You are here: HomeNews2013 04 22Article 271797

General News of Monday, 22 April 2013

Source: Peace FM

Sir John blasts O.B. Amoah over ‘blacklist’ comments

General Secretary of the opposition New Patriotic Party (NPP), Kwadwo Owusu Afriyie, popularly known as Sir John, has lambasted the Member of Parliament (MP) for Akuapem South, O.B Amoah, for admonishing him to refrain from making comments on the ongoing election petition case.

The NPP chief scribe sought to find out the position of the Akuapem South MP, for which he would dare question his authority to speak about the court proceedings.

Though he has pledged to defy the instructions by some lawyers in the country, O.B Amoah and the Ghana Journalist Association, demanding him and the General Secretary of the National Democratic Congress (NDC), Johnson Asiedu Nketia, to stop commenting on the pending election case, Sir John wondered why the NPP stalwart would assume a position to caution him.

He therefore asked “on whose authority is he speaking? Is he the authority on free speech or what? What is his locus in this matter? Is he the yardstick; the perfection, that people should look at? If he is speaking his mind, let him continue to speak his mind. I will continue to say what I think.”

“On what basis does he make his analysis? Is it in terms of age, in terms of knowledge or in terms of intellectual capacity? Who are these people to judge and to pontificate to say that they know how to talk and others do not? Who are they?”

Making his submissions on Radio Gold last Friday, Sir John debunked claims that he may be cited for contempt if he continues to give commentaries, stating firmly that “I know what contempt is”.

According to him, he has a long-standing experience in law which gives him the right to analyse the court proceedings.

He challenged his opponents to argue their case in the law court “because we cannot blacklist anybody. We cannot gag anybody from speaking…Since when did this nonsense surface in this country that when people speak, they should be gagged? Is that not an abuse of my right; a constitutional right to have my peace and speak”.