You are here: HomeWallOpinionsArticles2013 06 18Article 277061

Opinions of Tuesday, 18 June 2013

Columnist: Tawiah-Benjamin, Kwesi

Good Pidgin Speakers Do Not ‘Bomb’ Exams

To Akatsi-North DCE: Good Pidgin Speakers Do Not ‘Bomb’ Exams

Let me first establish my bona fides (or perhaps my mala fides –bad faith –as pidgin is generally considered a language for deviants) for making this claim. I spent two years investigating the phenomenon of Pidgin English/School Pidgin at University, and proceeded to write a dissertation on the gender issues in pidgin, for a degree in English. I lived in Commonwealth Hall for five years through undergraduate and graduate degree programmes at University of Ghana. While the official business of the hall was done in proper English, Pidgin English was the lingua franca in the hall. It was possible to conduct unofficial student meetings in pidgin alone, or where proper English was a strict rule, speak your mind in pidgin if you so pleased. It was smarter to use pidgin than to make a slave of the Queen’s language by saying misunderestimate or misspelling pore for pour. You were not deemed incapable of speaking proper English when you spoke flawless pidgin.

Secondly, I am an incurable Pidgin English speaker, and have been speaking it since secondary school. I was a reference case whenever our English teachers warned students about the dangers of the deviant language. There were concerns that students would write (I bore plus you) for I am angry at you, (Na I dey fear) for I was afraid and (I dey shy you) for I am shy with you. There were some unproven instances of some addicts who had sunk so deep into the pidgin habit that they had lost the linguistic capacity to swap tongues when they found themselves in official communication domains, where correct English was insisted. The SU students usually didn’t want to be associated with such a deviant mode of communication. They would rather speak in tongues and sound incomprehensible than risk becoming incorrigible by corrupting their tongue with the broken rules of broken English.

The pidgin community lived well with the SU students with no suspicions at all. What remained suspicious was the real intention of the English masters when they needlessly expressed fears about the potential of pidgin to corrupt our formal English application, or indeed, affect our performance in examinations. The Akatsi-North DCE’s recent comments on pidgin (see Pidgin English accounting for poor results-MCE, myjoyonline.com, June 10, 2013), sit well with popular official position on the matter. The setting was very appropriate for the intervention, even though he did not say exactly how Pidgin English dey make students bomb for Exams. The average pidgin speaker would find the DCE’s remarks ‘some way’ or ‘confing.’ They might also question why people dey dey dema top so. In the end, they would decide not to beez dem (ignore them) or lef dem (let them be/desert). As a sociolet, pidgin speakers share linguistic traits that set them apart from non speakers. That means the language is not for everybody, except where it is the lingua franca. The speakers see themselves as a community, so they know their folks and would not do business with anybody outside the community in a language that is unintelligible to them. They know how to codeswitch (change language for setting and context) to identify with situation or occasion. After all, pidgin is made up of a substrate that is familiar to many in a language community, and a superstrate that is also common. We get a pidgin language when we borrow from the two ‘strates’ (pidginisation) to form a medium of communication. Our pidgin (what we speak in our schools is School Pidgin) is a harmless mixture of English and our vernacular.

In my research, and from my experience as a speaker, I found that the average pidgin speaker (if he knew his pidgin well enough not to say ‘you dey resemble your father’, instead of ‘you dey gyee your poppee’) was an accomplished language user who was usually fluent in English. Indeed, you need good English to speak Pidgin English. Pidgin is a bit like pregnancy: You cannot be a little bit pregnant. You are either pregnant or not. You cannot pretend to be a pidgin speaker. You join the community armed with the vocabulary items necessary for effective communication. You would pick up a few more on the way, but you are not a pre-intermediate or intermediate speaker because you joined today. Those who fail in exams because of Pidgin English are not pidgin speakers. They would have failed anyway. When you listen to their pidgin, you would realise their discomfort with official English. It is that discomfort that betrays them in exams, not pidgin. The good pidgin speaker is on top of his game. He will blow the exam.

So, why would girls not speak pidgin in our schools? Well, I found ladies are usually conformists; they would not sidestep or overstep known boundaries (not only in the case of language). They did not mind saying a few words in pidgin if they identified you as a pidgin speaker. They also did not find anything wrong with dating a pidgin addict. A certain Mrs Tawiah-Benjamin has learnt to answer ‘I dey peace’ and ‘I dey tap you’. Power corrupts. Pidgin corrupts absolutely.

There is no proof that School Pidgin affects the linguistic/academic competencies of the speakers. If you would not say your wedding vows in pidgin (not even in Nigeria), why write pidgin items in WAEC exams? Ghanaian educationists should ask why in Nigeria, where everybody speaks pidgin, (even the unlettered), they have not found it to be affecting their exam results. Our DCE may have a point, but the big point about our education cannot be explained away on pidgin.

Kwesi Tawiah-Benjamin, Ottawa, Canada

bigfrontiers@gmail.com