Premier League giants Manchester City have come under scrutiny after reportedly being found guilty of 114 of the 115 charges brought against them by the Premier League over alleged breaches of its financial regulations.

English media reports indicate that an independent commission has ruled against the club on virtually all the charges following a long-running case that has cast a shadow over City’s dominance of English football.

The charges, formally brought in February 2023, relate to alleged financial breaches covering a nine-season period between 2009 and 2018.

Manchester City found guilty of Premier League financial charges

This article explains the charges, potential punishments, and the timescale within which the case is expected to be finalised.

Read the article as published on skysports.com below:

What are the charges against Man City?

Manchester City have been charged with breaking financial fair play rules over a nine-year period, which started in 2009 and went on until 2018. They have also been charged with failing to co-operate with Premier League investigations into their finances.

When the Premier League charged City in 2023, its press release detailed alleged rules breaches that added up to 115 in number, but it is believed that the actual number is 130.

Man City's 115 charges

Manchester City face 54 charges for failing to provide accurate and up-to-date financial information between 2009 and 2018.

The club also face 14 charges relating to the failure to provide accurate financial reports for player and manager compensation between 2009 and 2018.

Five charges relate to breaches of UEFA regulations, including the Financial Fair Play Regulations.

Manchester City face a further seven charges for breaching the Premier League’s Profitability and Sustainability Regulations between 2015 and 2018.

The remaining 35 charges concern the club’s alleged failure to cooperate with Premier League investigations between 2018 and 2023.

In total, Manchester City face 115 charges.

During the period in question, Man City, who have denied all the charges against them, won the Premier League three times.

The Premier League's Financial Fair Play (FFP) rules are designed to ensure clubs pretty much spend what they earn. You can get around those potentially by inflating how much you're earning or hiding how much you are spending. In the PSR (Profitability and Sustainability Rules) and FFP era, artificially increasing your revenue could, in theory, allow a club to spend more on transfers and wages.

According to the Premier League, Man City broke the rules over nine seasons by allegedly failing to provide accurate financial information.

Among the charges against City are that they didn't fully disclose the financial remunerations that were made to one of their managers over a four-year period. The suggestion is that there was a secret contract so one of the managers was getting paid much more than officially stated.

The Premier League also alleges Man City did not comply with UEFA's FFP rules over a five-year period.

How did the investigation begin?

The alleged rule breaches first came to light in a series of articles published by Der Spiegel in Germany in 2018. They were based on emails obtained by convicted Portuguese hacker Rui Pinto, which also appeared on the Football Leaks website.

It was this story that started a UEFA investigation into Man City in 2019, as well as a Premier League investigation.

In February 2020 City were found guilty of breaking UEFA's FFP rules and given a two-year European ban and €30m fine - but the ban was lifted by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) five months later and the fine reduced to €10m.

CAS said City showed "blatant disregard of UEFA's investigative process" but cleared them of "disguising equity funds as sponsorship contribution". The ruling stated that most of the alleged breaches "were either not established or time-barred," with UEFA statute only allowing prosecutions within a five-year period.

City said that the CAS ruling was "validation of the club's position and the body of evidence that it was able to present".

But the Premier League does not have a cut-off for investigating alleged breaches, which is why it has brought charges against the club going back to 2009.

When the Premier League eventually brought against City in February 2023, the club said they were "surprised" by the development and insisted their position was supported by a "comprehensive body of irrefutable evidence".

When was the hearing and when is a decision expected?
City's hearing in the case against the Premier League ran from September 16 to December 6 2024.

The 12-week hearing was held in front of a three-person independent commission at the International Dispute Resolution Centre in London.

The timeframe between the hearing and the judgment was always expected to take several months because of the volume of charges and the amount of information to be reviewed.

City boss Pep Guardiola said in February 2025 that he expected the outcome "in one month". However, that estimate came and went with no update.

And at the end of July, Premier League chief Richard Masters was asked when there may be a decision, but told NBC: "You can ask but our rules are very clear, it's a confidential process so I can't give any information on timing or anything like that. I can't add anything on that."

It is possible that the commission's judgment could arrive first, with any sanctions confirmed at a later date.

What are the possible punishments?

If the commission rules against City, it can punish them in any way it sees fit.

According to Premier League rules, the sanction could be a points deduction, a fine or even expulsion from the Premier League.

What punishments can the independent commission impose on a club?

Suspend a club from playing league matches
Points deductions
Recommend to the board that league matches be replayed
Recommend to the board that the league expels the respondent club
Order compensation
Cancel or refuse registration of players
Conditional punishment
Order the club to pay costs
Make such other order as it thinks fit

Anything is possible because the Premier League does not have set sanctions for financial rule breaches. Clubs decided not to have them because there were fears clubs would break the rules and take the punishment if they knew what that punishment was going to be.

In February 2025 Richard Masters said the Premier League was looking at having a 'sanctions grid' - setting out agreed sanctions for different rules breaches - but that is not yet in place.

Everton were deducted six and then two points last season for PSR breaches, while Nottingham Forest were deducted four points last season.

Further back, Luton Town - when in the EFL - were deducted 30 points in 2008/09 - 10 for illegal payments to agents and 20 for exiting administration without the required insolvency procedure of a Company Voluntary Arrangement.

More recently in 2021/22, Derby County, also in the EFL, were deducted 21 points - 12 for administration and nine for financial irregularities.

Could City appeal?

Once a judgment is made, both sides - the Premier League and Man City - can appeal within 14 days.

Any appeal would be heard by a new three-person commission, with members selected by Murray Rosen KC, the chair of the Premier League's judicial panel.

An appeal would further delay the imposition of any sanctions or points deductions.

But that decision would be final - neither side would be permitted to appeal further to CAS.

Guardiola said at the start of the season that he hoped there would be a swift conclusion for everyone's sake, saying in August 2024: "I wish from deep in my heart to go to the trial, the independent panel - and I say it again, independent panel - and as soon as possible (they) release what happened, and we will accept like always we have done."

The footballing world waits.

FULL FIGHT | Theo Kpakpo Allotey vs Facundo David Garcia – Every Round