Corruption has become one of Ghana’s most persistent national challenges, an issue we discuss loudly, legislate heavily, campaign upon passionately, yet address weakly.

Every administration promises to confront it, every institution claims to be committed to fighting it, and every citizen laments it but despite decades of reforms, Ghana continues to lose significant public resources to leakages, inflated contracts, procurement irregularities, misappropriation, and systemic indiscipline.

Here are five facts about Kenya

The recent public debate, whether Ghana should scrap the Office of the Special Prosecutor (OSP) is a telling reminder that the country’s anti-corruption landscape is not only struggling; it is on life support. The controversy reveals deep cracks in our governance architecture and exposes fundamental reasons why corruption remains stubbornly resilient.

This article explores why Ghana’s anti-corruption fight fails, using the OSP controversy as a fresh and practical window into the national dilemma.

1. Ghana Creates Institutions with Great Hope, Then Stangles Them with Politics

The OSP was established with enormous public anticipation. It represented a bold experiment: a prosecutorial office insulated from political interference. Yet within a few years, the office is entangled in disputes, underfunding, internal resistance, and calls for abolition.

The problem is not the OSP alone, it is Ghana’s historical pattern:

• We create institutions.

• We celebrate them.

• We starve them of resources.

• We politicize them.

• Then we declare them ineffective.

When an institution becomes inconvenient, the national instinct is to weaken it, not strengthen it. The OSP debate reflects this familiar cycle.

2. Selective Enforcement Destroys Public Trust

Corruption grows where enforcement is weak, inconsistent, or dependent on political climate. Ghana’s anti-corruption institutions often appear active when cases involve lower-level officials or politically vulnerable individuals but less so when investigations touch powerful persons or sensitive political networks.

The OSP has been criticized for:

• clashing with other state agencies, • overlapping mandates, • lack of prosecutorial support from institutions that must cooperate, • and sudden resistance when politically prominent cases emerge.

To many citizens, this signals that enforcement needs reforms.

3. GHANA FIGHTS CORRUPTION IN LAW, BUT CORRUPTION SURVIVES IN CULTURE Ghana has:

3. Ghana Fights Corruption in law, But Corruption Survives in Culture:

• more anti-corruption laws than many African countries, • numerous oversight bodies, • clear procurement regulations, • audit structures, and • financial administration frameworks.

Yet corruption thrives.

Why?

Because the fight has been reduced to a technical and political conversation, while the underlying moral crisis remains untouched. Ghanaian society increasingly tolerate:

• unexplained wealth, • shortcuts, • “protocol lists”, • inducements, • informal payments, • political patronage, • and social justification for wrongdoing.

When corruption becomes normalized, laws alone cannot defeat it. The OSP cannot compensate for a society that quietly admires the very behaviour it condemns publicly.

4. Weak Institutions, Strong Personalities (A Dangerous Model)

Ghana’s governance culture often elevates strong individuals instead of strong institutions. Anti-corruption success is tied to personalities rather than systems. The debate around the OSP has become less about the office and more about the person who occupies it.

This is dangerous for three reasons:

1. Institutions become fragile. Their survival depends on political mood.

2. Policies do not outlive individuals. Once a reformer leaves, reform collapses.

3. Conflict becomes personalized. Institutional disagreements turn into personal battles.

The OSP debate mirrors a long-standing pattern: we personalize institutions instead of institutionalizing processes.

5. The Architecture of Accountability is Too Fragmented. Ghana has: • EOCO • CHRAJ • OSP • Auditor-General • Internal Audit Agency • Parliament’s PAC • Public Procurement Authority • National Security components

But coordination is weak. Mandates overlap. Investigations delay. Cases bounce between agencies. Files get lost. Actions stall.

The OSP controversy exposes how anti-corruption bodies can work at cross-purposes, sometimes competing for legitimacy instead of cooperating for justice. Fragmentation creates loopholes and corruption thrives in loopholes.

6. Political Interference and Political Fear are Ever Present

Even when the law promises independence, the reality of political pressure remains. Leaders of anti-corruption bodies work in an atmosphere of: • political tension • media hostility • institutional resistance • funding uncertainty • bureaucratic sabotage

In such an environment, courage becomes costly, and neutrality becomes risky. The OSP debate lays this bare. Calls for abolition appear whenever the office moves in politically uncomfortable directions.

7. CORRUPTION IS TREATED AS AN EVENT, NOT A SYSTEM

7.Corruption is Treated as an Event, not a System

Ghana often reacts to corruption through: • press conferences • committee hearings • documentaries • public outrage • partisan debate

But rarely through systemic correction. The conversation becomes emotional, not structural. The OSP debate reflects this, the focus is on the controversy, not the deeper structural problems:

• procurement weaknesses • manual financial systems • poor internal controls • low public-sector pay • weak civic responsibility • political patronage • lack of deterrence

A nation cannot fight corruption through reactions; it must build systems that make wrongdoing difficult, undesirable, and costly.

8.Until Ghana Fiexes its Values, No Institution can Save Us

The uncomfortable truth is this:

Ghana’s corruption problem is not first a governance issue. It is a values issue. Institutions cannot rise above the beliefs and habits of the society they serve. A country that: • celebrates unexplained wealth, • mocks honest poverty, • rewards shortcuts, • justifies wrongdoing because “the system is hard,” …cannot expect transformation from any anti-corruption office, whether OSP or any other.

This is the central reason anti-corruption efforts keep failing.

CONCLUSION: SCRAPPING THE OSP WILL NOT SOLVE GHANA’S PROBLEM- FIXING GHANA WILL.

Conclusion: Scrapping the OSP will not solve Ghana's Problem - Fixing Ghana Will.

The debate about scrapping the Office of the Special Prosecutor is not merely an administrative suggestion; it is a reflection of national fatigue, institutional frustration, and political discomfort.

But scrapping an institution will not eliminate corruption. It will only: • restart the cycle • weaken public trust • embolden wrongdoers • and deepen the perception that Ghana is unwilling to confront powerful interests.

If we truly want to fight corruption, Ghana’s strategy must change primarily to: 1. strengthen institutions, not personalities 2. protect anti-corruption bodies from politics 3. enforce laws consistently 4. digitize systems and minimize discretion 5. build a moral and ethical culture 6. hold leaders to higher standards 7. create incentives for integrity 8. treat corruption as a national crisis, not a partisan weapon

Ghana must realize that corruption is not fought in press releases, committees, or political rhetoric. It is fought through institutional courage, moral renewal, and systems that make honesty profitable and wrongdoing expensive. Until these foundations are repaired, anti-corruption reforms, no matter how innovative will struggle. And debates like the one over the OSP will repeat endlessly.

The real battle is not about an office. The real battle is about the soul of the nation.

Also, watch why taxi and 'trotro' operators are cautioning the government about the Traffic Amendment Bill