Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. (John 14:6) .
.. ...
Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. (John 14:6) .
.. ...
Corrupt CAF 1 month ago
They found nothing wrong with his behavior because they were in with the corrupt behavior he carried out during the match
They found nothing wrong with his behavior because they were in with the corrupt behavior he carried out during the match
Achakanapaya 1 month ago
CAF saw nothing wrong with the referee on the day??? Like really???.
Eeiiiii, hmmmmmm.
CAF saw nothing wrong with the referee on the day??? Like really???.
Eeiiiii, hmmmmmm.
Folk 1 month ago
If nothing at all he is at fault for Senegal not having a VAR review of their goal by whistlingtoo early. It's basic for referees not to whistle beca VAR can review the action. Is CAF saying they also passed him correct for s ... read full comment
If nothing at all he is at fault for Senegal not having a VAR review of their goal by whistlingtoo early. It's basic for referees not to whistle beca VAR can review the action. Is CAF saying they also passed him correct for such a basic and major flaw?
GH8 1 month ago
@ Folk first of let's understand that Senegal didn't score a goal because he whistled for foul on Achraf Hakimi before the ball entered the back of the net.
On your second point I agree with you that he should have allowed ... read full comment
@ Folk first of let's understand that Senegal didn't score a goal because he whistled for foul on Achraf Hakimi before the ball entered the back of the net.
On your second point I agree with you that he should have allowed played to continue after all there is a VAR to determine if indeed there was foul or not. On that score we can say he had bad intentions of cheating the Senegalese.
We should also know that base on the rules governing the game he was not wrong for awarding the foul, so CAF cannot found him culpable of wrong doing on that aspect.
Folk 1 month ago
You didn't need to repeat what I already indicated. Now to school you on this again, referees are trained, taught, and advised not whistle in such circumstances because VAR can review the play and either award the goal or dis ... read full comment
You didn't need to repeat what I already indicated. Now to school you on this again, referees are trained, taught, and advised not whistle in such circumstances because VAR can review the play and either award the goal or disallow it for the perceived foul. He denied Senegal their due VAR review by whistling too early for what he considered a foul. He didn't only deny Senegal their opportunity, but all football fans around the world football justice.
Kofi Akwetey 1 month ago
VAR can call for a review even after the referee has whistled for an incident if it finds the on-field decision questionable. So, the argument that the ref eas too hasty does not hold. Also, replays of the incident clearly sh ... read full comment
VAR can call for a review even after the referee has whistled for an incident if it finds the on-field decision questionable. So, the argument that the ref eas too hasty does not hold. Also, replays of the incident clearly show that the Senegalese player committed a foul by violently pushing the Moroccan player. Replays confirm that his penalty decision was also correct. The decision by CAF's technical committee is absolutely correct.
Folk 1 month ago
You are wrong. VAR can only intervene in situations of a red card or a goal. By whistling too early technically no goal was scored. That's why VAR didn't intervene.
You are wrong. VAR can only intervene in situations of a red card or a goal. By whistling too early technically no goal was scored. That's why VAR didn't intervene.
Kwame Peter 1 month ago
CAF's decision on Monsieur Ndala is akin to Ghana where a High Court judge gives a judgement not founded in Ghana law occasioning successful appeals costing the taxpayer and those before the courts thousands of cedis but no ... read full comment
CAF's decision on Monsieur Ndala is akin to Ghana where a High Court judge gives a judgement not founded in Ghana law occasioning successful appeals costing the taxpayer and those before the courts thousands of cedis but nothing to the errant judge not even a reprimand,animal farm judge who was even recalled from retirement and promoted after his disgraceful judgment.
Oko 1 month ago
CAF, a citadel of corruption.
CAF, a citadel of corruption.
Akwasi KB. 1 month ago
ON WHAT BASES WAS HE CLEARED, THIS IS THE USUAL ATTITUDE OF AFRICAN OFFICIALS IN MISJUDGEMENT TOWARDS THOSE ON OUR SIDES.
ON WHAT BASES WAS HE CLEARED, THIS IS THE USUAL ATTITUDE OF AFRICAN OFFICIALS IN MISJUDGEMENT TOWARDS THOSE ON OUR SIDES.
Otto pfister 1 month ago
It was all planned for morrocco to win that thing guys,and God doesn't like evil...
It was all planned for morrocco to win that thing guys,and God doesn't like evil...
Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me. (John 14:6) .
.. ...
They found nothing wrong with his behavior because they were in with the corrupt behavior he carried out during the match
CAF saw nothing wrong with the referee on the day??? Like really???.
Eeiiiii, hmmmmmm.
If nothing at all he is at fault for Senegal not having a VAR review of their goal by whistlingtoo early. It's basic for referees not to whistle beca VAR can review the action. Is CAF saying they also passed him correct for s ...
read full comment
@ Folk first of let's understand that Senegal didn't score a goal because he whistled for foul on Achraf Hakimi before the ball entered the back of the net.
On your second point I agree with you that he should have allowed ...
read full comment
You didn't need to repeat what I already indicated. Now to school you on this again, referees are trained, taught, and advised not whistle in such circumstances because VAR can review the play and either award the goal or dis ...
read full comment
VAR can call for a review even after the referee has whistled for an incident if it finds the on-field decision questionable. So, the argument that the ref eas too hasty does not hold. Also, replays of the incident clearly sh ...
read full comment
You are wrong. VAR can only intervene in situations of a red card or a goal. By whistling too early technically no goal was scored. That's why VAR didn't intervene.
CAF's decision on Monsieur Ndala is akin to Ghana where a High Court judge gives a judgement not founded in Ghana law occasioning successful appeals costing the taxpayer and those before the courts thousands of cedis but no ...
read full comment
CAF, a citadel of corruption.
ON WHAT BASES WAS HE CLEARED, THIS IS THE USUAL ATTITUDE OF AFRICAN OFFICIALS IN MISJUDGEMENT TOWARDS THOSE ON OUR SIDES.
It was all planned for morrocco to win that thing guys,and God doesn't like evil...