Read Comments Comments (8)

• Truth Table 10 hours ago

  Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. (John 14:6) .
  .. ...

  Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. (John 14:6) .
  .. ...

  reply
• Corrupt CAF 10 hours ago

  They found nothing wrong with his behavior because they were in with the corrupt behavior he carried out during the match

  They found nothing wrong with his behavior because they were in with the corrupt behavior he carried out during the match

  reply
• Achakanapaya 9 hours ago

  CAF saw nothing wrong with the referee on the day??? Like really???.
  Eeiiiii, hmmmmmm.

  CAF saw nothing wrong with the referee on the day??? Like really???.
  Eeiiiii, hmmmmmm.

  reply
• Folk 6 hours ago

  If nothing at all he is at fault for Senegal not having a VAR review of their goal by whistlingtoo early. It's basic for referees not to whistle beca VAR can review the action. Is CAF saying they also passed him correct for s ...
  read full comment

  If nothing at all he is at fault for Senegal not having a VAR review of their goal by whistlingtoo early. It's basic for referees not to whistle beca VAR can review the action. Is CAF saying they also passed him correct for such a basic and major flaw?

  reply
• GH8 4 hours ago

  @ Folk first of let's understand that Senegal didn't score a goal because he whistled for foul on Achraf Hakimi before the ball entered the back of the net.
  On your second point I agree with you that he should have allowed ...
  read full comment

  @ Folk first of let's understand that Senegal didn't score a goal because he whistled for foul on Achraf Hakimi before the ball entered the back of the net.
  On your second point I agree with you that he should have allowed played to continue after all there is a VAR to determine if indeed there was foul or not. On that score we can say he had bad intentions of cheating the Senegalese.
  We should also know that base on the rules governing the game he was not wrong for awarding the foul, so CAF cannot found him culpable of wrong doing on that aspect.

  reply
• Folk 1 hour ago

  You didn't need to repeat what I already indicated. Now to school you on this again, referees are trained, taught, and advised not whistle in such circumstances because VAR can review the play and either award the goal or dis ...
  read full comment

  You didn't need to repeat what I already indicated. Now to school you on this again, referees are trained, taught, and advised not whistle in such circumstances because VAR can review the play and either award the goal or disallow it for the perceived foul. He denied Senegal their due VAR review by whistling too early for what he considered a foul. He didn't only deny Senegal their opportunity, but all football fans around the world football justice.

  reply
• Kofi Akwetey 2 hours ago

  VAR can call for a review even after the referee has whistled for an incident if it finds the on-field decision questionable. So, the argument that the ref eas too hasty does not hold. Also, replays of the incident clearly sh ...
  read full comment

  VAR can call for a review even after the referee has whistled for an incident if it finds the on-field decision questionable. So, the argument that the ref eas too hasty does not hold. Also, replays of the incident clearly show that the Senegalese player committed a foul by violently pushing the Moroccan player. Replays confirm that his penalty decision was also correct. The decision by CAF's technical committee is absolutely correct.

  reply
• Folk 1 hour ago

  You are wrong. VAR can only intervene in situations of a red card or a goal. By whistling too early technically no goal was scored. That's why VAR didn't intervene.

  You are wrong. VAR can only intervene in situations of a red card or a goal. By whistling too early technically no goal was scored. That's why VAR didn't intervene.

  reply