MAY HE REST IN PEACE. WAS THE BOXER INSURED BY THE PROMOTER
MAY HE REST IN PEACE. WAS THE BOXER INSURED BY THE PROMOTER
Santana 6 months ago
Please, we are not going to shoulder the payment of any compensation. There must be a life insurance cover somewhere. He died in the line of duty; nobody intentionally killed him
Please, we are not going to shoulder the payment of any compensation. There must be a life insurance cover somewhere. He died in the line of duty; nobody intentionally killed him
JANKROMAH 6 months ago
Who are the "we" here?
I hope the government does not listen to WICKED Lucifers like you.....
Who are the "we" here?
I hope the government does not listen to WICKED Lucifers like you.....
Atinga 6 months ago
Good gesture but was the program not insured? Was it not a private business venture? Why should the tax payer bear the cost?
Good gesture but was the program not insured? Was it not a private business venture? Why should the tax payer bear the cost?
Read between the lines 6 months ago
It appears either the event was under-insured or not insured at all. That is the only logical reason why the committee set up to probe his death will make such recommendation.
It appears either the event was under-insured or not insured at all. That is the only logical reason why the committee set up to probe his death will make such recommendation.
MAY HE REST IN PEACE. WAS THE BOXER INSURED BY THE PROMOTER
Please, we are not going to shoulder the payment of any compensation. There must be a life insurance cover somewhere. He died in the line of duty; nobody intentionally killed him
Who are the "we" here?
I hope the government does not listen to WICKED Lucifers like you.....
Good gesture but was the program not insured? Was it not a private business venture? Why should the tax payer bear the cost?
It appears either the event was under-insured or not insured at all. That is the only logical reason why the committee set up to probe his death will make such recommendation.
Such payments? I don't understand. Why?