You are here: HomeNews2019 03 28Article 733823

General News of Thursday, 28 March 2019

Source: Starr FM

NCA Case: High Court rejects Baffoe-Bonnie’s 3 caution statements


Click to read all about coronavirus →

Commercial High Court hearing the case of the Republic against Eugene Baffoe-Bonnie and four others, has rejected the first three caution statements taken from the first accused person when he was first arrested in May 2017.

The Court, however, admitted the last three of the six statements that were under contention as having been taken under duress, intimidation and threats.

On the 28th of February 2019, the lawyer for the first accused person, Thaddeus Sory, made it known to the trial court when he opposed the tendering of the six caution statements by State Prosecutors through their sixth prosecution witness who is the Police Officer who investigated the case, Detective Chief Inspector Michael Nkrumah.

Baffoe-Bonnie through his lawyer told the Court that he wrote and signed six out of 10 caution statements taken from him by investigators under duress, intimidation and threats. He further noted that the statements were taken without the presence of an independent witness.

Baffoe-Bonnie’s claims necessitated a mini-trial to establish whether or not the said statements were actually taken under duress, intimidation and threats of harm.

In all, Baffoe-Bonnie wrote and signed 10 statements that the State intends to tender in exhibits in support of their case. His lawyers, however, challenged the admissibility of six of the statements.

In his opposing argument, the defence lawyer stated that the statements of Baffoe-Bonnie were taken without any reference to him of his right to counsel of his choice. He further argued that the constitutional obligation to inform the Baffoe-Bonnie of his right to a lawyer of his choice was in breach of Article 14 of the 1992 Constitution of the Republic, and therefore a breach of his fundamental human rights.

“At the time of taking the statement, there was no independent witness present. The statement was extracted from the First Accused Person by the use of threats, inducement and duress,” Sory told the Court.

In a counter-argument to the claims of lawyers of Baffoe-Bonnie, the Director of Public Prosecution (DPP), Yvonne Atakora Buabisa, retorted Baffoe-Bonnie was reminded of his right to counsel before the statements were taken and in his own handwriting on the face of the caution statements indicated that he was reminded of his right to counsel.

Justice Eric Kyei Baffour’s court in its ruling after the mini-trial said from the evidence before him it is clear to him that the first three statements taken from the Baffoe-Bonnie person in May 2017, were not taken with due process and for that matter, they were not admissible in Court.

He further ruled that there was enough evidence to prove that the remaining three which have been marked ID4, ID5, ID6, were taken with due regard for the law and in the presence of an independent witness and were therefore admissible. Same the court said are admitted into evidence. The substantive trial has subsequently resumed and the sixth prosecution witness of the State, Detective Chief Inspector Michael Nkrumah, is back in the dock to continue a with his evidence.

Send your news stories to and via WhatsApp on +233 55 2699 625.

Join our Newsletter