SIX YEARS AND ONE TERM SOUNDS STRONGER TO ME. THE ONLY BAD SIDE IS THAT A VERY PROMISING LEADER WOULD HAVE TO FIND HIS WAY OUT AFTER SIX YEARS NO MATTER HOW PROGRESSIVE HIS GOVT WAS. FIVE YEARS AND TWO TERMS IS ALSO GOOD, BUT ... read full comment
SIX YEARS AND ONE TERM SOUNDS STRONGER TO ME. THE ONLY BAD SIDE IS THAT A VERY PROMISING LEADER WOULD HAVE TO FIND HIS WAY OUT AFTER SIX YEARS NO MATTER HOW PROGRESSIVE HIS GOVT WAS. FIVE YEARS AND TWO TERMS IS ALSO GOOD, BUT A BAD LEADER IS ALWAYS BAD AND THE LAST FIVE YEARS COULD BE DISASTROUS.
Ebei 6 years ago
Half of 4 is 2, so 6 years would be the most PRODUCTIVE!
Half of 4 is 2, so 6 years would be the most PRODUCTIVE!
SIX YEARS AND ONE TERM SOUNDS STRONGER TO ME. THE ONLY BAD SIDE IS THAT A VERY PROMISING LEADER WOULD HAVE TO FIND HIS WAY OUT AFTER SIX YEARS NO MATTER HOW PROGRESSIVE HIS GOVT WAS. FIVE YEARS AND TWO TERMS IS ALSO GOOD, BUT ...
read full comment
Half of 4 is 2, so 6 years would be the most PRODUCTIVE!