Great suggestion, but I disagree with the large allocation to the Tech. Partners and the catchment area community. Tech partner should receive a maximum of 30%, especially if it is the old partners that are retained, Governme ... read full comment
Great suggestion, but I disagree with the large allocation to the Tech. Partners and the catchment area community. Tech partner should receive a maximum of 30%, especially if it is the old partners that are retained, Government 30% for mega national infrastructure, community 10% to avoid national imbalance, and Public Float 30% for greater public participation for accountability and local ownership. But great idea worth considering
Albert Amonoo 3 weeks ago
Over-allocating to a retained tech partner or a single catchment area risks diminishing the national return on investment. By anchoring 30% for mega national infrastructure and 30% for a public float, you ensure the asset dri ... read full comment
Over-allocating to a retained tech partner or a single catchment area risks diminishing the national return on investment. By anchoring 30% for mega national infrastructure and 30% for a public float, you ensure the asset drives broad economic transformation while giving regular citizens a direct stake
Great suggestion, but I disagree with the large allocation to the Tech. Partners and the catchment area community. Tech partner should receive a maximum of 30%, especially if it is the old partners that are retained, Governme ...
read full comment
Over-allocating to a retained tech partner or a single catchment area risks diminishing the national return on investment. By anchoring 30% for mega national infrastructure and 30% for a public float, you ensure the asset dri ...
read full comment