Lawyers representing plaintiffs in a high-profile case filed at the Supreme Court of Ghana has withdrawn its legal services, citing a breach of internal office policy.

The withdrawal was formally communicated through a Notice of Withdrawal dated September 30, 2025, issued by Obour, Minta & Co Chambers, located at Abelemkpe, Accra.

The case, filed under Writ No J1/30/2025, was brought before the Supreme Court of Judicature by three plaintiffs: Israel Tetteh of Kade in the Eastern Region, Rockson-Nelson Dafeamekpor, Member of Parliament for South Dayi, and the Ghana Law Society.

The defendants in the matter are the Attorney General and the Ghana Bar Association (GBA).

According to court documents, the plaintiffs invoked the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court pursuant to Articles 2(1) and 130(1) of the 1992 Constitution, as well as Rule 45(1) of the Supreme Court Rules, 1996 (CI 16), as amended.

The writ was officially filed on September 23, 2025.

However, in the latest development, the legal representatives have withdrawn from the case, stating, “We hereby withdraw our services as lawyers for the Plaintiffs with immediate effect since the Writ was issued in violation of our office policy.”

GBA under fire over stance on Torkornoo's sacking

Rockson-Nelson Dafeamekpor, who doubles as Majority Chief Whip in Parliament, alongside private legal practitioner Israel Tetteh and the Ghana Law Society are challenging the exclusive recognition of the Ghana Bar Association (GBA) within Ghana’s legal and constitutional framework.

The suit, filed on Tuesday, September 23, 2025, invokes the original jurisdiction of the Supreme Court under Articles 2(1) and 130(1) of the 1992 Constitution.

The plaintiffs argue that the current GBA, a private voluntary association, should not be treated as the sole representative body for lawyers in the country.

The plaintiffs are seeking seven key declarations, including a request for the court to interpret references to the “Ghana Bar Association” in the Constitution and the Legal Profession Act as generic or umbrella terms, rather than exclusive to the existing GBA.

They contend that granting such exclusive status to a single private group violates constitutional rights to equality and freedom of association, as enshrined in Articles 17 and 21(1)(e) of the 1992 Constitution.

The plaintiffs assert that the continued recognition of the GBA as the sole voice for legal professionals discriminates against other lawyer associations, amounting to an unconstitutional monopoly.

Additionally, they are requesting an order to restrain the current GBA from presenting itself as the only constitutionally recognized legal body in the country, describing such a stance as misleading and unlawful.

The Attorney General and the Ghana Bar Association have been named as the 1st and 2nd defendants, respectively.

Speaking to Citi FM, the lawyer for the plaintiffs, Jenjifred Maurice Agyei, questioned the exclusive constitutional rights being enjoyed by the Ghana Bar Association over other legal associations.

CJ Suspension: Ghana Bar Association doing NPP's bidding – Abraham Amaliba claims

“It doesn’t have any legal backing. It is not supported by any Act of Parliament. Comparatively to other jurisdictions like Nigeria and Kenya, where you have Acts of Parliament establishing their law societies, but when you come to Ghana, the Ghana Bar Association, as we have it, is not established by any Act of Parliament. It is a private body and so how can such a private body enjoy constitutional rights?

“That is why we have mounted this action so that the Supreme Court should be able to tell us who that Ghana Bar is. Whether that Ghana Bar is what we have currently or, in the minds of the framers of the constitution, they meant a different Ghana Bar. We think that ‘Ghana Bar’ in the constitution should be interpreted as Associations of Lawyers,” he added.



AM/AE

Meanwhile, catch the highlights of Sarkodie x Shatta Wale's epic performance at Rapperholic Homecoming on GhanaWeb TV below: