The Supreme Court deserves commendation for standing firm and protecting the integrity of the judicial process. By rejecting the Attorney-General’s application for review in the Adu Boahene criminal disclosures case, the Co ... read full comment
The Supreme Court deserves commendation for standing firm and protecting the integrity of the judicial process. By rejecting the Attorney-General’s application for review in the Adu Boahene criminal disclosures case, the Court reaffirmed that justice is not subject to political convenience or prosecutorial overreach. This decision strengthens public confidence in the rule of law and shows that even the highest state officials are bound by clear legal standards.
Kristodia 2 months ago
The Attorney-General’s attempt to reopen the matter was disappointing and unnecessary. Rather than respecting the Court’s earlier ruling, the AG appeared determined to push the limits of procedure, raising concerns about ... read full comment
The Attorney-General’s attempt to reopen the matter was disappointing and unnecessary. Rather than respecting the Court’s earlier ruling, the AG appeared determined to push the limits of procedure, raising concerns about selective justice and the misuse of prosecutorial power. Such actions risk undermining trust in the justice system and give the impression that legal processes can be bent to suit an agenda.
Joojo 2 months ago
In a constitutional democracy, the courts must be respected, not pressured. On this occasion, the Supreme Court rose to that responsibility while the Attorney-General fell short of it.
In a constitutional democracy, the courts must be respected, not pressured. On this occasion, the Supreme Court rose to that responsibility while the Attorney-General fell short of it.
Successful 2 months ago
The Supreme Court has spoken clearly. Rule of law over rule of power.
The Supreme Court has spoken clearly. Rule of law over rule of power.
Adwoa Atta 2 months ago
The AG’s persistence was unnecessary and legally weak.
The AG’s persistence was unnecessary and legally weak.
Kenneth 2 months ago
The AG should respect finality in judgments, not test the Court’s patience.
The AG should respect finality in judgments, not test the Court’s patience.
Naa Dede 2 months ago
Democracy works when courts are bold and independent.
Democracy works when courts are bold and independent.
Mercedes 2 months ago
The Supreme Court reminded everyone: procedure matters.
The Supreme Court reminded everyone: procedure matters.
Windeck 2 months ago
The Supreme Court stood for fairness; the AG stood corrected.
The Supreme Court stood for fairness; the AG stood corrected.
Akua 2 months ago
Kudos to the Supreme Court for protecting judicial integrity.
Kudos to the Supreme Court for protecting judicial integrity.
The Supreme Court deserves commendation for standing firm and protecting the integrity of the judicial process. By rejecting the Attorney-General’s application for review in the Adu Boahene criminal disclosures case, the Co ...
read full comment
The Attorney-General’s attempt to reopen the matter was disappointing and unnecessary. Rather than respecting the Court’s earlier ruling, the AG appeared determined to push the limits of procedure, raising concerns about ...
read full comment
In a constitutional democracy, the courts must be respected, not pressured. On this occasion, the Supreme Court rose to that responsibility while the Attorney-General fell short of it.
The Supreme Court has spoken clearly. Rule of law over rule of power.
The AG’s persistence was unnecessary and legally weak.
The AG should respect finality in judgments, not test the Court’s patience.
Democracy works when courts are bold and independent.
The Supreme Court reminded everyone: procedure matters.
The Supreme Court stood for fairness; the AG stood corrected.
Kudos to the Supreme Court for protecting judicial integrity.
We are waiting for your press conference on that