On page 9 of our yesterday issue is a story in which the Coalition of CSO Networks in HIV, Tuberculosis (TB), and Malaria is calling on President Nana Addo Dankwa Akufo-Addo to assist in the clearing of locked-up Global Fund-donated health care items at Tema Port, valued at over US$40 million.

These items said to include antiretroviral (ARV), TB medications, and malaria treatments, have been locked up since May 2023.

The Global Fund invests more than US$5 billion a year to fight HIV, TB, and malaria and has been a crucial supporter of Ghana’s health initiatives, contributing over US$1.2 billion since 2002.

It is said that despite the Fund’s consistent aid, the government is demanding exorbitant taxes and port charges for clearing the donated commodities, contrary to the Framework Agreement exempting such charges.

What is more worrying is that efforts by a 12-member Global Fund delegation in March 2024 failed to resolve the impasse, leading to the suspension of all future commodity shipments until the current issue is resolved.

What has been the arrangement since 2002, when the Fund started supporting the country?

Now that this issue has come up, it will do the government good if it makes its relevant representatives explain matters to the public.

This is important and must be done at the earliest; otherwise, those who lack understanding of such matters would conclude that the government is just being callous, particularly because the Coalition says the lock-up has caused a shortage of drugs for treating HIV, TB, and malaria, as a result of which patients are suffering needless deaths.

How much are the duties and port charges accruing from the donations from the Global Fund, a non-profit organisation that cannot be waived when the government can grant tax holidays and other waivers to commercial entities?

The United States (US), described as the Global Fund’s largest donor, says its support for the Global Fund is a strategic investment in the millions of people whose lives have been saved through Global Fund-supported programmes.

Ghana should think about health first and adopt the US attitude so that even losing revenue for the sake of its citizens would not matter at all.

Meanwhile, it is not strange for Ghana to grant tax exemptions to the Global Fund.

It is on record that a tax waiver was granted to AngloGold Ashanti on December 22, 2010, for its malaria services, and subsequently, the Global Fund Board secured exceptional approval of extensions of the programme until the end of 2015.

Why can such an exemption not be granted to the Coalition of CSO Networks this time around?

Even there is a general principle that for each programme, the purchase and/or import of any goods or services using the grant funds shall be exempt from relevant taxation applicable in the host country, including but not limited to customs duties, import duties, taxes, or fiscal charges of equal effect levied or otherwise imposed on the health products imported into the host country under the Grant Agreement.

Even where certain taxes are paid, refunds must be made to the Global Fund.

The government must think of the more than 250,000 individuals living with HIV who depend on Global Fund-sponsored ARVs, the expiration of some of the drugs, and the impending loss of Global Fund support and urgently do something to avert any looming health calamity.