible job. Their arguments don't hold water. To Ipad's point, you cannot overturn facts a ...
    read full comment

  • Kwadwo 11 years ago

    I am also puzzled by the blatant admissions of errors made by the Respondents' attorneys.With these admissions, the only issue left to be determined by the Court is whether the errors or irregularities substantially affects t ...
    read full comment

  • Kwobia-Toronto 11 years ago

    I think you are looking at the case from the wrong angle.

  • tiger shark 11 years ago

    There cannot be a Nation wide election without Errors.Electoral Errors happen in countries with a more
    advanced electoral Gadgets as ours.We will all agree Errors are not fraud.

  • kk 11 years ago

    U have your own English, what is Error? Erros are mistake and if find more than three they are no longer mistake they are now premeditated Errors and premeditated Errors are fraud

  • kk 11 years ago

    If you came by error then you must go by error